Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of the distribution of various types of debris flows along the traffic artery. By examining the distribution of debris flows, the study found that the most conducive geological and tectonic conditions for debris flow formation are located 5–30 km from the main fault and experience peak ground motion acceleration of 0.15 g or 0.20 g. In the study area, debris flows are primarily concentrated in the plateau mountainous region, where the annual average temperature ranges from 4 to 8 ℃ and the annual average rainfall is less than 1000 mm. The paper further examines four key factors contributing to the hazard tendency of debris flows. It discusses in detail the underlying trends in tectonic activity and climate change and how these factors may impact the hazard tendency of debris flows in the study area. By using fuzzy synthesis method, the paper presents the distribution of debris flow hazard tendency within the study area. The study found that 11.9%, 30.8%, 31.0%, 10.4%, and 15.9% of the total area have very high, high, medium, low, and very low risk of debris flows, respectively. Of the 575 debris flow gullies identified by field investigations, 8%, 39%, 49%, 4%, and 0% were classified as having an extremely high, high, medium, low, and extremely low risk of debris flows, respectively. This indicates that the Sichuan–Tibet traffic corridor will remain a high-risk area for debris flows in the future due to the influence of active faults and climate change.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
References
Adachi K, Tokuyama K, Nakasuji A, Nakayama M, Oyagi T (1977) Study on judgment of outbreakability of debrisflow. Sabo Gakkaishi 30(3):7–16. https://doi.org/10.11475/sabo1973.30.3_7
Alberto C, Giovanni C, Paolo F (2008) Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology 94(3–4):353–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.033
Chang FJ, Chiang YM, Lee WS (2010) Investigating the impact of the Chi-Chi earthquake on the occurrence of debris flows using artificial neural networks. Hydrol Process 23(19):2728–2736. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7369
Chen M, Tang C, Zhang XZ, Xiong J, Chang Ming, Shi QY, Wang FL, Li MW (2021) Quantitative assessment of physical fragility of buildings to the debris flows on 20 August 2019 in the Cutou gully, Wenchuan, southwestern China. Eng Geol 293:106319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106319
Donat MG, Lowry AL, Alexander LV, O’Gorman PA, Masher N (2017) More extreme precipitation in the world’s dry and wet regions. Nat Clim Chang 6:508–513. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2941
Guo XJ, Cui P, Li Y, Ma L, Ge YG, Mahoney WB (2016) Intensity–duration threshold of rainfall-triggered debris flows in the Wenchuan Earthquake affected area, China. Geomorphology 253:208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.10.009
Guo CB, Zhang YS, Jiang LW, Shi JS, Meng W, Du YB, Ma CT (2017) Discussion on the environmental and engineering geological problems along the Sichuan- Tibet traffic corridor and its adjacent area. Geoscience 31(05):877–889. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2017.05.001
Guzzetti F, Peruccacci S, Rossi M, Stark CP (2008) The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows: an update. Landslides 5:3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0112-1
Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Tukey JW (1987) Exploring data tables, hazard tendency, and shapes. J Am Stat Assoc 82(397):348. https://doi.org/10.2307/2289183
Hollingsworth R, Kovacs GS (1981) Soil slumps and debris flows: prediction and protection. Environ Eng Geosci xviii(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.xviii.1.17
Houghton JT (2000) The IPCC Special Repot on Emisions Scenarios(SRES). Cambridge University Press 120, London
Hu TF, Liu JK, Zhu BZ, Zheng J (2016) Study on sliding characteristics and controlling measures of colluvial landslides in Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Procedia Eng 143:1477–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.174
Jiang WG, Deng L, Chen LY, Wu JJ, Li J (2009) Risk assessment and validation of flood disaster based on fuzzy mathematics. Prog Nat Sci 19(10):1419–1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.12.010
Jiang WG, Rao PZ, Cao R, Tang ZH, Chen K (2017) Comparative evaluation of geological disaster susceptibility using multi-regression methods and spatial accuracy validation. J Geog Sci 27:439–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-017-1386-4
Jomelli V, Brunstein D, Grancher D, Pech P (2007) Is the response of hill slope debris flows to recent climate change univocal? A case study in the Massif des Ecrins (French Alps). Clim Change 85:119–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9209-0
Jomelli V, Brunstein D, Deque M, Vrac M, Grancher D (2009) Impacts of future climatic change (2070–2099) on the potential occurrence of debris flows: a case study in the Massif desEcrins (French Alps). Clim Change 97:171–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9616-0
Li G, West AJ, Densmore AL, Jin Z, Parker RN, Hilton RG (2014) Seismic mountain building: Landslides associated with the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in the context of a generalized model for earthquake volume balance. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 15(4):833–844. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gc005067
Li J, Chen W, Liu Z (2018) The Qinghai-Tibet traffic corridor geological environment. Springer, Berlin
Liu X, Tang C (1995) Danger assessment on debris flows. Science Press, Beijing
Liu XL, Yue ZQ, Tham LG, Lee CF (2002) Empirical assessment of debris flows risk on a regional scale in Yunnan province, southwestern China. Environ Manage 30(2):249–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-001-2658-3
Liu D, Cui Y, Wang H et al (2021) Assessment of local outburst flood risk from successive landslides: case study of Baige landslide-dammed lake, upper Jinsha river, eastern Tibet[J]. J Hydrol 599:126294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126294
Ma DT, Tu JJ, Cui P, Lu RR (2004) Approach to mountain hazards in Tibet. China J Mt Sci 1(2):143–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02919336
Melchiorre C, Frattini P (2012) Modelling probability of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in a changing climate, Otta, Central Norway. Climatic Change 113(2):413–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0325-0
Mordeson JN (2001) Fuzzy mathematics. Foundations of Image Understanding 95–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1529-6_4
Nie HF (2001) The application of remote sensing technique and AHP-fuzzy method in comprehensive analysis and assessment for regional stability of Chongqing City, China. 2001 International Conferences on Info-Tech and Info-Net. Proceedings (Cat. No.01EX479). https://doi.org/10.1109/icii.2001.982739
Peng SZ (2017) 1-km monthly precipitation dataset for China (1901–2017). Natl Tibetan Plateau Data Center. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3185722
Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environ Earth Sci 60(5):1037–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0245-8
Qin YL, Wu JL, Zhan HY, Xiong C, Jia C, Bai XZ, Li MZ, Wu WH, Xu YF (2021) Discussion on the correlation between active fault and geological disaster distribution in the Ganzi area, western Sichuan province. J Geomech 27(03):463–474. https://doi.org/10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021.27.03.042
Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63(324):1379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2285891
Staffler H, Pollinger R, Zischg A, Mani P (2008) Spatial variability and potential impacts of climate change on flood and debris flows hazard zone mapping and implications for risk management. Nat Hazard 8(5):539–558. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-8-539-2008
Stoffel M, Bollschweiler M, Beniston M (2011) Rainfall characteristics for periglacial debris flows in the Swiss Alps: past incidences-potential future evolutions. Clim Change 105(1–2):263–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0036-6
Strahler AH (1952) Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geol Soc Am Bull 63(11):1117. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[1117:haaoet]2.0.co;2
Tapponnier P, Molnar P (1977) Active faulting and tectonics in China. J Geophys Res 82(20):2905–2930. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb082i020p02905
Theil H (1992) A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis. Henri Theil’s Contrib Econ Econometr 345–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2546-8_20
Wang W, Li J, Qu X, Han Z, Liu P (2019) Prediction on landslide displacement using a new combination model: a case study of Qinglong landslide in China. Nat Hazards 3:1121–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03595-3
Yilmaz I (2009) Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci 61(4):821–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0394-9
Zhao Y, Meng XM, Qi TJ, Li YJ, Chen G, Yue DX, Qing F (2021) AI-based rainfall prediction model for debris flows. Eng Geol 106456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106456
Acknowledgements
This study was jointly funded by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program (Grant No. 2019QZKK0902).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
You, Y., Wang, D., Liu, J. et al. Assessment of the distribution and hazard tendency of debris flows along the Chengdu–Changdu section of the Sichuan–Tibet traffic corridor. Bull Eng Geol Environ 82, 253 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03268-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03268-3