Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How tandem gait stumbled into the neurological exam: a review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tandem gait testing is an integral part of the neurological exam. It is informative in a wide variety of disorders ranging from cerebellar disease to vestibular and peripheral neuropathies, parkinsonism, and other neurodegenerative conditions. We discuss the history and development of tandem gait testing as well as its technique, utility, and limitations in the assessment of neurological conditions. Tandem gait has emerged as a tool in the assessment of cerebellar disease, Huntington disease, idiopathic Parkinson’s disease, atypical parkinsonism, peripheral neuropathies, and vestibulopathies. Its origin can be deduced from experimental observation and clinical experience as far back as the early nineteenth century. Despite the long history and ubiquitous performance of tandem gait testing, there is no standardized, guideline-based protocol to model for more homogenous research and clinical practices. Such a protocol should be developed using historical texts and manuscripts as well as the consensus of the medical research community. With standard protocols, further studies could define the sensitivity of abnormal tandem gait testing in cerebellar disorders, more diffuse neurodegeneration, and peripheral pathologies. Tandem gait can be a useful marker of dysfunction in neurologic conditions whose pathologies extend beyond the vermis or vestibulocerebellar module to include interconnected networks throughout the nervous system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daroff R, Fenichel G, Jankovic J, Mazziotta J (2012) Bradley’s neurology in clinical Practice. Elsevier Inc., Philadelphia, p 6e

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ropper AH, Samuels MA, Klein JP (2014) Chapter 7. Disorders of stance and sait. In: Ropper AH, Samuels MA, Klein JP (eds) Adams & Victor’s principles of neurology. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 10e

    Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell W (2005) Chapter 44. DeJong’s the neurologic examination. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 6e

    Google Scholar 

  4. Walter H (1990) Ch 69 The Cerebellum. In: Clinical Methods: The history, physical, and laboratory examinations, 3rd edn. Butterworths, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singer C, Sanchez-Ramos J, Weiner W (1994) Gait abnormality in essential tremor. Mov Disord 9:193–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stolze H, Petersen G, Raethjen J, Wenzelburger R, Deuschl G (2001) The gait disorder of advanced essential tremor. Brain 124:2278–2286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fine E, Ionita C, Lohr L (2002) The history of the development of the cerebellar examination. Semin Neurol 22(4):375-84

  8. Bastian A, Thach W (1995) Cerebellar outflow lesions: a comparison of movement deficits resulting from lesions at the levels of the cerebellum and thalamus. Ann Neurol 38:881–892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haines DE, Mihailoff GA, Bloedel JR (2002) The cerebellum. In: Haines DE (ed) Fundamental neuroscience, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 424–443

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pryse-Phillips W, Murray T (1992) Essential neurology: a concise textbook. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lindholm B, Nilsson M, Hansson O (2016) External validation of a 3-step falls prediction model in mild Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 263(12):2462–2469

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Aerts M, Esselink R, Abdo W (2016) Ancillary investigations to diagnose parkinsonism: a prospective clinical study. J Neurol 262:346–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdo WF, Borm GF, Munneke M, Verbeek MM, Esselink RA, Bloem BR (2006) Ten steps to identify atypical parkinsonism. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:1367–1369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Maksimovic A, Hanewinckel R, Verlinden V et al (2016) Gait characteristics in older adults with diabetes and impaired fasting glucose: the Rotterdam study. J Diabetes Complicat 30:61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McGinty R, McNamara B, Moore H (2015 Nov) DADS neuropathy associated with anti-TNF- α therapy. BMJ Case Rep 25:2015. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2015-211781

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen H, Mulavara A, Peters B et al (2013) Sharpening the tandem walking test for screening peripheral neuropathy. South Med J 106:565–569

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen H, Mulavara A, Peters B et al (2012) Tests of walking balance for screening vestibular disorders. J Vestib Res 22:95–104

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Gowers WR (1888) A manual of diseases of the nervous system. American ed. P. Blakiston, Philadelphia, pp 717–718

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bastian AJ, Mink JW, Kaufman BA, Thach WT (1998) Posterior vermal split syndrome. Ann Neurol 44(4):601–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Christopher F, Saladin LK (1996) Ch. 9 Disorders of the cerebellum and its connections. In: Pathophysiology of the motor systems: principles and clinical presentations. 1st Ed. F. A. Davis Company

  21. Marquer A, Barbieri G, Perennou D (2014) The assessment and treatment of postural disorders in cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 57:67–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huntington Study Group (1996) Unified Huntington’s disease rating scale: reliability and consistency. Mov Disord 11:136–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oster E, Eberly S, Dorsey E, Kayson-Rubin E, Oakes D, Shoulson I (2015) Informativeness of early Huntington disease signs about gene status. J Huntingtons Dis 4(3):271–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fregly AR, Graybiel A, Smith MJ (1972) Walk on floor eyes closed (WOFEC): a new addition to an ataxia test battery. Aerosp Med 43(4):395–399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lim E, Seo M, Woo S et al (2005) Relationship between essential tremor and cerebellar dysfunction according to age. J Clin Neurol 1(1):76–80

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rao AK, Gillman A, Louis ED (2011) Quantitative gait analysis in essential tremor reveals impairments that are mainained into advanced age. Gait Posture 34:65–70

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Earhart GM, Clark BR, Tabbal SD, Perlmutter JS (2009) Gait and balance in essential tremor: variable effects of bilateral thalamic stimulation. Mov Disord 24(3):386–391

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kronenbuerger M, Konczak J, Ziegler W, Buderath P, Frank B, Coenen VA et al (2009) Balance and motor speech impairment in essential tremor. Cerebellum (Lon- don England) 8(3):389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jankovic J (2002) Essential tremor: a heterogeneous disorder. Mov Disord 17:638–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Louis et al (2007) Neuropathological changes in essential tremor. Brain 130:3297–3307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Erickson-Davis et al (2010) “Hairy baskets” associated with degenerative purkinje cell changes in essential tremor. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 69:262–271

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Louis E, Rios E, Rao A (2010) Tandem gait performance in essential tremor: clinical correlates and association with midline tremor. Mov Disord 25(11):1633–1638

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Louis E, Rao A (2014) Tandem gait performance in essential tremor patients correlates with cognitive function. Cerebellum Ataxias 1:19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nonnekes J, Aerts M, Abdo W (2014) Medio-lateral balance impairment differentiates between Parkinson’s disease and atypical parkinsonism. J Park Dis 4:567–569

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jankovic J (2015) Gait Disorders. Neurol Clin 33:249–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nutt JG, Bastiaan BR, Nir G, Hallet M, Horak FB, Nieuwboer A (2011) Freezing of gait: moving forward on a mysterious clinical phenomenon. Lancet Neurol 10:734–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Snijders AH, Takakusaki K, Debu B, Lozano AM, Krishna V, Fasano A, Aziz TZ, Papa SM, Factor SA, Hallet M (2016) Physiology of freezing of gait. Ann Neurol 80:644–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bloem B, Grimbergen Y, Cramer M et al (2001) Prospective assessment of falls in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 248(11):950–958

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dennison A, Noorigian J, Robinson K et al (2007) Falling in Parkinson disease: identifying and prioritizing risk factors in recurrent fallers. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86(8):621–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Longridge N, Mallinson A (2010 Jul) Clinical Romberg testing does not detect vestibular disease. Otol Neurotol 31(5):803–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kammerlind A, Larsson P, Ledin T et al (2005) Reliability of clinical balance tests and subjective ratings in dizziness and disequilibirum. Adv Physiother 7:96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fregly A, Smith M, Graybiel A (1973 Jan) Revised normative standards of performance of men on a quantitative ataxia test battery. Acta Otolaryngol 75(1):10–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Speers R, Ashton-Miller J, Schultz A et al (1998) Age differences in abilities to perform tandem stand and walk tasks of graded difficulty. Gait Posture 7(3):207–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vereeck L, Wuyts F, Truijen S et al (2008) Clinical assessment of balance: normative data, and gender and age effects. Int J Audiol 47(2):67–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tinetti M, Speechley M (1989) Prevention of falls among the elderly. NEJM 320:1055–1059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Brooks AM, Snedden TR, Mixis B, Hetzel S, McGuine TA (2017) Establishing baseline normative values for the children sport concussison assessment tool. JAMA Pediatr 171(7):670–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Oldman JR, DiFabio MS, Kaminski TW, DeWolf RM, Buckley TA (2016) Normative tandem gait in collegiate student-athletes: implications for clinical concussion assessment. Sports Health 9(4):305–311

    Google Scholar 

  48. Blumenfeld H (2002) Neuroanatomy through clinical cases. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dozza M, Wall C, Peterka R et al (2007) Effects of practicing tandem gait with and without vibrotactile biofeedback in subjects with unilateral vestibular loss. J Vestib Res 17(4):195–204

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Miami School of Medicine, Professional Arts Center, 1150 NW 14th Street, Suite 609, Miami, FL, 33136, USA

    Jason Margolesky & Carlos Singer

Authors
  1. Jason Margolesky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos Singer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Margolesky.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Margolesky, J., Singer, C. How tandem gait stumbled into the neurological exam: a review. Neurol Sci 39, 23–29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3108-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3108-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation