Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Results of the prospective multicenter Japanese bridge to transplant study with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device

  • Original Article
  • Artificial Heart (Clinical)
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are becoming the standard of care for patients with refractory end-stage heart failure. We present the outcomes of patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter clinical study in Japan using the HeartMate II continuous-flow LVAD for bridge to transplantation. The study evaluated 6 inotrope-dependent heart failure patients failing on medical management (3 males and 3 females, age 44.7 ± 15.8 years, BSA 1.58 ± 0.17 m2) implanted with the HMII LVAD at 5 Japanese centers. Functional status, adverse events and outcomes were determined for the first 6 months with follow-up at 2 years. After implant, functional improvement was evident in 6-min walk distance which increased from 268 ± 92 m at baseline to 399 ± 105 m at 6 months, and 100 % of patients were in NYHA class I or II at 6 months compared to 0 % at baseline. Adverse events included localized non-device-related infection (4/6), arrhythmias (3/6) and percutaneous lead infection (1/6). There were no re-thoracotomies for bleeding and no strokes or pump replacements. All patients were alive at 6 months and all were transplanted after 1.96–3.58 years of LVAD support. The results in Japan of the HMII LVAD for BTT are consistent with results from the US pivotal clinical trial. The expanded use of this technology to Japanese heart failure patients is appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD, et al. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:885–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pagani FD, Miller LW, Russell SD, et al. Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:312–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lahpor J, Khaghani A, Hetzer R, et al. European results with a continuous-flow ventricular assist device for advanced heart-failure patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;37:357–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2241–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Starling RC, Naka Y, Boyle AJ, et al. Results of the post-U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation a prospective study using the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1890–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. John R, Naka Y, Smedira NG, et al. Continuous flow left ventricular assist device outcomes in commercial use compared with the prior clinical trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1406–13 discussion 1413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park SJ, Milano CA, Tatooles AJ, et al. Outcomes in advanced heart failure patients with left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5:241–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kyo S, Minami T, Nishimura T, Gojo S, Ono M. New era for therapeutic strategy for heart failure: destination therapy by left ventricular assist device. J Cardiol. 2012;59:101–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakatani T. Heart transplantation. Circ J. 2009;73:A55–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitamura S, Nakatani T, Kobayashi J, Toda K, Yanase M. Heart transplantation in Japan: critical appraisal of results. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2012;113:297–301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. ACC/AHA guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee to Develop Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:1505–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffith BP, Kormos RL, Borovetz HS, et al. HeartMate II left ventricular assist system: from concept to first clinical use. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S116–20 discussion S114–S116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers JG, Aaronson KD, Boyle AJ, et al. Continuous flow left ventricular assist device improves functional capacity and quality of life of advanced heart failure patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1826–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frazier OH, Delgado RM 3rd, Kar B, Patel V, Gregoric ID, Myers TJ. First clinical use of the redesigned HeartMate II left ventricular assist system in the United States: a case report. Tex Heart Inst J. 2004;31:157–9.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. John R, Kamdar F, Eckman P, et al. Lessons learned from experience with over 100 consecutive HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1593–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Slaughter MS, Naka Y, John R, et al. Post-operative heparin may not be required for transitioning patients with a HeartMate II left ventricular assist system to long-term warfarin therapy. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2010;29:616–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boyle AJ, Russell SD, Teuteberg JJ, et al. Low thromboembolism and pump thrombosis with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device: analysis of outpatient anti-coagulation. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2009;28:881–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thoratec Corporation and Nipro Corporation supported this research.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shunei Kyo.

Additional information

Other investigators for the HeartMate II Japanese Clinical Trial are listed in the Appendix.

See “Appendix 2” for listing of all contributors to the clinical trial.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

  1. 1.

    Patient or their legal representative has signed an informed consent.

  2. 2.

    Transplant candidates.

  3. 3.

    Body surface area (BSA) >1.3 m2

  4. 4.

    New York Heart Association class III with the history of class IV or class IV heart failure symptoms.

  5. 5.

    Female patients of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraceptive precautions (defined as oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, surgical contraceptive or a combination of condom and spermicide) for the duration of the study.

  6. 6.

    On inotropic support, if tolerated.

  7. 7.

    On medical therapy for heart failure.

  8. 8.

    Ages between 15 and 64 at signing an informed consent.

  9. 9.

    Sufficient supports from family and relatives.

  10. 10.

    Long-term observation should be agreed.

Exclusion criteria

  1. 1.

    Etiology of heart failure due to or associated with uncorrected thyroid disease, obstructive cardiomyopathy, pericardial disease, amyloidosis or restrictive cardiomyopathy.

  2. 2.

    Technical obstacles, which pose an inordinately high surgical risk, in the judgment of the investigator.

  3. 3.

    Existence of any ongoing mechanical circulatory support other than intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.

  4. 4.

    Body Mass Index (BMI) >40 kg/m2.

  5. 5.

    Positive pregnancy test if of childbearing potential.

  6. 6.

    Presence of mechanical aortic cardiac valve that will not be converted to a bioprosthesis at the time of LVAD implant.

  7. 7.

    History of cardiac transplant.

  8. 8.

    Platelet count <50000/mL.

  9. 9.

    Evidence of an untreated aortic aneurysm >5 cm.

  10. 10.

    Psychiatric disease, irreversible cognitive dysfunction or psychosocial issues that are likely to impair compliance with the study protocol and LVAD management.

  11. 11.

    Presence of an active uncontrolled infection.

  12. 12.

    Intolerance to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies or to any operative therapies during and post surgery that will be required by the investigator due to the patient’s status.

  13. 13.

    An INR > 2.5 which is not due to anticoagulant therapy or Plavix administration within 5 days.

  14. 14.

    A total bilirubin that is >5 mg/dL, or shock liver (e.g., transaminases >2000), or biopsy proven liver cirrhosis.

  15. 15.

    History of severe COPD or severe restrictive lung disease.

  16. 16.

    Fixed pulmonary hypertension, with a most recent PVR > 6 Wood units, that is unresponsive to pharmacological intervention.

  17. 17.

    History of unresolved stroke or uncorrectable cerebrovascular disease.

  18. 18.

    Serum creatinine >3.5 mg/dL or the need for chronic renal replacement therapy (e.g., chronic dialysis).

  19. 19.

    Significant peripheral vascular disease accompanied by rest pain or extremity ulceration.

  20. 20.

    The patient has moderate to severe aortic insufficiency without plans for correction during pump implantation surgery.

  21. 21.

    Participation in any other clinical investigation that is likely to confound study results or affect study outcome.

Appendix 2: List of all contributors to this clinical trial

In addition to the authors, the following surgeons and cardiologists participated in this study: Tohoku University, Miyagi—Masatoshi Akiyama, Kiichiro Kumagai, Takumi Shibuya; The University of Tokyo—Noboru Motomura, Takeshi Nishimura, Aya Saito, Tsuyoshi Taketani, Kan Nawata, Motoyuki Hisagi, Osamu Kinoshita; Osaka University—Taichi Sakaguchi, Sigeru Miyagawa, Yasushi Yoshikawa, Takashi Yamauchi, Shunsuke Saito; Kyushu University—Atsuhiro Nakashima, Takahiro Nishida, Yoshihisa Tanoue, Yasuhisa Oishi, Hiromichi Sonoda.

Data Safety and Monitoring Board—Shinichi Takamoto, Mitsui Memorial Hospital; Motonobu Nishimura, Tottori University; Kenji Yamazaki, Tokyo Women’s Medical University; Kazuhiro Sase, Juntendo Univesity; Medical Consultant—Shunei Kyo; Mitsuaki Isobe, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kyo, S., Ono, M., Sawa, Y. et al. Results of the prospective multicenter Japanese bridge to transplant study with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. J Artif Organs 17, 142–148 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-013-0752-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-013-0752-y

Keywords

Navigation