Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing performance factors in the UK banking sector: A multicriteria methodology

  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Further consolidation takes place not only among UK banks but also across borders, since some banks see size as a key factor in remaining competitive in international markets. Therefore, it is interesting to investigate the effectiveness and performance of UK banks. Based on their assets, banks are distinguished into small and large ones and a classification of UK banks in a multivariate environment for the period 1998–2002 takes place. The PAIRCLAS multicriteria methodology is employed to investigate the performance of UK small and large banks over multiple criteria, such as asset quality, capital adequacy, liquidity and efficiency/profitability. A comparison with discriminant analysis (DA) and logistic regression (LR) facilitates the investigation of the relative performance of PAIRCLAS against them. The results of the study determine the key factors that specify the classification of a bank as small or large and provide us with the responsible banking decision makers for future readjustments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altman, El., Avery R., Eisenbeis R. and Stinkey, J. (1981) Application of Classification Techniques in Business, Banking and Finance, Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arshadi N. and Lawrence E. C. (1987) An Empirical Investigation of New Bank Performance, Journal of Banking & Finance, 11, 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Athanassopoulos A. (2000) Assessing the efficiency in operations of bank branch networks using data envelopment analysis: an illustrative application to a specialized mortgage bank, Conference Proceedings, European Financial Management Association Conference, Athens.

  4. Athanassopoulos A., Giokas D. (2000) On-going use of data envelopment analysis in banking institutions: Evidence from the Commerical Bank of Greece, Interfaces, 30,2: 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bank of England, Institutions included within the United Kingdome banking sector (at 31st December 2002)—nationality analysis, available at: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/mfsd/ms/030303/bklist.doc.

  6. Barnes P., Dodds C. (1983) The structure and performance of the UK building society industry 1970-78, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 10: 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brans JP., Vincke Ph. (1985) A preference ranking organization method. Management Science, 31, 6: 647–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brieman L. (1996) Heuristics of instability and stabilization in model selection. Annals of Statistics 24: 2350–2383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper J.C.B. (1980) Economies of scale in the UK building society industry, Investment Analysis, 55: 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DeYoung R., Hasan I. (1998) The Performance of De Novo Commercial Banks: A Profit Efficiency Approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 5: 565–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Doumpos M., Zopounidis C. (2004) A multicriteria classification approach based on pairwise comparison. European Journal of Operational Research, 58: 378–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Doumpos M., Zopounidis C. (2002) Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Drake L. (2001) Efficiency and productivity change in UK banking, Applied Financial Economics, 11: 557–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Duda RO, Hart P.E., Stork D.G. (2001) Pattern Classification, 2nd Edition, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  15. European Commission (1997) Impact on services: credit institutions and banking, Single Market Review, subseries II, vol. 4, London: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities and Kogan Page Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Financial Stability Review (2000) The financial stability conjuncture and outlook. The UK financial system, December.

  17. Gilligann T., Smirlock M., Marshall W. (1984) Scale and Scope Economics in the Multi-Product Banking Firm. Journal of Monetary Economics, 13: 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giokas D. (1991) Bank branch operating efficiency: A comparative application of DEA and the loglinear model, Omega, 19, 6: 549–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goddard J., Molyneyx Ph., Wilson J. (2001) European Banking, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

  20. Golin J. (2001) The Bank Credit Analysis Handbook: A Guide for Analysts, Bankers and Investors, New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Golin J. (1979) Building societies mergers and the size of the efficiency relationship, Applied Economics, 11: 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hardy C. D., Simigiannis G. T. (1998) Competitiveness and Effectiveness of the Greek Banking System, Economic Review of the Bank of Greece, 11: 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hardwick P. (1989) Economies of scale in building societies, Applied Economics, 21: 1291–1304.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hardwick P. (1990), Multi-product cost attributes: a study of the UK building societies, Oxford Economic Papers, 42: 446–461.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hunter W. C., Timme S. G., Yang W. K. (1990) An Examination of Cost Subadditivity and Multiproduct Production in Large U.S. Commercial Banks. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 22: 504–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. International Financial Services, City Business Series 2000 and 2002, Banking, available at: http://www.ifsl.org.uk.

  27. Jacquet-Lagrèze E., Siskos Y. (1982) Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method, European Journal of Operational Research, 10: 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jacquet-Lagrèze E., Siskos Y. (2001) Preference disaggregation: Twenty years of MCDA experience. European Journal of Operational Research, 130: 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jayaratne J., Wolken J. (1999) How Important are Small Banks to Small Business Lending? New Evidence from a Survey of Small Firms, Journal of Banking & Finance, 23: 427–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kohavi R. (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (available at: http://robotics.stanford.edu/≈ronnyk/).

  31. Lang G., Welzel P., (1996) Efficiency and Technical Progress in Banking Empirical Results for a Panel of German Cooperative Banks, Journal of Banking & Finance, 20, 6: 1003–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller S., Noulas A. (1997) Portfolio Mix and Large-Bank Profitability in the USA, Applied Economics, 29: 505–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Miller S., Noulas A. (1996) The Technical Efficiency of Large Banks Production, Journal of Banking & Finance, 20, 3: 495–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Molyneux P., Altunbas Y., Gardener EPM (1996) Efficiency in European Banking, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mousseau V., Slowinski R. (1998) Inferring an ELECTRE-TRI model from assignment examples, Journal of Global Optimization, 12, 2: 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mousseau V., Slowinski R., Zielniewicz P. (2000) A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE-TRI method integrating preference elicitation support, Computers and Operations Research, 27, 7–8: 757–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Murray J. D., White R. W. (1983) Economies of Scales and Economics of Scope in Multiproduct Financial Institutions: A Study of British Columbia Credit Unions, Journal of Finance, 38: 887–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Petersen M., Rajan R. (1995) The Effects of Credit Market Competition on Lending Relationships, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 60: 407–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Revell J. (1980) Costs and Margins in Banking: An International Survey, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Roy B., Bouyssou D. (1993) Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas, Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Roy B. (1991) The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods, Theory and Decision, 31: 49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shao J. (1997) An asymptotic theory for linear model selection, Statistica Sinica 7: 221–264

    Google Scholar 

  43. Short B. (1979) The Relation between Commercial Bank Profit Rates and Banking Concentration in Canada, Western Europe and Japan, Journal of Banking & Finance, 3: 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Siskos Y., Yannacopoulos D (1985) UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigação Operacional, 5, 1: 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Spathis Ch., Kosmidou, K., Doumpos M. (2002) Assessing profitability factors in the Greek banking system: A multicriteria methodology, International Transactions in Operational Research, 9, 5: 517–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S (2001) Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th ed, Allyn & Bacon, Pearson Education.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kosmidou, K., Pasiouras, F., Doumpos, M. et al. Assessing performance factors in the UK banking sector: A multicriteria methodology. cent.eur.j.oper.res. 14, 25–44 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-006-0158-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-006-0158-5

JEL Classification

Keywords

Navigation