Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phrasing of the patient global assessment in the rheumatoid arthritis ACR/EULAR remission criteria: an analysis of 967 patients from two databases of early and established rheumatoid arthritis patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ACR/EULAR Boolean remission criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include a strict cutoff for patient global assessment (PGA, value ≤ 1/10). Near-remission corresponds to remission for joint counts and C-reactive protein but with PGA > 1. The objective was to explore whether the contribution of PGA to remission and near-remission varied according to the wording of the PGA and in relation to disease duration. In patients with early arthritis (N = 731, French ESPOIR cohort) or established RA (N = 236 patients from across Europe), frequency of remission versus near-remission was assessed according to the phrasing used for PGA (global health versus disease activity). In 967 patients (mean [standard deviation] age 49.7 [12.7] years, 76.7% women), remission was infrequent: range 12.9–16.7% (according to wording of PGA) in early RA and 6.8–7.2% in established RA. Near-remission was more frequent: 13.0–16.8% in early RA and 13.1–13.6% in established RA. The ratio of remission to near-remission was higher in the early arthritis cohort (0.8–1.3 versus 0.5–0.5 in established RA). Using the disease activity PGA led to more remission and less near-remission than the global health PGA in the early arthritis cohort (12.9 vs 16.7% near-remission, respectively, p = 0.047) but not in established RA. The proportion of patients who can be classified as remission or near-remission differs in early RA compared to establish RA and depends upon the formulation of the PGA question. PGA referring to disease activity and not global health may be preferred in early disease, if the objective is more alignment with inflammation assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Felson DT, Smolen JS, Wells G, Zhang B, van Tuyl LH, Funovits J et al (2011) American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 70(3):404–413. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2011.149765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vermeer M, Kuper HH, van der Bijl AE, Baan H, Posthumus MD, Brus HL et al (2012) The provisional ACR/EULAR definition of remission in RA: a comment on the patient global assessment criterion. Rheumatology (Oxford) 51(6):1076–1080. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shahouri SH, Michaud K, Mikuls TR, Caplan L, Shaver TS, Anderson JD, Weidensaul DN, Busch RE, Wang S, Wolfe F (2011) Remission of rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: application of the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism 2011 remission criteria. Arthritis Rheum 63(11):3204–3215. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30524

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Studenic P, Smolen JS, Aletaha D (2012) Near misses of ACR/EULAR criteria for remission: effects of patient global assessment in Boolean and index-based definitions. Ann Rheum Dis 71(10):1702–1705. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Balogh E, Madruga Dias J, Orr C, Mullan R, Harty L, FitzGerald O et al (2013 Dec 24) Comparison of remission criteria in a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treated rheumatoid arthritis longitudinal cohort: patient global health is a confounder. Arthritis Res Ther 15(6):R221. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar4421

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirwan JR, Bartlett SJ, Beaton DE, Boers M, Bosworth A, Brooks PM, Choy E, de Wit M, Guillemin F, Hewlett S, Kvien TK, Landewe RB, Leong a, Lyddiatt A, March L, May J, Montie PL, Nikai E, Richards P, Voshaar MMJH, Smeets W, Strand V, Tugwell P, Gossec L (2014) Updating the OMERACT filter: implications for patient-reported outcomes. J Rheumatol 41(5):1011–1015. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hewlett S, Nicklin J, Bode C, Carmona L, Dures E, Engelbrecht M, Hagel S, Kirwan J, Molto A, Redondo M, Gossec L (2016) Translating patient reported outcome measures: methodological issues explored using cognitive interviewing with three rheumatoid arthritis measures in six European languages. Rheumatology (Oxford) 55(6):1009–1016. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kew011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Wit MP, Kvien TK, Gossec L (2015) Patient participation as an integral part of patient-reported outcomes development ensures the representation of the patient voice: a case study from the field of rheumatology. RMD Open 1(1):e000129. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000129

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. French T, Hewlett S, Kirwan J, Sanderson T (2013) Different wording of the Patient Global Visual Analogue Scale (PG-VAS) affects rheumatoid arthritis patients' scoring and the overall disease activity score (DAS28): a cross-sectional study. Musculoskeletal Care 11(4):229–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan NA, Spencer HJ, Abda EA, Alten R, Pohl C, Ancuta C, Cazzato M, Géher P, Gossec L, Henrohn D, Hetland ML, Inanc N, Jacobs JW, Kerzberg E, Majdan M, Oyoo O, Peredo-Wende RA, Selim ZI, Skopouli FN, Sulli A, Hørslev-Petersen K, Taylor PC, Sokka T, QUEST-RA group (2012) Patient’s global assessment of disease activity and patient’s assessment of general health for rheumatoid arthritis activity assessment: are they equivalent? Ann Rheum Dis 71(12):1942–1949. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201142

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nikiphorou E, Radner H, Chatzidionysiou K, Desthieux C, Zabalan C, van Eijk-Hustings Y et al (2016) Patient global assessment in measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the literature. Arthritis Res Ther 18(1):251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwartz CE, Andresen EM, Nosek MA, Krahn GL, RRTC expert panel on health status measurement (2007) Response shift theory: important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88(4):529–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boers M, Kirwan JR, Wells G, Beaton D, Gossec L, d'Agostino MA, Conaghan PG, Bingham CO III, Brooks P, Landewé R, March L, Simon LS, Singh JA, Strand V, Tugwell P (2014) Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. J Clin Epidemiol 67(7):745–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Combe B, Rincheval N (2015) Early lessons from the recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis cohort ESPOIR. Joint Bone Spine 82(1):13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gossec L, Paternotte S, Aanerud GJ, Balanescu A, Boumpas DT, Carmona L, de Wit M, Dijkmans BAC, Dougados M, Englbrecht M, Gogus F, Heiberg T, Hernandez C, Kirwan JR, Mola EM, Cerinic MM, Otsa K, Schett G, Scholte-Voshaar M, Sokka T, von Krause G, Wells GA, Kvien TK (2011) Finalisation and validation of the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease score, a patient-derived composite measure of impact of rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 70(6):935–942. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.142901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fusama M, Miura Y, Yukioka K, Kuroiwa T, Yukioka C, Inoue M, Nakanishi T, Murata N, Takai N, Higashi K, Kuritani T, Maeda K, Sano H, Yukioka M, Nakahara H (2015) Psychological state is related to the remission of the Boolean-based definition of patient global assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 25(5):679–682. https://doi.org/10.3109/14397595.2015.1008955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thiele K, Huscher D, Bischoff S, Späthling-Mestekemper S, Backhaus M, Aringer M, Kohlmann T, Zink A, for the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres (2013) Performance of the 2011 ACR/EULAR preliminary remission criteria compared with DAS28 remission in unselected patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 72(7):1194–1199. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Bykerk V, Dougados M, Emery P, Kvien TK, Navarro-Compán MV, Oliver S, Schoels M, Scholte-Voshaar M, Stamm T, Stoffer M, Takeuchi T, Aletaha D, Andreu JL, Aringer M, Bergman M, Betteridge N, Bijlsma H, Burkhardt H, Cardiel M, Combe B, Durez P, Fonseca JE, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Graninger W, Hannonen P, Haraoui B, Kouloumas M, Landewe R, Martin-Mola E, Nash P, Ostergaard M, Östör A, Richards P, Sokka-Isler T, Thorne C, Tzioufas AG, van Vollenhoven R, de Wit M, van der Heijde D (2016) Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 75(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Tuyl LH, Hewlett S, Sadlonova M, Davis B, Flurey C, Hoogland W et al (2015) The patient perspective on remission in rheumatoid arthritis: ‘You’ve got limits, but you’re back to being you again’. Ann Rheum Dis 74(6):1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kilic L, Erden A, Bingham CO 3rd, Gossec L, Kalyoncu U (2016) Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in recent trials in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. J Rheumatol 43:1300–1305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For the ESPOIR cohort, we wish to thank Nathalie Rincheval who performs expert monitoring and data management for ESPOIR, and all the investigators who recruited and followed the patients (F. BERENBAUM, Paris-Saint Antoine, MC. BOISSIER, Paris-Bobigny, A. CANTAGREL, Toulouse, B. COMBE, Montpellier, M. DOUGADOS, Paris-Cochin, P FARDELONNE and P BOUMIER, Amiens, B. FAUTREL, Paris-Pitié, RM. FLIPO, Lille, P. GOUPILLE, Tours, F. LIOTE, Paris-Lariboisière, O VITTECOQ, Rouen, X MARIETTE, Paris-Bicetre, O MEYER, Paris Bichat, A.SARAUX, Brest, T. SCHAEVERBEKE, Bordeaux and J. SIBILIA, Strasbourg).For RAID, we wish to thank Dr. Loreto Carmona (Spain) and the RAID patient research partners who participated in setting up the initial study.

RAID investigators co-authors as a group:

Dimitrios T. Boumpas, MD, FACP1; Ben A.C. Dijkmans, MD, MS3; Matthias Englbrecht, PhD4; Feride Gogus, MD5; Turid Heiberg, RN PhD6,7; Emilio Martin Mola, MD8; Marco Matucci Cerinic, MD9; Kati Otsa, MD10; Georg Schett, MD4; Marieke Scholte-Voshaar, MSc11; Tuulikki Sokka, MD, PhD12

1University of Crete, Faculty of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece

3VU University Medical Center and Jan van Breemen Institute, the Netherlands

4Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany

5University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey

6Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

7Lovisenberg Diakonal College, Oslo, Norway

8Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain

9Division of Rheumatology AOUC, Denothe Centre, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy

10Tallinn Central Hospital, Estonia

11University of Twente, Netherlands

12Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland

Funding

The first author was partly funded by an Articulum Fellowship. The RAID study was funded by EULAR. The ESPOIR cohort was created and maintained through an unrestricted grant from Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) for the first 5 years; two additional grants from INSERM were obtained to support part of the biological database; the French Society of Rheumatology, Abbott, Pfizer and Roche-Chugai also supported the ESPOIR cohort study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laure Gossec.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

None.

Additional information

Key messages

1. Boolean remission is a state that is difficult to reach in RA, and PGA is the main limiting component: more than half of the patients with joint counts ≤ 1 and normal acute phase reactants are not attaining remission only because of PGA levels.

2. Among patients with normal/low joint counts and CRP, more patients did not reach remission because of PGA results in a cohort of established RA than in a cohort of early arthritis, indicating more discordance between PGA and objective criteria in established RA.

3. Remission was more frequent when using the disease activity PGA than the global health PGA in early arthritis, indicating disease activity PGA results are closer to examination and acute phase reactant results, than global health, at least in early disease.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gossec, L., Kirwan, J.R., de Wit, M. et al. Phrasing of the patient global assessment in the rheumatoid arthritis ACR/EULAR remission criteria: an analysis of 967 patients from two databases of early and established rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol 37, 1503–1510 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-018-3998-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-018-3998-1

Keywords

Navigation