Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

VOC emission reduction and energy efficiency in the flexible packaging printing processes: analysis and implementation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions into the atmosphere are among the primary environmental problems caused by flexible packaging printing plants. Since 1999, VOC emissions from the use of solvents in various technological processes have been limited by the volatile organic compounds solvents emissions directive, and by directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions since 2010. Thus, flexible packaging plants require processing technologies or other solutions to ensure compliance with these requirements. In this paper, combined VOC pollution prevention and treatment alternatives were suggested and were evaluated for their technical, environmental, and economic feasibility. A flexible plastic packaging company that produces over 1920 t/year of plastic packaging for the food industry was selected for detailed analysis. The material and energy flow analysis shows that VOC emissions from the main technological processes reached 112.2 kg/t of production, and a considerable amount of energy (up to 771.6 kWh/t of production) was used. Three integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC) alternatives of the five analysed in this study were selected and implemented within the company to reduce its VOC emissions and energy consumption. The results indicate that after the implementation of the three suggested economically reasonable IPPC alternatives (replacement of solvent-based with water-based inks; modernisation of the ventilation and lighting system), the VOC emissions decreased to 8.4 kg/t (92.5%) and the total energy consumption for the production of 1 t of flexible packaging decreased to 605.6 kWh/t (21.5%). This study shows that IPPC methods not only significantly reduces VOC emissions from flexible packaging printing processes, but also saves energy and raw materials, and reduces costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EI(i) :

Relative environmental indicator for input or output flow i

X ( i) :

Amount of input or output flow i per year

P :

Production volume

X VOC :

VOC emissions

M :

Volume of chemical materials

K :

Percentage composition of volatile substances [according to the material safety data sheet (MSDS)]

E pollutant :

Emissions of GHG (CO2), air emissions (such as CO, NOx)

ARfuel consumption :

Amount of fuel combusted

EFfuel pollutant :

Emission factor of combusted fuel

W(t):

Environmental performance indicator (effect) in a certain environmental area

P :

Payback period

I :

Total project investments

S :

Savings

Q :

Heat energy losses

C :

Specific heat capacity of air

V :

Air volume

ρ :

Air density

t 2 :

Temperature of exhaust air (°C)

t 1 :

Average air temperature in the country during the heating period

VOC:

Volatile organic compounds

IPPC:

Integrated pollution prevention and control

CP:

Cleaner Production

BAT:

Best available techniques

EI:

Environmental indicators

MSDS:

Material safety data sheet

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the Lithuanian-Swiss cooperation programme to reduce economic and social disparities within the enlarged European Union under project agreement No. CH-3-ŠMM-02/04.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daina Kliaugaite.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kliopova-Galickaja, I., Kliaugaite, D. VOC emission reduction and energy efficiency in the flexible packaging printing processes: analysis and implementation. Clean Techn Environ Policy 20, 1805–1818 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1571-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1571-x

Keywords

Navigation