Abstract
The molecular phylogenetic relationships among true butterfly families (superfamily Papilionoidea) have been a matter of substantial controversy; this debate has led to several competing hypotheses. Two of the most compelling of those hypotheses involve the relationships of (Nymphalidae + Lycaenidae) + (Pieridae + Papilionidae) and (((Nymphalidae + Lycaenidae) + Pieridae) + Papilionidae). In this study, approximately 3,500 nucleotide sequences from cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI), 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA), and elongation factor-1 alpha (EF-1α) were sequenced from 83 species belonging to four true butterfly families, along with those of three outgroup species belonging to three lepidopteran superfamilies. These sequences were subjected to phylogenetic reconstruction via Bayesian Inference (BI), Maximum Likelihood (ML), and Maximum Parsimony (MP) algorithms. The monophyletic Pieridae and monophyletic Papilionidae evidenced good recovery in all analyses, but in some analyses, the monophylies of the Lycaenidae and Nymphalidae were hampered by the inclusion of single species of the lycaenid subfamily Miletinae and the nymphalid subfamily Danainae. Excluding those singletons, all phylogenetic analyses among the four true butterfly families clearly identified the Nymphalidae as the sister to the Lycaenidae and identified this group as a sister to the Pieridae, with the Papilionidae identified as the most basal linage to the true butterfly, thus supporting the hypothesis: (Papilionidae + (Pieridae + (Nymphalidae + Lycaenidae))).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aagesen, L., and Sanso, A.M. (2003) The phylogeny of the Alstroemeriaceae, based on morphology, rps 16 intron, and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 28, 47–69.
Ackery, P.R. (1984) Systematic and faunistic studies on butterflies. In The Biology of Butterflies, R.I. Vane-Wright, and P.R. Ackery, eds. (London, United Kingdom: Academic Press), pp. 9–21.
Ackery, P.R., de Jong, R., and Vane-Wright, R.I. (1999) The butterflies: Hedyloidea, Hesperioidea, and Papilionoidea. In Lepidoptera: Moths and Butterflies. 1. Evolution, systematics, and biogeography, Handbook of Zoology Vol. IV, Part 35, N.P. Kristensen, ed. (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter), pp. 264–300.
Akaike, H. (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Auto. Contr. 19, 716–723.
Brower, A.V.Z. (2000) Phylogenetic relationships among the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera), inferred from partial sequences of the wingless gene. Proc. Biol. Sci. 267, 1201–1211.
Brock, J.P. (1971) A contribution towards an understanding of the morphology and phylogeny of the ditrysian Lepidoptera. J. Nat. Hist. 5, 29–102.
Brock, J.P. (1990) Origins and phylogeny of butterflies. In Butterflies of Europe 2, O. Kudrna, ed. (Wiesbaden, Germany: Aula Verlag), pp. 209–233.
Campbell, D.L., Brower, A.V.Z., and Pierce, N.E. (2000) Molecular evolution of the wingless gene and its implications for the phylogenetic placement of the butterfly family Riodinidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 684–696.
Castresana, J. (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic tool. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 668–674.
Caterino, M.S., Cho, S., and Sperling, F.A.H. (2000) The current state of insect molecular systematics: a thriving Tower of Babel. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45, 1–54.
Caterino, M.S., Reed, R.D., Kuo, M.M., and Sperling, F.A.H. (2001) A partitioned likelihood analysis of swallowtail butterfly phylogeny (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Syst. Biol. 50, 106–127.
Corbet, A.S., Pendlebury, H.M., and Eliot, J.N. (1992) The butterflies of the Malay Peninsula (Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Nature Society).
de Jong, R., Vane-Wright, R.I., and Ackery, P.R. (1996) The higher classification of butterflies (Lepidoptera): problems and prospects. Entomol. Scand. 27, 65–101.
Ehrlich, P.R. (1958) The comparative morphology, phylogeny and higher classification of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Kanas Univ. Sci. Bull. 39, 305–370.
Ehrlich, P.R., and Ehrlich, A.H. (1967) The phenetic relationships of the butterflies. I. Adult taxonomy and the non-specificity hypothesis. Syst. Zool. 16, 301–317.
Eliot, J.N. (1973) The higher classification of the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): a tentative arrangement. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Entomol. 28, 371–505.
Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R., and Vrijenhoek, R. (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3, 294–299.
Freitas, A.V.L., and Brown, K.S. (2004) Phylogeny of the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera). Syst. Biol. 53, 363–383.
Guindon, S., Lethiec, F., Duroux, P., and Gascuel, O. (2005) PHYML Online - a web server for fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W557–W559.
Hajibabaei, M., Singer, G.A.C., and Hickey, D.A. (2006) Benchmarking DNA barcodes: an assessment using available primate sequences. Genome 49, 851–854.
Harvey, D.J. (1987) The higher classification of the Riodinidae (Lepidoptera). Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
Hauser, C.L. (1993) The internal female genital organs in butterflies (Rhopalocera): comparative morphology and phylogenetic interpretation (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik 120, 389–439.
Huelsenbeck, J.P., and Ronquist, F. (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17, 754–755.
Joo, H.Z., Kim, S.S., and Sohn, J.D. (2005) Butterflies of Korea. (Seoul, Korea: Kyo-Hak Publishing Co., Ltd), pp. 402–411.
Jordan, K. (1898) Contributions to the morphology of Lepidoptera. Novit. Zool. 5, 374–415.
Kandul, N.P., Lukhtanov, V.A., Dantchenko, A.V., Coleman, J.W.S., Sekercioglu, C.H., Haig, D., and Pierce, N.E. (2004) Phylogeny of Agrodiaetus Hübner 1822 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inferred from mtDNA sequences of COI and COII and nuclear sequences of EF-1α: Karyotype diversification and species radiation. Syst. Biol. 53, 278–298.
Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K., and Miyata, T. (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066.
Kim, I., Lee, E.M., Seol, K.Y., Yun, E.Y., Lee, Y.B., Hwang, J.S., and Jin, B.R. (2006) The mitochondrial genome of the Korean hairstreak, Coreana raphaelis (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Insect Mol. Biol. 15, 217–225.
Kim, M.I., Baek, J.Y., Kim M.J., Jeong, H.C., Kim, K.G., Bae, C.H. Han, Y.S., Jin, B.R., and Kim, I. (2009) Complete nucleotide sequence and organization of the mitogenome of the red-spotted apollo butterfly, Parnassius bremeri (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) and comparison with other lepidopteran insects. Mol. Cells 28, 347–363.
Kristensen, N.P. (1976) Remarks on the family-level phylogeny of butterflies (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera). Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 14, 25–33.
Lanave, C., Preparata, G., Saccone, C., and Serio, G. (1984) A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol. 20, 86–93.
Lin, C.P., and Danforth, B.N. (2004) How do insect nuclear and mitochondrial gene substitution patterns differ? Insights from Bayesian analyses of combined datasets. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 30, 686–702.
Martin, J.A., and Pashley, D.P. (1992) Molecular systematic analysis of butterfly family and some subfamily relationships (Lepidoptera: Papilionidea). Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 85, 127–135.
Massana, R., Castresana, J., Balagué, Guillou, L., Romari, Groisillier, A., Valentin, K., and Pedrós-Alió, C. (2004) Phylogenetic and ecological analysis of novel marine stramenopiles. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 3528–3534.
Monteiro, A., and Pierce, N.E. (2001) Molecular phylogeny of Bicyclus butterflies (Satyridae) using COI, COII and EF1α. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18, 264–281.
Nazari, V., Zakharov, E.V., and Sperling, F.A. (2007) Phylogeny, historical biogeography, and taxonomic ranking of Parnassiinae (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) based on morphology and seven genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 42, 131–156.
Niehuis, O., Yen, S.H., Naumann, C.M., and Misof, B. (2006) Higher phylogeny of zygaenid moths (Insecta: Lepidoptera) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data and the evolution of larval cuticular cavities for chemical defence. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 39, 812–829.
Posada, D., and Crandal, K.A. (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817–818.
Robbins, R.K. (1982) How many butterfly species? News Lepid. Soc. 1982, 40–41.
Robbins, R.K. (1988) Comparative morphology of the butterfly foreleg coxa and trochanter (Lepidoptera) and its systematic implications. P. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 90, 133–154.
Savard, J., Tautz, D., Richards, S., Weinstock, G.M., Gibbs, R.A., Werren, J.H., Tettelin, H., and Lercher, M.J. (2006) Phylogenomic analysis reveals bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) at the base of the radiation of Holometabolous insects. Genome Res. 16, 1334–1338.
Schmitt, J.B. (1938) The feeding mechanism of adult Lepidoptera. Smithson Misc. Coll. 97, 1–28.
Scotland, R.W., Olmstead, R., and Bennett, J.R. (2003) Phylogeny reconstruction: the role of morphology. Syst. Biol. 52, 539–548.
Scott, J.A. (1985) The phylogeny of butterflies (Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea). J. Res. Lepid. 23, 241–281.
Scott, J.A., Wright, D.M., and Kudrna, O. (1990) Butterfly phylogeny and fossils. Butterflies of Europe: Introduction to lepidopterology 2, 152–208.
Smart, P. (1989) The illustrated encyclopedia of the butterfly world (New York, USA: Chartwell Books).
Strimmer, K., and Rambaut, A. (2002) Inferring confidence sets of possibly misspecified gene trees. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269, 137–142.
Swofford, D.L. (2002). PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and Other Methods) ver 4.0b10 (Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: Sinauer Associates).
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., and Kumar, S. (2007) MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software ver 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1596–1599.
Wahlberg, N., Weingartner, E., and Nylin, S. (2003) Towards a better understanding of the higher systematic of Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28, 473–484.
Wahlberg, N., Braby, M.F., Brower, A.V.Z., de Jong, R., Lee, M.-M., Nylin, S., Pierce, N.E., Sperling, F.A.H., Vila, R., Warren, A.D., et al. (2005a) Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272, 1577–1586.
Wahlberg, N., Brower, A.V.Z., and Nylin, S. (2005b) Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86, 227–251.
Weller, S.J., Pashley, D.P., and Martin, J.A. (1996) Reassessment of butterfly family relationships using independent genes and morphology. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 89, 184–192.
Zakharov, E.V., Caterino, M.S., and Sperling, F.A.H. (2004) Molecular phylogeny, historical biogeography, and divergence time estimates for swallowtail butterflies of the genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Syst. Biol. 53, 193–215.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, M.I., Wan, X., Kim, M.J. et al. Phylogenetic relationships of true butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) inferred from COI, 16S rRNA and EF-1α sequences. Mol Cells 30, 409–425 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-010-0141-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-010-0141-9