Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance and energy calculation on a green cementitious material composed of coal refuse

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coal refuse as industrial solid waste has become great threats to the environment. To activate coal refuse is one practical solution to recycle this huge amount of solid waste as substitute for ordinary Portland cement (OPC). Compared with conventional cement production, successful development of this new material could potentially save energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, recycle vast amount of coal wastes, and significantly reduce production cost. Coal refuse was confirmed as a pozzolanic material, which enhances its durability performance. In this experiment, 60 % of the OPC was substituted with the pozzolana mixture (30 % coal refuse + 25 % slag + 5 % FGD gypsum), which is an optimal solution for the creation of good-performance cementitious material. Compared with OPC, the 60 % pozzolana blended sample has a much higher resistance to the alkali-silica reaction and Cl ion penetration. In addition, microanalyses of the activated coal refuse by XRD demonstrated that some of the mineral phase changes in coal refuse were related to the performance of the cementitious material. For example, the transformation of kaolinite into metakaolin and the dehydroxylation of muscovite enhance the resistance of the cementitious material to the alkali-silica reaction and Cl penetration, respectively. Compared with conventional cement production by calculation, successful development of a new thermal activation process (800 °C) to convert coal refuse into desirable pozzolanic material for producing the new material would potentially save energy around by about 50 %, reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 67 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI Committee 232 (2003) Use of flyash in concrete (ACI 232.2R-03). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, p 41

  • ASCE (2009) America’s infrastructure report card

  • Brand R, Pulles T, Van Gijlswijk R, Fribourg-Blanc B, Courbet C (2004) European pollutant emission register. Final report

  • Choate W (2003) Energy and emission reduction opportunities for the cement industry. US Department of Energy, Washington

  • Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER) (2002) Coal waste impoundments: risks, responses, and alternatives

  • Fagerlund G (1977) The international cooperative test of the critical degree of saturation method of assessing freeze/thaw resistance of concrete. Mater Struct 10:56

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouad FH, Copham CA, Donovan JM (1998) Evaluation of concrete containing fly ash with high carbon content and/or small amounts of wood. Department of civil engineering, The University of Alabama, Birmingham

  • Glasser FP (1996) Properties of cement waste composite. Waste Manage 6:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokce A, Nagataki S, Hisada M, Saeki M (2000) Durability of recycled aggregate concretes subjected to freezing and thawing: impact of crushed concrete characteristics. II. In: International symposium, cement and concrete technology in the 2000s, vol 1, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 371–81

  • Gokce A, Nagataki S, Saeki T, Hisada M (2011) Identification of frost-susceptible recycled concrete aggregates for durability of concrete. Constr Build Mater 25(5):2426–2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guneyisi E, Gesoglu M (2008) A study on durability properties of high-performance concretes incorporating high replacement levels of slag. Mater Struct 40(3):479–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan Z (2001) Binding of external chloride by cement pastes. PhD thesis, Department of Building Materials, University of Toronto, Canada

  • Helmuth R (1987) Fly ash in cement and concrete. Portland Cement Association, Skokie

  • Hendrik van Oss G (2009) U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral commodity summaries, p 40

  • Kan A, Demirboga R (2009) A novel material for lightweight concrete production. Cem Concr Compos 31(7):489–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HS, Lee SH, Moon HY (2007) Strength properties and durability aspects of high strength concrete using Korean metakaolin. Constr Build Mater 21(6):1229–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucharczyková B, Keršner Z, Pospíchal O, Misák P, Daněk P, Schmid P (2012) The porous aggregate pre-soaking in relation to the freeze–thaw resistance of lightweight aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater 30:761–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Song X, Gong C, Pan Z (2006) Research on cementitious behavior and mechanism of pozzolanic cement with coal gangue. Cem Concr Res 36:1752–1759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe I, Mansfield D (2002) Toward a sustainable cement industry. Environment, health and safety performance improvement. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, p 2

  • Mazzucato E, Artioli G, Gualtieri A (1999) High temperature dehydroxylation of muscovite-2M1: a kinetic study by in situ XRPD. Phys Chem Miner 26(5):375–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM (2006) Concrete: microstructure, properties, and materials, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Mukherjee A, Pathak S (2003) Investigation of hydraulic activity of ground granulated blast furnace slag in concrete. Cem Concr Res 33(9):1481–1486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regourd M (1995) Cement Portland hydration—hydraulic concrete: knowledge and practice. ENPC, Paris (in French)

  • Sun H, Yao Y (2012) Research and development of a new silica-alumina based cementitious material largely using coal refuse for mine backfill, mine sealing and waste disposal stabilization. Department of Energy. http://www.osti.gov/bridge/purl.cover.jsp?purl=/1048945/

  • Suryavanshi AK, Scantlebury JD, Lyon SB (1996) Mechanism of Friedel’s salt formation in cements rich in tri-calcium aluminate. Cem Concr Res 26(5):717–727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2008) Coal refuse, materials characterization paper

  • U.S. EPA (2011) Materials characterization paper in support of the final rulemaking: identification of nonhazardous materials that are solid waste-coal refuse

  • Vuorinen J (1969) On the behaviour of hardened concrete during freezing. The State Institute for Technical Research, Finland, Publication 145

  • Wang SZ, Llamazos E, Baxter L, Fonseca F (2008) Durability of biomass fly ash concrete: freezing and thawing and rapid chloride permeability tests. Fuel 87(3):359–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wesche K (1991) Fly ash in concrete: properties and performance. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens U, Schiessl P (1997) Chloride binding of cement paste containing fly ash. In: Justnes H (ed) Proceedings of the 10th ICCC. Goteborg, Sweden, pp 4–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods H (1968) Durability of concrete construction. American Concrete Institution, Detroit

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrell E, Galitsky C (2008) Energy efficiency improvement and cost saving opportunities for cement making—an ENERGY STAR guide for energy and plant managers

  • Yao Y, Sun H (2012a) A novel silica alumina-based backfill material composed of coal refuse and fly ash. J Hazard Mater 213–214:71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Sun H (2012b) Characterization of a new silica alumina-based backfill material utilizing large quantities of coal combustion byproducts. Fuel 97:329–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Sun H (2012c) Durability and leaching analysis of a cementitious material composed of high volume coal combustion byproducts. Constr Build Mater 36:97–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Sun H (2012d) Improvements on pozzolanic reactivity of coal refuse by thermal activation. Environ Pollut 01(2):33–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zanazzi P, Pavese A (2002) Behavior of micas at high pressure and high temperature. Rev Miner Geochem 6(1):99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Sun H, Liu M, Zhang J (2009) Early-age characteristics of red mud–coal gangue cementitious material. J Hazard Mater 167(1–3):927–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Sun H, Sun Y, Zhang N (2010) Correlation between 29 Si polymerization and cementitious activity of coal gangue. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 10(9):1334–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Liu M, Sun H, Li L (2011) Pozzolanic behaviour of compound-activated red mud–coal gangue mixture. Cem Concr Res 41(3):270–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from US Department of Energy (DOE-DE-EE0003496), internal funding from Pacific Resources Research Center for performing this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Yao.

Additional information

Y. Yao and Y. Li contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yao, Y., Li, Y., Liu, X. et al. Performance and energy calculation on a green cementitious material composed of coal refuse. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16, 281–290 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0620-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0620-8

Keywords

Navigation