Abstract
Pore geometrical models are widely used to study transport in porous media, permeability, internal stability, and filter compatibility. Transport of fine grains through the voids between the skeleton of the coarser fraction is mainly controlled by the pore throats or constriction sizes. This study compares various constriction size distribution criteria and capillary tube models, which elucidate the limitations of the Kovacs capillary tube model, and this model is explained and developed. The new proposed threshold boundaries (\({\mathrm{d}}_{0}= \mathrm{2} {\mathrm{.3d}}_{85}^{\mathrm{f}}\) and \({\mathrm{d}}_{0}= \mathrm{2} {\mathrm{.8d}}_{85}^{\mathrm{f}}\)) categorized soil samples as internally stable, transient zone, or unstable. The model also incorporates the precise shape coefficient of particles. This improved model was validated based on a database from the literature, as well as performing 10 new experimental tests on two ideal gradation curves that identified the threshold boundary of Kenney and Lau criteria. This proposed model, which is dependent on grading, porosity, and grain shape, provides accurate predictions using a precise shape factor. This finding may enhance our knowledge about transport in porous media and contribute toward internal stability assessing for practical applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- PSD/GSD:
-
Particle/grain size distribution
- D x, d x :
-
Grain size that X percent is finer than it
- D :
-
Particle size (mm)
- \({D}_{avg}\) :
-
Average grain size of the PSD curve
- f :
-
Finer fraction
- f i :
-
Percentage of grains that are finer from i or at i fragment
- n :
-
Porosity
- SSA or \(S_{0}\) :
-
Specific surface area in \({1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 m}} \right. \kern-0pt} m}\) or \({{m^{2} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{m^{2} } g}} \right. \kern-0pt} g}\)
- \({\upalpha }\), SF :
-
Shape factor, shape coefficient
- \(D_{eff} ,\,{\mathrm{D}}_{{\mathrm{h}}}\) :
-
Effective grain size
- \(d_{2}\) :
-
Maximum pores diameter
- \({\varphi }_{ic}\) :
-
Inscribed-circumscribed sphere ratio
- CSD:
-
Constriction size distribution
- F, F d :
-
Percentage finer than D, mass passing
- H :
-
Mass fraction between diameter D and 4D, mass increment
- \({D}_{i}\) :
-
The size of the grain that i percent is finer
- \({\mathrm{D}}_{85}{\prime}\),\({\mathrm{D}}_{85}^{{\mathrm{f}}}\) :
-
Grain size commensurate 85% in the finer fraction
- \({\mathrm{n}}_{c}\) :
-
Porosity of the coarser fraction
- \({\mathrm{d}}_{cont.}\) :
-
Controlling constriction size
- R d :
-
Relative density
- \({D}_{eff}^{C}\), \({D}_{h}^{C}\) :
-
Effective particle diameter of the coarser fraction
- \(d_{1}\) :
-
Minimum pore diameter
- \(d_{0}\) :
-
Mean pores diameter
- \({\mathrm{\varphi }}_{{\mathrm{s}}}\) :
-
True sphericity
References
Aberg B (1992) Void ratio of noncohesive soils and similar materials. ASCE J Geotech Eng 118:1315–1334
Aberg B (1993) Washout of grains from filtered sand and gravel materials. J Geotech Eng 119:36–53. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:1(36)
ASTM D2487 (2017) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, West Conshohocken
ASTM D4253-00 (2006) Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
ASTM D4254-00 (2006) Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
Aubertin M, Mbonimpa M, Bussière B, Chapuis RP (2003) A model to predict the water retention curve from basic geotechnical properties. Can Geotech J 40:1104–1122. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-054
Bear J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Elsevier, New York
Berkowitz B, Ewing RP (1998) Percolation theory and network modeling applications in soil Physics. Surv Geophys 19:23–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006590500229
Burenkova VV (1993) Assessment of suffusion in non-cohesive and graded soils. In: Filters in Geotechnical and Hydraulic Engineering. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 357–360
Carman PC (1937) Fluid flow through granular beds. Chem Eng Res Des 15:S32–S48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8762(97)80003-2
Carman PC (1939) Permeability of saturated sands, soils and clays. J Agric Sci 29:262–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600051789
Carrier WD (2003) Goodbye, Hazen; Hello, Kozeny-Carman. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 129:1054–1056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:11(1054)
Chang DS, Zhang LM (2013) Extended internal stability criteria for soils under seepage. Soils Found 53:569–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.06.008
Chapuis RP (2012) Predicting the saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils: a review. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:401–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-012-0418-7
Chapuis RP (2021) Analyzing grain size distributions with the modal decomposition method: potential for future research in engineering geology. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80:6667–6676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02341-z
Chatzis I, Dullien FAL (1977) Modelling pore structure by 2-D And 3-D networks with applicationto sandstones. J Can Pet Technol 16:97–108. https://doi.org/10.2118/77-01-09
Dallo YAH, Wang Y (2016) Determination of controlling constriction size from capillary tube model for internal stability assessment of granular soils. Soils Found 56:315–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2016.02.013
Daneshian B, Habibagahi G, Nikooee E (2021) Determination of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of sandy soils: a new pore network approach. Acta Geotech 16:449–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01088-3
Deng Z, Chen X, Jin W, Wang G (2023) Effect of gradation characteristics and particle morphology on internal erosion of sandy gravels: a large-scale experimental study. Water 15:2660. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15142660
Dolzyk K, Chmielewska I (2014) Predicting the coefficient of permeability of non-plastic soils. Soil Mech Found Eng 51:213–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-014-9279-3
Dong H, Blunt MJ (2009) Pore-network extraction from micro-computerized-tomography images. Phys Rev E - Stat Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys 80:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.036307
Fair GM, Hatch LP (1933) Fundamental factors governing the streamline flow of water through sand. J Am Water Works Assoc 25:1551–1565. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1933.tb18342.x
Fan Z, Hu C, Zhu Q et al (2021) Three-dimensional pore characteristics and permeability properties of calcareous sand with different particle sizes. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80:2659–2670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-02078-1
Foster M, Fell R (2001) Assessing embankment dam filters that do not satisfy design criteria. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 127:398–407. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(398)
Fuller W, Thomson S (1907) The laws of proportioning concrete. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 59:67–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0001979
Hassani M (2020) Effect of particle shape on internal erosion of cohesionless soils. Dissertation, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran (in Persian)
Heywood H (1933) Calculation of the specific surface of a powder. Proc Inst Mech Eng 125:383–459. https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1933_125_021_02
Homberg U, Baum D, Prohaska S, et al (2012) Automatic extraction and analysis of realistic pore structures from µCT data for pore space characterization of graded soil. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Scour and Erosion (ICSE-6). Paris, pp 66–73
Hunger M, Brouwers HJH (2009) Flow analysis of water-powder mixtures: application to specific surface area and shape factor. Cem Concr Compos 31:39–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.09.010
Indraratna B, Vafai F (1997) Analytical model for particle migration within base soil-filter system. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 123:100–109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1997)123:2(100)
Indraratna B, Raut AK, Khabbaz H (2007) Constriction-based retention criterion for granular filter design. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 133:266–276. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:3(266)
Indraratna B, Israr J, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2015) Geometrical method for evaluating the internal instability of granular filters based on constriction size distribution. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng ASCE 141:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001343
Istomina V s (1957) Filtration stability of soils. Gostroizdat, Moscow, Leningrad (in Russian)
Kenney TC, Lau D (1985) Internal stability of granular filters. Can Geotech J 22:215–225. https://doi.org/10.1139/t86-068
Kenney TC, Lau D (1986) Internal stability of granular filters: Reply. Can Geotech J 23:420–423. https://doi.org/10.1139/t86-068
Kenney TC, Chahal R, Chiu E et al (1985) Controlling constriction sizes of granular filters. Can Geotech J 22:32–43. https://doi.org/10.1139/t85-005
Kezdi A (1979) Soil physics- selected topics. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Khilar KC, Fogler HS (1998) Migrations of fines in porous media. Springer, Netherlands
Kovacs G (1981) Seepage hydraulics. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
Kozeny M (1927) Uber kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden. Sitzungsber Akad Wiss, Wien 136:271–306
Li M, Fannin RJ (2008) Comparison of two criteria for internal stability of granular soil. Can Geotech J 45:1303–1309. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-046
Li M, Fannin RJ (2013) Capillary tube model for internal stability of cohesionless soil. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 139:831–834. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000790
Li M (2008) Seepage induced instability in widely graded soils. Dissertation, University of British Columbia
Liang Y, Yeh T-CJ, Zha Y et al (2017) Onset of suffusion in gap-graded soils under upward seepage. Soils Found 57:849–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.08.017
Loudon AG (1952) The computation of permeability from simple soil tests. Géotechnique 3:165–183. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1952.3.4.165
Lubochkov (1969) The calculation of suffossion properties of non-cohesive soils when using the non-suffossion analog. In: Proceedings of international conference on hydraulic research. Pub Technical University of Brno, Svazek B-5 (in Russian), Brno, Czechoslovakia, pp 135–148
Maroof A, Mahboubi A, Noorzad A (2020a) A new method to determine specific surface area and shape coefficient of a cohesionless granular medium. Adv Powder Technol 31:3038–3049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2020.05.028
Maroof A, Mahboubi A, Noorzad A, Safi Y (2020b) A new approach to particle shape classification of granular materials. Transp Geotech 22:100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100296
Maroof A, Mahboubi A, Noorzad A (2021a) Effects of grain morphology on suffusion susceptibility of cohesionless soils. Granul Matter 23:8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-020-01075-1
Maroof A, Eidgahee DR, Mahboubi A (2022) Particle morphology effect on the soil pore structure. In: Feng G (ed) Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE 213), pp 1–10. Springer Singapore, Singapore
Maroof A, Mahboubi A, Vincens E, Noorzad A (2022b) Effects of particle morphology on the minimum and maximum void ratios of granular materials. Granul Matter 24:41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-021-01189-0
Maroof A, Mahboubi A, Noorzad A (2021) Particle shape effect on internal instability of cohesionless soils. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Scour and Erosion (ICSE-10). Arlington, Virginia, USA, p 12
Milligan V (1986) Internal stability of granular filters: Discussion. Can Geotech J 23:414–418. https://doi.org/10.1139/t86-066
Nguyen NS, Taha H, Marot D (2021) A new Delaunay triangulation-based approach to characterize the pore network in granular materials. Acta Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01157-1
Raoof A, Hassanizadeh M (2010) A new method for generating pore-network models of porous media. Transp Porous Media 81:391–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-009-9412-3
Reboul N, Vincens E, Cambou B (2008) A statistical analysis of void size distribution in a simulated narrowly graded packing of spheres. Granul Matter 10:457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-008-0111-5
Reboul N, Vincens E, Cambou B (2010) A computational procedure to assess the distribution of constriction sizes for an assembly of spheres. Comput Geotech 37:195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.09.002
Sahimi M (2011) Flow and transport in porous media and fractured rocks https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527636693
Schuler U (1996) Scattering of the composition of soils—An aspect for the stability of granular filters. In: Geofilters 96. Bitech Publications, Montreal, pp 21–34
Seblany F, Homberg U, Vincens E et al (2018) Merging criteria for defining pores and constrictions in numerical packing of spheres. Granul Matter 20:37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-018-0808-z
Seblany F, Vincens E, Picault C (2021) Determination of the opening size of granular filters. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 45:1195–1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3198
Sherard JL, Dunnigan LP (1986) Internal stability of granular filters: Discussion. Can Geotech J 23:418–420. https://doi.org/10.1139/t86-067
Sherard JL, Dunnigan LP, Talbot JR (1984) Basic properties of sand and gravel filters. J Geotech Eng 110:684–700. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:6(684)
Shire T, O’Sullivan C (2016) Constriction size distributions of granular filters: a numerical study. Géotechnique 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.215
Shire T, O’Sullivan C, Taylor HF (2016) Measurement of constriction size distributions using three grain-scale methods. Scour Eros – Proc 8th Int Conf Scour Eros 1067–1073. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315375045-136
Silveira A (1965) An analysis of the problem of washing through in protective filters. 6th Int Conf on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 2. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 551–555
Sjah J, Vincens E (2013) Determination of the constriction size distribution of granular filters by filtration tests. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 37:1231–1246. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2076
Skempton AW, Brogan JM (1994) Experiments on piping in sandy gravels. Géotechnique 44:449–460. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1994.44.3.449
Slangen P, Fannin RJ (2017) The role of particle type on suffusion and suffosion. Géotechnique Lett 7:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.16.00099
Sperry JM, Peirce JJ (1995) A model for estimating the hydraulic conductivity of granular material based on grain shape, grain size, and porosity. Ground Water 33:892–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00033.x
Tangjarusritaratorn T, Miyazaki Y, Kikumoto M, Kishida K (2022) Modeling suffusion of ideally gap-graded soil. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 46:1331–1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3348
Taylor HF, O’Sullivan C, Sim WW (2015) A new method to identify void constrictions in micro-CT images of sand. Comput Geotech 69:279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.05.012
Taylor HF, O’Sullivan C, Sim WW (2016) Geometric and hydraulic void constrictions in granular media. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 142:. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001547
Taylor HF, O’Sullivan C, Shire T, Moinet WW (2018) Influence of the coefficient of uniformity on the size and frequency of constrictions in sand filters. Géotechnique 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.t.051
Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd Editio. Wiley
Vafai F (1996) Analytical modelling and laboratory studies of particle transport in filter media. Dissertation, University of Wollongong
Veiskarami M, Roshanali L, Habibagahi G (2023) A theoretical study on the hydraulic conductivity of anisotropic granular materials by implementing the microstructure tensor. Granul Matter 25:66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-023-01352-9
Vincens E, Witt KJ, Homberg U (2015) Approaches to determine the constriction size distribution for understanding filtration phenomena in granular materials. Acta Geotech 10:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0308-1
Wadell H (1933) Sphericity and roundness of rock particles. J Geol 41:310–331. https://doi.org/10.1086/624040
Wan CF, Fell R (2008) Assessing the potential of internal instability and suffusion in embankment dams and their foundations. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 134:401–407. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:3(401)
Witt KJ (1993) Reliability study of granular filters. In: Brauns J, Heibaum M, U. S (eds) Filters in Geotechnical and Hydraulic Engineering. Balkema: Rotterdam, pp 35–41
Wu L, Nzouapet BN, Vincens E, Bernat-minana S (2012) Laboratory experiments for the determination of the constriction size distribution of granular filters. Icse 6:233–240
Zhang L, Deng G, Chen R, Luo Z (2023) Confining stress effects on global and local responses of internal erosion in gap-graded cohesionless soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ 82:326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03339-5
Zheng W, Tannant DD (2017) Improved estimate of the effective diameter for use in the Kozeny-Carman equation for permeability prediction. Géotechnique Lett 7:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.16.00088
Acknowledgements
The authors truthfully appreciate the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Maroof, A., Mahboubi, A., Vincens, E. et al. A developed capillary tube model for suffossion susceptibility of non-cohesive soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ 83, 17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03515-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03515-7