Skip to main content
Log in

Normative data for measuring performance change on parallel forms of a 15-word list recall test

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Declarative memory evaluation is an essential step in the clinical and neuropsychological assessment of a variety of neurological disorders. It typically addresses the issue of normality/abnormality of an individual’s performance. Another clinical application of the neuropsychological assessment of declarative memory is the longitudinal evaluation of an individual’s performance change. In fact, in a variety of neurological conditions repeated assessments are needed to evaluate the modifications of a memory disorder as a function of time or in response to a pharmacological or rehabilitation treatment. This study was aimed at collecting data for measuring and interpreting performance change on a memory test for verbal material. For this purpose, we administered to 100 healthy subjects (age range 20–80 years; years of formal education range 8–17 years) three parallel forms of a test requiring the immediate and delayed recall of a 15-word list. The subjects performed the recall test three times (each time with a different list) at least 1 week apart. The order of the lists was randomized across subjects. Results revealed that performance on the three lists was highly correlated and did not vary as a function of the order of presentation. However, accuracy of recall was slightly better on a list compared to the others. Based on a method devised by Payne and Jones (J Clin Psychol 13:115–121, 1957), we provide normative data for establishing whether a discrepancy in recall accuracy on two versions of the test exceeds the discrepancy expected based on the performance of normal controls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barigazzi R, Della Sala S, Laiacona M, Spinnler H, Valenti V (1987) Esplorazione testistica della memoria di prosa. Ricerche di psicologia 1:50–80

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertinetto PM, Burani C, Laudanna A, Marconi L, Ratti D, Rolando C, Thornton AM (2005) Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto (CoLFIS) http://linguistica.sns.it/CoLFIS/Home.htm

  3. Bertolani L, De Renzi E, Faglioni P (1993) Normative data on non-verbal memory test of clinical interest. Archivio di Psicologia Neurologia e Psichiatria 54(4):477–486

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bortolini U, Tagliavini C, Zampolli A (1971) Lessico di frequenza della lingua italiana contemporanea. Garzanti, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brandt J (1991) The Hopkins verbal learning test: development of a new memory test with six equivalent forms. Clin Neuropsychol 5:125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F, Zonato F, Venneri A (2002) Rey–Osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci 22:443–447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Capitani E, Della Sala S, Laiacona M, Marchetti C, Spinnler H (1994) Standardizzazione ed uso clinico di un test di memoria di prosa. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata 209:47–63

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carlesimo GA, Oscar-Berman M (1992) Memory deficits in Alzheimer’s patients: a comprehensive review. Neuropsychol Rev 3:119–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G, The group for the standardization of the Mental Deterioration Battery (1996) The mental deterioration battery: normative data, diagnostic reliability and qualitative analyses of cognitive impairment. Eur Neurol 36:378–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carlesimo GA, Buccione I, Fadda L, Graceffa A, Mauri M, Lorusso S, Bevilacqua G, Caltagirone C (2002) Standardizzazione di due test di memoria per uso clinico. Breve racconto e figura di Rey. Nuova Rivista di Neurologia 12(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dc Delis, McKee R, Massman P, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Gettman D (1991) Alternate forms of the California verbal learning test: development and reliability. Clin Neuropsychol 5:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Renzi E, Faglioni P, Ruggerini C (1977) Prove di memoria verbale di impiego clinico per la diagnosi di amnesia. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria 38:303–318

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mauri M, Carlesimo GA, Graceffa AMS, Loasses A, Lorusso S, Sinforiani E, Bono G, Caltagirone C (1997) Standardizzazione di due nuovi test di memoria: apprendimento di liste di parole correlate e non correlate semanticamente. Archivio di Psicologia Neurologia e Psichiatria 58:621–645

    Google Scholar 

  14. Measso G, Cavarzeran F, Zappalà G, Lebowitz BD, Crook TH, Pirozzolo FJ, Amaducci LA, Massari D, Grigoletto F (1993) The mini-mental state examination: normative study of an Italian random sample. Dev Neuropsychol 9(2):77–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Milner B (2005) The medial temporal-lobe amnesic syndrome. Psychiatr Clin N Am 28:599–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Novelli G, Papagno C, Capitani E, Laiacona M, Cappa SF, Vallar G (1986) Tre test clinici di memoria verbale a lungo termine. Archivio di Psicologia Neurologia Psichiatria 47:278–296

    Google Scholar 

  17. Payne RW, Jones HG (1957) Statistics for the investigation of individual cases. J Clin Psychol 13:115–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saling MM (2009) Verbal memory in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: beyond material specificity. Brain 132:570–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shapiro DM, Harrison DW (1990) Alternate forms of the AVLT: a procedure and test of form equivalency. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 5:405–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smirni D, Turriziani P, Oliveti M, Smirni P, Cipolotti L (2010) Standardizzazione di tre nuovi test di memoria di riconoscimento verbale e non verbale: uno studio preliminare. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 1:227–248

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e Taratura Italiana di Test Neuropsicologici. Italian J Neurol Sci 6(8):44–46

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the ‘Neurone’ Foundation for research in neuropsychobiology and clinical neurosciences, Rome, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni A. Carlesimo.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 55 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlesimo, G.A., De Risi, M., Monaco, M. et al. Normative data for measuring performance change on parallel forms of a 15-word list recall test. Neurol Sci 35, 663–668 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-013-1573-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-013-1573-8

Keywords

Navigation