Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Secular trends in the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis at a referral center (2007–2018)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze the epidemiological and clinical changes in EFIE. All definite IE episodes treated at a referral center between 2007 and 2018 were registered prospectively, and a trend test was used to study etiologies over time. EFIE cases were divided into three periods, and clinical differences between them were analyzed. All episodes of E. faecalis monomicrobial bacteremia (EFMB) between 2010 and 2018 and the percentage of echocardiograms performed were retrospectively collected. Six hundred forty-eight IE episodes were studied. We detected an increase in the percentage of EFIE (15% in 2007, 25.3% in 2018, P = 0.038), which became the most prevalent causative agent of IE during the last study period. One hundred and eight EFIE episodes were analyzed (2007–2010, n = 30; 2011–2014, n = 22; 2015–2018, n = 56). The patients in the last period were older (median 70.9 vs 66.5 vs 76.3 years, P = 0.015) and more frequently had an abdominal origin of EFIE (20% vs 13.6% vs 42.9%, P = 0.014), fewer indications for surgery (63.3% vs 54.6% vs 32.1%, P = 0.014), and non-significantly lower in-hospital mortality (30% vs 18.2% vs 12.5%, P = 0.139). There was an increase in the percentage of echocardiograms performed in patients with EFMB (30% in 2010, 51.2% in 2018, P = 0.014) and EFIE diagnoses (15% in 2010, 32.6% in 2018, P = 0.004). E. faecalis is an increasing cause of IE in our center, most likely due to an increase in the percentage of echocardiograms performed. The factors involved in clinical changes in EFIE should be thoroughly studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Selton-Suty C, Célard M, Le Moing V et al (2012) Preeminence of Staphylococcus aureus in infective endocarditis: a 1-year population-based survey. Clin Infect Dis 54:1230–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chirouze C, Athan E, Alla F et al (2013) Enterococcal endocarditis in the beginning of the 21st century: analysis from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:1140–1147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Muñoz P, Kestler M, De Alarcon A et al (2015) Current epidemiology and outcome of infective endocarditis. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernández-Hidalgo N, Almirante B, Tornos P et al (2008) Contemporary epidemiology and prognosis of health care–associated infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 47:1287–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright A, Otome O, Harvey C, Bowe S, Athan E (2018) The current epidemiology of injecting drug use-associated infective endocarditis in Victoria, Australia in the midst of increasing crystal methamphetamine use. Heart Lung Circ 27:484–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Olmos C, Vilacosta I, Fernández-Pérez C et al (2017) The evolving nature of infective endocarditis in Spain: a population-based study (2003 to 2014). J Am Coll Cardiol 70:2795–2804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Østergaard L, Bruun NE, Voldstedlund M et al (2019) Prevalence of infective endocarditis in patients with positive blood cultures: a Danish nationwide study. Eur Heart J 40:3237–3244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dahl A, Iversen K, Tonder N et al (2019) Prevalence of infective endocarditis in Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia. J Am Coll Cardiol 74:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernández-Hidalgo N, Escolà-Vergé L (2019) Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia: consider an echocardiography, but consult an infectious diseases specialist. J Am Coll Cardiol 74:202–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Habib G, Erba PA, Iung B et al (2019) Clinical presentation, aetiology and outcome of infective endocarditis. Results of the ESC-EORP EURO-ENDO (European infective endocarditis) registry: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J 40:3222–3232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pizzi MN, Roque A, Fernández-Hidalgo N et al (2015) Improving the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in prosthetic valves and intracardiac devices with 18F-Fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography angiography: initial results at an infective endocarditis referral center. Circulation 132:1113–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Escolà-Vergé L, Peghin M, Givone F et al (2020) Prevalence of colorectal disease in Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis: results of an observational multicenter study. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 73(9):711–717

  13. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N et al (2000) Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 30:633–638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ et al (2015) 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: the task force for the management of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J 36:3075–3128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Benito N, Miró JM, de Lazzari E et al (2009) Health care–associated native valve endocarditis in patients with no history of injection drug use: current importance of non-nosocomial acquisition. Ann Intern Med 150:586–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Horstkotte D (2004) Guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis executive summary the task force on infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 25:267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Habib G, Hoen B, Tornos P et al (2009) Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009): the task force on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and by the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC) for infection and cancer. Eur Heart J 30:2369–2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC et al (2003) 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med 31:1250–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kellum JA, Levin N, Bouman C, Lameire N (2002) Developing a consensus classification system for acute renal failure. Curr Opin Crit Care 8:509–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bouza E, Kestler M, Beca T et al (2015) The NOVA score: a proposal to reduce the need for transesophageal echocardiography in patients with enterococcal bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 60:528–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Berge A, Krantz A, Östlund H, Nauclér P, Rasmussen M (2019) The DENOVA score efficiently identifies patients with monomicrobial Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia where echocardiography is not necessary. Infection 47:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Forestier E, Roubaud-Baudron C, Fraisse T et al (2019) Comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients suffering from infective endocarditis. A prospective multicentric cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 25:1246–1252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fernández-Hidalgo N, Almirante B, Gavaldà J et al (2013) Ampicillin plus ceftriaxone is as effective as ampicillin plus gentamicin for treating Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 56:1261–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Escolà-Vergé L, Fernández-Hidalgo N, Rodríguez-Pardo D et al (2019) Teicoplanin for treating enterococcal infective endocarditis: a retrospective observational study from a referral centre in Spain. Int J Antimicrob Agents 53:165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fernández-Hidalgo N, Almirante B, Tornos P et al (2011) Prognosis of left-sided infective endocarditis in patients transferred to a tertiary-care hospital--prospective analysis of referral bias and influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect 17:769–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

L. Escolà-Vergé has a Río Hortega contract in the call 2018 Strategic Action Health from Instituto de Salud Carlos III of Spanish Health Ministry for the years 2019-2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuria Fernández-Hidalgo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval, consent to participate, and consent to publish

This study was approved by the ethics committee of HUVH [PR(AG)356/2019]. Informed consent to participate and to publish from patients was not required according to the ethics committee.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Escolà-Vergé, L., Fernández-Hidalgo, N., Larrosa, M.N. et al. Secular trends in the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis at a referral center (2007–2018). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 40, 1137–1148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04117-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04117-x

Keywords

Navigation