Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

DYMUS-Hr self-assessment questionnaire (Croatian version) for dysphagia in multiple sclerosis-validity, reliability, and cross-cultural adaptation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of dysphagia in the early phases of multiple sclerosis is 30–40%, with an estimated of 30% of cases going undiagnosed cases. Such complications can lead to malnutrition, dehydration, and aspiration pneumonia and have a great impact on the quality of life and psychosocial status of a person with MS. The aim of this study was the validation of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis self-assessment questionnaire (DYMUS) in the Croatian language.

Methods and patients

The cross-cultural adaptation process included a back-forward translation technique of the English language version of DYMUS to the Croatian language, with pilot testing on 30 participants. The validity and reliability of the Croatian version of DYMUS (DYMUS-Hr) was applied to 106 MS patients, with comparison to the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT10), the Water Swallowing Test (WST), and a dichotomous self-assessment question. In the assessment of test-retest reliability, 99 MS patients were included.

Results

Internal consistency of DYMUS-Hr was very good (Cronbach’s alpha—0.837); Cronbach’s alpha was 0.819 for the “dysphagia for solids”, and 0.562 for “dysphagia for liquids” subscale. A significant correlation (p < 0.001) was found between DYMUS-Hr and EAT10 (Spearman’s rho—0.787), and WST (Spearman’s rho—0.483). Construct validity was assessed with the self-assessment question and interpreted with the Mann–Whitney U test. Test-retest reliability showed moderate to substantial Cohen’s Kappa reliability for each item.

Conclusion

DYMUS-Hr is a valid and reliable screening assessment tool for patients with MS. There is a general lack of awareness about dysphagia symptoms among patients with MS; consequently, this disorder receives inadequate attention and often goes untreated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data supporting this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Kurtzke J (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pauw A de, Dejaeger E, C BD, Carton H (2002) Dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 104:345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0303-8467(02)00053-7

  3. Guan XL, Wang H, Huang HS, Meng L (2015) Prevalence of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 36:671–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2067-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calgano P, Ruoppolo G, Grasso MG et al (2002) Dysphagia in multiple sclerosis - prevalence and prognostic factors. Acta Neurol Scand 105:40–43. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.10062.x

  5. Alfonsi E, Bergamaschi R, Cosentino G et al (2013) Electrophysiological patterns of oropharyngeal swallowing in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol 124:1638–1645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.03.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aghaz A, Alidad A, Hemmati E et al (2018) Prevalence of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis and its related factors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Neurol 17:180–188

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Barzegar M, Mirmosayeb O, Rezaei M et al (2022) Prevalence and risk factors of dysphagia in patients with multiple sclerosis. Dysphagia 37:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10245-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sales DS, Alvarenga RM, Cf Vasconcelos C et al (2013) (2013) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the DYMUS questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Springerplus 2:332. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-332

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Printza A, Kalaitzi M, Bakirtzis C et al (2018) Reliability and validity of the DYMUS questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis (Greek version) and proposed modification. Mult Scler Relat Disord 23:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2018.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sadeghi Z, Ghoreishi ZS, Flowers H et al (2021) Depression, anxiety, and stress relative to swallowing impairment in persons with multiple sclerosis. Dysphagia 36:902–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10207-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tahir E, Kavaz E, Kemal Ö et al (2020) Screening of dysphagia by DYMUS (Dysphagia in multiple sclerosis) and SWALQoL (Swallowing quality of life) surveys in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 45:102397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2020.102397

  12. Bergamaschi R, Crivelli P, Rezzani C et al (2008) The DYMUS questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 269:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2007.12.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pajouh SD, Moradi N, Yazdi MJS et al (2017) Diagnostic evaluation of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis patients using a Persian version of DYMUS questionnaire. Mult Scler Relat Disord 17:240–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2017.08.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grasso MG, Gamberini G, Patti F et al (2021) The dysphagia in multiple sclerosis questionnaire correlates with fiber-optic endoscopic examination for detecting swallowing deficits in MS. Dysphagia 36:192–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10119-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ et al (2008) Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Annals Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117(12):919–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940811701210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McHorney CA, Robbins JA, Lomax K et al (2002) The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia 17:97–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-001-0109-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bergamaschi R, Rezzani C, Amato MP et al (2009) Validation of the DYMUS questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Funct Neurol 24:159–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alali D, Ballard K, Vucic S, Bogaardt H (2018) Dysphagia in multiple sclerosis: evaluation and validation of the DYMUS questionnaire. Dysphagia 33:273–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9864-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tenekeci EG, Kara B, Çetiz A et al (2018) Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Noropsikiyatri Arsivi 55:243–247. https://doi.org/10.5152/npa.2016.18105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shahbodaghi MR, Jafari Z, Maroufizadeh S, Moghadasi AN (2018) Validation of the Persian version of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Iran J Neurol 17:99–104

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bergamaschi R, Crivelli P, Rezzani C et al (2008) Reprinted from The DYMUS questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 269:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2007.12.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–3191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krištof M (2016) Census of Population, Households and Dwellings 2011, Population according to economic features. In: Statistical Reports. https://web.dzs.hr/Hrv_Eng/publication/2016/SI-1585.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2018

  24. Benjak T, Štefančić V, Draušnik Ž et al (2018) Prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Croatia: data from national and non-governmental organization registries. Croat Med J 59:65–70. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2018.59.65

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F et al (2018) Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 17:162–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Poljaković Z, Vodanović D, Bender DV et al (2017) Smjernice za rano prepoznavanje, dijagnostiku i terapiju neurogene orofaringealne disfagije. Lijec Vjesn 139:118–135

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kolundžić Z, Vodanović D, Premuž H (2019) Disfagija u populaciji starijih osoba smještenih u ustanovama za starije i nemoćne. Logopedija 8:56–62. https://doi.org/10.31299/log.8.2.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu MC, Chang YC, Wang TG, Lin LC (2004) Evaluating swallowing dysfunction using a 100-ml Water Swallowing Test. Dysphagia 19:43–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-003-0030-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. IBM Corp (2017) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY:IBM Corp

  31. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust - SAC Instrument Review Criteria. (1995) 3:4

  32. Field A (2018) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics 2, 5th ed. SAGE

  33. El-Wahsh S, Heard R, Bogaardt H (2019) Development and validation of a speech pathology-specific questionnaire for persons with multiple sclerosis (SMS). Int J Speech Lang Pathol 21:553–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2018.1499802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Verdonschot RJCG, Baijens LWJ, van de Kolk I et al (2017) Affective symptoms in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res 97:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sales DS, da Silva RG, Alvarenga RM et al (2021) Accuracy of the Brazilian version of the DYMUS questionnaire for the screening of oropharyngeal dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 50:102772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2021.102772

  36. Printza A, Boziki M, Bakirtzis C et al (2020) The modified DYMUS questionnaire is a reliable, valid and easy-to-use tool in the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 27:1231–1237.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14219

  37. Habek M, Hojsak I, Brinar V (2010) Nutrition in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 112:616–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLINEURO.2010.03.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Daria Zadravec, Jelena Mandić, and Melanie Tvrdinić for their work and accomplishments during the translation process of DYMUS. We would like to thank Martina Ćužić for her help during the data analysis.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jelena Bartolović Vučković and Zdravko Kolundžić designed the study and participated in data collection. Jelena Bartolović Vučković, Zdravko Kolundžić and Boris Šimunjak. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of results Jelena Bartolović Vučković, Zdravko Kolundžić, Boris Šimunjak, and Tena Šimunjak worked on draft manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript adhering ICMJE guidelines.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jelena Bartolović Vučković.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the University Hospital “Sveti Duh” and General hospital “Požega” Bioethical Board, adhering to the Helsinki Declaration Revision of 2013. It was conducted according to national and institutional regulations and ethical standards. The study was compiled at University Hospital “Sveti Duh,” Zagreb (approval n° 01-1736/11) and General County hospital Požega (approval n° 01-1442/1-2018).

Consent to participate 

Written informed consent adhering to the Helsinki Declaration of 2013, was obtained from all individual participants for data collection and publication of this article.

Competing Interests

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 37.6 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vučković, J.B., Kolundžić, Z., Šimunjak, B. et al. DYMUS-Hr self-assessment questionnaire (Croatian version) for dysphagia in multiple sclerosis-validity, reliability, and cross-cultural adaptation. Neurol Sci 44, 3637–3645 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06850-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06850-5

Keywords

Navigation