Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: Food Sci Biotechnol (2022) 31:1315-1323 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-022-01118-8
In the original publication, incorrect versions of Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5 were published. Specifically, the arrows in Figs. 2, 3 and 4 were moved outside the representative images, and the Fig. 5 was wrongly replaced by another figure. The correct version of Figs. 2, 3, 4, and 5, were shown below.
Representative H&E-stained images showing the liver morphology (200 ×). The blue arrow referred to portal vein congestion. Besides, the green arrow referred to hepatocellular swelling, karyopyknosis, and steatosis. H&E hematoxylin and eosin; Control control group, IR ionizing radiation group, IR + CA50 ionizing radiation + 50 mg/kg body weight of CA group, IR + CA100 ionizing radiation + 100 mg/kg body weight of CA group, IR + CA200 ionizing radiation + 200 mg/kg body weight of CA group
Representative immunohistochemistry images of BAX in liver tissues (200 ×). The BAX positive area was in brown color and indicated in blue arrows. Control control group, IR ionizing radiation group, IR + CA50 ionizing radiation + 50 mg/kg body weight of CA group, IR + CA100 ionizing radiation + 100 mg/kg body weight of CA group, IR + CA200 ionizing radiation + 200 mg/kg body weight of CA group
Representative immunohistochemistry images of Bcl-xL in liver tissues (200 ×). The Bcl-xL positive area was in brown color and indicated in blue arrows. Control control group, IR ionizing radiation group, IR + CA50 ionizing radiation + 50 mg/kg body weight of CA group, IR + CA100 ionizing radiation + 100 mg/kg body weight of CA group, IR + CA200 ionizing radiation + 200 mg/kg body weight of CA group
CA ameliorates liver damage in irradiated mice. A The sinusoidal congestion and steatosis score of radiation-induced liver damage after radiation. B The relative expression ratio of BAX in liver tissues. C The relative expression ratio of Bcl-xL in liver tissues. The levels of BAX and Bcl-xL protein expression were analyzed after normalization to that of control group. Control control group, IR ionizing radiation group, IR + CA50 ionizing radiation + 50 mg/kg body weight of CA group, IR + CA100 ionizing radiation + 100 mg/kg body weight of CA group, IR + CA200 ionizing radiation + 200 mg/kg body weight of CA group. Data were expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 compared with IR group
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, YH., Wu, JX., He, Q. et al. Correction to: Amelioration of radiation‑induced liver damage by p-coumaric acid in mice. Food Sci Biotechnol 32, 723–727 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-023-01290-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-023-01290-5