Abstract
For most primates living in tropical forests, food resources occur in patchworks of different habitats that vary seasonally in quality and quantity. Efficient navigation (i.e., spatial memory-based orientation) towards profitable food patches should enhance their foraging success. The mechanisms underpinning primate navigating ability remain nonetheless mostly unknown. Using GPS long-term tracking (596 days) of one group of wild western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla), we investigated their ability to navigate at long distances, and tested for how the sun was used to navigate at any scale by improving landmark visibility and/or by acting as a compass. Long episodic movements ending at a distant swamp, a unique place in the home range where gorillas could find mineral-rich aquatic plants, were straighter and faster than their everyday foraging movements relying on spatial memory. This suggests intentional targeting of the swamp based on long-distance navigation skills, which can thus be efficient over a couple of kilometres. Interestingly, for both long-distance movements towards the swamp and everyday foraging movements, gorillas moved straighter under sunlight conditions even under a dense vegetation cover. By contrast, movement straightness was not markedly different when the sun elevation was low (the sun azimuth then being potentially usable as a compass) or high (so providing no directional information) and the sky was clear or overcast. This suggests that gorillas navigate their home range by relying on visual place recognition but do not use the sun azimuth as a compass. Like humans, who rely heavily on vision to navigate, gorillas should benefit from better lighting to help them identify landmarks as they move through shady forests. This study uncovers a neglected aspect of primate navigation. Spatial memory and vision might have played an important role in the evolutionary success of diurnal primate lineages.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Tropical forests are characterised by a patchwork of habitats (van Schaik and Brockman 2009). Habitats differ by providing food differing in quantity and quality, and whose availability varies seasonally, resulting in time-dependent habitat preferences for animal species (e.g., Chapman et al. 2003; Pennec et al. 2020). As the habitats may be highly scattered, this may compel animals to occasionally travel several kilometres to reach a particular habitat type and balance their nutrient intakes. This is for example the case in tropical forests for large, inundated areas such as swamps and clearings (aka bais), which may attract many large mammals because they offer diverse minerals in large quantities (e.g., Gessner et al. 2014; Magliocca and Gautier-Hion 2004).
When food occurs in dispersed and ephemeral patches outside the forager's perceptual range, a spatiotemporal memory is a prerequisite to forage efficiently (Boyer and Walsh 2010; Grove 2013; Bracis et al. 2015; Robira et al. 2021). Foraging efficiently implies minimising the cost of movements (e.g., moving straight) to accurately target high-quality food while maximising the nutritional benefits of this food. Numerous animal species are expected to rely on a memory of food patch locations and phenology to plan their foraging movements, but what is the actual information used is mainly unknown (Trapanese et al. 2019; Fagan et al. 2013). In addition, especially in primates, movements have mostly been scrutinised for short distances (of some hundreds of metres, for movements from one food tree to another nearby food tree; Trapanese et al. 2019), while animals’ ability to navigate (i.e., to rely on some form of spatial memory to efficiently reach a target beyond perceptual range) at long distances remains poorly investigated. Focusing on the long-distance travels between habitat patches should increase our understanding of the navigation mechanisms across scales.
Independent of the movement scale, the way a mammal can efficiently navigate its home range remains poorly understood. As the home range is a 'familiar area', navigation within it should be supported by mechanisms that are quite different from those at work in animals navigating large unfamiliar areas, as for the long-distance travels of migratory birds during their first migratory journey (Thorup et al. 2007). Depending on the species, animals can rely on three main types of navigation mechanisms (review in Benhamou 2010 and Durieux and Liedvogel 2021), two of which are very useful mainly for navigating unfamiliar areas: using long-distance environmental gradients (Wallraff 2001), and keeping track of the location of the starting point by integrating its own movement (path integration, Mittelstaedt and Mittelstaedt 1980), usually in combination with a compass to keep the process accurate. The third can be operational only for navigating a familiar area: relying on olfactory, auditory, or visual cues that have been integrated into a spatial learning process to become a beacon (a conspicuous object closely associated with a goal, or an intermediate location, along a path leading to a goal) or a landmark (a conspicuous object used to form a reference frame in which the goal location can be addressed and memorised; mosaic map hypothesis, initially proposed by Wallraff 1974).
To navigate their home range, most mammals can thus be expected to rely in some ways on familiar cues, which must be accurately recognised (Tsoar et al. 2011; Warren 2019). In particular, visual landmarks and beacons should be of key importance for visual diurnal foragers such as primates (Dominy et al. 2001; Dominy and Lucas 2001). However, in dense and murky tropical forests with closed canopy, the visual recognition of a place based on local visual cues may largely depend on the lighting conditions, i.e., on whether the sky is clear or overcast.
The lighting level may also affect individuals using a sun compass to get access to a reference direction. A compass is generally favoured when navigating unfamiliar environments, but it can also help organise spatial knowledge about familiar environments when landmark cueing is rendered difficult. In a rainforest environment, where visual panoramas may often be similar and thus difficult to distinguish, young, inexperienced forest human hunter-gatherers inhabiting the dense Congo basin forest use a sun compass, predominantly to navigate outside their familiar range (Jang et al. 2019a, b). The sun azimuth (i.e., the direction of the sun in the horizontal plane) indeed efficiently provides a reference direction and is used by birds (Schmidt-Koenig 1990; Alerstam et al. 2001) and hymenopterans (first demonstration by Santschi 1911; see also Müller & Wehner 2007). Whether diurnal primates are also able to use the sun azimuth to obtain a reference direction has remained completely unexplored.
In this study, we aimed to provide further insights into the navigation ability of primates, using western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) as a case study, henceforth called western gorillas. Interestingly, the daily movements of this socially cohesive great ape do not include only short-distance travels to nearby food patches (Salmi et al 2020), but also longer journeys towards distant and special forest habitats (i.e., swamp and clearings) to feed on mineral-rich aquatic plants (Nishihara 1995; Magliocca and Gautier-Hion 2002; Metsio et al. 2014; Yamagiwa et al. 2018). These plants are crucial for balancing mineral intakes across seasons in this species (e.g., Masi et al. 2015). A swamp, giving access to unique feeding resources and located at the far periphery of the home range of the study group, provided us with an experimental-like opportunity to address the question of whether western gorillas are also able to navigate efficiently over longer distances. Specifically, we focused on the straightness, duration, and timing of these long-distance movements to test whether they were the simple result of a drift followed by opportunistic feeding, or rather they were intentional and memory-driven.
Western gorillas are known to use memory at short distances to maximise foraging efficiency on high-quality, clustered, and ephemeral resources (Salmi et al. 2020; Robira et al. 2023a). How the target choice is made (i.e., how spatial, temporal, and attribute knowledge is weighted against each other to decide where to go) has recently been mechanistically investigated (Robira et al. 2023b). However, how gorillas manage to go where they want is currently unknown. To obtain further insights into the cognitive processes underlying western gorillas' navigation, we investigated whether the sun may help them better recognize visual cues (landmarks and beacons) and/or as a reference direction, both during short- and long-distance travel. If the sun was used as a navigation tool by an animal, an overcast sky or dense vegetation would result in less efficient navigation because it makes it more difficult to recognise the place (based on beacons and/or landmarks) and/or should induce the inability to use the sun azimuth as a compass. These two putative roles of the sun (cue recognition and sun compass) can be disentangled by investigating to which extent navigation efficiency depends on the sun's elevation because, even in good light conditions, the sun azimuth becomes hard to assess when the sun is high (i.e., at times close to noon; Müller and Wehner 2007). We thus focused on the straightness of movement bouts directed towards feeding patches (a proxy of navigation efficiency) in different contexts of sun elevation and weather conditions to test for the use of a sun compass and/or landmark recognition by western gorillas when they navigate their home range.
Methods
Study group and area
The study group ranged close to Mondika Research Station (2°22’N, 16°16’E), in the Djeke triangle, in the western part of the Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park, in the Congo basin. It consisted of 1 silverback, 2 blackbacks, 5 adult females, 2–3 sub-adult males, 1–2 sub-adult females, 1–4 juveniles, and 4–5 infants (following Breuer et al. 2009’s age/sex classes). We tracked the group from dawn to dusk. As gorilla groups are cohesive, we could assess the behaviour of all individuals every day. The study group was fully habituated to human presence for a long time, allowing us to follow the group in very close proximity (ca. 10 m) and thus accurately record their behaviour and the group location without disturbing their daily activities. This group generally travels around 1 km a day, to cover a 7 km2 home range (Robira et al. 2022). This home range partially overlaps with neighbouring groups (for example ca. 5% with one monitored neighbouring group, Robira et al. 2022).
The area is characterised by the rainfall pattern of a moist tropical forest with a long rainy season from March to November (Supplementary Figure S1). It harbours a patchwork of different vegetation types (Fig. 1). A medium-sized river runs through the centre of the study group’s home range, where it gives birth to a non-swampy riparian area. In addition, a large swamp is located northeast of the group’s home range (Fig. 1). Swamps are an important source of mineral-rich plants for western gorillas (Nishihara 1995; Metsio et al. 2014; Yamagiwa et al. 2018; Magliocca and Gautier-Hion 2002; Doran-Sheehy et al. 2004).
Locational and behavioural data
Between October 2012 and January 2015 (596 days), the behaviour of all visible individuals of the study group was recorded at 20-min interval scan sampling (Altmann 1974), in synchrony with the GPS location of the group (determined using a handheld Garmin GPS recorder, with an accuracy of 15-18 m), the vegetation openness (canopy and understorey separately; between 0 = very closed to 3 = very open) and type, and the weather conditions (0: mainly blue sky; 1: mainly overcast). These various scores, assessed directly in the field, provide a reliable proxy for the sun illumination as perceived from the ground at the current time. Behaviours were defined as feeding (the food species and type being systematically specified: fruits, young leaves, mature leaves, stems/piths, roots, insects, other), resting (including self-grooming), moving, socialising (e.g., collective play, vocalising) or others (solitary play, vigilance, etc.) (see Masi, et al. 2009 for more details on behavioural classification). We considered that a feeding event occurred when at least three (sub)adults were visible in a given behavioural group scan, and at least half of them were feeding on the same food species (to exclude opportunistic snacking, Salmi et al. 2020). To remove pseudo-movements due to GPS noise when gorillas did not move, we considered the successive GPS locations that were within 30 m of each other as a single location.
To show that the swamp represents a unique foodspot for the study group, hence worth memorising, we compared food consumption within the swamp and the different habitats, in particular at a river which is located at the heart of their home range (Fig. 1) and represents the only other aquatic habitat, assuming that food consumption would evidence difference in food availability. In each habitat, we calculated the feeding percentage for a given species and/or food type as the proportion of feeding observations on the food of interest given all recorded feeding scans for all individuals. To maximise data independency, we considered data of the same hour as a unique observation. We compared feeding rates with the Horn-Morisita index (adapted for proportions) using the ‘horn_morisita’ function of the abdiv package (Bittinger 2020), which accounts for a resemblance in both the rate of consumption and the diversity of the food types. Values close to zero (lower bound) indicate weak similarity, while values close to one (upper bound) indicate high similarity. For this computation, we removed all food types that were not associated with plants (e.g., insects, Fig. 2) and counted each observation (individual-scan) for each species-food type.
Daily path straightness
In primate studies, the efficiency of navigation is often assessed by two proxies, the path straightness (i.e., the ratio of the beeline distance over the travelled path length) and the movement speed (Janmaat et al. 2021). However, in western gorillas, numerous confounding factors (feeding and social events, resting, reluctance to move in rainy conditions for reasons that are not necessarily related to navigation abilities) may affect the speed. We therefore focused only on the path's straightness to assess navigational efficiency, the speed being considered only as a proxy of the motivation level to quickly reach the target. Following Girard et al. (2004), we looked at the backward evolution of the straightness of the movements that the gorillas performed on a given day. The rationale behind this approach is as follows. When an animal reaches a distant goal, the movement directed towards a given target is expected to be relatively straight, whereas movements performed before this orientation phase starts are more tortuous. Consequently, looking at the backward evolution of the straightness index is an easy means to determine when/where the orientation phase starts: with this approach, intentional movements are evidenced by a straightness, measured backward from the target, that remains very high until reaching the point where the animal decides to move to the target. For the days the gorillas reached the swamp, the backward evolution was computed with respect to the entry point into the swamp. It appeared that gorillas moved straight toward the swamp from locations farther than 1500 m away. We thus considered this as the greatest possible distance for which gorillas showed straight movements toward a given target. Furthermore, 1500 m is the average home range radius observed in western gorillas (including the study group, see Robira et al. 2022). We thus focused specifically on the 8 (out of 41) long-distance (> 1500 m) movements reaching the swamp (and we discarded the gorillas’ shorter movements towards the swamp; see Supplementary Figure S2). We contrasted these movements with the movements performed on all other days, for which the backward evolution was computed with respect to the farthest location reached on that day.
Segmentation of the daily movements in short-distance movement bouts
Compasses and place recognition may be useful in both short and long-distance navigation, but (1) light conditions can rapidly change along a daily movement, depending on the weather and the local vegetation cover, and (2) the sun elevation is high at midday but far lower during the early morning and late afternoon. For these reasons, we segmented daily movements, irrespective of whether they corresponded to short- or long-distance navigation, in a series of short-term movement bouts to investigate how the sun may affect their straightness. Note that at this short scale, movement bouts are expected to correspond to directed movements in any case, so that this makes sense to estimate their straightness as the ratio beeline distance/path length travelled (Benhamou 2004).
For the days when the swamp was not visited, we defined a movement bout as the movement performed between two successive feeding sites, which should have been deliberately targeted by gorillas based on their spatial memory (Salmi et al. 2020; Robira et al. 2023a). However, these bouts were considered in the analysis only if (1) the starting and ending feeding sites were located at > 50 m away from each other, to avoid considering sensory-driven movement bouts, and (2) there was at least one further GPS location in-between, as the straightness of a bout defined by only two locations is meaningless.
Long-distance movements ending at the swamp could not be segmented into movement bouts in the same way because gorillas rarely stopped to eat on the way. As such movements were clearly directed overall (see Results), we considered any series of three consecutive GPS locations as a movement bout, provided the first and last locations were located > 50 m away from each other. When necessary, additional GPS locations were added to the series of locations until this condition was fulfilled.
Effect of the lighting level and putative use of the sun azimuth as a compass
All analyses were carried out with the R software (v.4.1.2, R Core Team 2020). We tested how the straightness of directed movement bouts may depend on the weather conditions and vegetation openness (canopy and understorey), both acting as proxies for the habitat visibility and thus testing for landmark-based navigation, and the cosine of the sun elevation (a proxy for how easy it is to determine the sun azimuth), to investigate whether gorillas use the sun azimuth as a compass, using a beta regression (Model “Sun visibility” in Supplementary Material, ‘betareg’ function of the betareg package, Cribari-Neto and Zeileis 2010; Grün, et al. 2012, with a logit-link function and a fixed dispersion parameter). The sun elevation for each movement bout was determined with the “getSunlightPosition” function of the suncalc package (Thieurmel and Elmarhraoui 2022) based on the mid-time of each bout.
Initially, we considered the pairwise interactions between weather (binary variable indicating whether the sky is clear or overcast) and the canopy and understorey openness, because the effect of canopy or understorey openness on the overall visibility may be stronger when the sky is not overcast. We also included an interaction between the weather and the cosine of sun elevation. The use of a sun compass would be highlighted by a significant positive effect of the cosine of sun elevation when the sky was blue (i.e., clear), but no significant effect when the sky was overcast, resulting in a significant interaction between the two factors. We also controlled for the context (swamp vs non-swamp days) and the distance travelled during the movement bout (taking the logarithm, and scaling it to a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1), since the quality of the measure of straightness may vary with the distance travelled (the GPS locations are sampled only each 20 min).
To ease the final model interpretation, we removed non-significant interactions (but kept the singular variables) and mentioned their respective test in the Results section. This led to the following model formulation
where \(s{\prime}=\frac{\left(s\left({N}_{bouts}-1\right)+0.5\right)}{{N}_{bouts}}\), is the adjusted straightness to fit the requirement for a beta regression, with s corresponding to the 'standard' straightness and Nbouts to the number of movement bouts considered in the analysis, while f is the transformation function required to model a beta regression, \({I}_{w}\) is a binary weather variable (0 for blue sky, 1 for overcast sky), \({Z}_{u}\) and \({Z}_{c}\) are the degrees of openness of the undercover and canopy, respectively (which were z-transformed to a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1, for easier interpretability; Schielzeth 2010), cos(e) the cosine of the sun’s elevation, \({Z}_{d}\) the logarithm of the distance travelled (also z-transformed), and \({I}_{cx}\) is a context indicator function specifying whether the movement occurred on a “swamp day” or a “non-swamp day”. The \(\beta\) values are the regression coefficients to be estimated, and \(\epsilon\) is the random error term. After fitting, we verified the necessary statistical assumptions for such modelling (e.g., absence of collinearity, homogeneous distribution of residuals, etc.), the fit quality, and the model stability (i.e., outlier tests). We observed no major issue (see Supplementary Material).
Results
The swamp is a source of unique food
Gorillas fed on different food types in the swamp and the riparian area (Fig. 2A; Horn-Morisita similarity index: 0.15). Stems/piths and roots were the main eaten food type in the swamp while gorillas mostly ate fruits and leaves in the riparian area. The two most consumed plants at the swamp (Hydrocharis chevalieri, for the roots, and Culcasia sp., for the leaves, representing 47.77% and 12.6% of the consumption rate, respectively) were not consumed at the river. The third most consumed plant at the swamp (Aframomum sp.) was however eaten at similar rate in both aquatic habitats (Fig. 2B).
Long-distance movements to the swamp
To go to the swamp, gorillas travelled distances at least three times the daily distance they usually travel (see Supplementary Material “Longer daily travelled distances when the swamp is visited”). Visits to the swamp were not homogeneously distributed during the year (see Supplementary Material “Timing of visits to the swamp area”), with one peak occurring during high frugivory. Nineteen visits (out of 41) were followed by another one in the next three days, with gorillas remaining within 1500 m from the swamp in 84% of the cases. Eight of the total visits started with the group being initially at more than 1500 m from the swamp ([min, max] = [1644, 2461]).
The backward evolution of the straightness of the long-distance movements (> 1500 m) movements ending at the swamp was linear with values very close to 1, indicating a strongly directed movement (Fig. 3). This was markedly different from what was observed for long-distance movements that did not reach the swamp, for which the straightness rapidly decreased as a function of the backward distance to the endpoint (Fig. 3). This means that for everyday movements the ending point was targeted only when the group was close to it, whereas it could be targeted even at more than 1500 m when the ending point corresponded to a swamp entry. During these long-distance movements to the swamp, they ate and rested about 70% less than during movements not ending at the swamp (see Supplementary Material “Reduced feeding/resting opportunities when en route to the swamp”). This highlights the high motivational level of the gorillas to quickly reach the swamp once they have decided to go there.
Influence of the sun
To investigate whether the visibility of the sun may improve the navigation efficiency, we considered the 657 movement bouts toward a potential target (food or resting site; both short- and long-distance movements) located at more than 50 m (distance assumed to correspond to the gorilla visual perception range). The lighting conditions influenced how straight gorillas moved (full vs null model comparison: \({\chi }_{4}^{2}\)= 26.765, p < 0.001). However, in the initial full model, all initial pairwise interactions (weather and canopy openness, weather and understorey openness, and weather and cosine of the sun’s elevation), were not significant (respective likelihood ratio tests: \({\chi }_{1}^{2}\)= 0.281, p = 0.60, \({\chi }_{1}^{2}\)= 0.871, p = 0.35, \({\chi }_{1}^{2}\)= 0.825, p = 0.36). Weather conditions alone also influenced how straight gorillas moved (Table 1). The straightness of movements performed under an overcast vs. blue sky was lowered by 5% (from 0.81 to 0.77) when the effects of other covariates were averaged (Fig. 4, Table 1). Similarly, gorillas travelled straighter when the sun’s elevation was low (i.e., the cosine was high, Table 1), but this was independent of the weather conditions (as the interaction was non-significant, see above). Canopy and understorey openness did not influence the straightness (Table 1).
Discussion
The navigation processes used by terrestrial mammals at the home range scale cannot be considered a simple spatial extension of those that were highlighted at a small scale in the lab (Benhamou 1996, 2010; Warren 2019), and on which an important knowledge has been accumulated in terms of behavioural and neurobiological processes (Poucet and Benhamou 1997). Our understanding of navigation at the home range scale is poorer. It has been addressed only by a few studies (e.g., Tsoar et al. 2011; Toledo et al. 2020). With this study, we aimed to offer new insights into wild western gorilla’s navigation abilities at this scale. As our results refer to only a single gorilla group, their generality may be questioned. Yet, in previous comparative studies, this group did not differ from the other study groups in terms of ranging behaviour (daily distance travelled or home range size, Robira et al. 2022), diet choice (Robira et al. 2023a, 2023b) or other behaviours (feeding and communication: Miglietta et al. 2021; dispersal and genetic patterns: Masi et al. 2021).
We showed that since the beginning of the journey, western gorillas travelled to a distant swamp in a very straight way, much straighter than the everyday movements for the days when the swamp was not visited. The swamp excursions occurred within a day and were more frequent at specific times of the year. Overall, this indicates that western gorillas memorised the swamp location and deliberately targeted it from far away (> 1500 m). All these journeys except one (see Fig. 1) started early during the day. Even though the sample size is low, this emphasises that gorillas may have planned quite quickly after the night to target the swamp, similar to female chimpanzees when foraging on widely dispersed, ephemeral, and sought-after fruit (Janmaat et al. 2014). Western gorillas seem thus able to rely on spatial memory to forage also at long distances, in addition to short-range movements as previously shown (Salmi et al. 2020; Robira, et al. 2023a; Robira et al. 2023b). As the swamp represented a unique source of mineral-rich plants (Magliocca and Gautier-Hion 2002; Metsio et al. 2014), not available elsewhere in their home range, the decision to go feeding there was likely triggered by the mineral intake need, particularly important during the high-frugivory season (Masi et al. 2015). During this period, mineral nutrient intake is indeed lower in western gorilla diet when compared to low-frugivory periods (Masi et al. 2015; Lodwick and Salmi 2019). Such a high motivation was further highlighted by the reduction of feeding and resting events on the way to the swamp. This translated into a faster travel towards the swamp from a distant starting point, because of the absence of the usual snacking and resting en route. Taken together, the results mean that the study gorillas efficiently navigated their home range.
Gorillas may be expected to navigate their home range using a compass and/or landmarks. For both these mechanisms, the sun may affect the way diurnal individuals may move. On one side, the sun azimuth may be used as a reference direction, but only when it is not too high (i.e., when distant from noon). We observed that around noon, western gorillas’ movements were more tortuous. However, this result was obtained irrespective of whether the sky was blue or overcast. This suggests that the apparent effect of the sun’s elevation on the straightness of directed movement was due to an (unknown) time-dependent factor rather than because the sun's elevation made it difficult to benefit from the sun azimuth, as expected if the sun was used as a compass. Certainly, hunger might play on the motivation, hence on the foraging efficiency of individuals (Noser and Byrne 2010; but see de Guinea et al. 2021 for contrasting empirical evidence). For western gorillas, noon generally represents a moment of inactivity/food satiety (Masi et al. 2009). This may result in different movement patterns associated with at least a lower speed (Salmi et al. 2020; however, note that this study used a coarser estimation of time—early/late morning/afternoon, and did not find changes in straightness along the day).
Generally, the tools used to navigate the environment vary with familiarity (Åkesson et al. 2014), which may or may not influence navigation efficiency (Presotto et al. 2019; Salmi et al. 2020). A compass is particularly useful for navigating unfamiliar areas (e.g., Guilford and Biro 2014). It is therefore not surprising that western gorillas may have not used the sun compass to navigate their home range, which corresponds to a very familiar area to them (Robira et al. 2022). The relative rarity of the movements toward the far-away swamp did not allow us to test whether the sun could be used specifically as a compass in relocation movements towards areas that are scarcely exploited by the group, thus likely also the least familiar ones. However, while these events may be infrequent over a year, visits to the swamp occur every year. Thus, some group members should have considerable experience of the whole periphery of their main range, hence being able to lead the rest of the group to the swamp from different directions. As gorilla groups are cohesive, only a few knowledgeable group members are sufficient to guide the whole group using vocalisations (Miglietta et al. 2021). This may explain the absence of preferred travelled routes towards the swamp.
The absence of compass use does not necessarily mean that a reference direction is useless for navigation; such a reference may foster efficient navigation, even in familiar environments (Benhamou 1998). At the home range scale, the visual recognition of familiar places, which should be helped by good illumination, should play a major role, particularly given primates’ visual abilities (Dominy et al. 2001; Dominy and Lucas 2001). In a familiar environment, this direction can be built up based on the configuration of surrounding landmarks, as shown by a large number of neurobiological studies performed on rats (reviewed in Poucet and Benhamou 1997). These studies highlighted not only the role of hippocampal neurons, called place cells, in the landmark-based recognition of familiar places (O'Keefe & Nadel 1978), but also of post-subiculum neurons, called head-direction cells (Taube et al. 1990a,b) in the use of a landmark-based reference direction (see model in Benhamou 1998). Thus, provided that the landmarks are sufficiently illuminated to be visually recognised, western gorillas should benefit from using a reference direction associated with the set of landmarks perceptible from the group's current position, letting a compass be unnecessary. Coherently, we showed that the lighting level affected western gorillas’ movement patterns. An overcast sky is likely to decrease visibility, contrast, and colour perception (Théry 2001), thereby landmark-based place recognition (Guilford and Graham 2014). This is probably why gorillas move straighter under a blue sky than under an overcast one. The lack of effect of the canopy and the understorey openness may, however, seem paradoxical in this regard. It can nonetheless be explained because canopy openness is usually inversely related to understorey openness as plants are competing for light access (Kitajima and Poorter 2008), so the overall ground-level brightness depends mainly on sky clarity. It now remains to elucidate how western gorillas use these landmarks to navigate. Indeed, the way landmarks are used to navigate the home range should be quite different from the landmark triangulation used to pinpoint a goal at a short distance (Benhamou 2010). At the home range scale, landmarks may be associated with the nodes of a network of routes (Poucet 1993; Benhamou 2010; Warren 2019). Many primates may indeed navigate their home range in this way (Di Fiore and Suarez 2007; Presotto et al. 2018; de Guinea et al. 2019; de Raad and Hill 2019; Abreu et al. 2021; Watkins et al. 2022).
Overall, despite being based on a single group, our study contributes to the understanding of how western gorillas navigate their home ranges. The role of sunlight in the studied gorilla group movement patterns mirrored what is observed in human populations. Humans also perform landmark-based navigation in familiar environments (Waller and Lippa 2007) and are sensitive to dark conditions, moving less accurately (Kettunen et al. 2015). Yet, despite their lower visual abilities in the dark, many so-called diurnal primates are also active at night, such as chimpanzees (Tagg et al. 2018). During this nocturnal active time, some chimpanzees have been observed navigating the forest efficiently to reach the forest edge and raid human crops (Krief et al. 2014; Lacroux et al. 2022).
Primates might thus rely on a large palette of navigational tools, favouring some over others depending on the conditions they face. In this regard, as spatial memory (Rosati 2017) and vision (Dominy and Lucas 2001) may have played together an important role in the evolutionary success of primate lineages, and shaped their movements, comparative studies of the movement patterns of different primate species under different light, weather, and moon conditions should be of considerable interest to better understand navigation processes in diurnal primates.
Data availability
Given the conservation threat that may be associated with the possession of location data for this threatened species, the request for access and use of the raw data should be made directly to the WCS in the Republic of the Congo, the owner of the data. Analytical scripts can then be provided by BR.
References
Abreu F, Rosário D, Ferreira da Silva M, Fragaszy D (2021) Navigating in a challenging semiarid environment: the use of a route-based mental map by a small-bodied neotropical primate. Anim Cogn 24:629–643
Åkesson S, Boström J, Liedvogel M, Muheim R (2014) Anim Navi Move Scales 21:151–178
Alerstam T, Gudmundsson GA, Green M, Hedenstrom A (2001) Migration along orthodromic sun compass routes by arctic birds. Anim Cogn 4:227–266
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Anim Cogn 49:227–266
Benhamou S (1996) No evidence for cognitive mapping in rats. Anim Behav 52:201–212
Benhamou S (1998) Place navigation in mammals: A configuration-based model. Anim Cogn 1:55–63
Benhamou S (2004) How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal’s path: straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension? J Theor Biol 229:209–220
Benhamou S (2010) Orientation and Navigation. In: Koob GF, Le Moal M, Thompson RF, editors. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience. Vol. 2. Oxford (UK): Academic Press; 2010. p. 497–503.
Bittinger K (2020) abdiv: Alpha and Beta Diversity Measures. R package, <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=abdiv>
Boyer D, Walsh PD (2010) Modelling the mobility of living organisms in heterogeneous landscapes: does memory improve foraging success? Philos Trans Royal Society Math, Phy Eng Sci 368(1933):5645–5659
Bracis C, Gurarie E, Van Moorter B, Goodwin RA (2015) Memory effects on movement behavior in animal foraging. PLoS ONE 10:e0136057
Calenge C (2006) The package adehabitat for the R software: tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:1035
Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Rode KD, Hauck EM, McDowell LR (2003) Variation in the nutritional value of primate foods: among trees, time periods, and areas. Int J Primatol 24:317–333
Cribari-Neto F, Zeileis A (2010) Beta Regression in R. J Stat Softw 34:1–24
Doran-Sheehy DM, Greer D, Mongo P, Schwindt D (2004) Impact of ecological and social factors on ranging in western gorillas. Am J Primatol 64:207–222
Doran-Sheehy DM, Mongo P, Lodwick J, Conklin-Brittain NL (2009) Male and female western gorilla diet: Preferred foods, use of fallback resources, and implications for ape versus old world monkey foraging strategies. Am J Phys Anthropol 140:727–738
Dominy NJ, Lucas PW (2001) Ecological importance of trichromatic vision to primates. Nature 410:363–366
Dominy NJ, Lucas PW, Osorio D, Yamashita N (2001) The sensory ecology of primate food perception. Evol Anthropol 10:171–186
de Guinea M, Estrada A, Nekaris KAI, Van Belle S (2019) Arboreal navigation and route selection: energetic implications associated with tree monitoring and landscape attributes in a Neotropical primate. Mov Ecol 7:39
de Guinea M, Estrada A, Nekaris KAI, Van Belle S (2021) Cognitive maps in the wild: revealing the use of metric information in black howler monkey route navigation. J Exp Biol 224:
de Raad LA, Russell HA (2019) Topological spatial representation in wild chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). Anim Cogn 22:3
Di Fiore A, Suarez SA (2007) Route-based travel and shared routes in sympatric spider and woolly monkeys: cognitive and evolutionary implications. Anim Cogn 10:317–329
Durieux G, Liedvogel M (2021) Orientation and navigation in the animal world. In: Jade Morton YT, van Diggelen F, Spilker Jr JJ, Parkinson BW (eds) Position, Navigation, and Timing Technologies in the 21st Century: Integrated Satellite Navigation, Sensor Systems, and Civil Applications, vol 2. John Wiley & Sons Inc, pp 1689–1709
Fagan WF, Lewis MA, Auger-Méthé M, Avgar T, Benhamou S, Breed G, Ladage L et al (2013) Spatial memory and animal movement. Ecol Lett 16:1316–1329
Garrett RC, Nar A, Fisher TJ (2022) Ggvoronoi: Voronoi Diagrams and Heatmaps with 'Ggplot2'. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggvoronoi
Gessner J, Buchwald R, Wittemyer G (2014) Assessing species occurrence and species-specific use patterns of bais (forest clearings) in Central Africa with camera traps. Afr J Ecol 52:59–68
Girard C, Benhamou S, Dagorn L (2004) FAD: Fish Aggregating Device or Fish Attracting Device? A new analysis of yellowfin tuna movements around floating objects. Anim Behav 67:319–326
Grove M (2013) The evolution of spatial memory. Math Biosci 242:25–32
Grün B, Kosmidis I, Zeileis A (2012) Extended Beta Regression in R: Shaken, Stirred, Mixed, and Partitioned. J Stat Softw 48:1–25
Guilford T, Biro D (2014) Route Following and the Pigeon’s Familiar Area Map. J Exp Biol 217:169–179
Guilford T, Graham TK (2014) The sun compass revisited. Anim Behav 97:135–143
Jang H, Boesch C, Mundry R, Ban SD, Janmaat KRL (2019a) Travel linearity and speed of human foragers and chimpanzees during their daily search for food in tropical rainforests. Sci Rep 9:1–13
Jang H, Boesch C, Mundry R, Kandza V, Janmaat KRL (2019b) Sun, age and test location affect spatial orientation in human foragers in rainforests. Proc R Soc B 286:20190934
Janmaat KRL, Polansky L, Ban SD, Boesch C (2014) Wild chimpanzees plan their breakfast time, type, and location. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:16343–16348
Janmaat KRL, de Guinea M, Collet C, Byrne RW, Robira B, van Loon E, Jang H et al (2021) Using natural travel paths to infer and compare primate cognition in the wild. iScience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102343
Kettunen P, Putto K, Gyselinck V, Krause CM, Sarjakoski LT (2015) Perception and recall of landmarks for personal navigation in nature at night versus day. In: Liu J, Zhao J (eds) Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, pp 281–301
Kitajima K, Poorter L (2008) Functional basis for resource niche partitioning by tropical trees. Trop Forest Com Ecol 1936:160–181
Krief S, Cibot M, Bortolamiol S, Seguya A, Krief J-M, Masi S (2014) Wild chimpanzees on the edge: Nocturnal activities in croplands. PLoS ONE 9:e109925
Lacroux C, Robira B, Kane-Maguire N, Guma N, Krief S (2022) Between Forest and Croplands: Nocturnal Behavior in Wild Chimpanzees of Sebitoli, Kibale National Park. Uganda Plos ONE 17:e0268132
Lodwick JL, Salmi R (2019) Nutritional composition of the diet of the western gorilla (Gorilla gorilla): Interspecific variation in diet quality. Am J Primatol 81:e23044
Magliocca F, Gautier-Hion A (2002) Mineral content as a basis for food selection by western lowland gorillas in a forest clearing. Am J Primatol 57:67–77
Magliocca F, Gautier-Hion A (2004) Inter-group encounters in western lowland gorillas at a forest clearing. Folia Primatol 75:379–382
Masi S, Cipolletta C, Robbins M (2009) Western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) change their activity patterns in response to frugivory. Am J Primatol 71:91–100
Masi S, Mundry R, Ortmann S, Cipolletta C, Boitani L, Robbins M (2015) The influence of seasonal frugivory on nutrient and energy intake in wild western gorillas. PLoS ONE 10:e0129254
Masi S, Austerlitz F, Chabaud C, Lafosse S, Marchi N, Georges M, Dessarps-Freichey F, Miglietta S, Sotto-Mayor A, San Galli A, Meulman E, Pouydebat E, Krief S, Todd A, Fuh T, Breuer T, Ségurel L (2021) No evidence for female kin association, indications for extragroup paternity, and sex-biased dispersal patterns in wild western gorillas. Ecol Evol 11(12):7634–7646
Metsio SJ, Buchwald R, Wittemyer G (2014) Plant mineral concentrations related to foraging preferences of western lowland gorilla in central African forest clearings. Am J Primatol 76:1115–1126
Miglietta S, Bardino G, Sotto-Mayor A, Galli AS, Meulman E, Breuer T, Fuh T, Masi S (2021) Absence of specific individuals and high food abundance elicit food calls in wild western gorillas. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 75(6):98
Mittelstaedt ML, Mittelstaedt H (1980) Homing by path integration in a mammal. Naturwiss 67:566
Müller M, Wehner R (2007) Wind and sky as compass cues in desert ant navigation. Naturwissenschaften 94:589–594
Nishihara T (1995) Feeding ecology of western lowland gorillas in the Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park, Congo. Primates 36:151–168
Noser R, Byrne RW (2010) How do wild baboons (Papio ursinus) plan their routes? Travel among multiple high-quality food sources with inter-group competition. Anim Cogn 13:145–155
O’Keefe J, Nadel L (1978) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 570
Pennec F, Gérard C, Meterreau L, Monghiemo C, Bokika Ngawolo J-C, Laurent R, Narat V (2020) Spatiotemporal variation in Bonobo (Pan paniscus) habitat use in a forest–savanna mosaic. Int J Primatol 41:775–799
Presotto A, Verderane MP, Biondi L, Mendonca-Furtado O, Spagnoletti N, Madden M, Izar P (2018) Intersection as key locations for bearded capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) traveling within a route network. Anim Cogn 21:393–405
Presotto A, Fayrer-Hosken R, Curry C, Madden M (2019) Spatial mapping shows that some African elephants use cognitive maps to navigate the core but not the periphery of their home ranges. Anim Cogn 22:251–263
Poucet B (1993) Spatial cognitive maps in animals: New hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychol Rev 100:163–182
Poucet B, Benhamou S (1997) The neuropsychology of spatial cognition in the rat. Crit Rev Neurobiol 11:101–120
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
Robira B, Benhamou S, Breuer T, Obeki Bayanga E, Miglietta S, Sotto-Mayor A, Bardino G, Todd A, Cipolletta C, Masi S (2022) Passive segregation and multi-scale space-use adjustments to socio-ecological variables in western gorillas. Research Square, preprint.
Robira B, Benhamou S, Fuh T, Masi S (2023a) Do Seasonal Frugivory and Cognition Shape Foraging Movements in Wild Western Gorillas? In: Reyna-Hurtado R, Melletti M, Chapman C (eds) Movement Ecology of Afrotropical Forest Mammals. Springer
Robira B, Benhamou S, Obeki Bayanga E, Breuer T, Masi S (2023b) How do primates decide where to feed? Insights in wild western gorillas. Anim Behav 204:25–36
Robira B, Benhamou S, Masi S, Llaurens V, Riotte-Lambert L (2021) Foraging efficiency in temporally predictable environments: is a long-term temporal memory really advantageous? Royal Soc Open Sci 8:211431
Rosati AG (2017) Foraging cognition: reviving the ecological intelligence hypothesis.". Trends Cogn Sci 21:691–702
Salmi R, Presotto A, Scarry CJ, Hawman P, Doran-Sheehy DM (2020) Spatial cognition in western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla): an analysis of distance, linearity, and speed of travel routes. Anim Cogn 23:545–557
Santschi F (1911) Obervations Et Remarques Critiques Sur Le mécanisme de l’orientation Chez Les Fourmis. Rev Suisse Zool 19:303–338
van Schaik CP, Brockman DK (2009) Seasonality in primate ecology, reproduction, and life history: an overview. In: Brockman DK, van Schaik CP (eds) Seasonality in Primates. Cambridge University Press, pp 3–20
Schielzeth H (2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol Evol 1:103–113
Schmidt-Koenig K (1990) The sun compass. Experientia 46:336–342
Tagg N, McCarthy M, Dieguez P, Bocksberger G, Willie J, Mundry R, Stewart F et al (2018) Nocturnal activity in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Evidence for flexible sleeping patterns and insights into human evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol 166:510–529
Taube JS, Muller RU, Ranck JB (1990a) Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Descr Quant Anal J Neurosci 10:420–435
Taube JS, Muller RU, Ranck JB (1990b) Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. II. Eff En Manip J Neurosci 10:436–447
Théry M (2001) Forest light and its influence on habitat selection. Plant Ecol 153:251–261
Thieurmel B, Elmarhraoui A (2022) Suncalc: Compute Sun Position, Sunlight Phases, Moon Position and Lunar Phase. CRAN.R-project.org. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=suncalc.
Thorup K, Bission IA, Holland RA, Wingfield JC, Ramenofsky M, Wikelski M (2007) Evidence for a navigational map stretching across the continental U.S. in a migratory songbird. PNAS 104:18115–18119
Toledo S, Shohami D, Schiffner I, Lourie E, Orchan Y, Bartan Y, Nathan R (2020) Cognitive map–based navigation in wild bats revealed by a new high-throughput tracking system. Science 369:188–193
Tsoar A, Nathan R, Bartan Y, Vyssotski A, Dell’Omo G, Ulanovsky N (2011) Large-scale navigational map in a mammal. PNAS 108:E718–E724
Trapanese C, Meunier H, Masi S (2019) What, where and when: spatial foraging decisions in primates. Biol Rev 94:483–502
Waller D, Lippa Y (2007) Landmarks as beacons and associative cues: Their role in route learning. Mem Cogn 35:910–924
Wallraff HG (1974) Das Navigationsystem der Vögel München: Oldenbourg
Wallraff HG (2001) Navigation by homing pigeon: updated perspective. Ethol Ecol Evol 13:1–48
Warren WH (2019) Non-euclidean navigation. J Exp Biol 222:186890
Watkins B, Oelklaus J, Arnaud C, O’Connor D, Wright PC, Jolly A (2022) Routes matter: the effect of seasonality on bamboo lemur navigational strategies. Anim Cogn 186:137–149
Yamagiwa J, Iwata Y, Ando C, Basabose AK (2018) Use of swamp and riverside forest by eastern and western gorillas. In: Nowak K, Barnett AA, Matsuda I (eds) Primates in Flooded Habitats. Cambridge University Press, pp 184–194
Funding
The research presented here utilises data from Mondika Research Site of the Wildlife Conservation Society Congo Program. The views expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of WCS or other data contributors. Any errors are attributable to the author(s). We thank the “Ministère de l’Économie Forestière” and the “Ministère de la Recherche Scientifique et de l’Innovation Technologique” of the Government of the Republic of the Congo for their permission to carry out this research. We deeply thank the Wildlife Conservation Society and its associated team, including field assistants and the Aka trackers involved in the data collection, for their crucial support and involvement in this study. We thank the USAID Central Africa Regional Program for the Environment (CARPE) and Spain-UNEP LifeWeb for financially supporting Mondika Research Centre. B.R. was funded by a PhD grant from the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research to the École Normale Supérieure in Paris.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BR: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing, Visualization. SB: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing. EOB: Investigation. TB: Resources, Project administration, Writing—Review & Editing. SM: Conceptualization, Supervision, Resources, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare having no conflict of interest.
Animal Ethics
This research adhered to ethics, research protocols, and legal requirements of the government of Republic of the Congo. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Robira, B., Benhamou, S., Obeki Bayanga, E. et al. Changes in movement patterns in relation to sun conditions and spatial scales in wild western gorillas. Anim Cogn 27, 37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-024-01871-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-024-01871-9