Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the peripheral nerve involvement electrophysiologically in Behçet patients without clinically evident neurological signs and symptoms. Sixty-three patients who fulfilled the International Study Group Classification Criteria for Behçet’s disease (BD) and 49 healthy control subjects were enrolled to the study. Conventional electrophysiological studies of peripheral nerves including F latencies were performed to all subjects. Thirty-one male and 32 female Behçet patients with a mean age of 33.6 ± 11.1 years and (22 male and 27 female healthy control subjects with a mean age of 35.8 ± 9.9 years were included to the study. All but four of the patients were active. In the BD group, electrophysiologically diagnosed neuropathy was detected in nine (14.28%) patients. One (1.58%) patient had sensorimotor polyneuropathy, one patient (1.58%) had sural and ulnar sensorimotor neuropathy, three (4.75%) patients had median and one patient (1.58%) had ulnar sensorimotor neuropathy. Sural nerve sensorial action potential was unobtainable in two (3.17%) patients and prolonged F latencies were observed in two (3.17%) patients. In the control group only one subject (2.4%) had low sural sensorial conduction velocity. The frequency of neuropathy was higher in the patients with BD when compared with the control subjects. Sensory nerves were affected more prominently than motor nerves. There was no relationship between the clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients and the electrophysiologic findings. No significant difference was observed between the clinical parameters of the patients with and without electrophysiologically detected neuropathy, except the levels of disease duration (8.8 ± 5.1 vs 5.28 ± 4.3 years, respectively, p < 0.05). In conclusion, Behçet patients may have subclinical peripheral nerve involvement. Conventional electrophysiologic nerve conduction studies including F responses are recommended in routine examination to diagnose early neuropathy in Behçet patients without evident neurologic symptoms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Behçet H (1937) Uber rezidivierende aphthouse durch ein virus verursachte Geschwuere am Mund, am Auge, und an den Genitalien. Dermatol Wochenschr 105:1152–1157
Kaklamani VG, Vaiopoulus G, Kaklamanis PG (1998) Behçet’s disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum 27:197–215
Önder M, Gurer MA (1997) The multiple faces of Behçet’s disease and its aetiological factors. Yonsei Med J 38:423–427
Serdaroğlu P, Yazıcı H, Özdemir C, Yurdakul S, Bahar S, Aktin E (1989) Neurologic involvement in Behçet’s syndrome. Arch Neurol 46:265–269
Siva A, Kantarci OH, Saip S, Altintas A, Hamuryudan V, Islak C, Kocer N, Yazıcı H (2001) Behçet’s disease: diagnostic and prognostic aspects of neurological involvement. J Neurol 248:95–103
Kidd D, Steuer A, Denman AM, Rudge P (1999) Neurological complications in Behçet’s syndrome. Brain 122:2183–2194
Lannuzel A, Lamaury I, Charpentier D, Caparros-Lefebvre D (2002) Neurological manifestations of Behçet’s disease in a Caribbean population: clinical and imaging findings. J Neurol 249:410–418
Namer IJ, Karabudak R, Zileli T, Ruacan Ş, Küçükali T, Kansu E (1987) Peripheral Nervous system involvement in Behçet’s disease: case report and review of the literature. Eur Neurol 26:235–240
Takeuchi A, Kodama M, Takatsu M, Hashimoto T, Miyashita H (1989) Mononeuritis multiplex in incomplete Behçet’s disease: a case report and review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol 8:375–380
International Study Group for Behçet’s disease (1992) Evaluation of diagnostic classification criteria in Behçet’s disease. Br J Rheumatol 31:299–308
Gur-Toy G, Lenk N, Yalçın B, Aksaray S, Allı N (2005) Serum interleukin 8 as a serologic marker of activity in Behçet’s disease. Int J Dermatol 44(8):657–660
Katsantonis J, Adler Y, Orfanos CE, Zoubolis CC et al (2000) Adamantiades–Behçet’s disease: serum IL-8 is a more reliable marker for disease activity than C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Dermatology 201:37–39
American Diabetes Association (1988) Report and recommendations of San Antonio Conference on diabetic neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 11:661–667
Oh SH (1993) Nerve conduction techniques. In: Oh SH (ed) Clinical electromyography: nerve conduction studies, 2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 39–55
Budak F, Efendi H, Apaydın R, Bilen N, Komsuoğlu S (2000) The F response parameters in Behçet’s disease. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 40:45–48
Akman-Demir G, Serdaroğlu P, Tasci B (1999) Clinical patterns of neurological involvement in Behçet’s disease: evaluation of 200 patients, The Neuro–Behçet Study Group. Brain 122:2171–2182
O’Duffy JD, Carney JA, Deodhar S (1971) Behçet’s disease. Report of 10 cases, 3 with new manifestations. Ann Intern Med 75:561–570
Birol A, Ulkatan S, Koçak M, Erkek E (2004) Peripheral neuropathy in Behçet’s disease. J Dermatol 31:455–459
Yazıcı H, Yurdakul S, Hamuryudan V (2001) Behçet disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol 13:18–22
Oh SH (1993) Nerve conduction techniques. In: Oh SH (ed) Clinical electromyography: nerve conduction in polyneuropathies, 2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 575–666
Sakane T, Suzuki N, Nagafuchi H (1997) Etiolopathology of Behçet’s disease: immunological aspects. Yonsei Med J 38:350–358
Yoo WH, Kim HK, Park TS, Baek HS (2000) Mediastinal mass and brachial plexopathy caused by subclavian arterial aneurysm in Behçet’s disease. Rheumatology 19:227–230
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akbulut, L., Gur, G., Bodur, H. et al. Peripheral neuropathy in Behçet disease: an electroneurophysiological study. Clin Rheumatol 26, 1240–1244 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0466-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0466-0