Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of rapid polymerase chain reaction-based organism identification of gram-positive cocci for patients with a single positive blood culture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For patients with a single-positive blood culture growing gram-positive cocci, organism identification can provide supportive information for differentiating contamination from infection. We investigated the effect of a rapid blood culture identification panel (BCID) on vancomycin-prescribing patterns and patient outcomes for single positive blood culture (PBC) growing gram-positive cocci. Adult patients with single-positive blood culture growing gram-positive cocci with conventional organism identification (pre-BCID) were compared with organism identification by BCID (post-BCID). Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) review of PBC was performed in both study groups. Vancomycin prescribing patterns were studied. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of nephrotoxicity, length of stay (LOS), readmission rate, mortality, and hospital costs. A total of 188 patients (86 pre-BCID, 102 post-BCID) were included. Organism identification was known 21 h sooner in the post-BCID group (P < 0.001). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most commonly isolated organisms (73%). In patients where vancomycin was deemed unnecessary (n = 133), vancomycin use (51% pre-BCID vs 36% post-BCID; P = 0.09) and time from culture positivity to vancomycin discontinuation (1.5 vs. 1.7 days; P = 0.92) did not differ between groups. We found no differences in the development of nephrotoxicity, LOS, readmission, mortality, or hospital costs. Earlier identification of single positive blood culture growing gram-positive cocci did not significantly influence prescribing patterns of vancomycin. However, baseline antimicrobial stewardship review of single positive blood culture growing gram-positive cocci may have lessened the opportunity for detectable differences. Larger studies, accounting for the impact of ASP intervention, should be performed to determine the value of each individual component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall KK, Lyman JA (2006) Updated review of blood culture contamination. Clin Microbiol Rev 19(4):788–802

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker K, Heilmann C, Peters G (2014) Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 27(4):870–926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Beekmann SE, Diekema DJ, Doern GV (2005) Determining the clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26(6):559–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bekeris LG, Tworek JA, Walsh MK, Valenstein PN (2005) Trends in blood culture contamination: a College of American Pathologists Q-tracks study of 356 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129(10):1222–1225

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Souvenir D, Anderson DE Jr, Palpant S, Mroch H, Askin S, Anderson J et al (1998) Blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci: antisepsis, pseudobacteremia, and therapy of patients. J Clin Microbiol 36(7):1923–1926

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Holland TL, Arnold C, Fowler VG, Jr. Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a review. JAMA 2014;312(13):1330–1341

  7. Tamma PD, Avdic E, Li DX, Dzintars K, Cosgrove SE (2017) Association of adverse events with antibiotic use in hospitalized patients. JAMA Intern Med 177(9):1308–1315

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Timbrook TT, Morton JB, McConeghy KW, Caffrey AR, Mylonakis E, LaPlante KL (2016) The effect of molecular rapid diagnostic testing on clinical outcomes in bloodstream infections: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis

  9. Bauer KA, Perez KK, Forrest GN, Goff DA (2014) Review of rapid diagnostic tests used by antimicrobial stewardship programs. Clin Infect Dis 59(Suppl 3):S134–S145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blaschke AJ, Heyrend C, Byington CL, Fisher MA, Barker E, Garrone NF et al (2012) Rapid identification of pathogens from positive blood cultures by multiplex polymerase chain reaction using the FilmArray system. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 74(4):349–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, Mohapatra S, Casellas JM, Goossens H et al (2004) International prospective study of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: implications of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in nosocomial infections. Ann Intern Med 140(1):26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P (2004) Acute dialysis quality initiative w. acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the second international consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality initiative (ADQI) group. Crit Care 8(4):R204–R212

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Alahmadi YM, Aldeyab MA, McElnay JC, Scott MG, Darwish Elhajji FW, Magee FA et al (2011) Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital setting. J Hosp Infect 77(3):233–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Heijden YF, Miller G, Wright PW, Shepherd BE, Daniels TL, Talbot TR (2011) Clinical impact of blood cultures contaminated with coagulase-negative staphylococci at an academic medical center. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 32(6):623–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Buehler SS, Madison B, Snyder SR, Derzon JH, Cornish NE, Saubolle MA et al (2016) Effectiveness of practices to increase timeliness of providing targeted therapy for inpatients with bloodstream infections: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Rev 29:59–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. MacVane SH, Nolte FS (2016) Benefits of adding a rapid PCR-based blood culture identification panel to an established antimicrobial stewardship program. J Clin Microbiol 54(10):2455–2463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wong JR, Bauer KA, Mangino JE, Goff DA (2012) Antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist interventions for coagulase-negative staphylococci positive blood cultures using rapid polymerase chain reaction. Ann Pharmacother 46:1484–1490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nagel JL, Huang AM, Kunapuli A, Gandhi TN, Washer LL, Lassiter J et al (2014) Impact of antimicrobial stewardship intervention on coagulase-negative staphylococcus blood cultures in conjunction with rapid diagnostic testing. J Clin Microbiol 52(8):2849–2854

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pardo J, Klinker KP, Borgert SJ, Butler BM, Giglio PG, Rand KH (2016) Clinical and economic impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions with the FilmArray blood culture identification panel. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 84:159–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rupp ME, Cavalieri RJ, Marolf C, Lyden E (2017) Reduction in blood culture contamination through use of initial specimen diversion device. Clin Infect Dis

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the Medical University of South Carolina Clinical Microbiology Laboratory for their assistance.

Funding

This work was a part of our routine work. No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn H. MacVane.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

SHM is a current employee and shareholder of the Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB).

Informed consent

A waiver of informed consent was granted by the IRB.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 228 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacVane, S.H., Raux, B.R. & Smith, T.T. Evaluation of rapid polymerase chain reaction-based organism identification of gram-positive cocci for patients with a single positive blood culture. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 38, 1471–1479 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03574-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03574-3

Keywords

Navigation