Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of the technical, microeconomic, and political impact of a carbon tax on carbon dioxide sequestration resulting from liquefied natural gas production

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With increasing attention to the environmental impact of discharging greenhouse gases (GHG) in general, and CO2 in particular, many are looking to carbon sequestration as an approach to reduce the carbon impact of stationary point sources of CO2. Although much of the focus has historically been on capturing and sequestering post-combustion CO2 from the burning of fossil fuels, there are many industrial processes that already require separation of CO2 that also contribute to GHG emissions. This CO2 can also be sequestered. One such process is the commercial production of liquefied natural gas, which necessitates the separation of CO2 from the hydrocarbon for liquefaction; resulting in a relatively pure CO2 stream which can be sequestered. The Gorgon project is one such commercial project. In the broader political environment of Australia’s carbon tax system and government grants to offset the capital investment in carbon abatement technologies, the economics of the Gorgon project can be analyzed to determine the technical and economic parameters that make the carbon sequestration more or less feasible for this self-contained project. These findings can then be applied to any such project where a pure CO2 is a necessary by-product and a carbon tax is either in effect or being considered. This analysis is the primary objective of this article. In this context, a computer-based simulator was developed to analyze the impact of technical, market, and public policy factors on project economics. A base case was developed using the current project parameters and a number of alternative scenarios were then developed. Sensitivity analyses were conducted and a “best case” scenario was developed to look at what the appetite for investment could be to improve the sequestration of CO2. The article demonstrates that CCS project competitiveness can be simulated to analyze the impact of key technological, market, and policy changes on the project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antle JM, Capalbo SM, Paustian K, Ali MK (2007) Estimating the economic potential for agricultural soil carbon sequestration in the central United States using an aggregate econometric-process simulation model. Clim Change 80:145–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopaghyay A (2010) Amine vs. ammonia absorption of CO2 as a measure of reducing GHG emission: a critical analysis. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13:269–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battersby A (2011) Australia’s climate tax will hit LNG. Upstream, 15th July

  • Beatty A, Millar I, Flynn M (2009) The Gorgon project: legal and policy issues. Baker & McKenzie Think Piece, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghout N, van den Broek M, Faaij A (2013) Techno-economic performance and challenges of applying CO2 capture in the industry: a case study of five industrial plants. Int J Greenh Gas Control 17:259–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blondes MS, Schuenemeyer JH, Olea RA, Drew LJ (2013) Aggregation of carbon dioxide sequestration assessment units. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:1839–1859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbon Storage Taskforce (2009) National carbon mapping and infrastructure plan—Australia: Full Report. ISBN 978-1-921516-75-7

  • Chevron (2005) Gorgon project: CO2 seismic baseline survey. ABN: 29,086,197,757

  • Chevron (2011) Annual report and first quarter results. http://investor.chevron.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=130102&p=irol-reportsOther. Last Accessed 30 April 2012

  • Chevron (2014) Gorgon project: overview. http://www.chevronaustralia.com/docs/default-source/default-document-library/fact-sheet-gorgon-project-overview. Last Accessed 6 Feb 2014

  • Chevron Australia (2014). http://www.chevronaustralia.com/our-businesses/gorgon. Last Accessed 16 Feb 2014

  • Chevron Factsheet, Gorgon project: Gorgon subsea configuration. http://www.chevronaustralia.com/Libraries/Chevron_Documents/Factsheet_Subsea_Configuration.pdf.sflb.ashx. Last Accessed 12 Sept 2013

  • Clean Air Act (2004) Risks from greenhouse gas emissions: hearing before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, 107th Congress, 2nd session on the economic and environmental risks associated with increasing greenhouse gas emissions

  • CO2-CRC Report, Gorgon executive summary. http://www.co2crc.com.au/dls/pubs/co2tech/Gorgon_Executive_Summary.pdf. Last Accessed 22 Sept 2013

  • Corsten M, Ramirez A, Shen L, Koornneef J, Faaij A (2013) Environmental impact assessment of CCS chains—lessons learned and limitations from LCA literature. Int J Greenh Gas Control 13:59–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CSLF Secretariat (2011) Strategic Plan Implementation Report. Report from the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum, February 2011

  • Cuevas-Cubria C, Schultz A, Petchey R, Beaini F, New R (2011) Energy in Australia. Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism, Commonwealth of Australia. ISSN 1833-038

  • Di Lorenzo GD, Barbera P, Ruggieri G, Witton J, Pilidis P, Probert D (2013) Pre-combustion carbon-capture technologies for power generation: an engineering-economic assessment. Int J Energy Res 37:389–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elms RD, El-Halwagi MM (2010) The effects of greenhouse gas policy on the design and scheduling of biodiesel plants with multiple feedstocks. Clean Technol Environ Policy 12:547–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Administration [EIA] (2011) Annual energy outlook 2011. US Department of Energy, Washington DC; DOE/EIA-0383

  • England JR, May B, Raison RJ, Paul KI (2013) Cradle-to-grave inventory of wood production from Australian plantations and native hardwood forests: carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions. For Ecol Manag 302:295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlund J, Nduagu E, Romao I, Zevenhoven R (2010) A stepwise process for carbon dioxide sequestration using magnesium silicates. Front Chem Eng China 4(2):133–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang B, Liang Q, Wei Y, Liu L (2011) CO2 emission abatement technology and impact analysis. Energy economics: CO2 emissions in China. Springer, New York, vol 7, p 161–195

  • Fehr M, Costa ALS, Martins AP, Oliviera PCA, Silva MKA (2011) Pragmatic policy options for monitoring the movement of carbon dioxide derived from fossil and bio-fuels. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13:63–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flett M, Beacher G, Brantjes J, Burt A, Dauth C, Koelmeyer F, Lawrence R, Leigh S, McKenna J, Gurton R, Robinson WF, Tankersley T (2008) Gorgon project—subsurface evaluation of carbon dioxide disposal under Barrow Island. In: Proceedings from Society of Petroleum Engineers Asia Pacific oil and gas conference, p 1022–1043

  • Flett M, Brantjes J, Gurton R, McKenna J, Tankersley T, Trupp M (2009) Subsurface development of CO2 disposal for the Gorgon project. Energy Proc 1(1):3031–3038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gorgon Joint Venture (2005) Chapter 13: Greenhouse gas emissions—risks and management. Draft environmental impact statement/environmental reviews and management programme for the Gorgon development. ISBN 0-9757659-0-6

  • Ha-dong M, Keith DW (2003) Carbon storage: the economic efficiency of storing CO2 in leaky reservoirs. Clean Technol Environ Policy 5:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey C (2011) Options for permitting early CCS projects. Talking process: steps for developing regulatory frameworks for CCS demonstration and commercial deployment. International energy agency workshop, 18 July 2011

  • Holloway S (2008) Chapter 4: Sequestration—the underground storage of carbon dioxide. Climate change and energy pathways for the Mediterranean. Springer, Dordrecht, p 61–88

  • Huang Y, Rebennack S, Zheng QP (2013) Techno-economic analysis and optimization models for carbon capture and storage: a survey. Energy Syst 4(4):315–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingerwersen WW, Garmestani AS, Gonzalez MA, Templeton JJ (2013) A systems perspective on responses to climate change. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0577-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Jana BK, Biswas S, Majumder M, Sonkar S, Roy P, Mazumdar A (2010) Chapter 16: Conservation of natural resource with the application of carbon sequestration and carbon economy. Impact of climate change on natural resource management. Springer, Heidelberg, p 295–309

  • Jensen JT (2011) Asian natural gas markets: supply, infrastructure, and pricing issues. Paper presented at the 2011 Pacific energy summit: unlocking the potential of natural gas in the Asia Pacific, Jakarta, 21–23 Feb 2011

  • Johnston P, Santillo D, Stringer R, Parmentier R, Hare B, Krueger M (1999) Sequestration of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel production and use: an overview of rationale, techniques and implications. Environ Sci Pollut Res 6(4):245–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller K, McInerney D, Bradford DF (2008) Carbon dioxide sequestration: how much and when? Clim Change 88:267–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koroneos CJ, Rovas DC (2010) Chapter 16: Carbon sequestration: a comparative analysis. Global warming, clean energy & technology. Springer, New York, p 281–294

  • Krahe M, Heidug W, Ward J, Smale R (2013) From demonstration to deployment: an economic analysis of support policies for carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 60:753–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuramochi T, Ramirez A, Turkenburg W, Faaij A (2013) Techno-economic prospects for CO2 capture from distributed energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 19:328–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyoto Protocol (2005) Assessing the status of efforts to reduce greenhouse gases: hearing before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, 109th congress, first session

  • Leamon G (2011) Site selection—Gorgon carbon dioxide injection project, Geoscience Australia, CCS in CDM Workshop, Abu Dhabi

  • Liu J (2011) CCS projects in Western Australia—Gorgon and Collie Hub. Department of Mines and Petroleum, Government of Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzolini G, Macchi E, Gazzani M (2013) CO2 capture in natural gas combined cycle with SEWGS. Part B: economic assessment. Int J Greenh Gas Control 12:502–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Najjar YSH (2008) Modern and appropriate technologies for the reduction of gaseous pollutants and their effects on the environment. Clean Technol Environ Policy 10:269–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1) (2010) Advancing the science of climate change. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2) (2010) Verifying greenhouse gas emissions: methods to support international climate agreements. Committee methods for estimating greenhouse gas emissions. National Research Council (U.S.)

  • Ng KS, Zhang N, Sadhukhan J (2013) Techno-economic analysis of polygeneration systems with carbon capture and storage and CO2 re-use. Chem Eng J 219:96–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ooi R, Foo D, Ng D, Tan R (2013) Planning of carbon capture and storage with pinch analysis techniques. Chem Eng Res Des 91:2721–2731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rai V, Victor DG, Thurber MC (2010) Carbon capture and storage at scale: lessons from the growth of analogous energy technologies. Energy Policy 38:4089–4098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravanchi MT, Sahebdelfar S, Zangeneh FT (2011) Carbon dioxide sequestration in petrochemical industries with the aim of reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Front Chem Sci Eng 5(2):173–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saygin D, van den Broek M, Ramirez M, Patel MK, Worrell E (2013) Modelling the future of CO2 abatement potentials of energy efficiency and CCS: the case of the Dutch industry. Int J Greenh Gas Control 18:23–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott R (2011) Case study: the Gorgon CO2 injection project, Gorgon CO2 injection project, Chevron. http://ww.cagsinfo.net/pdfs/workshop1/session7b-3.pdf. Last Accessed 16 Feb 2014

  • Shukri T, Wheeler F (2004) LNG technology selection. Hydrocarb Eng 2:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikdar SK (2009) Quo vadis energy sustainability? Clean Technol Environ Policy 11:367–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson J (2009) Climate change science high quality greenhouse gas emissions data are a cornerstone of programs to address climate change: testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, GAO-09-423T

  • Theobald N (2006) The world’s most significant gas fields. 23rd World gas conference, Amsterdam. http://www.igu.org/html/wgc2006/pdf/paper/add12639.pdf. Last Accessed 16 Feb 2014

  • Valbuena E, Barrufet M, Falcone G (2012) Analytical estimation of CO2 storage capacity in depleted oil and gas reservoirs based on thermodynamic state functions. Society of Petroleum Engineers Latin America and Caribbean petroleum engineering conference, SPE153307

  • Wall Street Journal (2012) Crisis in Japan transforms global natural gas market. February 13th edition

  • Young WS (2012) Gorgon project downstream execution overview. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9MTU0NTAwfENoaWxkSUQ9LTF8VHlwZT0z&t=1. Last Accessed 16 Feb 2014

  • Zahid U, Lee U, An J, Lim Y, Han C (2013) Economic analysis for the transport and storage of captured carbon dioxide in South Korea. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. doi:10.1002/ep

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Li Y, Xu T, Qlang W, Xiao S (2006) The effect of carbon dioxide leakage on fractures, and water quality of potable aquifers during geological sequestration of CO2. Chin J Geochem 25(Suppl):58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Zhu B, Fuss S, Szolgayová J, Obersteiner M, Fei W (2010) Uncertainty modeling of CCS investment strategy in China’s power sector. Appl Energy 87(7):2392–2400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L, Chen WY, Zhang XL, Qi TY (2013) Simulation and economic analysis of indirect coal to liquid technology coupling carbon capture and storage. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:9871–9878. doi:10.1021/ie301748m

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chemical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3122, USA

    Rasha Hasaneen

  2. Petroleum Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3116, USA

    Nesreen A. Elsayed & Maria A. Barrufet

Authors
  1. Rasha Hasaneen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nesreen A. Elsayed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria A. Barrufet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rasha Hasaneen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasaneen, R., Elsayed, N.A. & Barrufet, M.A. Analysis of the technical, microeconomic, and political impact of a carbon tax on carbon dioxide sequestration resulting from liquefied natural gas production. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16, 1597–1613 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0735-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0735-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation