Skip to main content
Log in

Dysphagia Prevalence, Attitudes, and Related Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dysphagia in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is associated with significant morbidity and has profound impact on the quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to analyze the dysphagia prevalence, attitudes, and dysphagia-related QoL in patients with MS, not at relapse. A prospective study of 108 consecutively recruited patients. The patients were asked to report dysphagia and completed a general dysphagia questionnaire (the Eating Assessment Tool-10, EAT-10), a disease-specific dysphagia questionnaire (the Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis, DYMUS), and a dysphagia-related QoL questionnaire (the Swallowing-Quality of Life). Twenty-six percent of the patients reported dysphagia. Many more were classified as dysphagic by the questionnaires (34.3% by EAT-10 and 44.4% by DYMUS). Overall, one out of four patients reported difficulties or choking while drinking fluids and eating food, cough related to eating, food sticking in the throat, need for food and drink segmentation, and repetitive swallows. The pleasure of eating was found to be moderately affected. The patients seem to cope well with the psychological and social impact of dysphagia. Serious consideration must be given to patients’ perceptions and attitudes towards dysphagia. Our patients reported very little fear associated with their swallowing difficulties and choking. Apparently, they do not perceive the severity of their symptoms as an actual danger, as they have developed coping strategies. Dysphagia is common in MS patients not at relapse, even with mild disease-related impairment. Swallowing should be systematically assessed with validated questionnaires in all patients with MS at the course of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Professor Athanasia Printza had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

References

  1. Calcagno P, Ruoppolo G, Grasso MG, De Vincentiis M, Paolucci S. Dysphagia in multiple sclerosis—prevalence and prognostic factors. Acta Neurol Scand. 2002;105:40–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Guan X, Wang H, Huang H, Meng L. Prevalence of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2015;36(5):671–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Printza A, Kalaitzi M, Bakirtzis C, Nikolaidis I, Proios H, Grigoriadis N. Reliability and validity of the DYMUS Questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis (Greek version) and proposed modification. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;23:62–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2018.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandes A, Duprat AC, Eckley C, Silva L, Ferreira R, Tilbery C. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with multiple sclerosis: do the disease classification scales reflect dysphagia severity? Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;79(4):460–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Solaro C, Rezzani C, Trabucco E, Amato M, Zipoli V, Portaccio E, Giannini M, Patti F, D'Amico E, Frau J, Lorefice L, Bonavita S, Della, Corte M, Grasso M, Finamore L, Ghezzi A, Annovazzi P, Rottoli M, Gasperini C, Restivo D, Maimone D, Rossi P, Stromillo M, Bergamaschi R (2013) Prevalence of patient-reported dysphagia in multiple sclerosis patients: an Italian multicenter study (using the DYMUS questionnaire). J Neurol Sci 15 331(1–2):94–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.020.

  6. Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, Wuttge-Hannig A, Ortega P. Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):139–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Belafsky P, Mouadeb D, Rees C, Pryor J, Postma G, Allen J, Leonard R. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117:919–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Macqueen C, Taubert S, Cotter D, Stevens S, Frost G. Which commercial thickening agent do patients prefer? Dysphagia. 2003;18:46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Printza Α, Kyrgidis Α, Pavlidou E, Triaridis S, Constantinidis J. Reliability and validity of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Greek adaptation) in neurogenic and head and neck cancer related oropharyngeal dysphagia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(7):1861–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5001-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergamaschi R, Rezzani C, Minguzzi S, Amato M, Patti F, et al. DMS Group Validation of the DYMUS questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Funct Neurol. 2009;24(3):159–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, et al. The SWALQOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17:97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Georgopoulos V, Perdikogianni M, Mouskenteri M, Psychogiou L, Oikonomou M, Malandraki G. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the SWAL-QoL questionnaire in Greek. Dysphagia. 2018;33(1):91–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9837-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Monzani A, Ceriani E, Atac M, Jukic-Peladic N, et al. Reliability and validity of the Italian eating assessment tool. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011;122:717–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alali D, Ballard K, Vucic S, Bogaardt H. Dysphagia in multiple sclerosis: evaluation and validation of the DYMUS questionnaire. Dysphagia. 2018;33(3):273–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9864-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurtzke J. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33:1444–522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenbek J, Robbins J, Roecker E, Coyle J, Wood J. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Neubauer P, Rademaker A, Leder S. The Yale pharyngeal residue severity rating scale: an anatomically defined and image based tool. Dysphagia. 2015;30:521–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alfonsi E, Bergamaschi R, Cosentino G, Ponzio M, Montomoli C, Restivo D, Brighina F, Ravaglia S, Prunetti P, Bertino G, Benazzo M, Fontana D, Moglia A. Electrophysiological patterns of oropharyngeal swallowing in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(8):1638–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.03.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tenekeci E, Kara B, Cetiz A, Demirkaya S, Demir N, Acikel C. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Noro Psikiyatr ARS. 2016;55(3):243–7. https://doi.org/10.5152/npa.2016.18105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sales D, Alvarenga R, Vasconcelos C, Silva R, Thuler L. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the DYMUS questionnaire for the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. SpringerPlus. 2013;2:332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alali D, Ballard K, Bogaardt H. The frequency of dysphagia and its impact on adults with multiple sclerosis based on patient-reported questionnaires. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;25:227–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2018.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rommer P, Eichstädt K, Ellenberger D, Flachenecker P, Friede T, Haas J, Kleinschnitz C, Pöhlau D, Rienhoff O, Stahmann A, Zettl U. Symptomatology and symptomatic treatment in multiple sclerosis: results from a nationwide MS registry. Mult Scler. 2018;19:1352458518799580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518799580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cordier R, Joosten A, Clavé P, Schindler A, Bülow M, Demir N, Arslan SS, Speyer R. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10) using Rasch analysis. Dysphagia. 2017;32(2):250–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9754-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bartlett RS, Moore JE, Thibeault SL. Temporal analysis of factors associated with EAT-10 in outpatients with oropharyngeal dysphagia from a tertiary care clinic. Dysphagia. 2018;33(4):457–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9874-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athanasia Printza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors Athanasia Printza, MD, MSc, PhD; Stefanos Triaridis, MD, MSc, PhD; Maria Kalaitzi, MSc; Ioannis Nikolaidis, MD, PhD; Christos Bakirtzis, MD, PhD; Jannis Constantinidis, MD, PhD; and Nikolaos Grigoriadis, MD, PhD declare that there is no conflict of interest related to this paper.

Ethical Approval

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments and had Institutional review Board approval.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Printza, A., Triaridis, S., Kalaitzi, M. et al. Dysphagia Prevalence, Attitudes, and Related Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Dysphagia 35, 677–684 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-10075-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-10075-0

Keywords

Navigation