Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic vibratory membrane processing for use in water recovery from soluble coffee product manufacturing wastewater

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of a dynamic vibratory membrane system for the recovery of usable water from soluble coffee processing wastewater has been investigated. Coffee wastewater is a complex food and beverage wastewater consisting of a variety of inorganic and organic constituents and dissolved and suspended solids. Manufacturing processes require high volumes of water, which leads to significant generation of wastewater. Effective design and scale-up of a recovery process are necessary to improve the sustainability of water draw for production. Rejections of COD, turbidity, and conductivity were observed to determine the purity of water recovered. A variety of membranes were initially screened for effective performance; a thin-film composite nanofiltration and a thin-film composite reverse osmosis membrane were selected for further studies. Process parameter studies for these membranes evaluated the effect of time, pressure, and vibration (shear). Steady-state flux was enhanced when vibration was introduced by factors of 4.5 and 1.6 when processing with the nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes, respectively. COD and turbidity rejection were above 97% for both the nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in vibratory filtration. Conductivity rejection was 75 and 99% for the nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes, respectively, in vibratory filtration. The nanofiltration membrane was tested in a high-recovery simulation run and produced high flux at 85% total permeate recovery, indicating commercial-scale design is feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

(adapted from Slater et al. 2015)

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akoum OA, Jaffrin MY, Ding L, Paullier P, Vanhoutte C (2002) An hydrodynamic investigation of microfiltration and ultrafiltration in a vibrating membrane module. J Membr Sci 197:37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akoum O, Jaffrin MY, Ding L (2005) Concentration of total milk proteins by high shear ultrafiltration in a vibrating membrane module. J Membr Sci 247:211–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blomenhofer V, Groß F, Procelewska J, Delgado A, Becher T (2013) Water quality management in the food and beverage industry by hybrid automation using the example of breweries. Water Sci Technol 13:427–434

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bosak VK, VanderZaag AC, Crolla A, Kinsley C, Chabot D, Miller SS, Gordon RJ (2016) Treatment of potato farm wastewater with sand filtration. Environ Technol 37:1597–1604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canizares P, Lobato J, Paz R, Rodrigo MA, Saez C (2007) Advanced oxidation processes for the treatment of olive-oil mills wastewater. Chemosphere 67:832–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas A, Morales U, Saldago L, Zayas T (2009) Electrochemical oxidation of wastewaters from the instant coffee industry using a dimensionally stable RuIrCoOx anode. ECS Trans 20:291–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casani S, Rouhany M, Knochel S (2005) A discussion paper on challenges and limitations to water reuse and hygiene in the food industry. Water Res 39:1134–1146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassano A, Drioli E (2013) Integrated membrane operations: in the food production. De Gruyter Inc, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chollangi A, Hossain MdM (2007) Separation of proteins and lactose from dairy wastewater. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 46:398–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke RJ, Macrae R (1987) Coffee, vol 2. Elsevier Applied Sciences, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coskun T, Debik E, Demir NM (2010) Treatment of olive mill wastewaters by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 259:65–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan A, Bosch H (2013) Industrial separation processes: fundamentals. Walter de Gruyer GmbH, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Devi R, Singh V, Kumar A (2008) COD and BOD reduction from coffee processing wastewater using Avacado peel carbon. Bioresour Technol 99:1853–1860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dewettick K, Le Trung T (2011) Membrane separations in food processing. In: Proctor A (ed) Alternatives to conventional food processing. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 184–253

    Google Scholar 

  • El Rayess Y, Albasi C, Bacchin P, Taillandier P, Raynal J, Mietton-Peuchot M, Devatine A (2011) Cross-flow microfiltration applied to oenology: a review. J Membr Sci 382:1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Field R, Bekassy-Molnar E, Lipnizki F, Vatai G (2017) Engineering aspects of membrane separation and application in food processing. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Frappart M, Jaffrin MY, Ding LH, Espina V (2008) Effect of vibration frequency and membrane shear rate on nanofiltration of diluted milk, using a vibratory dynamic filtration system. Sep Purif Technol 62:212–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenson LN, Den Q, Cassano A (2015) Conventional macroscopic pretreatment. In: Galanakis CM (ed) Food waste recovery: processing technologies and industrial techniques. Academic Press, London, pp 85–103

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ho WSW, Sirkar KK (1992) Membrane handbook. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hu K, Dickson JM (2015) Membrane processing for dairy ingredient separation. Wiley and the Institute of Food Technologists, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kertesz S, Laszlo Z, Forgacs E, Szabo G, Hodur C (2011) Dairy wastewater purification by vibratory shear enhanced processing. Desalin Water Treat 35:195–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klemes J, Smith R, Kim JK (2008) Handbook of water and energy management in food processing. Elsevier Science, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotsanopoulos KV, Arvanitoyannis IS (2013) Membrane processing technology in the food industry: food processing, wastewater treatment, and effects on physical, microbiological, organoleptic, and nutritional properties of foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 55:1147–1175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee W, Okos MR (2011) Sustainable food processing systems: path to zero liquid discharge: reduction of water, waste and energy. Procedia Food Sci 1:1768–1777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipnizki F (2010) Cross-flow membrane applications in the food industry. In: Peinenmann K, Pereira Nunes S, Giorno L (eds) Membrane technology: membranes for food applications. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, Weinheim, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo J, Cao W, Ding L, Zhu Z, Wan Y, Jaffrin MY (2012) Treatment of dairy effluent by shear-enhanced membrane filtration: the role of foulants. Sep Purif Technol 96:194–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2011) The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol Earth Sci 15:1577–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DJ, Dreyer DR, Bielawski CW, Paul DR, Freeman BD (2017) Surface modification of water purification membranes. Angew Chem Int Ed 56:4662–4711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder M (1996) Basic principles of membrane technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • New Logic Research, Inc (2017) VSEP technology. http://www.vsep.com/technology/index.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2018

  • Noghabi MS, Razavi SM, Mousavvi SM, Elahi M, Miazmand R (2011) Effect of operating parameters on performance of nanofiltration of sugar beet press water. Procedia Food Sci 1:160–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pouliot Y, Conway V, Leclerc P-L (2014) Separation and concentration technologies in food processing. In: Clark S, Jung S, Lamsal B (eds) Food processing: principles and applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 33–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pujol D, Liu C, Gominho J, Olivella MA, Fiol N, Villaescusa I, Pereira H (2013) The chemical composition of exhausted coffee waste. Ind Crops Prod 50:423–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rattan S, Parande AK, Nagaraju VD, Ghiwari GK (2015) A comprehensive review on utilization of wastewater from coffee processing. Environ Sci and Pollut Res Int 22:6461–6472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rice EW, Barid RB, Eaton AD, Cleceri LS (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau RW (1987) Handbook of separation process technology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadr SM, Saroj DP (2015) Membrane technologies for municipal wastewater treatment. In: Basile A, Cassano A, Rastogi NK (eds) Advances in membrane technologies for water treatment. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 443–463

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shete BS, Shinkar NP (2013) Dairy industry wastewater sources, characteristics and its effects on environment. Int J Curr Eng Technol 3:1611–1615

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi W, Benjamin MM (2011) Effect of shear rate on fouling in a vibratory shear enhanced processing (VSEP) RO system. J Membr Sci 366:148–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slater CS, Savelski MJ, Kostetskyy P, Johnson M (2015) Shear-enhanced microfiltration of microalgae in a vibrating membrane module. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:1743–1755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks T, Chase G (2016) Filters and filtration handbook. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions (2017) Filtration and separation spectrum. https://www.suezwatertechnologies.com/kcpguest/document-library.do. Accessed 12 June 2017

  • U.S. Department of Energy (2011) Cooling towers: understanding key components of cooling towers and how to improve water efficiency. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/10/f3/waterfs_coolingtowers.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2018

  • Vourch M, Balannec B, Chaufer B, Dorange G (2008) Treatment of dairy wastewater by reverse osmosis for water reuse. Desalination 219:190–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski CM, Savelski MJ, Slater CS (2017) Membrane-based water recovery in coffee manufacture. Proc Water Environ Fed. https://doi.org/10.2175/193864717822155623

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the Pollution Prevention Grant Program (NP-96271316-1). The authors also acknowledge the Rowan Engineering Clinic students: Richard Bartell, John Borovilas, Don Dunner, Brandon Lawrence, and Andrew Warne. The authors also appreciate the support of Jim Barden, Fredéric Bodo, Daniel Donhowe, Erica Grun, John Morton, Mike Moscatiello, and Eugene Williford of Nestlé, USA. We would also like to thank Landon Graham of New Logic Research for his help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Stewart Slater.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wisniewski, C.M., Slater, C.S. & Savelski, M.J. Dynamic vibratory membrane processing for use in water recovery from soluble coffee product manufacturing wastewater. Clean Techn Environ Policy 20, 1791–1803 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1569-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1569-4

Keywords

Navigation