Skip to main content
Log in

Shear strength of a silt at various oil/water contents

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important to understand the shear behavior of oil-contaminated soils in many geotechnical problems, such as the analysis of pipelines and storage tanks affected by oil leakage. In this study, the shear behavior of a silt permeated with silicone oil/water (denoted by OS and WS, respectively) was investigated through direct shear tests. The residual shear strength was measured at various degrees of liquid saturation (65–100%) and net normal stresses (50 to 400 kPa). The oil and water retention curves were measured and used to explain the shear behavior. The results show that the residual friction angle of OS is 30% larger than that of WS. This is likely because OS and WS show aggregated and matrix structures, respectively, as evidenced by the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) test. The former structure includes more particle contacts than the latter one. These structural differences can be attributed to varying fluid properties, such as wettability, viscosity, and dielectric constant. When the volumetric degree of water saturation decreases, the total cohesion of WS increases substantially because of the strengthening effects of air-water interfaces on the soil skeleton. In contrast, the degree of oil saturation has minuscule effects on these variables, mainly because OS has a low oil retention ability and the air-oil suction remains very low (i.e., less than 2 kPa) during the desaturation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

α, n, m :

Soil parameters in the VG model (van Genuchten 1980)

β :

Scaling factor that equals the ratio of interfacial tensions

c brine :

Concentration of NaCl brine (g/g)

c t :

Total cohesion

G ker :

The ratio of the unit weight of kerosene to that of water

LL DW :

Liquid limit of soil with deionized water

LL brine :

Liquid limit of soil with 2-M NaCl brine

LL ker :

Liquid limit of soil with kerosene

S l S r :

Volumetric degree of liquid saturation

S o :

Volumetric degree of oil saturation

S w :

Volumetric degree of water saturation

s :

Matric suction

s aw :

Suction produced by the air-water interface

s ao :

Suction produced by the air-oil interface

T al :

Interfacial tensions of air-scaled liquid

T aw :

Interfacial tensions of air-water

T ao :

Interfacial tensions of air-oil

u a :

Pore air pressure

u o :

Oil pressure

u w :

Water pressure

σ :

Total normal stress

σ- u a :

Net normal stress

τ f :

Shear strength of soil

φ′ :

Effective friction angle

References

  • AASHTO (2010) Standard method of test for moisture-density relations of soils using a 2.5-kg (5.5-lb) rammer and a 305-mm (12-in.) Drop. AASHTO standard T99-10. American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sanad HA, Eid WK, Ismael NF (1995) Geotechnical properties of oil-contaminated Kuwaiti sand. J Geotech Eng 121(5):407–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson W (1986) Wettability literature survey-part 2: wettability measurement. J Petrol Technol 38(11):1246–1262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2012) Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort. ASTM D698. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM (2017a) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2017b) Standard test method for consolidated undrained direct simple shear testing of fine grain soils. ASTM D6528. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2017c) Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis. ASTM D6913/D6913M, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM (2017d) Standard test method for particle-size distribution (gradation) of fine-grained soils using the sedimentation (hydrometer) analysis. ASTM D7928. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Buildings Department (BD) (2009) Practice note for authorised persons and registered structural engineers APP 15, 55, site formation - temporary or permanent filling work, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government, Hong Kong

  • Chen J, Anandarajah A, Inyang H (2000) Pore fluid properties and compressibility of kaolinite. J Geotech GeoEnviron Eng 126(9):798–807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Lee CF, Law KT (2004) Causative mechanisms of rainfall-induced fill slope failures. J Geotech GeoEnviron Eng 130(6):593–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Y, Delage P, Alzoghbi P (2003) Retention and transport of a hydrocarbon in a silt. Géotechnique 53(1):83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai BB, Yang J, Zhou CY (2016) Observed effects of interparticle friction and particle size on shear behavior of granular materials. Int J Geomech 16(1):04015011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delage P, Audiguier M, Cui YJ, Howat MD (1996) Microstructure of a compacted silt. Can Geotech J 33(1):150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H (1993) Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • GB 51254 (2017) Technical code for deep filled ground. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Kincaid CT, Lenhard RJ, Simmons CS (1991) Recent studies of flow and transport in the vadose zone. Rev Geophys 29(S1):227–239

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghadyani M, Hamidi A, Hatambeigi M (2019) Triaxial shear behaviour of oil-contaminated clays. Eur J Environ Civil Eng 23(1):112–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel G, O’Carroll DM (2011) Experimental investigation of nonequilibrium capillarity effects: fluid viscosity effects. Water Resour Res 47:W09507

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Han Z, Vanapalli SK (2016) Stiffness and shear strength of unsaturated soils in relation to soil-water characteristic curve. Géotechnique 66(8):627–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilf JW (1956) An investigation of pore-water pressure in compacted cohesive soils, PhD Thesis, Technical Memorandum. No. 654, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Design and Construction Division, Denver

  • Hossain MA, Yin JH (2010) Behaviour of a compacted completely decomposed granite soil from suction controlled direct shear tests. J Geotech GeoEnviron Eng 136(1):189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ijaz N, Ur Rehman Z, Ijaz Z (2022a) Recycling of paper/wood industry waste for hydromechanical stability of expansive soils: a novel approach. J Clean Prod 348:131345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ijaz N, Ye W, Ur Rehman Z, Dai F, Ijaz Z (2022b) Numerical study on stability of lignosulphonate-based stabilized surficial layer of unsaturated expansive soil slope considering hydro-mechanical effect. Transp Geotech 32:100697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izdebska-Mucha D, Trzciński J (2021) Clay soil behaviour due to long-term contamination by liquid petroleum fuels: microstructure and geotechnical properties. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80:3193–3206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jang J, Carlos Santamarina J (2016) Fines classification based on sensitivity to pore-fluid chemistry. J Geotech GeoEnviron Eng 142(4):06015018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia Y et al (2011) The influence of oil contamination on the geotechnical properties of coastal sediments in the Yellow River Delta, China. Bull Eng Geol Environ 70:517–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya A, Fang H-Y (2000) The effects of organic fluids on physicochemical parameters of fine-grained soils. Can Geotech J 37(5):943–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kererat C (2019) Effect of oil-contamination and water saturation on the bearing capacity and shear strength parameters of silty sandy soil. Eng Geol 257:105138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kermani M, Ebadi T (2012) The effect of oil contamination on the geotechnical properties of fine-grained soils. Soil Sediment Contam: Int J 21(5):655–671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khamehchiyan M, Charkhabi AH, Tajik M (2007) Effects of crude oil contamination on geotechnical properties of clayey and sandy soils. Eng Geol 89(3–4):220–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi E, Ghasemzadeh H, Sabour MR, Yazdani H (2013) Geotechnical properties of gas oil-contaminated kaolinite. Eng Geol 166:11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behaviour, vol 3. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore C, Mitchell J (1974) Electromagnetic forces and soil strength. Géotechnique 24(4):627–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasehi SA, Uromeihy A, Nikudel MR, Morsali A (2016) Influence of gas oil contamination on geotechnical properties of fine and coarse-grained soils. Geotech Geol Eng 34(1):333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr AM (2009) Experimental and theoretical studies for the behaviour of strip footing on oil-contaminated sand. J Geotech GeoEnviron Eng 135(12):1814–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr AM (2013) Uplift behaviour of vertical piles embedded in oil-contaminated sand. J Geotech GeoEnviron Eng 139(1):162–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr A, Krishna Rao S (2016) Behaviour of laterally loaded pile groups embedded in oil-contaminated sand. Géotechnique 66(1):58–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Chiu ACF (2003) Laboratory study of loose saturated and unsaturated decomposed granitic soil. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng ASCE 129(6):550–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Menzies B (2007) Advanced unsaturated soil mechanics and engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton

  • Ng CWW, Sadeghi H, Jafarzadeh F (2017) Compression and shear strength characteristics of compacted loess at high suctions. Can Geotech J 54(5):690–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Zhou C, Chiu CF (2020) Constitutive modelling of state-dependent behaviour of unsaturated soils: an overview. Acta Geotech 15(10):2705–2725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson RE, Mesri G (1970) Mechanisms controlling compressibility of clays. J Soil Mech Found Div 96(6):1863–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JC, Lenhard RJ, Kuppusamy T (1987) A parametric model for constitutive properties governing multiphase flow in porous media. Water Resour Res 23(4):618–624

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puri VK (2000) Geotechnical aspects of oil-contaminated sands. Soil Sediment Contam 9(4):359–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi H, Sharifipour M (2019) Geotechnical properties of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils: a comprehensive review. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(5):3685–3717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnaweera P, Meegoda JN (2006) Shear strength and stress-strain behavior of contaminated soils. Geotech Test J 29(2):133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman ZU, Ijaz N, Ye W, Ijaz Z (2023) Design optimization and statistical modeling of recycled waste-based additive for a variety of construction scenarios on heaving ground. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(14):39783–39802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero E, Della Vecchia G, Jommi C (2011) An insight into the water retention properties of compacted clayey soils. Géotechnique 61(4):313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safehian H, Rajabi AM, Ghasemzadeh H (2018) Effect of diesel-contamination on geotechnical properties of illite soil. Eng Geol 241:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng D, Zhou A, Fredlund DG (2011) Shear strength criteria for unsaturated soils. Geotech Geol Eng 29(2):145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif MA, Burrous CM (1969) Temperature effects on the unconfined shear strength of saturated, cohesive soil. Effects of temperature and heat on engineering behavior of soils, Special report 103:267–272

  • Shin EC, Das BM (2001) Bearing capacity of unsaturated oil-contaminated sand. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 11(03):220–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Soga K, Kawabata J, Kechavarzi C, Coumoulos H, Waduge W (2003) Centrifuge modeling of nonaqueous phase liquid movement and entrapment in unsaturated layered soils. J Geotech GeoEnviron Eng 129(2):173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarantino A (2010) Unsaturated soils: compacted versus reconstituted states. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils, Barcelona, Spain, 113–136

  • Tiwari B, Marui H (2005) A new method for the correlation of residual shear strength of the soil with mineralogical composition. J Geotech GeoEnviron Eng 131(9):1139–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trauner L, Dolinar B, Mišič M (2005) Relationship between the undrained shear strength, water content, and mineralogical properties of fine-grained soils. Int J Geomech 5(4):350–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ur Rehman Z, Junaid MF, Ijaz N et al (2023) Remediation methods of heavy metal contaminated soils from environmental and geotechnical standpoints[J]. Sci Total Environ 867:161468

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(5):892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler SJ, Sharma RS, Buisson MSR (2003) Coupling of hydraulic hysteresis and stress–strain behaviour in unsaturated soils. Géotechnique 53(1):41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • XIAMETER™, PMX-200 Silicone Fluid (n.d.) https://www.dow.com/en-us/pdp.xiameter-pmx-200-silicone-fluid-5-cst.01013131z.html?productCatalogFlag=1#properties

  • Yu JR, Zhou C, Mu QY (2022) Numerical investigation on LNAPL flow in the vadose zone considering porosity effects on soil hydraulic properties. Vadose Zone J 21(5):e20211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LM, Xu Y, Tang WH (2008) Calibration of models for pile settlement analysis using 64 field load tests. Can Geotech J 45(1):59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

 The authors would like to thank the National Science Foundation of China (52022004 and 52279109) and the Technology Innovation Center for Land Engineering and Human Settlements, Shaanxi Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd and Xi’an Jiaotong University (201912131-A1).

Funding

This work is supported by the Research Grants Council (RGC) of the HKSAR through the research grant 16204817.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingyi Mu.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, J., Zhou, C. & Mu, Q. Shear strength of a silt at various oil/water contents. Bull Eng Geol Environ 83, 92 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-024-03578-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-024-03578-0

Keywords

Navigation