Neurological Sciences

, Volume 37, Issue 10, pp 1597–1601 | Cite as

Survey of young patients with polio and a foreign background at a Swedish post-polio outpatient clinic

  • Lars WerhagenEmail author
  • Kristian Borg
Original Article


Nowadays, polio survivors aged under 60 years are non-native Swedes which pose new aspects and challenges to a post-polio outpatient clinic. To analyze the medical data, walking aids, occupational, and family situation in non-native polio survivors aged less than 60 years at a Swedish post-polio outpatient clinic. Retrospective data analysis. Data were retrieved from medical records at the post-polio outpatient clinic. Actual age, age at acute polio infection, walking capacity, pain, concomitant diseases, working and family situation, and ethnical origin were analyzed. Data are presented in numbers and percentage. 153 patients were included. Mean age was 45 (17–60) years, and mean age at acute polio infection was 2 (0–12) years. Paresis of the lower extremities was the most common disability. 10 % were wheelchair dependent. Pain occurred in 70 % with a mean intensity of 55 measured with the visual analog scale. Hypertension was the most common concomitant disease. Half of the polio survivors were working at least part time, and roughly half were singles. Data were comparable with data earlier published in Swedish native polio survivors. Non-native polio survivors aged under 60 years showed similarities in age at acute polio infection, paresis, prevalence, and intensity of pain when compared with native Swedish polio survivors. They were, however, younger, and were less often working and married/cohabitants than native Swedish polio survivors. The results of this study underline the importance of social and vocational rehabilitation tailoring rehabilitation suitable for polio survivors with a foreign background.


Polio Post-polio syndrome Pain Fatigue Walking aids 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Atkinson W, Hamborsky J, McIntyre L, Wolfe S (eds) (2009) “Poliomyelitis” (PDF). Epidemiology and prevention of vaccine-preventable diseases (The Pink Book), 11th edn. Public Health Foundation, Washington DC, pp 231–244Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO poliomyelitis fact sheet no. 114; Accessed Apr 2016
  3. 3.
    Thompson KM, Tebbens RJ (2012) Current polio global eradication and control policy options: perspectives from modeling and prerequisites for oral poliovirus vaccine cessation. Expert Rev Vaccine 11:449–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vreede KS, Broman L, Borg K (2016) Long-term follow-up of patients with prior polio over a 17 year period. J Rehabil Med 48:359–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carlsson AM (1983) Assessment of chronic pain. Aspects on reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 16:87–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Werhagen L, Borg K (2010) Analysis of long-standing nociceptive and neuropathic pain in patients with post-polio syndrome. J Neurol 257:1027–1031CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stoelb BL, Carter GT, Abresch RT, Purekal S, McDonald CM, Jensen MP (2008) Pain in persons with post polio syndrome: frequency, intensity, and impact. Arch Phys Rehabil 89:1933–1940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jublet B (2004) Post-polio syndrome. Curr Treat Options Neurol 6:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ostlund G, Broman L, Werhagen L, Borg K (2012) IVIG treatment in post-polio patients: evaluation of responders. J Neurol 259:2571–2578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Living conditions survey, population aged 16–64-proportion of persons in percent by main activity foreign and Swedish background 2010–11, Sweden statisticsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zeilig G, Weingarden H, Shemesh Y, Herman A, Heim M, Zeweker M, Dudkiewicz I (2012) Functional and environmental factors affecting work status in individuals with longstanding poliomyelitis. J Spinal Cord Med 35:22–27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farbu E, Gilhus NE (1997) Poliomyelitis: long-time consequences for social life. Acta Neurol Scand 96:353–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farbu E, Rekand T, Aarli JA, Gilhus NE (2001) Polio survivors—well educated and hard working. J Neurol 248:500–505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Living conditions survey, family by indicator age and sex 2011, Sweden statisticsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Living conditions survey, long-term illness by indicator age and sex 2011, Sweden statisticsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rekand T, Kõrv J, Farbu E, Roose M, Gilhus NE, Langeland N, Aarli JA (2003) Long term outcome after poliomyelitis in different health and social conditions. J Epidemiol Community Health 57:368–372CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fenelly K (2005) The, “healthy migrant” effect. Healthy Gener 5:1–4Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Werhagen L, Borg K, Danese A, Turri M, Monaco S, Bertolasi L (2016) Acute poliomyelitis—a retrospective data analysis (submitted) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trojan DA, Cashman NR (2005) Postpoliomyelitis syndrome. Muscle Nerve 31:6–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gonzalez H, Olsson T, Borg K (2010) Management of post polio syndrome. Lancet Neurol 9:634–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Farbu E, Gilhus NE, Barnes MP, Borg K, de Visser M, DriessenA Howard R, Nollet F, Opara J, Stalberg E (2006) EFNS guideline and diagnosis and management of postpolio syndrome. Report of an Efns task force. Eur J Neurol 13:295–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    March of Dimes. Post-polio syndrome. Identifying best practice in diagnosis and care. Accessed 13 June 2016

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Clinical SciencesKarolinska Institutet at Danderyds HospitalStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations