Skip to main content
Log in

The Rao’s Brief Repeatable Battery in the study of cognition in different multiple sclerosis phenotypes: application of normative data in a Serbian population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive impairment is prevalent in multiple sclerosis (MS) occurring in 43–72 % of patients with all MS phenotypes. The aim of our study was to assess cognitive performance in different MS subtypes in Serbian population. Rao’s Brief Repeatable Battery of neuropsychological tests (BRB-N) was administered to 168 MS patients [37 patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) suggestive of MS, 65 with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 31 with secondary progressive MS (SPMS) and 35 patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS)]. The percentage of cognitively impaired patients in our total MS cohort was 58.9 %. Prevalence of cognitive dysfunction was 40.5 % in CIS group, 36.9 % in RRMS, 96.8 % in SPMS, and 85.7 % in PPMS group. Patients in CIS and RRMS groups performed consistently better all tests of the Rao’s battery than patients in SPMS and PPMS cohort. CIS and RRMS groups performed consistently better in all tests of the Rao’s battery than SPMS and PPMS cohort. Additionally, difference in the performance of any of the BRB-N tests was not found between CIS and RRMS. However, there was a significant difference between SPMS and PPMS patients in the performance on five tests of Rao’s battery. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) in favor of PPMS patients was demonstrated for the following tasks: SRT_lts, SRT_cltr, SDMT, SRT_D, SPART_D. Our study demonstrates that cognitive impairment is frequent in all MS phenotypes. Furthermore, we have found that cognitive deficit is most severe and most frequent in SPMS patients, followed by PPMS subjects and then CIS and RRMS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F (1991) Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology 41(5):685–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peyser JM, Edwards KR, Poser CM, Filskov SB (1980) Cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 37(9):577–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J (2008) Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 7(12):1139–1151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Langdon DW (2011) Cognition in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 24(3):244–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prakash RS, Snook EM, Lewis JM, Motl RW, Kramer AF (2008) Cognitive impairments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Mult Scler 14(9):1250–1261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rao SM and the Cognitive Function Study Group of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (1990) A manual for the Brief Repeatable Battery of neuropsychological tests in multiple sclerosis. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benedict RH, Fischer JS, Archibald CJ, Arnett PA, Beatty WW, Bobholz J, Chelune GJ, Fisk JD, Langdon DW, Caruso L, Foley F, LaRocca NG, Vowels L, Weinstein A, DeLuca J, Rao SM, Munschauer F (2002) Minimal neuropsychological assessment of MS patients: a consensus approach. Clin Neuropsychol 16(3):381–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Benedict RH, Cookfair D, Gavett R, Gunther M, Munschauer F, Garg N, Weinstock-Guttman B (2006) Validity of the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (MACFIMS). J Int Neuropsychol Soc 12(12):549–558

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Langdon DW, Amato MP, Boringa J, Brochet B, Foley F, Fredrikson S, Hämäläinen P, Hartung HP, Krupp L, Penner IK, Reder AT, Benedict RH (2012) Recommendations for a Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS). Mult Scler 18(6):891–898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnett PA, Barwick FH, Beeney JE (2008) Depression in multiple sclerosis: review and theoretical proposal. Int Neuropsychol Soc 14(5):691–724

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arnett PA (2005) Longitudinal consistency of the relationship between depression symptoms and cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis. CNS Spectr 10(5):372–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Landro NI, Celius EG, Sletvold H (2004) Depressive symptoms account for deficient information processing speed but not for impaired working memory in early phase multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 217(2):211–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DeLuca J, Barbieri-Berger S, Johnson SK (1994) The nature of memory impairments in multiple sclerosis: acquisition versus retrieval. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 16(2):183–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sundgren M, Maurex L, Wahlin Å, Piehl F, Brismar T (2013) Cognitive impairment has a strong relation to nonsomatic symptoms of depression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 28(2):144–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huijbregts SC, Kalkers NF, de Sonneville LM, de Groot V, Polman CH (2006) Cognitive impairment and decline in different MS subtypes. J Neurol Sci 245(1–2):187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Denney DR, Sworowski LA, Lynch SG (2005) Cognitive impairment in three subtypes of multiple sclerosis. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 20(8):967–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruggieri RM, Palermo R, Vitello G, Gennuso M, Settipani N, Piccoli F (2003) Cognitive impairment in patients suffering from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with EDSS < or = 3.5. Acta Neurol Scand 108(5):323–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zipoli V, Goretti B, Hakiki B, Siracusa G, Sorbi S, Portaccio E, Amato MP (2010) Cognitive impairment predicts conversion to multiple sclerosis in clinically isolated syndromes. Mult Scler 16(1):62–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mesaros S, Rocca MA, Riccitelli G, Pagani E, Rovaris M, Caputo D, Ghezzi A, Capra R, Bertolotto A, Comi G, Filippi M (2009) Corpus callosum damage and cognitive dysfunction in benign MS. Hum Brain Mapp 30(8):2656–2666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Obradovic D, Petrovic M, Antanasijevic I, Marinkovic J, Stojanovic T, Obradovic S (2012) The Brief Repeatable Battery: psychometrics and normative values with age, education and gender corrections in a Serbian population. Neurol Sci 33(6):1369–1374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, Fujihara K, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Montalban X, O’Connor P, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Waubant E, Weinshenker B, Wolinsky JS (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 69(2):292–302

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA, Cutter GR, Sørensen PS, Thompson AJ, Wolinsky JS, Balcer LJ, Banwell B, Barkhof F, Bebo B Jr, Calabresi PA, Clanet M, Comi G, Fox RJ, Freedman MS, Goodman AD, Inglese M, Kappos L, Kieseier BC, Lincoln JA, Lubetzki C, Miller AE, Montalban X, O’Connor PW, Petkau J, Pozzilli C, Rudick RA, Sormani MP, Stüve O, Waubant E, Polman CH (2014) Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology 83(3):278–286

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33(11):1444–1452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beck AT, Beck RW (1972) Screening depressed patients in family practice. A rapid technic. Postgrad Med 52(6):81–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Buschke H, Fuld PA (1974) Evaluating storage, retention, and retrieval in disordered memory and learning. Neurology 24(11):1019–1025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Barbizet J, Cany E (1968) Clinical and psychometrical study of a patient with memory disturbances. Int J Neurol 7(1):44–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith A (1982) Symbol digits modalities test. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gronwall DM (1977) Paced auditory serial-addition task: a measure of recovery from concussion. Percept Mot Skills 44(2):367–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Amato MP, Portaccio E, Goretti B, Zipoli V, Iudice A, Della Pina D, Malentacchi G, Sabatini S, Annunziata P, Falcini M, Mazzoni M, Mortilla M, Fonda C, De Stefano N, TuSCIMS Study Group (2010) Relevance of cognitive deterioration in early relapsing-remitting MS: a 3-year follow-up study. Mult Scler 16(12):1474–1482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sepulcre J, Vanotti S, Hernández R, Sandoval G, Cáceres F, Garcea O, Villoslada P (2006) Cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis using the Brief Repeatable Battery-neuropsychology test. Mult Scler 12(2):187–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Solari A, Mancuso L, Motta A, Mendozzi L, Serrati C (2002) Comparison of two brief neuropsychological batteries in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 8(2):169–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gaudino EA, Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J, Diamond BJ (2001) A comparison of memory performance in relapsing-remitting, primary progressive and secondary progressive, multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychiatr Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 14(1):32–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Huijbregts SC, Kalkers NF, de Sonneville LM, de Groot V, Reuling IE, Polman CH (2004) Differences in cognitive impairment of relapsing remitting, secondary, and primary progressive MS. Neurology 63(2):335–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Potagas C, Giogkaraki E, Koutsis G, Mandellos D, Tsirempolou E, Sfagos C, Vassilopoulos D (2008) Cognitive impairment in different MS subtypes and clinically isolated syndromes. J Neurol Sci 267(1–2):100–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ruet A, Deloire M, Charre-MorinJ Hamel D, Brochet B (2013) Cognitive impairment differs between primary progressive and relapsing- remitting MS. Neurology 80(16):1501–1508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosti-Otajärvi E, Ruutiainen J, Huhtala H, Hämäläinen P (2014) Cognitive performance profile in different phenotypes of MS with cognitive complaints. Mult Scler Relat Disord 3(4):463–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Feuillet L, Reuter F, Audoin B, Malikova I, Barrau K, Cherif AA, Pelletier J (2007) Early cognitive impairment in patients with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 13(1):124–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Patti F, Amato MP, Trojano M, Bastianello S, Tola MR, Goretti B, Caniatti L, Di Monte E, Ferrazza P, Brescia Morra V, Lo Fermo S, Picconi O, Luccichenti G, COGIMUS Study Group (2009) Cognitive impairment and its relation with disease measures in mildly disabled patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: baseline results from the cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (COGIMUS) study. Mult Scler 15(7):779–788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rocca MA, Amato MP, De Stefano N, Enzinger C, Geurts JJ, Penner IK, Rovira A, Sumowski JF, Valsasina P, Filippi M, MAGNIMS Study Group (2015) Clinical and imaging assessment of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 14(3):302–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sumowski JF, Rocca MA, Leavitt VM, Dackovic J, Mesaros S, Drulovic J, DeLuca J, Filippi M (2014) Brain reserve and cognitive reserve protect against cognitive decline over 4.5 years in MS. Neurology 82(20):1776–1783

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This investigation was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technologic Development of the Republic of Serbia (Grant Nos 175031 and 175087).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jelena Dackovic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dackovic, J., Pekmezovic, T., Mesaros, S. et al. The Rao’s Brief Repeatable Battery in the study of cognition in different multiple sclerosis phenotypes: application of normative data in a Serbian population. Neurol Sci 37, 1475–1481 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2610-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2610-1

Keywords

Navigation