Skip to main content
Log in

A previously documented Neisseria macacae isolate providing a false-positive result with Roche cobas 4800 CT/NG does not cross-react with the later generation cobas 6800 CT/NG assay

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

Table 1 provides all data for this study.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Bromhead C, Miller A, Jones M, Whiley D (2013) Comparison of the cobas 4800 CT/NG test with culture for detecting Neisseria gonorrhoeae in genital and nongenital specimens in a low-prevalence population in New Zealand. J Clin Microbiol 51:1505–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Field N, Clifton S, Alexander S, Ison CA, Hughes G, Beddows S et al (2015) Confirmatory assays are essential when using molecular testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in low-prevalence settings: insights from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). Sex Transm Infect 91:338–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Perry MD, Jones RN, Corden SA (2014) Is confirmatory testing of Roche cobas 4800 CT/NG test Neisseria gonorrhoeae positive samples required? Comparison of the Roche cobas 4800 CT/NG test with an opa/pap duplex assay for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Infect 90:303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith DW, Tapsall JW, Lum G (2005) Guidelines for the use and interpretation of nucleic acid detection tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Australia: a position paper on behalf of the Public Health Laboratory Network. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep 29:358–365

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tabrizi SN, Unemo M, Limnios AE, Hogan TR, Hjelmevoll SO, Garland SM et al (2011) Evaluation of six commercial nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and other Neisseria species. J Clin Microbiol 49:3610–3615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Upton A, Bromhead C, Whiley DM (2013) Neisseria gonorrhoeae false-positive result obtained from a pharyngeal swab by using the Roche cobas 4800 CT/NG assay in New Zealand in 2012. J Clin Microbiol 51:1609–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Whiley DM, Lahra MM (2015) National Neisseria Network. Review of 2005 Public Health Laboratory Network Neisseria gonorrhoeae nucleic acid amplification tests guidelines. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep 39:E42–E45

    Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae-2014. MMWR Recomm Rep 63(RR-02):1–19.

  9. Schachter J, Moncada J, Liska S, Shayevich C, Klausner JD (2008) Nucleic acid amplification tests in the diagnosis of chlamydial and gonococcal infections of the oropharynx and rectum in men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis 35:637–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pryce TM, Hiew VJ, Haygarth EJ, Whiley DM (2021) Second- and third-generation commercial Neisseria gonorrhoeae screening assays and the ongoing issues of false-positive results and confirmatory testing. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 40:67–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Olivia R. Foti for performing the cobas testing and collation of results.

Funding

All funding was internal (PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA) and there were no external funding sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TP: conceptualisation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft. CB: conceptualisation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing. DW: conceptualisation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd M. Pryce.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable as is a quality exercise: according to the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007 (updated May 2015) by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council and Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee.

Consent to participate

Not applicable (as above).

Consent for publication

Not applicable (as above).

Conflict of interest

TP: none. CB: reports educational funding from Roche Diagnostics New Zealand Ltd. DW: reports research funding from SpeeDx Pty Ltd.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pryce, T.M., Bromhead, C. & Whiley, D.M. A previously documented Neisseria macacae isolate providing a false-positive result with Roche cobas 4800 CT/NG does not cross-react with the later generation cobas 6800 CT/NG assay. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 42, 121–123 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-022-04519-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-022-04519-z

Navigation