Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A quantitative method of describing grain size distribution of soils and some examples for its applications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The grain size distribution of soils is known to be an important parameter in providing initial understanding for the physical and mechanical behavior of soils in many engineering geology applications. Therefore, the literature contains many grain size-based approaches, indices, or empirical models to describe soil for classification purposes or predict soil behavior under static and/or dynamic loading conditions. Because of the absence at present of a convenient single parameter that defines an entire grain size distribution curve, mean, median, standard deviation, the coefficients of uniformity and curvature, fines content, effective particle size etc., are currently used to describe the general slope and shape of the grain size distribution curve in engineering geological studies. In order to overcome with this limitation, comprehensive research has been performed in which an appropriate new parameter to represent grain size distribution curves is defined. Accordingly “grain size index (I GS)” is then used in a soil classification system and empirical models to predict physical and mechanical properties of soils. Statistical analyses were performed to prove its validity and to test its applicability for prediction of soil physical and mechanical properties. In addition to the availability of the I GS for soil classification and preliminary assessment of liquefaction properties of soil, it can also be used to estimate the swelling characteristics of expansive soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasoglu C (1971) Ion exchange process affecting swelling and other properties of Ankara clay. MSc. Thesis, METU, Civil Engineering Department, p 78

  • Al-Homoud AS, Al-Suleiman TI (1997) Loss in serviceability of pavements due to expansive clay subgrades. Environ Eng Geosci III(1):277–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mhaidib AI (2006) Swelling behavior of expansive shale: a case study from Saudi Arabia. In: Al-Rawas AA, Goosen MFA (eds) Expansive soils: recent advances in characterization and treatment. Taylor and Francis––AA Balkema Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 273–287

  • ASTM D4546-90 (1996) Standard test methods for one-dimensional swell or swell settlement potential of cohesive soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM D422-63 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ATC-32 (Applied Technical Council) (1996) Improved seismic design criteria for California bridges. Provisional recommendations. Department of Transportation, California, pp 89–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Attom MF, Abu-Zreig MM, Obaidat MT (2006) Effect of remolding techniques on soil swelling and shear strength properties. In: Al-Rawas AA, Goosen MFA (eds) Expansive soils: recent advances in characterization and treatment. Taylor and Francis––AA Balkema Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 127–138

  • Bardet JP, Kapuskar M (1993) Liquefaction sand boils in San Francisco during 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. J Geotech Eng 119(3):543–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baser O (2009) Stabilization of expansive soils using waste marble dust. MSc. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, pp 102

  • British Standard 1377-2 (1990) Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes, classification tests, British Standards Institution, London

  • Budhu M (2000) Soil mechanics and foundations. Wiley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Calisan OF (1987) A study on volume change behavior of silt added METU Clay. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara

  • Casagli N, Ermini L (1999) Geomorphic analysis of landslide dams in the Northern Apennines. Trans Jpn Geomorphol Union 20(3):219–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Casagli N, Ermini L, Rosati G (2003) Determining grain size distribution of the material composing landslide dams in the Northern Apennines: sampling and processing methods. Eng Geol 69:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetiner SI (2004) Stabilization of expansive soils by çayirhan fly ash and desulphogypsum. M.S. Thesis, METU, Turkey, pp 107

  • Chen FH (1988) Foundations on expansive soils. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen SA (1993) Ormond earthquake liquefaction reconnaissance report. Bull N Z Nat Soc Earthq Eng 26(3):312–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig RF (2004) Soil mechanics. Taylor & Francis Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Day RW (1998) Swelling behavior of desiccated clay. Environ Eng Geosci IV(1): 124–129

  • Elgamal AW, Adalier K, Amer M (1993) Liquefaction during the October 12, 1992 Egyptian Dahshure earthquake.In: Proc of 3rd Int Conf on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, St. Louis, Missouri, 1–4 June, paper no. 14.18

  • Erguler ZA, Shakoor A (2009) Relative contribution of various climatic processes in disintegration of clay-bearing rocks. Eng Geol 108:36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erguler ZA, Ulusay R (2003) A simple test and predictive models for assessing swell potential of Ankara (Turkey). Eng Geol 67:331–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertekin Y (1991) Measurement of lateral swell pressure with thin wall oedometer technique. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara

  • GEB (Geotechnical Engineering Bureau: NYS DOT) (2007) Liquefaction potential of cohesionless soils. DOT.NY.GOV, https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/technical-services/technical-services-repository/GDP-9b.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2013

  • Hashim R, Muntohar AS (2006) Swelling rate of expansive clay soils. In: Al-Rawas AA, Goosen MFA (eds) Expansive soils: recent advances in characterization and treatment, Taylor and Francis––AA Balkema Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 139–148

  • Hergül T (2012) An experimental study on the treatment of expansive soils by granular materials. PhD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, pp 322

  • Holtz WG, Gibbs H (1956) Engineering properties of expansive clays. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 121:641–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz RD, Kovacs WD (1981) An introduction to geotechnical engineering. Prentice-hall, Eaglewood cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K (1985) Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes. In: Proc 11 Int Conf on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco

  • Iskender C (1971) Permeability of Ankara clay subjected to various compaction efforts. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara

  • Japan Port and Harbor Association (1999) Technical standards for port and harbour facilities in Japan, pp 281–288 (in Japanese)

  • Kalyoncu Erguler G, Erguler ZA, Akcakoca H, Ucar A (2014) The effect of column dimensions and particle size on the results of kinetic column test used for acid mine drainage (AMD) prediction. Miner Eng 55:18–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KL, Fitton JA (1969) “Factors affecting the cyclic loading strength of soil,” Vibration effects of earthquakes on soils and foundations, ASTM STP 450, American Society for Testing and Materials

  • Numata A, Mori S (2004) Limits in the gradation curves of liquefiable soils. In: 13th World Conf on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1–6 August, paper no. 1190

  • PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center) (2013) Some observations of geotechnical aspects of the february 28, 2001, nisqually earthquake in Olympia, South Seattle, and Tacoma, Washington. Soil Liquefaction and Ground Failure. http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/nisqually/geotech/ liquefaction/distribution/.Accessed 9 Dec 2013

  • Pilotti M, Bacchi B (1996) Analysis of the uncertainties in the identification of the outflow hydrograph following a landslide dam breach process. In: Luino L (ed) Proceedings of International Conference on Prevention of Hydrogeological Hazards: The Role of Scientific Research, “Alba’96”, vol. II. L’artisticadi Savigliano, Assisi, pp 535–544

  • Powrie W (2004) Soil mechanics: concepts and applications. Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppala AJ, Manosuthikij T, Chittoori BCS (2014) Swell and shrinkage strain prediction models for expansive clays. Eng Geol 168:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satyanaga A, Rahardjo H, Leong EC, Wang JY (2013) Water characteristic curve of soil with bimodal grain-size distribution. Comput Geotech 48:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB (1968) The Fourth Terzaghi Lecture: landslides during earthquakes due to liquefaction. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 94(5): 1053–1122

  • Seed HB, Woodward RJ, Lundgren R (1962) Prediction of swelling potential for compacted clays. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 88(SM3):53–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Arango I, Chan CK (1976) Evaluation of soil liquefaction potential for level ground during earthquakes––a summary report. Shannon and Wilson, Inc. Agbabian Associates. Washington, DC, p 113. (NUREG-0026-NRC-6)

  • Sivapullaiah PV, Sitharam TG, Rao KSS (1987) Modified free swell index for clays. Geotech Test J 10(2):80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STSC (2014). Statgraphics® Centurion XVII User Manual

  • Thevanayagam S, Martin GR (2002) Liquefaction in silty soils-screening and remediation issues. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22:1035–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilgen HP (2003) Relationship between suction and shear strength parameters of compacted METU campus clay. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, pp 120

  • Tsuchida H (1970) Evaluation of liquefaction potential of sandy deposits and measures against liquefaction induced damage. In: Proc of the annual seminar of the Port and Harbour Research Institute, 1970 (3-1)-(3-33) (in Japanese)

  • Walker AJ, Steward HE (1989) Cyclic undrained behavior of nonplastic and low plasticity silts. Technical report NCEER-89-0035, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, SUNY, Buffalo

  • Wasti Y (1967) Effect of sand content on some properties of clays with special reference to compressibility. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara

  • Yazici V (2004) Stabilization of expansive clays using granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS), GBFS-lime combinations and GBFS cement. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, p 100

  • Yesilbas G (2004) Stabilization of expansive soils using aggregate waste, rock powder and lime. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, p 112

  • Yilma zI (2009) Swell potential and shear strength estimation of clays. Appl Clay Sci 46:376–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL, Idriss IM et al (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geological Engineering, Dumlupinar University, Main Campus, 43100, Kutahya, Turkey

    Zeynal Abiddin Erguler

Authors
  1. Zeynal Abiddin Erguler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeynal Abiddin Erguler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erguler, Z.A. A quantitative method of describing grain size distribution of soils and some examples for its applications. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75, 807–819 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0790-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0790-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation