Virtual memory palaces: immersion aids recall

  • Eric Krokos
  • Catherine Plaisant
  • Amitabh Varshney
Original Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Virtual reality displays, such as head-mounted displays (HMD), afford us a superior spatial awareness by leveraging our vestibular and proprioceptive senses, as compared to traditional desktop displays. Since classical times, people have used memory palaces as a spatial mnemonic to help remember information by organizing it spatially and associating it with salient features in that environment. In this paper, we explore whether using virtual memory palaces in a head-mounted display with head-tracking (HMD condition) would allow a user to better recall information than when using a traditional desktop display with a mouse-based interaction (desktop condition). We found that virtual memory palaces in HMD condition provide a superior memory recall ability compared to the desktop condition. We believe this is a first step in using virtual environments for creating more memorable experiences that enhance productivity through better recall of large amounts of information organized using the idea of virtual memory palaces.

Keywords

Immersion Experimental methods HMD 3D navigation Visualization Psychology Training Education User study Perception Presence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our sincere appreciation to the anonymous reviewers who helped us refine this paper that significantly improved its presentation. We appreciate the support of the NSF Grants 14-29404, 15-64212, the State of Maryland’s MPower initiative, and the NVIDIA CUDA Center of Excellence. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the research sponsors. Lastly, we would like to thank the 40 study participants.

References

  1. 3DMarko (2011) Medieval town 01 Dubrovnik. https://www.turbosquid.com/FullPreview/Index.cfm/ID/632415. Retrieved 10 May 2018
  2. 3DMarko (2014) Palace interior 02. https://www.turbosquid.com/FullPreview/Index.cfm/ID/809577. Retrieved 10 May 2018
  3. Atkinson RC, Shiffrin RM (1968) Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. Psychol Learn Motiv 2:89–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baddeley AD, Hitch G (1974) Working memory. Psychol Learn Motiv 8:47–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry C, Lever C, Hayman R, Hartley T, Burton S, O’Keefe J, Jeffery K, Burgess N (2006) The boundary vector cell model of place cell firing and spatial memory. Rev Neurosci 17(1–2):71–98Google Scholar
  6. Barsalou LW (2008) Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59:617–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumann O, Mattingley JB (2010) Medial parietal cortex encodes perceived heading direction in humans. J Neurosci 30(39):12,897–12,901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowman DA, McMahan RP (2007) Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer 40(7):36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks BM (1999) The specificity of memory enhancement during interaction with a virtual environment. Memory 7(1):65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks FP Jr, Airey J, Alspaugh J, Bell A, Brown R, Hill C, Nimscheck U, Rheingans P, Rohlf J, Smith D, Turner D, Varshney A, Wang Y, Weber H, Yuan X (1992) Six generations of building walkthrough: final technical report to the National Science Foundation TR92-026, Department of Computer Science. University of North Carolina at Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown MW, Aggleton JP (2001) Recognition memory: what are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nat Rev Neurosci 2(1):51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burgess N (2008) Spatial cognition and the brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1124(1):77–97.  https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buzsáki G, Moser EI (2013) Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system. Nat Neurosci 16(2):130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekstrom AD, Kahana MJ, Caplan JB, Fields TA, Isham EA, Newman EL, Fried I (2003) Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation. Nature 425(6954):184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fassbender E, Heiden W (2006) The virtual memory palace. J Comput Inf Syst 2(1):457–464Google Scholar
  16. Gardner H (2006) Multiple intelligences: new horizons. Basic books, New York. ISBN 978-0465047680Google Scholar
  17. Godden DR, Baddeley AD (1975) Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. Br J Psychol 66(3):325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Godwin-Jones R (2010) Emerging technologies from memory palaces to spacing algorithms: approaches to second-language vocabulary learning. Lang Learn Technol 14(2):4Google Scholar
  19. Harman J (2001) Creating a memory palace using a computer. In: CHI ’01 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 407–408Google Scholar
  20. Harman J, Brown R, Johnson D (2017) Improved memory elicitation in virtual reality: new experimental results and insights. In: IFIP conference on human–computer interaction, Springer, pp 128–146Google Scholar
  21. Harris JE (1980) Memory aids people use: two interview studies. Mem Cogn 8(1):31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hartley T, Lever C, Burgess N, O’Keefe J (2014) Space in the brain: how the hippocampal formation supports spatial cognition. Philos Trans R Soc B 369(1635):20120,510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hok V, Save E, Lenck-Santini P, Poucet B (2005) Coding for spatial goals in the prelimbic/infralimbic area of the rat frontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(12):4602–4607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Julian J (1976) The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. The Adelphi, MilanGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim Y, Varshney A, Jacobs DW, Guimbretière F (2010) Mesh saliency and human eye fixations. ACM Trans Appl Percept (TAP) 7(2):12Google Scholar
  26. Kim J, Delcasso S, Lee I (2011) Neural correlates of object-in-place learning in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 31(47):16,991–17,006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knauff M (2013) Space to reason: a spatial theory of human thought. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Legge EL, Madan CR, Ng ET, Caplan JB (2012) Building a memory palace in minutes: equivalent memory performance using virtual versus conventional environments with the method of loci. Acta Psychol 141(3):380–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leutgeb S, Leutgeb JK, Moser MB, Moser EI (2005) Place cells, spatial maps and the population code for memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15(6):738–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lever C, Burton S, Jeewajee A, O’Keefe J, Burgess N (2009) Boundary vector cells in the subiculum of the hippocampal formation. J Neurosci 29(31):9771–9777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loomis JM, Blascovich JJ, Beall AC (1999) Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 31(4):557–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Madl T, Chen K, Montaldi D, Trappl R (2015) Computational cognitive models of spatial memory in navigation space: a review. Neural Netw 65:18–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mania K, Chalmers A (2001) The effects of levels of immersion on memory and presence in virtual environments: a reality centered approach. CyberPsychol Behav 4(2):247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mania K, Troscianko T, Hawkes R, Chalmers A (2003) Fidelity metrics for virtual environment simulations based on spatial memory awareness states. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 12(3):296–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mayer JD, Salovey P, Caruso DR, Sitarenios G (2001) Emotional intelligence as a standard intelligence. Emotion 1(3):232–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCabe JA (2015) Location, location, location! Demonstrating the mnemonic benefit of the method of loci. Teach Psychol 42(2):169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63(2):81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moser EI, Kropff E, Moser MB (2008) Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system. Annu Rev Neurosci 31:69–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Regan JK, Noë A (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav Brain Sci 24(5):939–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parsons TD (2015) Virtual reality for enhanced ecological validity and experimental control in the clinical, affective and social neurosciences. Front Hum Neurosci 9:660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pausch R, Proffitt D, Williams G (1997) Quantifying immersion in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, SIGGRAPH ’97, pp 13–18Google Scholar
  42. Perrault ST, Lecolinet E, Bourse YP, Zhao S, Guiard Y (2015) Physical loci: leveraging spatial, object and semantic memory for command selection. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’15, pp 299–308Google Scholar
  43. Ragan ED, Sowndararajan A, Kopper R, Bowman DA (2010) The effects of higher levels of immersion on procedure memorization performance and implications for educational virtual environments. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 19(6):527–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Repetto C, Serino S, Macedonia M, Riva G (2016) Virtual reality as an embodied tool to enhance episodic memory in elderly. Front Psychol 7:1839:1–1839:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Richardson AE, Montello DR, Hegarty M (1999) Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Mem Cognit 27(4):741–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roediger HL (1979) Implicit and explicit memory models. Bull Psychon Soc 13(6):339–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ruddle RA, Payne SJ, Jones DM (1999) Navigating large-scale virtual environments: what differences occur between helmet-mounted and desktop displays? Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 8(2):157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sanchez-Vives MV, Slater M (2005) From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nat Rev Neurosci 6(4):332–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shapiro L (2010) Embodied cognition. Routledge, New York. ISBN 978-0415773423Google Scholar
  50. Skarbez R, Brooks FP Jr, Whitton MC (2017) A survey of presence and related concepts. ACM Comput Surv 50(6):96:1–96:39.  https://doi.org/10.1145/3134301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Slater M (2009) Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364(1535):3549–3557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sowndararajan A, Wang R, Bowman DA (2008) Quantifying the benefits of immersion for procedural training. In: Proceedings of the 2008 workshop on immersive projection technologies/emerging display technologies, IPT/EDT ’08, pp 2:1–2:4Google Scholar
  53. Wraga M, Creem-Regehr SH, Proffitt DR (2004) Spatial updating of virtual displays. Mem Cognit 32(3):399–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yates FA (1992) The art of memory, vol 64. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Maryland, College ParkCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.University of Maryland, College ParkCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.University of Maryland, College ParkCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations