Skip to main content
Download PDF

Photobiomodulation invigorating collagen deposition, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki67 expression during dermal wound repair in mice

Lasers in Medical Science volume 37, pages 171–180 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

The present investigation focuses on understanding the role of photobiomodulation in enhancing tissue proliferation. Circular excision wounds of diameter 1.5 cm were created on Swiss albino mice and treated immediately with 2 J/cm2 and 10 J/cm2 single exposures of the Helium-Neon laser along with sham-irradiated controls. During different days of healing progression (day 5, day 10, and day 15), the tissue samples upon euthanization of the animals were taken for assessing collagen deposition by Picrosirius red staining and cell proliferation (day 10) by proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki67. The positive influence of red light on collagen synthesis was found to be statistically significant on day 10 (P < 0.01) and day 15 (P < 0.05) post-wounding when compared to sham irradiation, as evident from the image analysis of collagen birefringence. Furthermore, a significant rise in PCNA (P < 0.01) and Ki67 (P < 0.05) expression was also recorded in animals exposed to 2 J/cm2 when compared to sham irradiation and (P < 0.01) compared to the 10 J/cm2 treated group as evidenced by the microscopy study. The findings of the current investigation have distinctly exhibited the assenting influence of red laser light on excisional wound healing in Swiss albino mice by augmenting cell proliferation and collagen deposition.

Introduction

Wound repair is an outcome of a series of well-orchestrated multiplex events to re-establish the skin’s anatomical and functional integrity. The process is grouped into overlapping phases of hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. The repair process mainly becomes recurrently deficient due to extended trauma, prolonged infections, and inflammation [1]. In this line, extensive research is underway, focused on establishing better therapeutic modalities to expedite healing and improve patients’ quality of life.

Fibroblast migration and proliferation, synthesis of extracellular matrix (ECM), and successful granulation tissue formation are the hallmarks of the proliferative phase of the dermal repair process. Defects in the aforementioned events of the proliferative phase result in imperfective healing. Owing to its importance in the wound repair process, tracking markers of the proliferative phase becomes decisive to judge the therapy’s fate. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki67 are the well-established markers to probe cellular proliferation during wound repair. Ki67 is a nuclear protein associated with the cell cycle, synthesized by all proliferating cells of the active cell cycle and deficient in resting cells [2]. Ki67 antibodies specifically interact with intranuclear antigens of active proliferative phase cells. PCNA is another well-known nuclear protein, clinically trusted marker for proliferation, which participates in cell proliferation by mediating DNA polymerase. Elevated PCNA expressions were recorded during the S, G2, and M phases of the cell mitosis in healthy and cancerous tissues [3]. Blocking the PCNA production in cells severely affects cell division, indicating its importance in cell proliferation [4].

In the recent past, photobiomodulation (PBM) or low-power laser therapy (LPLT), a fully non-pharmacological pain-free approach, is earning popularity in the treatment of more than ninety ailments as investigated either in preclinical models or in clinical studies [5]. The indications inspected by PBM include a plethora of disorders of internal organs such as brain, bone, kidney, heart and lung, eye, connective tissue, muscle, and skin. In dermatology, PBM is administered mainly to treat delayed wound healing and hair regrowth and medications of psoriasis [5]. This treatment modality relies on low-intensity light of a wavelength in the visible to near-infrared (600–1070-nm) [6] from either coherent or quasi-coherent sources for best therapeutic effects [5, 7]. PBM’s positive outcomes at the cellular level have reported the involvement of numerous genes connected to mitochondrial signaling, cell attachment, cell movement, cell survival, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and collagen synthesis [5, 8].

Currently, PBM is extensively being investigated in roughly 40 different countries [5]. Although most of the reports involving PBM have exhibited a positive effect on wound healing, a small number of inspections have proven the contrary, making its use uncertain in clinical practice [9, 10]. This disparity could be attributed to a lack of consensus on the fundamental mechanism of PBM and molecular targets of the therapy [11]. Moreover, PBM is a light-driven therapeutic modality; thus, choice of ideal illumination parameters including wavelength, irradiance, dose, time of light exposure, number of exposures, etc., are the predisposing factors that significantly control the outcome of the technique.

Recently, researchers reported an in-house PBM system for the optimization of fluence and time of irradiation to augment excisional skin repair in an animal model [12]. Uniform exposure of the irradiation source to the wound site was also demonstrated in that study [13]. Furthermore, histological evidence was also provided to elucidate the role of red light in regulating different phases of wound healing in Swiss albino mice [14]. Based on these reports, the present study is designed to interrogate the outcome of 632.8-nm laser illumination on the regulation of the proliferative phase (cell proliferation and collagen synthesis) during dermal wound healing in a preclinical model. Expressions of PCNA, Ki67, and collagen deposition were appraised following immediate and single exposure of different doses of the 632.8-nm laser.

Materials and methods

Selection of animals

For animal care and handling, instruction of the World Health Organization was followed. Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC/KMC/07/2007–2008) clearance was obtained before performing the experiments. Forty-five Swiss albino mice of both sexes (6–8 weeks old, weight 25–30 g) were used, which were housed in a regular pathogen-free condition with constant temperature (23 ± 2 °C), humidity (50 ± 5%), and light and dark cycle (14 and 10 h) respectively. During the study period, animals had free access to sterile food and water ad libitum.

Full-thickness wound induction

Excisional wound induction upon anesthetization of animals was performed as per the previously described protocol [12]. Following wounding, the animals were housed in a separate polypropylene cage containing sterile paddy husk bedding.

Laser irradiation of animal wounds

Animals were illuminated after wounding to pre-assigned doses of the 632.8-nm laser. Figure 1 illustrates the graphical layout of the experimental setup, and Table 1 provides the details of the laboratory settings used for laser irradiation. The technical specifications of the experimental setup employed for the current investigation were described elsewhere [12]. Animals assigned to the sham irradiation (SI) group were not given laser or any other treatments. A brief description of the experimental timeline is illustrated in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic experimental setup used for treatment with PBM. The illumination source is He-Neon laser; L1 and L2 are the biconvex focusing lens

Full size image
Table 1 Illumination parameters used for photobiomodulation study
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Experimental timeline indicating pre- and post-wounding procedures, treatment, and tissue sample collection intervals for microscopic analysis

Full size image

Immunohistochemical (IHC) studies of wound granulation tissues

For IHC experiments, 15 animals were selected, further split into 3 groups of 5 animals. The first group was assigned to SI, the second group to 2 J/cm2 treatment, and the third group to 10 J/cm2 treatment. All the animals were euthanized on day 10 post-wounding to harvest wound granulation tissues. Excised tissues were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen.

Microscopic inspection of granulation tissues

For microscopic examinations (histology), 30 animals were selected and split into 2 groups of 15 animals each. The first group was assigned to SI and the second group to 2 J/cm2 treatment. Five animals from each group were euthanized on the 5th, 10th, and 15th day post-wounding to harvest the granulation tissues and were immediately fixed in Bouin’s fixative for further tissue processing.

Tissue processing for IHC studies

Around 3–5-μm thick sections were taken manually from the frozen granulation tissues. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by treating the tissue sections with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 5–8 min at 4 °C. Subsequently, the sections were rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS-pH 7.4) for 5 min. Furthermore, the slides were covered with ready to use equilibrium buffer (iHistochem-Mouse Ki67 immunohistochemistry kit, cat. no. RUK-KI001) and incubated for 30 min in a moist chamber (for Ki67) or incubated with a ready to use blocking solution (Invitrogen PCNA Staining kit, cat. no. 93-1143) for 10 min at room temperature (for PCNA). The sections were successfully incubated overnight at 4 °C with the anti-Ki67 antibody (1:100 dilution with antibody diluent; iHistochem-Mouse Ki67 immunohistochemistry kit, cat. no. RUK-KI001) or with the anti-PCNA antibody (ready to use, Invitrogen PCNA Staining kit, cat. no. 93-1143) at 4 °C for 60 min. Later, the slides were rinsed with wash buffer and then with PBS, respectively. Furthermore, slides were incubated immediately either with streptavidin-peroxidase (Invitrogen PCNA Staining kit, cat. no. 93-1143) (for PCNA) for 10 min or ready to use Rabbit HRP polymer (iHistochem-Mouse Ki67 immunohistochemistry kit, cat. no. RUK-KI001) at 4 °C for 60 min (Ki67). For both Ki67 and PCNA detection, the slides were incubated with the substrate (diaminobenzedine tetrahydrochloride), followed by hematoxylin counterstaining (both substrate and hematoxylin are part of the kit). For negative control, tissue sections were incubated with PBS by omitting the primary antibody for Ki67 and PCNA. Colon cancer tissue sections (control slides—part of the kit) were used as a positive control. Cells with positive or no expression were stained either with brown and blue color, regardless of the color intensity. The stained slides were imaged using a digital camera fitted to an optical microscope (Motic BA 400, Motic Microsystems). A trained pathologist in a blinded fashion counted positive nuclei and total nuclei (both Ki67 and PCNA) in five random fields per section using image analysis software (Motic Images Plus 3.0, multifunctional microscopy software), and the mean for the same was computed. While counting the cells, hair follicles were excluded. For all the cell counting, a × 40 magnification objective lens was used. Quantification of PCNA and Ki67 levels was expressed as a percentage of positive cells in the tissue sections.

Tissue processing for Picrosirius red (PSR) staining

PSR staining was performed on 5–7-μm thick tissue sections as per the previously published procedure [15]. For each slide, nuclear staining was performed by Weigert’s hematoxylin, followed by 0.1% PSR staining. A standard optical microscope with polarizing filters was used to capture collagen birefringence from the PSR-stained tissue sections. PSR-stained sections on different post-wounding days were photographed at × 10 and × 40 magnification objective lenses, and images were further used for image analysis.

Image analysis for PSR staining

“TissueQuant” software was utilized to extract information on collagen birefringence from PSR-stained tissue sections [16], and image analysis was performed as described previously [17]. This software provided information on scores for assigned color (red/green/yellow) and pixel area. For the quantitative analysis, the mean and standard error of the mean scores were computed. The scores of red, yellow color (collagen type I), and green color (collagen type III) were added, and the sum of the scores was represented as percentage scores indicating the total collagen deposition. Total collagen deposited on day 5, day 10, and day 15 post-wounding for the SI and 2 J/cm2 treatment group was compared and plotted. Furthermore, to understand the possible role of red light in stimulating the early conversion of type III to type I collagen during the repair process, the individual contribution of type III and type I collagen was computed for SI and 2 J/cm2 groups on all post-wounding days. Total deposited collagen on each day for the respective group was considered as 100%. The contribution of either type I or type III collagen in total deposited collagen for each day for the respective group (SI and 2 J/cm2) was calculated and plotted. Type III and type I collagen contribution among SI and 2 J/cm2 were compared.

Statistical analysis

Experimental data were represented as mean ± SEM. PCNA and Ki67 data of laser treatment and SI groups were compared for statistical significance by one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni’s post hoc test utilizing GraphPAD Prism 4 software. Comparisons of total collagen values and individual contribution of collagen type I and type III among the SI and 2 J/cm2 groups were executed by Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05.

Results

Immunohistochemical studies of wound granulation tissues

Expression of Ki67 and PCNA from the granulation tissues of all the experimental groups on day 10 post-wounding was performed, and the results are presented in Fig. 3. A smaller number of Ki67-positive cells (brown cells; Fig. 3a) was recorded in the newly established epidermal layers in the SI group. Interestingly, immediate exposure of 2 J/cm2 after wounding a substantially elevated number of Ki67-positive cells in the freshly deposited basal layer of the epidermis was observed (Fig. 3b). On the contrary, a single bout of 10 J/cm2 showed fewer Ki67-positive cells (Fig. 3c). Equally, increased PCNA expression was noticed in 2 J/cm2 treated animals (Fig. 3e). Both SI (Fig. 3d) and laser treatment with 10 J/cm2 (Fig. 3f) were quite alike, showing a few PCNA-positive cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Ki-67 (a, b, and c) and PCNA expression (d, e, and f) in tissue sections of the laser treatment and SI group on day 10 post-wounding. a, d SI; b, e 2 J/cm2 treatment; c, f 10 J/cm2. Arrows indicate Ki67 and PCNA-positive cells displaying dark brown cells demonstrating the nuclear localization pattern (X 200)

Full size image

The SI group recorded 12.8 ± 1.49% positive cells, and 2 J/cm2 treatment groups showed 20.6 ± 2.13% positive cells for Ki67 (Table 2). Excision wounds subjected to 10 J/cm2 dose recorded with 11.2 ± 1.24% Ki67-positive cells. This elevated expression of Ki67 in 2 J/cm2 treated animals on the 10th day post-wounding was found to be statistically significant when matched to a SI group (P < 0.05) and to a single illumination of 10 J/cm2 treatment group (P < 0.01). In like manner, illumination of excision wounds with 2 J/cm2 exalted PCNA expression with 30.2 ± 2.00%. The percentage of PCNA-positive cells was lowered to 20.8 ± 1.59 and 19.8 ± 1.39 in SI and 10 J/cm2 treatment groups, respectively. This notable rise in expression of PCNA achieved by 632.8 nm at 2 J/cm2 was equally significant (P < 0.01) while compared to both SI and 10 J/cm2 treatment groups.

Table 2 Percentage of expression for Ki67 and PCNA in day 10 post-wound granulation tissues. Significance levels: for Ki67, *P < 0.05 compared to SI and **P < 0.01 compared to 10 J/cm2. For PCNA, **P < 0.01 compared to SI and 10 J/cm2
Full size table

Microscopic inspection of granulation tissues

The PSR-stained tissue sections of the SI (Fig. 4a, b, and c) and 2 J/cm2 treatment group (Fig. 4d, e, and f) on the 5th, 10th, and 15th day post-wounding were shown in Fig. 4. From image analysis of PSR-stained tissue sections, the total collagen (%) for SI and 2 J/cm2 treatment group on different post-wounding days was plotted (Fig. 5a). In the SI group, the total collagen values of 0.41 ± 0.27%, 2.12 ± 0.82%, and 4.61 ± 1.00% were noted on the 5th, 10th, and 15th day post-wounding, respectively. The 2 J/cm2 treatment noticeably raised the total deposited collagen with scores of 1.80 ± 0.53%, 6.06 ± 0.90%, and 7.51 ± 0.11% on the 5th, 10th, and 15th day post-wounding. This laser-assisted boost in total collagen was found to be statistically significant on day 10 (P < 0.01) and day 15 (P < 0.05) post-wounding when matched to SI. However, on day 5 post-wounding, the difference between SI and 2 J/cm2 treated animals was insignificant.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Photomicrographs of the SI (a, b, and c) and 2 J/cm2 treatment group (d, e, and f) on day 5, day 10, and day 15 post-wounding followed by PSR staining and visualization by the polarized microscope. Arrows indicate the collagen deposition in the histological sections (X 400)

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison of collagen deposition among the SI and 2 J/cm2 treatment group. a Changes in the total collagen derived from image analysis of PSR-stained tissue sections. b Contribution of type III and type I collagen in SI and 2 J/cm2 treated animals on different post-wounding days. Data mean ± SEM. Level of significance *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and no symbol = insignificant compared to the SI group

Full size image

The percentage contribution of collagen III and collagen I in total deposited collagen for both the experimental groups on all the post-wounding time intervals was computed (Fig. 5b). On day 5 post-wounding, type III and type I collagen contribution for the SI was found to be 1.62 ± 0.79% and 98.39 ± 0.78%, respectively. For the same day, a single bout of 632.8-nm laser light at 2 J/cm2 dose reduced the type III collagen contribution to 0.16 ± 0.09% (P = 0.1046) and increased the type I collagen to 99.83 ± 0.098% (P = 0.1042). A similar trend was noticed for SI in type III collagen contribution with 0.12 ± 0.07% and 0.03 ± 0.01% compared to 2 J/cm2 treatment with 0.02 ± 0.01% (P = 0.2243) and 0.01 ± 0.01% (P = 0.4232) on day 10 and day 15 post-wounding respectively. Likewise, a higher contribution of type I collagen was recorded for the 2 J/cm2 treatment group with 99.97 ± 0.01% (P = 0.2240) and 99.98 ± 0.01% (P = 0.4233) compared to the SI group with 99.87 ± 0.07% and 99.97 ± 0.01% on day 10 and day 15 post-wounding, respectively. Although higher type III collagen contribution on day 5 post-wounding was recorded in the SI group when compared to the 2 J/cm2 treatment group, and higher type I collagen contribution was recorded in the 2 J/cm2 treatment group compared to SI in all post-wounding time intervals, these differences were not found to be statistically significant (P > 0.05).

Discussion

In the past two decades, PBM has shown enormous progress in rejuvenating healing by conserving either the damaged or decaying tissue or cells under stress. PBM, a simple non-pharmacological approach with no reported cytotoxic effects, triggers various cellular and biological pathways without comprehensively accepted precise mechanisms [18]. Out of 3500 published research articles on PBM to date, 85%–90% of studies employed lasers as a light source [5]. Helium-Neon with the wavelength of 632.8-nm, gallium-aluminum arsenide, gallium arsenide, and aluminum gallium indium phosphide with a wavelength of 780, 820, 830, and 904-nm, respectively, are the most prominent lasers utilized for PBM studies [19]. Long visible and near-infrared light displayed decisive during tested wavelengths, while short wavelengths reported having adverse outcomes [20]. Lesser tissue scattering at a higher wavelength and least absorption by tissue components result in deeper tissue penetration at this spectral region (red to near-infrared). The present study was intended to inspect the possible photobiological mechanism to regulate proliferation stimulated by red light in a preclinical excisional wound model.

Ki67 is a non-histone nuclear protein associated with cell proliferation, even though its exact role in it was unknown yet. Ki67 antibodies are expedient in evaluating the proliferating cells in various normal, neoplastic, and regenerative tissues. Immunohistochemical identification of this protein for various pathological applications is very well accepted. The identification of Ki67 through IHC is considered a quick, reliable method to measure the cell population’s growth fraction under study [21]. Another non-histone nuclear protein PCNA, which is primarily expressed in the cycling cells, functions as the auxiliary protein for DNA polymerase δ essential for DNA synthesis in the S phase, and it intermingles with various cell cycle regulation and checkpoint proteins. The expression of these two markers was also examined concerning wound healing in preclinical models [22, 23].

In the current investigation, these two vital proliferation markers were selected to comprehend the role of red light irradiation in regulating proliferation in the course of the wound repair process. IHC findings indicated that an immediate illumination of 2 J/cm2 resulted in a 1.61% and 1.84% fold increase in Ki67-positive cells compared to SI and 10 J/cm2 laser dose, respectively. Likewise, a 1.45% and 1.53% fold increase in PCNA expression was recorded in 2 J/cm2 treatment compared to SI and 10 J/cm2 groups. A previous study by Wu and co-workers reported elevated PCNA expression leading to cellular proliferation during early tendon healing [24]. This study also suggested that PCNA could be an ideal marker to assess cellular proliferation during healing progression. Out of the two proliferative markers, PCNA-positive cells were higher than Ki67 cells in all experimental groups. This could be attributed to the expression of PCNA in resting cells and the longer half-life of PCNA, allowing it to recognize even after completion of cell division.

Recently enhanced proliferation in tenocytes was reported following low-level laser irradiation as measured by a substantial upsurge of Ki67 and PCNA expression [4]. Likewise, diode laser irradiation to periapical lesions in rats resulted in elevated expression of PCNA, leading to higher proliferation [25]. Similar studies performed by Wan-Ping and co-workers [26] reported increased cell proliferation via Ki67 expression in melanoma cells following single exposure of He-Ne laser. In a study reported by Gupta and co-workers [23] on a preclinical model of partial-thickness dermal abrasion, elevated PCNA expression has resulted in higher proliferation following 635-nm and 810-nm laser treatments. A study conducted by Li et al. on the rabbit skin wound model reported higher Ki67 expression resulting in rapid healing following red light-emitting diode treatment [27] compared to blue light and unilluminated control group. In the same way, high-frequency pulsed low-level diode laser therapy (904–910-nm) resulted in significantly higher PCNA expression in the tooth extracted preclinical wound model [28]. In an exciting finding reported by Shu and co-workers, scar fibroblast cells exposed to He-Ne laser at higher power densities (100 and 150 mWcm−2) lead to a rise in the number of cells in GO/G1 phase and reduction in cells in S phase measured by cell cycle assay [29]. In that study, high power He-Ne laser irradiation also impeded fibroblast proliferation through decreased PCNA expression in a preclinical hypertrophic scar model. The authors of the study directly linked the reduction of PCNA at higher power densities to the halting of cells in the G0/G1 phase. It was also concluded that optimal illumination parameters are critical in regulating the proliferation phase of tissue repair.

Outcomes of the current investigation are entirely in agreement with the previously published reports indicating the positive influence of red light on proliferation when applied at optimal doses [29, 30]. For the first time, the regulation of  Ki67 and PCNA following 632.8-nm laser exposure in a full-thickness excision wound model was reported. Furthermore, this study endorses the red light mediated proliferation during wound healing via Ki67 and PCNA. Thus, the current report’s outcomes postulate that 632.8-nm might promote the cells to traverse the G1 phase to enter the S phase and move through the G2/M checkpoint, thereby promoting cell proliferation during tissue repair. It might otherwise be indicated that an optimal dose of 632.8-nm laser promotes nuclear proteins’ expression to alter cell proliferation during wound repair.

Collagen, a vital constituent of the ECM, substantially contributes to the skin’s elastic property [31]. During wound repair, this vital protein mainly regulates cell proliferation and migration, and its role is supposed to be decisive in wound closure and successful wound healing [31]. The amount, quality, and collagen synthesis rate during repair are directly linked to the functional and esthetic outcomes of the newly formed tissue. Type I collagen is the most abundant ECM found in the skin, providing scar tissue resistance against friction [32]. Enhanced wound healing following PBM through elevated collagen synthesis has been reported in the literature [12,13,14]. Owing importance of collagen in wound healing, in the current investigation, it is proposed to scrutinize 632.8-nm laser’s role in the production of type I and type III collagen and total collagen deposition during the wound repair process.

The widely reported staining methods for collagen quantifications such as van Gieson and trichome fail to discern among different collagen types and identify thin fibers of collagen, resulting in underestimating collagen content [33]. Classical hematoxylin and eosin staining also extensively utilized for collagen quantification, although stains used have no specificity for this protein [34]. Quantification of collagen in PSR-stained tissue sections through bright-field microscopy was also reported previously [35]. However, this approach lacks to provide structural information and fails to differentiate between the thin and thick fibers (both appear red) and brightness, and fiber color is non-uniform. Thus, in the current investigation, the combination of PSR and polarized microscopy followed by image analysis for quantification of the contribution of type III and type I collagen and total deposited collagen post-laser treatment was performed. The wounded animals illuminated with 2 J/cm2 of red laser light displayed 4.40, 2.85, and 1.62fold increase in total collagen on day 5, day 10, and day 15 post-wounding compared to the SI group as revealed by the image analysis of PSR-stained tissue slices. Upon comparing the proportion of type I and type III collagen in total deposited collagen between the experimental groups, 10.10, 4.83, and 1.86 fold increase in type III collagen was recorded in SI compared to 2 J/cm2 treatment group on day 5, day 10, and day 15 post-wounding respectively. On the contrary, laser treatment with a 2 J/cm2 dose elevated the type I collagen formation compared to SI animals in all the tested post-wounding days. Even though total collagen deposition in 2 J/cm2 was significantly higher on day 10 and day 15 post-wounding, type I and type III collagen proportion comparison between the 2 J/cm2 and SI, the difference was found to be statistically insignificant.

Histological findings on collagen deposition following PBM therapy recorded in the present study thoroughly corroborated with previous investigations on biochemical measurements performed on granulation tissues at different post-wounding days [12]. In that study, biochemical estimation of hydroxyproline (a direct measure of collagen) in granulation tissues following single illumination of various laser doses of 632.8-nm at three different post-wounding treatment intervals was performed. The findings of the biochemical study concluded that red light illumination at 2 J/cm2 is the optimum dose for collagen deposition. Thus, only an optimal laser dose of 632.8-nm was selected for further microscopic investigations on collagen deposition in the present study.

Positive effects of red light (660-nm) on collagen deposition during the rats’ muscle repair process were reported previously [36, 37]. Similarly, the therapeutic effects of LEDs on collagen synthesis in a rodent model of skin wound healing are investigated by De Sousa et al. [38], wherein elevated fibroblast proliferation was reported. Kerppers and co-workers [39] irradiated incisional wounds on a rat model with 627-nm and 945-nm LEDs and reported prevalence of mature collagen in 627-nm treated wounds. In the same study, sizable raise in type I collagen post-infrared LED (945-nm) exposure was noticed compared to other treatments. Similarly, Pugliese and co-workers [40] inspected the impact of 670-nm laser on collagen and elastin fibers’ alterations during wound repair in a rat model. Wounds illuminated with 4 J/cm2 improved the deposition of collagen and elastin fibers on day 5 and day 7 post-wounding compared to non-irradiated control and 8 J/cm2 treatment group as endorsed by PSR staining of tissue sections. In that study, although authors noticed an improvement in the accumulation of these two ECM proteins following exposure to optimal laser dose during wound repair, the difference was statistically insignificant.

Equally, in the current exploration, experiential higher collagen deposition on day 5 post-wounding following red light illumination at 2 J/cm2 was not statistically significant compared to SI. While comparing the contribution, it was noticed that the SI group displayed higher type III collagen and lower type I collagen when matched to the 2 J/cm2 treatment group in all assessed treatment intervals. From the earlier pieces of literature, it is evident that type III collagen is predominant in early healing tissue, and at a later stage of remodeling collagen type I, overtake the former to expedite wound repair by avoiding the scar tissue formation [7, 32, 41]. The early replacement of type III collagen with type I collagen in healing tissue witnessed in the current inedited report could be linked to the exposure of an optimum dose of 632.8-nm laser, thereby augmenting the wound repair process. The findings of the current work on the early replacement of type III to type I collagen is entirely corroborated with an earlier published report [41]. Our assumption that a raise in collagen noticed in the current investigation is directly linked with an increase in the number of fibroblasts, as depicted in several other studies with other illuminated wavelengths [38, 42,43,44,45].

Conclusion

In summary, the outcomes of the present study indicate that the 632.8-nm laser at optimum dose regulates the proliferative phase of wound repair in Swiss albino mice by altering the expression of proliferation markers (Ki67 and PCNA) and extending the exposure time did not seem to have a substantial influence on cellular proliferation. Our findings also established that PBM utilization at optimum dose-escalated total collagen production and prompted the early replacement of collagen III by collagen I in regenerated tissue, thus contributing to the hastened tissue repair process.

References

  1. Otterco AN, Andrade AL, Brassolatti P, Pinto KNZ, Araujo HSS, Parizotto NA (2018) Photobiomodulation mechanisms in the kinetics of the wound healing process in rats. J Photochem Photobiol B 183:22–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jonat W, Arnold N (2011) Is the Ki-67 labelling index ready for clinical use? Ann Oncol 22(3):500–502

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Takahashi T, Caviness VS Jr (1993) PCNA-binding to DNA at the G1/S transition in proliferating cells of the developing cerebral wall. J Neurocytol 22(12):1096–1102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsai WC, Cheng JW, Chen JL, Chen CY, Chang HN, Liao YH, Lin MS, Pang JH (2014) Low-level laser irradiation stimulates tenocyte proliferation in association with increased NO synthesis and upregulation of PCNA and cyclins. Lasers Med Sci 29(4):1377–1384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heiskanen V, Hamblin MR (2018) Photobiomodulation: lasers vs. light emitting diodes? Photochem Photobiol Sci 17(8):1003–1017

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Enwemeka CS (2005) Light is light. Photomed Laser Surg 23(2):159–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reddy GK (2003) Comparison of the photostimulatory effects of visible He-Ne and infrared Ga-As lasers on healing impaired diabetic rat wounds. Lasers Surg Med 33(5):344–351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jere SW, Abrahamse H, Houreld NN (2017) The JAK/STAT signaling pathway and photobiomodulation in chronic wound healing. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 38:73–79

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Allendorf JD, Bessler M, Huang J, Kayton ML, Laird D, Nowygrod R, Treat MR (1997) Helium-neon laser irradiation at fluences of 1, 2, and 4 J/cm2 failed to accelerate wound healing as assessed by both wound contracture rate and tensile strength. Lasers Surg Med 20(3):340–345

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bouma MG, Buurman WA, van den Wildenberg FA (1996) Low energy laser irradiation fails to modulate the inflammatory function of human monocytes and endothelial cells. Lasers Surg Med 19(2):207–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garza ZCF, Born M, Hilbers PAJ, van Riel NAW, Liebmann J (2018) Visible blue light therapy: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Curr Med Chem 25(40):5564–5577

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prabhu V, Rao SB, Rao NB, Aithal KB, Kumar P, Mahato KK (2010) Development and evaluation of fiber optic probe-based helium-neon low-level laser therapy system for tissue regeneration--an in vivo experimental study. Photochem Photobiol 86(6):1364–1372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hegde VN, Prabhu V, Rao SB, Chandra S, Kumar P, Satyamoorthy K, Mahato KK (2011) Effect of laser dose and treatment schedule on excision wound healing in diabetic mice. Photochem Photobiol 87(6):1433–1441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Prabhu V, Rao SB, Chandra S, Kumar P, Rao L, Guddattu V, Satyamoorthy K, Mahato KK (2012) Spectroscopic and histological evaluation of wound healing progression following low level laser therapy (LLLT). J Biophotonics 5(2):168–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Junqueira LC, Cossermelli W, Brentani R (1978) Differential staining of collagens type I, II and III by Sirius red and polarization microscopy. Arch Histol Jpn 41(3):267–274

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prasad K, Bhagath Kumar P, Chakravarthy M, Prabhu G (2012) Applications of ‘TissueQuant’- a color intensity quantification tool for medical research. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 106(1):27–36

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prabhu V, Rao SB, Fernandes EM, Rao AC, Prasad K, Mahato KK (2014) Objective assessment of endogenous collagen in vivo during tissue repair by laser induced fluorescence. PLoS One 9(5):e98609

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mokoena D, Dhilip Kumar SS, Houreld NN, Abrahamse H (2018) Role of photobiomodulation on the activation of the Smad pathway via TGF-beta in wound healing. J Photochem Photobiol B 189:138–144

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ayuk SM, Abrahamse H, Houreld NN (2018) Photobiomodulation alters matrix protein activity in stressed fibroblast cells in vitro. J Biophotonics 11(3)

  20. Wang Y, Huang YY, Wang Y, Lyu P, Hamblin MR (2017) Red (660 nm) or near-infrared (810 nm) photobiomodulation stimulates, while blue (415 nm), green (540 nm) light inhibits proliferation in human adipose-derived stem cells. Sci Rep 7(1):7781

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown DC, Gatter KC (2002) Ki67 protein: the immaculate deception? Histopathology 40(1):2–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Crompton R, Williams H, Ansell D, Campbell L, Holden K, Cruickshank S, Hardman MJ (2016) Oestrogen promotes healing in a bacterial LPS model of delayed cutaneous wound repair. Lab Investig 96(4):439–449

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta A, Dai T, Hamblin MR (2014) Effect of red and near-infrared wavelengths on low-level laser (light) therapy-induced healing of partial-thickness dermal abrasion in mice. Lasers Med Sci 29(1):257–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu YF, Chen CH, Cao Y, Avanessian B, Wang XT, Tang JB (2010) Molecular events of cellular apoptosis and proliferation in the early tendon healing period. J Hand Surg Am 35(1):2–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khan SZ, Kokubu E, Tsuruoka M, Murakami S, Matsuzaka K, Inoue T (2013) Morphological effect of diode laser irradiation of periapical lesion in rat. Int J Las Dent 3(2):37–43

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hu WP, Wang JJ, Yu CL, Lan CC, Chen GS, Yu HS (2007) Helium-neon laser irradiation stimulates cell proliferation through photostimulatory effects in mitochondria. J Invest Dermatol 127(8):2048–2057

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Y, Zhang J, Xu Y, Han Y, Jiang B, Huang L, Zhu H, Xu Y, Yang W, Qin C (2016) The histopathological investigation of red and blue light emitting diode on treating skin wounds in Japanese big-ear white rabbit. PLoS One 11(6):e0157898

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Noda M, Aoki A, Mizutani K, Lin T, Komaki M, Shibata S, Izumi Y (2016) High-frequency pulsed low-level diode laser therapy accelerates wound healing of tooth extraction socket: an in vivo study. Lasers Surg Med 48(10):955–964

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shu B, Ni GX, Zhang LY, Li XP, Jiang WL, Zhang LQ (2013) High-power helium-neon laser irradiation inhibits the growth of traumatic scars in vitro and in vivo. Lasers Med Sci 28(3):693–700

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Azevedo LH, de Paula EF, Moreira MS, de Paula EC, Marques MM (2006) Influence of different power densities of LILT on cultured human fibroblast growth : a pilot study. Lasers Med Sci 21(2):86–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cuttle L, Nataatmadja M, Fraser JF, Kempf M, Kimble RM, Hayes MT (2005) Collagen in the scarless fetal skin wound: detection with picrosirius-polarization. Wound Repair Regen 13(2):198–204

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Walker MD, Rumpf S, Baxter GD, Hirst DG, Lowe AS (2000) Effect of low-intensity laser irradiation (660 nm) on a radiation-impaired wound-healing model in murine skin. Lasers Surg Med 26(1):41–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rittie L (2017) Method for Picrosirius red-polarization detection of collagen fibers in tissue sections. Methods Mol Biol 1627:395–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schulz R, Gres P, Konietzka I, Heusch G (2005) Regional differences of myocardial infarct development and ischemic preconditioning. Basic Res Cardiol 100(1):48–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ophof R, Maltha JC, Von den Hoff JW, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2004) Histologic evaluation of skin-derived and collagen-based substrates implanted in palatal wounds. Wound Repair Regen 12(5):528–538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Baptista J, Martins MD, Pavesi VC, Bussadori SK, Fernandes KP, Pinto Junior Ddos S, Ferrari RA (2011) Influence of laser photobiomodulation on collagen IV during skeletal muscle tissue remodeling after injury in rats. Photomed Laser Surg 29(1):11–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. de Souza TO, Mesquita DA, Ferrari RA, Dos Santos Pinto D Jr, Correa L, Bussadori SK, Fernandes KP, Martins MD (2011) Phototherapy with low-level laser affects the remodeling of types I and III collagen in skeletal muscle repair. Lasers Med Sci 26(6):803–814

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. de Sousa AP, Santos JN, Dos Reis JA Jr, Ramos TA, de Souza J, Cangussu MC, Pinheiro AL (2010) Effect of LED phototherapy of three distinct wavelengths on fibroblasts on wound healing: a histological study in a rodent model. Photomed Laser Surg 28(4):547–552

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kerppers II, de Lima CJ, Fernandes AB, Villaverde AB (2015) Effect of light-emitting diode ( 627 nm and 945 nm ) treatment on first intention healing: immunohistochemical analysis. Lasers Med Sci 30(1):397–401

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pugliese LS, Medrado AP, Reis SR, Andrade Zde A (2003) The influence of low-level laser therapy on biomodulation of collagen and elastic fibers. Pesqui Odontol Bras 17(4):307–313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cunha JLS, Carvalho FMA, Pereira Filho RN, Ribeiro MAG, de Albuquerque-Junior RLC (2019) Effects of different protocols of low-level laser therapy on collagen deposition in wound healing. Braz Dent J 30(4):317–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Aparecida Da Silva A, Leal-Junior EC, Alves AC, Rambo CS, Dos Santos SA, Vieira RP, De Carvalho PT (2013) Wound-healing effects of low-level laser therapy in diabetic rats involve the modulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 and the redistribution of collagen types I and III. J Cosmet Laser Ther 15(4):210–216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Demir H, Yaray S, Kirnap M, Yaray K (2004) Comparison of the effects of laser and ultrasound treatments on experimental wound healing in rats. J Rehabil Res Dev 41(5):721–728

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Oliveira Sampaio SC, de C Monteiro JS, Cangussu MC, Pires Santos GM, dos Santos MA, dos Santos JN, Pinheiro AL (2013) Effect of laser and LED phototherapies on the healing of cutaneous wound on healthy and iron-deficient Wistar rats and their impact on fibroblastic activity during wound healing. Lasers Med Sci 28(3):799–806

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Silveira PC, Silva LA, Freitas TP, Latini A, Pinho RA (2011) Effects of low-power laser irradiation (LPLI) at different wavelengths and doses on oxidative stress and fibrogenesis parameters in an animal model of wound healing. Lasers Med Sci 26(1):125–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the help of Mr. Subhash Chandra, Junior Engineer, Department of Biophysics, Manipal School of Life Sciences (MSLS), MAHE, Manipal, during animal experiments. The authors are also thankful to Dr. K. Satyamoorthy, Professor and Director, MSLS, MAHE, Manipal, for his constant support and MAHE, Manipal, India, for providing the necessary facilities.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal. Life Sciences Research Board-Defence Research and Development Organization (LSRB-DRDO), G.O.I. project no. DLS/81/48222/LSRB-164/BDB/2008, entitled “Development of fiber optic probe-based low level laser therapy (LLLT) for tissue regeneration” funded this work.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Vijendra Prabhu

    Present address: Department of Biotechnology, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

  2. Bola Sadashiva Satish Rao

    Present address: Directorate of Research, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, 576104, Manipal, India

  3. Anuradha Calicut Kini Rao

    Present address: Department of Pathology, Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya (a Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, 575018, India

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biophysics, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

    Vijendra Prabhu & Krishna Kishore Mahato

  2. Department of Radiation Biology and Toxicology, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

    Bola Sadashiva Satish Rao

  3. Department of Pathology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

    Anuradha Calicut Kini Rao

  4. Manipal School of Information Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

    Keerthana Prasad

Authors
  1. Vijendra Prabhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bola Sadashiva Satish Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anuradha Calicut Kini Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Keerthana Prasad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Krishna Kishore Mahato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishna Kishore Mahato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Consent to participation

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prabhu, V., Rao, B.S.S., Rao, A.C.K. et al. Photobiomodulation invigorating collagen deposition, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki67 expression during dermal wound repair in mice. Lasers Med Sci 37, 171–180 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03202-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03202-z

Keywords

  • Excisional wounds
  • Wound repair
  • Photobiomodulation
  • Proliferating cell nuclear antigen
  • Ki67
  • Collagen deposition