Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Meta-analysis is no substitute for a comprehensive national registry

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) agents have become an established treatment option for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but are not without risks. As TNF-α has a role in tumour surveillance, anti-TNF-α blockade could potentially increase the risk of malignancy. Recent meta-analysis by Bongartz et al. (JAMA 295:2275–2285, 2006) reported an increase in the incidence of malignancy attributed to anti-TNF-α antibodies, and the information has quickly and uncritically reached several secondary sources with huge effects on public perception of risks related to anti-TNF-α therapy. In contrast, the results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register show that in clinical practice, anti-TNF-α therapy in RA does not appear to increase the risk of malignancy in those patients with low risk of malignancy. We discuss the issues emerging from these published data and suggest caution against giving weight to meta-analysis of short-term drug studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bongartz T, Sutton AJ, Sweeting MJ, Buchan I, Mattison EL, Montori V (2006) Anti-TNF antibody therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of serious infections and malignancies. JAMA 295:2275–85 (correction JAMA 295:E1)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Listing J, Strangfeld A, Kary S et al (2005) Infections in patients with RA treated with biologic agents. Arthritis Rheum 52:3403–3412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Askling J, Fored CM, Brandt L et al (2005) Risks of solid cancers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and after treatment with tumour necrosis factor antagonists. Ann Rheum Dis 64:1421–1426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wegener’s Granulomatosis Etanercept Trial (WGET) Research Group (2005) Etanercept plus standard therapy for Wegener’s granulomatosis. N Engl J Med 352:351–361

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fleischmann R, Baumgartner SW, Weisman MH, Liu T, White B, Peloso P (2006) Long term safety of etanercept in elderly subjects with rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 65:379–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Watson KD, Dixon WG, Hyrich KL, Lunt M, Symmons DPM, Silman AJ (2006) Influence of anti-TNF therapy and previous malignancy of cancer incidence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the BSR biologics register. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45(Suppl 1):i10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Symmons DP, Silman AJ (2006) The world of biologics. Lupus 15:122–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tonks A (2006) Meta-analysis finds rare but serious side effects. BMJ 332:1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. In Brief (2006) Drugs for arthritis triple cancer risk. Nurs Times 102(21):8

  10. Reuters Health Information (2006) Anti–TNF antibody therapy for RA increases cancer and infection risk. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/532660 Accessed on 29 May 2006

  11. Groch J (2006) Rare risks tied to anti-TNF agents for RA. Medpage Today. Available at http://www.medpagetoday.com/Rheumatology/GeneralRheumatology/tb/3308 Accessed on 29 May 2006

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Dziadzio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dziadzio, M., Smith, R. Meta-analysis is no substitute for a comprehensive national registry. Clin Rheumatol 26, 1134–1135 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0445-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0445-5

Keywords

Navigation