Abstract
Congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) are nevi that are present from birth and occur in approximately 1 % of newborns. CMN may be cosmetically disfiguring and are at risk for malignant transformation. For these two reasons, CMN are frequently treated. A variety of treatment modalities have been utilized with variable efficacy, including excision, dermabrasion, curettage, chemical peels, radiation therapy, cryotherapy, electrosurgery, and lasers. The current treatment of choice for CMN is surgical excision. However, some CMN occur in cosmetically sensitive areas, where a surgical scar is less acceptable, or in inoperable locations. For these reasons, there has been increasing interest in the potential for laser treatment of CMN. The lasers that have been studied to date for the treatment of CMN include pigment-specific lasers, including ruby (694 nm), alexandrite (755 nm), and Nd:yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) (1064 nm), as well as ablative laser treatment with CO2 laser (10,600 nm) and Er:YAG (2940 nm). To date, ruby lasers have been studied most extensively in the treatment of CMN. Ruby laser has been shown to improve the cosmetic appearance of some CMN and may be cautiously considered for lesions located in cosmetically sensitive areas that are less amenable to surgical excision. For very large CMN, ruby laser has been tried as an alternative to extensive surgical and grafting procedures. Dual treatment with Q-switched ruby laser and normal mode ruby laser may provide the best outcomes; however, multiple treatment sessions should be anticipated. The practicality and expense of multiple treatments should be discussed with the patient prior to initiating treatment. Importantly, because of the persistence of dermal nevus cells, lifelong follow-up is required for all laser-treated CMN, even those with excellent cosmetic effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rabinovitz H, Barnhill R (2012) Benign Melanocytic Neoplasms. In: Bolognia J, Jorizzo J, Schaffer J (eds) Dermatology, 3rd edn. Elsevier, New York
Ibrahimi OA, Alikhan A, Eisen DB (2012) Congenital melanocytic nevi: where are we now? Part II. Treatment options and approach to treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol 67(4):515 e511-513; quiz 528–530
Levins PC, Anderson RR (1995) Q-switched ruby laser for the treatment of pigmented lesions and tattoos. Clin Dermatol 13(1):75–79
Geronemus RG (1992) Q-switched ruby laser therapy of nevus of Ota. Arch Dermatol 128(12):1618–1622
Goldberg DJ (1993) Benign pigmented lesions of the skin. Treatment with the Q-switched ruby laser. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 19(4):376–379
Goldberg DJ, Stampien T (1995) Q-switched ruby laser treatment of congenital nevi. Arch Dermatol 131(5):621–623
Waldorf HA, Kauvar AN, Geronemus RG (1996) Treatment of small and medium congenital nevi with the Q-switched ruby laser. Arch Dermatol 132(3):301–304
Grevelink JM, van Leeuwen RL, Anderson RR, Byers HR (1997) Clinical and histological responses of congenital melanocytic nevi after single treatment with Q-switched lasers. Arch Dermatol 133(3):349–353
Ueda S, Imayama S (1997) Normal-mode ruby laser for treating congenital nevi. Arch Dermatol 133(3):355–359
Duke D, Byers HR, Sober AJ, Anderson RR, Grevelink JM (1999) Treatment of benign and atypical nevi with the normal-mode ruby laser and the Q-switched ruby laser: clinical improvement but failure to completely eliminate nevomelanocytes. Arch Dermatol 135(3):290–296
Imayama S, Ueda S (1999) Long- and short-term histological observations of congenital nevi treated with the normal-mode ruby laser. Arch Dermatol 135(10):1211–1218
Kono T, Ercocen AR, Chan HH, Kikuchi Y, Nozaki M (2002) Effectiveness of the normal-mode ruby laser and the combined (normal-mode plus q-switched) ruby laser in the treatment of congenital melanocytic nevi: a comparative study. Ann Plast Surg 49(5):476–485
Kono T, Ercocen AR, Nozaki M (2005) Treatment of congenital melanocytic nevi using the combined (normal-mode plus Q-switched) ruby laser in Asians: clinical response in relation to histological type. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):494–501
Helsing P, Mork G, Sveen B (2006) Ruby laser treatment of congenital melanocytic naevi—a pessimistic view. Acta Derm Venereol 86(3):235–237
Kishi K, Okabe K, Ninomiya R et al (2009) Early serial Q-switched ruby laser therapy for medium-sized to giant congenital melanocytic naevi. Br J Dermatol 161(2):345–352
Minakawa S, Takeda H, Korekawa A, Kaneko T, Urushidate S, Sawamura D (2012) Q-switched ruby laser therapy and long-term follow-up evaluation of small to medium-sized congenital melanocytic naevi. Clin Exp Dermatol 37(4):438–440
Funayama E, Sasaki S, Furukawa H et al (2012) Effectiveness of combined pulsed dye and Q-switched ruby laser treatment for large to giant congenital melanocytic naevi. Br J Dermatol 167(5):1085–1091
Kim YJ, Whang KU, Choi WB et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of 1,064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment for removing melanocytic nevi. Ann Dermatol 24(2):162–167
Kim S, Kang WH (2005) Treatment of congenital nevi with the Q-switched Alexandrite laser. Eur J Dermatol 15(2):92–96
Sohn S, Kim S, Kang WH (2004) Recurrent pigmented macules after q-switched alexandrite laser treatment of congenital melanocytic nevus. Dermatol Surg 30(6):898–907, discussion 907
Reda AM, Taha IR, Riad HA (1999) Clinical and histological effect of a single treatment of normal mode alexandrite (755 nm) laser on small melanocytic nevi. J Cutan Laser Ther 1(4):209–215
Reynolds N, Kenealy J, Mercer N (2003) Carbon dioxide laser dermabrasion for giant congenital melanocytic nevi. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(7):2209–2214
Horner BM, El-Muttardi NS, Mayou BJ (2005) Treatment of congenital melanocytic naevi with CO2 laser. Ann Plast Surg 55(3):276–280
Park SH, Koo SH, Choi EO (2001) Combined laser therapy for difficult dermal pigmentation: resurfacing and selective photothermolysis. Ann Plast Surg 47(1):31–36
Chong SJ, Jeong E, Park HJ, Lee JY, Cho BK (2005) Treatment of congenital nevomelanocytic nevi with the CO2 and Q-switched alexandrite lasers. Dermatol Surg 31(5):518–521
Mandal A, Al-Nakib K, Quaba AA (2006) Treatment of small congenital nevocellular naevi using a combination of ultrapulse carbon dioxide laser and Q-switched frequency-doubled Nd-YAG laser. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30(5):606–610
Al-Hadithy N, Al-Nakib K, Quaba A (2012) Outcomes of 52 patients with congenital melanocytic naevi treated with UltraPulse Carbon Dioxide and Frequency Doubled Q-Switched Nd-Yag laser. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(8):1019–1028
Lapiere K, Ostertag J, Van De Kar T, Krekels G (2002) A neonate with a giant congenital naevus: new treatment option with the erbium:YAG laser. Br J Plast Surg 55(5):440–442
Whang KK, Kim MJ, Song WK, Cho S (2005) Comparative treatment of giant congenital melanocytic nevi with curettage or Er:YAG laser ablation alone versus with cultured epithelial autografts. Dermatol Surg 31(12):1660–1667
Lim JY, Jeong Y, Whang KK (2009) A combination of dual-mode 2,940 nm Er:YAG laser ablation with surgical excision for treating medium-sized congenital melanocytic nevus. Ann Dermatol 21(2):120–124
Ostertag JU, Quaedvlieg PJ, Kerckhoffs FE et al (2006) Congenital naevi treated with erbium:YAG laser (Derma K) resurfacing in neonates: clinical results and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol 154(5):889–895
Lee SE, Choi JY, Hong KT, Lee KR (2015) Treatment of acquired and small congenital melanocytic nevi with combined Er: YAG laser and long-pulsed alexandrite laser in Asian skin. Dermatol surg 41(4):473–480
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding/support
No funds were involved in the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis and interpretation of data, preparation, review or approval of the manuscript, or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Financial disclosure
None reported.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bray, F.N., Shah, V. & Nouri, K. Laser treatment of congenital melanocytic nevi: a review of the literature. Lasers Med Sci 31, 197–204 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1833-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1833-3