Skip to main content
Log in

A stochastic multi-period energy hubs through backup and storage systems: enhancing cost efficiency, and sustainability

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy hubs are a complex system designed to enable the efficient transmission, transformation, and retention of diverse energy sources within consumption networks. This research presents an innovative model designed to optimize energy distribution across three hierarchical layers: production, distribution, and ultimate consumption. This model incorporates an interconnected system of varied energy hubs equipped with various technologies and situated within residential structures. Given the potential for equipment failures over time and the varying stochastic demand from customers in different seasons, the proposed model incorporates backup equipment and storage systems to enhance reliability and fulfilling customer requirements. The objectives of the model encompass minimizing operational costs and mitigating pollution arising from energy consumption ensuring overall reliability in the event of potential energy hub equipment failure. To solve this problem, a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) approach is employed. Specifically, the CPLEX solver within the GAMS software is utilized to identify an optimal solution. The results of the model demonstrate that incorporating backup and storage systems reduces costs and enhances overall efficiency of the system. Additionally, a case study is undertaken to evaluate the applicability of the proposed model in Omid Town, a mixed-use space in Tehran. The case study showcased the benefits of energy hubs, including reducing power outages to zero percent and saving an average of 15% energy during non-peak months for income generation, while effectively managing energy supply, facilitating storage, and enabling exchange between residential and other units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Algorithm 1
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Figure5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon request.

References

  • Amiri S, Honarvar M (2018) Providing an integrated model for planning and scheduling energy hubs and preventive maintenance. Energy 163:1093–1114

    Google Scholar 

  • Axon CJ, Darton RC (2021) Sustainability and risk–a review of energy security. Sustain Prod Consum 27(2021):1195–1204

    Google Scholar 

  • Das S, De S (2023a) MCDM for simultaneous optimum economy, investment risk and environmental impact for distributed renewable power: Demonstration with an Indian village data. Energy Convers Manag 277:116631

    Google Scholar 

  • Das S, De S (2023b) Technically efficient, economic and environmentally benign hybrid decentralized energy solution for an Indian village: Multi criteria decision making approach. J Clean Prod 388:135717

    Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Ray A, De S (2020) Optimum combination of renewable resources to meet local power demand in distributed generation: a case study for a remote place of India. Energy 209:118473

    Google Scholar 

  • Davatgaran V, Saniei M, Mortazavi SS (2019) Smart distribution system management considering electrical and thermal demand response of energy hubs. Energy 169:38–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Eladl AA, El-Afifi MI, El-Saadawi MM, Sedhom BE (2023) A review on energy hubs: models, methods, classification, applications, and future trends. Alex Eng J 68:315–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraji J, Hashemi-Dezaki H, Ketabi A (2021) Stochastic operation and scheduling of energy hub considering renewable energy sources’ uncertainty and N-1 contingency. Sustain Cities Soc 65:102578

    Google Scholar 

  • Favre-Perrod P (2005) A vision of future energy networks. In: 2005 IEEE power engineering society inaugural conference and exposition in Africa, pp 13–17. IEEE

  • Geidl M, Koeppel G, Favre-Perrod P, Klockl B, Andersson G, Frohlich K (2006) Energy hubs for the future. IEEE Power Energ Mag 5(1):24–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Geidl M (2007) Integrated modeling and optimization of multi-carrier energy systems (Doctoral dissertation, ETH Zurich)

  • Ghaffarpour R, Mozafari B, Ranjbar AM, Torabi T (2018) Resilience oriented water and energy hub scheduling considering maintenance constraint. Energy 158:1092–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartono D, Yusuf AA, Hastuti SH, Saputri NK, Syaifudin N (2021) Effect of COVID-19 on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in Indonesia. Sustain Prod Consum 28:391–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidari A, Mortazavi SS, Bansal RC (2020a) Equilibrium state of a price-maker energy hub in a competitive market with price uncertainties. IET Renew Power Gener 14(6):976–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidari A, Mortazavi SS, Bansal RC (2020b) Stochastic effects of ice storage on improvement of an energy hub optimal operation including demand response and renewable energies. Appl Energy 261:114393

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Zhang W, Yang K, Hou W, Huang Y (2019) An optimal scheduling method for multi-energy hub systems using game theory. Energies 12(12):2270

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamalzadeh F, Mirzahosseini AH, Faghihi F, Panahi M (2020) Optimal operation of energy hub system using hybrid stochastic-interval optimization approach. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101998

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski M, Najafi A, Homaee O, Kermani M, Tsaousoglou G, Leonowicz Z, Novak T (2023) Operation and planning of energy hubs under uncertainty-a review of mathematical optimization approaches. IEEE Access

  • Li Z, Ierapetritou MG (2007) A new methodology for the general multiparametric mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problems. Ind Eng Chem Res 46(15):5141–5151

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Li H, Zhou K, Yang S (2023) Optimal load dispatch of energy hub considering uncertainties of renewable energy and demand response. Energy 262:125564

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo X, Liu Y, Liu J, Liu X (2020) Energy scheduling for a three-level integrated energy system based on energy hub models: a hierarchical Stackelberg game approach. Sustain Cities Soc 52:101814

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma T, Wu J, Hao L (2017) Energy flow modeling and optimal operation analysis of the micro energy grid based on energy hub. Energy Convers Manag 133:292–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Madathil D, Nair MG, Jamasb T, Thakur T (2021) Consumer-focused solar-grid net zero energy buildings: a multi-objective weighted sum optimization and application for India. Sustain Prod Consum 27:2101–2111

    Google Scholar 

  • Majidi M, Nojavan S, Zare K (2017) A cost-emission framework for hub energy system under demand response program. Energy 134:157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancarella P (2014) MES (multi-energy systems): an overview of concepts and evaluation models. Energy 65:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri SA, Ahmarinejad A, Sheidaei F, Javadi MS, Jordehi AR, Nezhad AE, Catalao JP (2022) A multi-stage joint planning and operation model for energy hubs considering integrated demand response programs. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 140:108103

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei MA, Oskouei MZ, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Loni A, Zare K, Marzband M, Shafiee M (2020) Integrated energy hub system based on power-to-gas and compressed air energy storage technologies in the presence of multiple shiftable loads. IET Gener Transm Distrib 14(13):2510–2519

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi M, Noorollahi Y, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Yousefi H (2017) Energy hub: from a model to a concept–a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 80:1512–1527

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohseni-Bonab SM, Rabiee A, Jalilzadeh S, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Nojavan S (2015) Probabilistic multi objective optimal reactive power dispatch considering load uncertainties using Monte Carlo simulations. J Oper Autom Power Eng 3(1):83–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Najafi A, Marzband M, Mohamadi-Ivatloo B, Contreras J, Pourakbari-Kasmaei M, Lehtonen M, Godina R (2019) Uncertainty-based models for optimal management of energy hubs considering demand response. Energies 12(8):1413

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves AR, Leal V (2010) Energy sustainability indicators for local energy planning: review of current practices and derivation of a new framework. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(9):2723–2735

    Google Scholar 

  • Nsafon BEK, Owolabi AB, Butu HM, Roh JW, Suh D, Huh JS (2020) Optimization and sustainability analysis of PV/wind/diesel hybrid energy system for decentralized energy generation. Energ Strat Rev 32:100570

    Google Scholar 

  • Odetoye OA, Olulope PK, Olanrewaju OM, Alimi AO, Igbinosa OG (2023) Multi-year techno-economic assessment of proposed zero-emission hybrid community microgrid in Nigeria using HOMER. Heliyon 9(9).

  • Pazouki S, Haghifam MR, Moser A (2014) Uncertainty modeling in optimal operation of energy hub in presence of wind, storage and demand response. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 61:335–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakipour D, Barati H (2019) Probabilistic optimization in operation of energy hub with participation of renewable energy resources and demand response. Energy 173:384–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Sani MM, Noorpoor A, Motlagh MSP (2019) Optimal model development of energy hub to supply water, heating and electrical demands of a cement factory. Energy 177:574–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanjani K, Vahabzad N, Nazari-Heris M, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B (2019) A robust-stochastic approach for energy transaction in energy hub under uncertainty. In: Robust optimal planning and operation of electrical energy systems, pp 219–232

  • Sedighizadeh M, Shaghaghi-shahr G, Esmaili M, Aghamohammadi MR (2019) Optimal distribution feeder reconfiguration and generation scheduling for microgrid day-ahead operation in the presence of electric vehicles considering uncertainties. J Energy Storage 21:58–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Setlhaolo D, Sichilalu S, Zhang J (2017) Residential load management in an energy hub with heat pump water heater. Appl Energy 208:551–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahrabi E, Hakimi SM, Hasankhani A, Derakhshan G, Abdi B (2021) Developing optimal energy management of energy hub in the presence of stochastic renewable energy resources. Sustain Energy Grids Netw 26:100428

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikani H, Ramezanian R, Setak M, Van Woensel T (2021) Hybrid evolutionary algorithms and Lagrangian relaxation for multi-period star hub median problem considering financial and service quality issues. Eng Appl Artif Intell 97:104056

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahid-Pakdel MJ, Nojavan S, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Zare K (2017) Stochastic optimization of energy hub operation with consideration of thermal energy market and demand response. Energy Convers Manag 145:117–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalaoui A, Chaabi K, Yalaoui F (2014) Integrated production planning and preventive maintenance in deteriorating production systems. Inf Sci 278:841–861

    Google Scholar 

  • You S, Tong H, Armin-Hoiland J, Tong YW, Wang CH (2017) Techno-economic and greenhouse gas savings assessment of decentralized biomass gasification for electrifying the rural areas of Indonesia. Appl Energy 208:495–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Y, Bayod-Rújula AA, Chen H, Martínez-Gracia A, Wang J, Pinnarelli A (2019) An advanced multicarrier residential energy hub system based on mixed integer linear programming. Int J Photoenergy 2019:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaroni H, Maciel LB, Carvalho DB, Pamplona EDO (2019) Monte Carlo Simulation approach for economic risk analysis of an emergency energy generation system. Energy 172:498–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Shahidehpour M, Alabdulwahab A, Abusorrah A (2015) Optimal expansion planning of energy hub with multiple energy infrastructures. IEEE Transact Smart Grid 6(5):2302–2311

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Zhou M, Xiang Z, Zhang L, Sun Y, Li G (2020) Research on optimal configuration of energy hub considering system flexibility. In: Proceedings of PURPLE MOUNTAIN FORUM 2019-international forum on smart grid protection and control: pp 243–257. Springer, Singapore.

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Zohreh Shakeri Kebria contributed to conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, investigation, writing—original draft, and visualization. Parviz Fattahi contributed to conceptualization, investigation, visualization, and writing—review & editing. Mostafa Setak contributed to conceptualization, investigation, writing—Review & editing, and supervision

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parviz Fattahi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1: Notations’ list and its definitions.

Appendix 1: Notations’ list and its definitions.

Table 7 shows the sets, parameters, and variables of M-EHN-UC model.

Table 7 Definition of sets, parameters and variables

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shakeri Kebria, Z., Fattahi, P. & Setak, M. A stochastic multi-period energy hubs through backup and storage systems: enhancing cost efficiency, and sustainability. Clean Techn Environ Policy 26, 1049–1073 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02660-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02660-7

Keywords

Navigation