Abstract
This study employed electroencephalography to record event-related potentials to investigate the difference in learning performance between learners with different levels of spatial ability in a traditional learning environment that utilizes presentation slides and a learning environment that incorporates virtual reality (VR). Thirty-two university students participated in the experiment. The N1 and P2 components were results that indicated selective attention at an early stage; their amplitudes were proportional to the cognitive loads. The experiment results revealed that the main effect of learning environment was significant. The N1 and P2 components had larger amplitudes and indicated higher cognitive loads in the presentation slides-based environment than in the VR-based environment. The main effect of spatial ability was also significant. The N1 and P2 amplitudes evoked in the high spatial ability (HSA) learners were smaller than those evoked in the low spatial ability (LSA) learners, indicating that the LSA learners possessed fewer cognitive resources and bore relatively high cognitive loads. The interaction effect of learning environment and spatial ability was significant. Larger P2 amplitude was observed in LSA learners in the presentation slides-based environment than in the VR-based environment, implying that VR facilitates the reduction of cognitive loads in LSA learners. The P2 amplitude detected in HSA learners did not show any significant difference in both learning environments, indicating that the VR-based learning environment did not enhance their learning. This result supports the ability-as-compensator hypothesis to a certain extent.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Badilla MG, Meza S (2015) A pedagogical model to develop teaching skills. The collaborative learning experience in the immersive virtual world TYMMI. Comput Hum Behav 51:594–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.016
Bell JT, Fogler HS (2004) The application of virtual reality to (chemical engineering) education. IEEE 2004:27–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2004.1310077
Boucheix J-M, Schneider E (2009) Static and animated presentations in learning dynamic mechanical systems. Learn Instr 19:112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.004
Bricken M (1991) Virtual reality learning environments: potentials and challenges. ACM Siggraph Comput Graph 25:178–184. https://doi.org/10.1145/126640.126657
Brunken R, Plass JL, Leutner D (2003) Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ Psychol 38:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_7
Chen CJ (2006) Are spatial visualization abilities relevant to virtual reality? e-J Instr Sci Technol 9:1–16
Cheng K, Zhou A (2009) The effect of representational model of information and personality traits of learners on the learning in multimedia environment. Psychol Dev Educ 25:83–91
Chia CC, Chien YC (2017) Exploring the effect of learning styles on learning achievement in a u-Museum. Interact Learn Environ 7:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.385488
Christodoulou Y, Yannopoulos A, Bountris EJ, Varvarigou T (2016) Ontology-driven interactive visualization of film production complexity using a visual language. Int J Semant Web Inf 12:100–122
Clark RE, Clark VP, Jiang M (2014) From neo-behaviorisim to neuroscience: perspectives on the origins and future contribution of cognitive load research. Mod Distance Educ Res 3:52–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.012
David T, Fernando B, Kamila N (2014) The development of the N1 and N2 components in auditory oddball paradigms: a systematic review with narrative analysis and suggested normative values. J Neural Transm 122:375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-01401258-3
Eliot J (2002) About spatial intelligence: I. Percept Motor Skills 94:479. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.94.2.479-486
Fan Y, Han SH (2008) Temporal dynamic of neural mechanism involved in empathy for pain: an event-related brain potential study. Neuropsychologia 46(1):160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.023
Freeman J, Avons SE, Pearson DE, IJsselsteijn W (1999) Effects of sensory information and prior experience on direct subjective ratings of presence. Presence 8(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474699566017
Gonsalvez CJ, Barry RJ, Rushby JA, Polich J (2007) Target-to-target interval, intensity, and P300 from an auditory single-stimulus task. Psychophysiology 44:245–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00495.x
Goteborg (2015) The benefits of virtual reality in education: a comparison study. Dissertation, University of Gothenburg
Gurtubay IG, Alegre M, Labarga A, Malanda A, Iriarte J, Artieda J (2001) Gamma band activity in an auditory oddball paradigm studied with the wavelet transform. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1219–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00557-0
Hawkins DG (1995) Virtual reality and passive simulators: the future of fun. In: Biocca F, Levy MR (eds) Communication in the age of virtual reality. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 159–189
Hegarty M, Kriz S (2008) Effects of knowledge and spatial ability on learning from animation. In: Lowe R, Schnotz W (eds) Learning with animation: research implications for design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–29
Heiling M (1962) Sensorama simulator. Retrieved from http://www.mortonheilig.com/. Accessed 9 Oct 2017
Höffler TN (2010) Spatial ability: its influence on learning with visualization—a meta-analytic review. Educ Psychol Rev 22:245–269
Höffler TN, Leutner D (2011) The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations-Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis. Comput Hum Behav 27(1):209–216
Horat SK, Herrmann FR, Favre G, Terzis J (2015) Assessment of mental workload: a new electrophysiological method based on intra-block averaging of ERP amplitudes. Neuropsychologia 82:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.013
Kalyuga S, Ayres P, Chandler P, Sweller J (2003) The expertise reversal effect. Educ Psychol 38:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
Kerawalla L, Luckin R, Seljeflot S, Woolard A (2006) “Making it real”: exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Real 10(3):163–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0036-4
Lavie N, Tsal Y (1994) Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Percept Psychophys 56:183–197. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213897
Lavie N, Hirst A, de Focket JW, Viding E (2004) Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. J Exp Psychol Gen 133(3):339–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339
Lee EAL, Wong KW (2014) Learning with desktop virtual reality: low spatial learners are more positively affected. Comput Educ 79:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.010
Lee EAL, Wong KW, Fung CC (2010) How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Comput Educ 55(4):1424–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.006
Leite WL, Svinicki M, Shi Y (2010) Attempted validation of the scores of the VARK: learning styles inventory with multitrait multimethod confirmatory factor analysis models. Educ Psychol Meas 70(2):323–339
Li W (2014) The influence of animating presentation format and spatial ability on multimedia. Dissertation, School of Educational Information Technology, Central China Normal University
Liu T-Y, Tan T-H, Chu Y-L (2009) Outdoor natural science learning with an RFID-supported immersive ubiquitous learning environment. Educ Technol Soc 12(4):161–175
Lytras MD, Raghavan V, Damiani E (2017) Big data and data analytics research: from metaphors to value space for collective wisdom in human decision making and smart machines. Int J Semant Web Inf 13(1):1–10
Mayer RE (2001) Pain perception. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Meng J, Jackson T, Chen H, Hu L, Yang Z, Su YH, Huang XT (2013) Pain perception in the self and observation of others: an ERP investigation. NeuroImage 72:164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enuroimage.2013.01.024
Merchant Z, Goetz ET, Keeny-Kennicutt W, Cifuentes L, Wok OK, Davis TJ (2013) Exploring 3-D virtual reality technology for spatial ability and chemistry achievement. J Comput Assist Learn 29(6):579–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12018
Näätänen R, Kujala T, Winkler I (2011) Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: a unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology 48:4–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986
Nisbett RE, Wilson TD (1977) Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental process. Psychol Rev 84:231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
Pan Z, Cheok AD, Yang H, Zhu J, Shi J (2006) Virtual reality and mixed reality for virtual learning environments. Comput Graph 30:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2005.10.004
Plass JL, Chun DM, Mayer RE, Leuther D (2003) Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Comput Hum Behav 19:221–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00015-8
Rieber L (1990) Using computer animated graphics in science instructions with children. J Educ Psychol 82:135–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.135
Ritter W, Vaughan HG (1969) Averaged evoked responses in vigilance and discrimination: a reassessment. Science 164:326–328. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.164.3877.326
Santangelo V, Fagioli S, Macaluso E (2010) The costs of monitoring simultaneously two sensory modalities decrease when dividing attention in space. NeuroImage 49:2717–2727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.061
Shim KC et al (2003) Application of virtual reality technology in biology education. J Biol Educ 37:71–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655854
Silver HF, Strong RW, Perini MJ (2000) So each may learn: integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences. ASCD, Alexandria, VA, USA
Sofien G, Nourah A, Hassan M, Hatim A, Kais B (2017) BCWB: a P300 brain-controlled web browser. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst 13:55–73. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSWIS.2017040104
Stahl C (2011) Learning routes from visualizations for indoor wayfinding: presentation modes and individual differences. Spat Cogn Comput 11:281–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2011.571326
Struber D, Polich J (2002) P300 and slow wave from oddball and single-stimulus visual tasks: inter-stimulus interval effects. Int J Psychophysiol 45:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00071-5
Thurstone LL (1938) Primary mental abilities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Vandenberg SG, Kuse AR (1978) Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Percept Mot Skills 47:599–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
Wei JH, Luo YJ (2010) Principle and technique of event-related brain potentials. Science Press, Beijing
Wetter S, Polich J, Vanasse L, Donchin E (2004) Olfactory, auditory, and visual ERPs from single trials: no evidence for habituation. Int J Psychophysiol 54:263–272
Wickens C, Kramer A, Vanasse L, Donchin E (1983) Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science 221:1080–1082
Xie YJ (2014) The effects of spatial ability animation types on multimedia learning. Dissertation, Central China Normal University
Xin Y, Li H, Yuan JJ (2010) Negative emotion interferes with behavioral inhibitory control: an ERP study. Acta Psychol Sin 42:334–341. https://doi.org/10.3724/SPJ.1041.2010.00334
Yuan JJ, Xu MM, Yang JM et al (2017) The application of the two-choice oddball paradigm to the research of behavioral inhibitory control. Sci China Life Sci 47:1065–1073. https://doi.org/10.1360/N052017-00125
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant No. MOST 106-2511-S-003 -029 -MY3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, R., Wu, Y.J. & Cai, Q. The effect of a virtual reality learning environment on learners’ spatial ability. Virtual Reality 23, 385–398 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0355-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0355-2