Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acceptance of dance training system based on augmented reality and technology acceptance model (TAM)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advancement in Computer Vision (CV) has evolved drastically from image processing to object recognition, tracking video, restoration of images, three-dimensional (3D) pose recognition, and emotion analysis. These advancements have eventually led to the birth of Augmented Reality (AR) technology, which means embedding virtual objects into the real-world environment. The primary focus of this research was to solve the long-term learning retention and poor learning efficiency for mastering a dance skill through the AR technology based on constructivism learning theory, Dreyfus model and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The problem analysis carried out in this research had major research findings, in which the retention and learning efficiency of a dance training system were predominantly determined through the type of learning theory adopted, learning environment, training tools, skill acquisition technology and type of AR technique. Therefore, the influential factors for the user acceptance of AR-based dance training system (ARDTS) were based on quantitative analysis. These influential factors were determined to address the problem of knowledge gap on acceptance of AR-based systems for dance education through self-learning. The evaluation and testing were conducted to validate the developed and implemented ARDTS system. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as the evaluation model and quantitative analysis was done with a research instrument that encompassed external and internal variables. TAM consisted of 37 items, in which six factors were used to assess the new developed ARDTS by the authors and its acceptability among 86 subjects. The current study had investigated the potential use of AR-based dance training system to promote a particular dance skill among a sample population with various backgrounds and interests. The obtained results support a general acceptance towards ARDTS among the users who are interested in exploring the cutting-edge technology of AR for gaining expertise in a dance skill.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abiddin WZ, Jailani R, Omar AR, Yassin IM (2016) Development of MATLAB Kinect Skeletal Tracking System (MKSTS) for gait analysis. In: ISCAIE 2016–2016 IEEE symposium on computer applications and industrial electronics, pp 216–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAIE.2016.7575066

  • Alabbasi H, Gradinaru A, Moldoveanu F, Moldoveanu A (2016) Human motion tracking & evaluation using Kinect V2 sensor. In: 2015 E-health and bioengineering conference, EHB 2015, pp 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/EHB.2015.7391465

  • Alharbi S, Drew S (2014) Using the Technology Acceptance Model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 5(1):143–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambudkar B (2013) Introducing network design to students via a dance activity. In: Proceedings-2013 IEEE 5th international conference on technology for education, T4E 2013, pp 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2013.37

  • Amin D, Govilkar S (2015) Comparative study of augmented reality SDK’s. Int J Comput Sci Appl 5(1):11–26. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsa.2015.5102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbarsanti N, Prihatmanto AS (2016) Dance learning and recognition system based on hidden Markov model. A case study: Aceh traditional dance. Jurnal Teknologi 78(2–2):73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson F, Grossman T, Matejka J, Fitzmaurice G (2013) YouMove: enhancing movement training with an augmented reality mirror. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee A, Saha S, Basu S, Konar A, Janarthanan R (2014) A novel approach to posture recognition of ballet dance. IEEE CONECCT 2014:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baptista F, Lopes PF, Santana P (2017) MotionDesigner: augmented artistic performances with Kinect-based human body motion tracking. Encontro Portugues De Computacao Graca e Interacao, EPCGI 2016:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/EPCGI.2016.7851195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

  • Boukir S, Cheneviere F (2004) Compression and recognition of dance gestures using a deformable model. Pattern Anal Applic 7(3):308–316

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Carmigniani J, Furht B (2011) Handbook of augmented reality. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chan JCP, Leung H, Tang JKT, Komura T (2011) A virtual reality dance training system using motion capture technology. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 4(2):187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choensawat W, Sookhanaphibarn K, Kijkhun C, Hachimura K (2013) Desirability of a teaching and learning tool for Thai dance body motion. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), 8013 LNCS (Part 2), pp 171–179

  • Cisneros RE, Stamp K, Whatley S, Wood K (2019) WhoLoDancE: digital tools and the dance learning environment. Res Dance Educ 20(1):54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2019.1566305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias JR, Penha R, Morgado L, Da Veiga PA, Carvalho ES, Fernandes-Marcos A (2019) Tele-media-art: feasibility tests of web-based dance education for the blind using Kinect and sound synthesis of motion. Int J Technol Human Interact 15(2):11–28. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.2019040102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Anjos IDVC, Ferraro AA (2018) The influence of educational dance on the motor development of children. Revista Paulista De Pediatria 36(3):337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus SE, Dreyfus HL (1980) A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. California Univ Berkeley Operations Research Center

  • Eichner M, Ferrari V (2012) Human pose co-estimation and applications. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(11):2282–2288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan R, Xu S, Geng W (2012) Example-based automatic music-driven conventional dance motion synthesis. IEEE Trans vis Comput Graph 18(3):501–515. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghidoni S, Munaro M (2017) A multi-viewpoint feature-based reidentification system driven by skeleton keypoints. Robot Auton Syst 90:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2016.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gianluca Romano JS, Drachsler H (2019) Dancing salsa with machines: filling the gap of dancing learning solutions. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo T, Wu X (2013) 3D human gesture matching via graph cut. In: Proceedings of the 2013 6th international congress on image and signal processing, CISP 2013, vol 2, pp 675–679. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP.2013.6745251

  • Guyon I, Athitsos V, Jangyodsuk P, Escalante HJ (2014) The ChaLearn gesture dataset (CGD 2011). Mach vis Appl 25(8):1929–1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-014-05963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Shao L, Xu D, Shotton J (2013) Enhanced computer vision with Microsoft Kinect sensor: a review. IEEE Trans Cybern 43(5):1318–1334. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2013.2265378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartson R, Pyla P (2019) Chapter 10—UX design requirements: user stories and requirements. In: Hartson R, Pyla P (eds) The UX book, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, pp 227–250

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan E, Chaudhury S, Gopal M (2011) Annotating dance posture images using multi kernel feature combination. In: Proceedings 2011 3rd national conference on computer vision, pattern recognition, image processing and graphics, NCVPRIPG 2011, pp 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/NCVPRIPG.2011.16

  • Hergenhahn BR, Olson MH (1993) An introduction to theories of learning. In: An introduction to theories of learning, 4th ed. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

  • Heryadi Y, Fanany MI, Arymurthy AM (2013) Stochastic regular grammar-based learning for basic dance motion recognition. In: 2013 International conference on advanced computer science and information systems, ICACSIS 2013, pp 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS.2013.6761612

  • Ho C, Tsai WT, Lin KS, Chen HH (2013) Extraction and alignment evaluation of motion beats for street. In: IEEE, pp 2429–2433

  • Ibanez R, Soria A, Teyseyre A, Rodriguez G, Campo M (2017) Approximate string matching: a lightweight approach to recognize gestures with Kinect. Pattern Recogn 62:73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2016.08.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igbaria M, Iivari J (1995) The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega 23(6):587–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00035-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioan CA, Velcin J, Trausan-Matu S (2012) Tagging choreographic data for data mining and classification. In: Proceedings of international conference on tools with artificial intelligence, ICTAI, vol 1, pp 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2012.102

  • Jeffrey DA (2015) Testing the Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM 3) with the inclusion of change fatigue and overload, in the context of faculty from Seventh-day Adventist Universities: a revised model. (Doctoral dissertation). Andrews University, Michigan. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/1581

  • Kari T, Makkonen M (2014) Explaining the usage intentions of exergames. In: Proceedings of the 35th international conference on information systems, ICIS, pp 1–18

  • Kim D, Kim DH, Kwak KC (2017) Classification of K-pop dance movements based on skeleton information obtained by a Kinect sensor. Sensors 17(6):1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17061261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitsikidis A, Dimitropoulos K, Douka S, Grammalidis N (2014) Dance analysis using multiple Kinect sensors. In: 2014 International conference on computer vision theory and applications, vol 2, pp 789–795

  • Kohn B, Nowakowska A, Belbachir AN (2012) Real-time body motion analysis for dance pattern recognition. IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput vis Pattern Recognit Workshops. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2012.6238894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konar A, Saha S (2018) Fuzzy image matching based posture recognition in ballet dance. Stud Comput Intell 724:65–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62212-53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraiger K, Ford J, Salas E (1993) Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. J Appl Psychol 78:311–328. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.78.2.311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuang H, Cai S, Ma X, Liu X (2018) An effective skeleton extraction method based on Kinect depth image. In: Proceedings of 10th international conference on measuring technology and mechatronics automation, ICMTMA 2018, pp 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMTMA.2018.00052

  • Kumar P, Saini R, Yadava M, Roy PP, Dogra DP, Balasubramanian R (2017) Virtual trainer with real-time feedback using Kinect sensor. In: TENSYMP 2017-IEEE international symposium on technologies for smart cities. https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCONSpring.2017.8070063

  • Kuramoto I, Nishimura Y, Yamamoto K, Shibuya Y, Tsujino Y (2013) Visualizing velocity and acceleration on augmented practice mirror self-learning support system of physical motion. In: Proceedings of 2nd IIAI international conference on advanced applied informatics, IIAI-AAI 2013, pp 365–368. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2013.28

  • Lee Y (2003) The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future the technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 12:752–780. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Theng YL, Cheong WL, Hoo YF, Ngo MD (2016) Exergames for the corporate wellness program in Singapore: an investigation of employees’ acceptance via watching Kinect video. Digital Health 2:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616654578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar R, Dinesan P (2012) Framework for teaching Bharatanatyam through digital medium. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 4th international conference on technology for education, T4E 2012, pp 241–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2012.53

  • Miyazaki J, Kato H, Chen A, Yamamoto G, Taketomi T, Santos MEC (2014) Augmented reality learning experiences: survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 7(1):38–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2013.37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert S, Harel I (1991) Constructionism: research reports and essays. In: Epistemelogy and learning research group, pp 1985–1990. Ablex Publishing Corporation

  • Premkumar G, Potter M (1995) Adoption of Computer aided software engineering (CASE) technology: and innovation adoption perseptive. ACM SIGMIS Database 26:105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadijanti N, Fahrul HF, Pangestu DM (2017) Basic dance pose applications using Kinect technology. In: 2016 International conference on knowledge creation and intelligent computing, KCIC 2016, pp 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1109/KCIC.2016.7883646

  • Reede RM, Collomosse J (2012) Visual sentences for pose retrieval over low resolution cross-media dance collections. IEEE Trans Multimedia 14(6):1652–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster. https://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:126680

  • Saha S, Ghosh S, Konar A, Nagar AK (2013) Gesture recognition from Indian classical dance using Kinect sensor. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on computational intelligence, communication systems, and networks, CICSYN 2013, pp 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CICSYN.2013.11

  • Saha S, Konar A (2014) Posture recognition in ballet dance. Int Conf Control Instrum Energy Commun CIEC 2014:708–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha S, Lahiri R, Konar A, Banerjee B, Nagar AK (2016) Human skeleton matching for elearning of dance using a probabilistic neural network. Proc Int Joint Conf Neural Netw 2016:1754–1761. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2016.7727411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraydem R, Enstitusu SB, Okulu KH (2016) Kinect sensor Taban I skelet takip sistemi kullanarak komut tan ma command recognition by using skeletal tracking based on Kinect Sensor. In: IEEE, pp 2–5

  • Shan J, Akella S (2015) 3D human action segmentation and recognition using pose kinetic energy. Proc IEEE Workshop Adv Robot Soc Impacts ARSO 2015:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2014.7020983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi A, Behzadan AH (2015) Content delivery using augmented reality to enhance students’ performance in a building design and assembly project. Adv Eng Educ 4(3):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner B (1974) The causes of behavior. About behaviorism, p 1023. Vintage

  • Torres R, Clotet R, Gonzalez R, Pirrone J, Sagbay G, Rivas D, Soto A (2015) Analysis of corporal movement alterations using a 3D body tracking sensor. In: 1st IEEE international symposium on systems engineering, ISSE 2015—Proceedings, pp 202–205. https://doi.org/10.1109/SysEng.2015.7302757

  • Trajkova M, Cafaro F (2016) E-ballet designing for remote ballet learning. UBICOMP/ISWC ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2971442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh P, Babu JD (2016) Automatic expression recognition and expertise prediction in Bharatnatyam. In: 2016 International conference on advances in computing, communications and informatics, ICACCI 2016, pp 1864–1869. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2016.7732321

  • Vermun K, Senapaty M, Sankhla A, Patnaik P, Routray A (2013) Gesture-based affective and cognitive states recognition using kinect for effective feedback during e-learning. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE 5th international conference on technology for education, T4E 2013, pp 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2013.34

  • Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R (2010) Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Med Educ 44(1):75–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Leung H, Yue L, Deng L (2012) Automatic dance lesson generation. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 5(3):191–198. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2011.31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazaki Y, Soga A, Umino B, Hirayama M (2016) Automatic composition by body part motion synthesis for supporting dance creation. In: Proceedings of 2015 international conference on cyberworlds, CW 2015, pp 200–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/CW.2015.26

  • Zhu G, Zhang L, Shen P, Song J (2016) An online continuous human action recognition algorithm based on the Kinect sensor. Sensors 16(2):161. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16020161

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javid Iqbal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

See Table 8.

Table 8 TAM constructs for ARDTS

Appendix B

See Table 9.

Table 9 Factors of TAM used in questionnaire

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iqbal, J., Sidhu, M.S. Acceptance of dance training system based on augmented reality and technology acceptance model (TAM). Virtual Reality 26, 33–54 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00529-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00529-y

Keywords

Navigation