Abstract
Offshore aquifer research is an emerging field that is becoming increasingly important as population growth and climate change put pressure on coastal water resources. One of the largest reserves, globally, of offshore freshened groundwater (OFG) was recently identified off the South Island of New Zealand. This has highlighted the potential for OFG elsewhere in New Zealand. This study aims to: (1) screen for New Zealand coastal aquifers most likely to contain OFG and, (2) document evidence for OFG in New Zealand. An OFG-likelihood rating scheme was developed as part of the study. An application of the rating scheme used survey responses from regional councils responsible for groundwater management, in combination with national and regional-scale technical documents. The rating scheme was found to be a simple and transparent first-pass approach for highlighting areas where OFG is more or less likely at the national scale. Results are presented in a map showing the likelihood of OFG around the New Zealand coastline. Regions with aquifers where OFG likelihood is high include Greater Wellington, Canterbury, Tasman, Hawkes Bay and Marlborough. Aquifers in these regions are associated with major fluvial depositional systems, including glacial outwash gravels. Despite high dependence on groundwater in these regions and extensive groundwater extraction near the coast, there are no major reported incidences of seawater intrusion, suggesting offshore groundwater may be augmenting onshore extraction.
Résumé
La recherche d’un aquifère en mer est un sujet émergent qui devient de plus en plus important tant la croissance de la population et le changement climatique font pression sur les ressources en eau côtières. L’une des réserves les plus importantes au monde d’eaux souterraines douces en mer (ESDM) a été identifiée récemment au large de l’Ile du Sud, en Nouvelle Zélande. Ceci a mis en évidence le potentiel en ESDM ailleurs en Nouvelle Zélande. La présente étude vise à: (1) sélectionner les aquifères côtiers néo-zélandais les plus susceptibles de contenir des ESDM et (2) documenter les preuves d’ESDM en Nouvelle Zélande. Un système d’évaluation de la probabilité d’ESDM a été développé dans le cadre de l’étude Une application du système de notation a utilisé les réponses aux enquêtes émanant des conseils régionaux responsables de la gestion des eaux souterraines, corrélativement aux documents techniques d’échelle nationale et régionale. Le système de notation s’est avéré être une approche de première analyse simple et transparente pour mettre en évidence les zones où les ESDM existent plus ou moins probablement à l’échelle nationale. Les résultats sont présentés sur une carte montrant la probabilité d’ESDM le long de la ligne de côte néo-zélandaise. Les régions dans lesquelles les aquifères présentent une forte probabilité d’ESDM comprennent Greater Welligton, Canterbury, Tasman, Hawkes Bay et Marlborough. Les aquifères de ces régions sont associés à des systèmes de dépôts fluviatiles majeurs, incluant des graviers d’épandage glaciaire. En dépit de la forte dépendance de ces régions vis-à-vis des eaux souterraines et de l’exploitation considérable de celles-ci près de la côte, il n’y a pas d’incidences majeures signalées d’intrusion d’eau de mer, ce qui suggère que les ESDM peuvent permettre d’augmenter l’exploitation à terre.
Resumen
La investigación de los acuíferos submarinos es un campo emergente que adquiere cada vez más importancia a medida que el crecimiento demográfico y el cambio climático ejercen presión sobre los recursos hídricos costeros. Recientemente se ha identificado una de las mayores reservas de agua subterránea dulce de la costa (OFG) frente a la Isla Sur de Nueva Zelanda. Esto ha puesto de manifiesto el potencial de OFG en otros lugares de Nueva Zelanda. Este estudio tiene como objetivo: (1) detectar los acuíferos costeros de Nueva Zelanda con mayor probabilidad de contener OFG y (2) documentar las pruebas de OFG en Nueva Zelanda. Como parte del estudio se desarrolló un esquema de clasificación de la probabilidad de OFG. En la aplicación del esquema de clasificación se utilizaron las respuestas a una encuesta de los consejos regionales responsables de la gestión de las aguas subterráneas, en combinación con documentos técnicos a escala nacional y regional. El esquema de clasificación resultó ser un enfoque sencillo y transparente en una primera aproximación para destacar las zonas en las que la OFG es más o menos probable a escala nacional. Los resultados se presentan en un mapa que muestra la probabilidad de OFG alrededor de la costa de Nueva Zelanda. Las regiones con acuíferos donde la probabilidad de OFG es alta incluyen el Gran Wellington, Canterbury, Tasman, Hawkes Bay y Marlborough. Los acuíferos de estas regiones están asociados a los principales sistemas de deposición fluvial, incluidas las gravas de afloramiento glaciar. A pesar de la elevada dependencia de las aguas subterráneas en estas regiones y de la amplia extracción que se realiza cerca de la costa, no se han registrado incidencias importantes de intrusión de agua de mar, lo que sugiere que las aguas subterráneas en el mar pueden estar reforzando la extracción en tierra.
摘要
近海含水层研究是一个新兴领域,随着人口增长和气候变化对沿海水资源造成压力,其变得越来越重要。最近在新西兰南岛附近发现了全球最大的近海新鲜地下水 (OFG) 储量之一, 这凸显了 OFG 在新西兰其他地方的潜力。本研究研究目的在于:(1)筛选最可能含有OFG的新西兰沿海含水层,以及(2) 新西兰OFG的文件证据。作为研究的一部分,本次开发了一个 OFG 可能性分级方案。分级方案的应用使用了负责地下水管理的区域委员会的调查答复,并结合了国家和区域尺度的技术文件。本次分级方案是一种简单、透明的一次通过方法, 用于评估在全国范围内或多或少可能出现 OFG 的区域。 结果显示在一张地图中,表明新西兰海岸线周围发生 OFG 的可能性。OFG 可能性高的含水层区域包括大惠灵顿、坎特伯雷、塔斯曼、霍克斯湾和马尔堡。这些地区的含水层与主要的河流沉积系统有关,包括冰川外流砾石。尽管这些地区高度依赖地下水并且在海岸附近广泛开采地下水,但没有重大海水入侵事件的报道,这表明近海地下水可能会增加陆上开采。
Resumo
A pesquisa de aquíferos no mar é um campo emergente que está se tornando cada vez mais importante à medida que o crescimento populacional e as mudanças climáticas pressionam os recursos hídricos costeiros. Uma das maiores reservas, globalmente, de águas subterrâneas doces no mar (ASDM) foi recentemente identificada na Ilha Sul da Nova Zelândia. Isso destacou o potencial para ASDM em outros lugares da Nova Zelândia. Este estudo visa: (1) rastrear aquíferos costeiros da Nova Zelândia com maior probabilidade de conter ASDM e, (2) documentar evidências de ASDM na Nova Zelândia. Um esquema de classificação de probabilidade de ASDM foi desenvolvido como parte do estudo. Uma aplicação do esquema de classificação usou respostas de pesquisas de conselhos regionais responsáveis pela gestão de águas subterrâneas, em combinação com documentos técnicos em escala nacional e regional. O esquema de classificação foi considerado uma abordagem simples e transparente de primeira passagem para destacar áreas onde ASDM é mais ou menos provável na escala nacional. Os resultados são apresentados em um mapa mostrando a probabilidade de ASDM ao redor da costa da Nova Zelândia. Regiões com aquíferos onde a probabilidade de ASDM é alta incluem Greater Wellington, Canterbury, Tasman, Hawkes Bay e Marlborough. Os aquíferos nestas regiões estão associados aos principais sistemas deposicionais fluviais, incluindo cascalhos glaciais. Apesar da alta dependência das águas subterrâneas nessas regiões e da extensa extração de águas subterrâneas perto da costa, não há grandes incidências relatadas de intrusão de água do mar, sugerindo que as águas subterrâneas offshore podem estar aumentando a extração em terra.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Coastal aquifers are an important source of freshwater at many locations globally (Ferguson and Gleeson 2012), including New Zealand (Ingham 2006; Moreau et al. 2019). However, increasingly dense human occupation of coastal zones is causing what has been termed a ‘coastal groundwater squeeze’ whereby groundwater is threatened with onshore contamination as well as seawater intrusion (Michael et al. 2017).
Coastal groundwater investigations traditionally focus on freshwater availability in onshore aquifers, i.e., in aquifers on the landward side of the shoreline. However, Post et al. (2013) recognised that vast reserves of offshore freshened groundwater (OFG) occur in submerged fringes of continents globally, including New Zealand. OFG can derive from present-day onshore recharge to coastal aquifers that extend offshore (Kooi and Groen 2001). OFG can also be paleo-groundwater that was derived from recharge during past glacial periods, when sea levels were lower. It is thought that the lower sea level caused steeper water tables, which increased topography-driven groundwater flow (Post et al. 2013). Additionally, in some cases, the exposure of continental shelves (due to lower sea levels) caused freshwater recharge from rainfall, paleo-rivers and ice sheets to become trapped under the sea-floor as sea level rose to present day levels (Person et al. 2003; Post et al. 2013). For OFG to persist despite transgressions of the sea, there needs to be an aquitard between the ocean and the underlying subsea aquifer, to impede the mixing of seawater and freshwater.
In addition to the emplacement mechanisms detailed in the preceding, Michael et al. (2016) has shown that large-scale heterogeneity resulted in farther offshore extension of low salinity groundwater, and that a sea level lowstand may not be a necessary condition for large bodies of OFG. However, as the salinity distributions under this emplacement mechanism take a long time to reach a conceptual steady state (on the order of 104–105 years), it is plausible to assume that heterogeneity and transient effects (i.e., recharge and sea level changes) act in tandem (Jiao and Post 2019).
A number of analytic models are available to estimate the offshore steady-state extent of OFG that originates from modern-day terrestrial recharge (Bakker 2006; Bakker et al. 2017; Werner and Robinson 2018). Specifically, these analytic models predict the position of the freshwater–saltwater interface assuming homogeneous and isotropic aquifer/aquitard properties. These solutions indicate that the extent of offshore groundwater is a function of the hydraulic gradient between onshore heads and heads at the coast (i.e., offshore groundwater flow), vertical conductance of the semiconfining layer (i.e., its ability to transmit water, which is a function of the hydraulic conductivity and thickness) and the offshore extent of the overlying semiconfining layer. The larger the offshore groundwater flow, the lower the conductance of the semiconfining layer, and the further offshore this layer extends, the further offshore the fresh groundwater will extend.
In this study, OFG is defined as an offshore groundwater body with a salinity less than seawater occurring within semiconfined aquifers that extend from onshore to offshore, and discharge through the continental shelf at the scale of a few km to 10s of km, i.e., at the embayment and shelf scale (Bratton 2010).
Offshore freshened groundwater is recognised as a potential water resource for many coastal communities through offshore pumping (Bakken et al. 2012; Post et al. 2013; UN-Water 2020). However, it is yet to be proved that OFG can be a viable source of freshwater for coastal communities. In New Zealand, the water utility Wellington Water carried out exploratory drilling in Wellington harbour to determine the viability of pumping fresh groundwater from beneath the harbour (Radio New Zealand 2017). This was for emergency water supply, as existing pipelines intersect geological faults and may rupture in the event of an earthquake. The groundwater was found to have elevated iron and manganese, and concept plans to pipe the groundwater direct to Wellington City via a seabed pipeline were abandoned due to the high costs of treatment. Also, there was concern about the risk of pumping-induced drawdown of saline harbour water into the aquifer. In addition to potential contamination from the overlying saline water, Yu and Michael (2019) have shown that offshore pumping can impact onshore aquifers through reduced flows and subsidence.
To date, there are no documented cases where offshore pumping is supplying water at a large scale. However, at many locations globally, OFG is augmenting onshore pumping and hence used for water supply, albeit unknowingly in many cases (Knight et al. 2018). That is, there are many places where onshore pumping wells would likely be salinised through seawater intrusion if OFG were not present (Morgan and Werner 2015; Knight et al. 2019). Perth in Western Australia is a good example of this, where onshore pumping in the confined Yarragadee aquifer has resulted in a 40-m head decline since the early 1980s, with heads now around 5 m below mean sea level. Despite this, large groundwater pumping schemes within 10 km of the coast have not become salinized and this is most likely due to a large OFG reserve (Knight et al. 2018; Morgan et al. 2018). As such, coastal aquifers with OFG may have a degree of resilience to seawater intrusion arising from the offshore location of the interface. However, it is important to understand the extent of OFG, and the location of the freshwater–saltwater interface in particular, so that onshore pumping can be managed sustainably. Once the migrating fresh-to-saline-water transition reaches coastal boreholes, it will be too late to put effective management controls in place. This is particularly important as groundwater exploitation and scarcity increases.
While New Zealand is well endowed with freshwater (Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ 2019), high per capita water use (OECD 2018) and an uneven distribution of rainfall results in periodic water shortages and dependence on groundwater in some regions. The New Zealand economy is heavily reliant on agricultural exports. In recent decades, there has been a shift away from dryland sheep and beef farming to intensive dairy farming and horticulture (Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ 2019). Much of the expansion has occurred in areas of low rainfall and irrigation requirements have increased. Between 1999 and 2010 the demand for groundwater approximately doubled (Rajanayaka et al. 2010), and it is recognised that groundwater is over-allocated in many regions of New Zealand (Boone and Fragaszy 2018).
There are numerous aquifers in New Zealand with diverse geologic, hydraulic and chemical properties (White 2001). A digital dataset showing the location and area of New Zealand’s aquifers has been developed by the Ministry for the Environment (2015) and is shown in Fig. 1. This dataset used aquifer extents first described by White (2001), with some of the boundaries updated by Moreau and Bekele (2015) from information supplied by regional councils and information from Lovett and Cameron (2015). The aquifer boundaries in this dataset are in some cases actual aquifer boundaries, and in other cases they are groundwater management zones. The dataset consists of 153 distinct aquifer location boundaries (polygons) and some of these contain more than one aquifer, particularly at locations where aquifers are stacked (i.e., where there are multiple aquifers vertically at a single location).
More broadly, Moreau et al. (2019) divided the New Zealand land mass into eight hydrogeological systems. The hydrogeological systems were defined as geographical areas with broadly consistent hydrogeological properties, resource pressures and management issues. The hydrogeological systems (and their proportion by land area) are coastal basin (30%), inland basin (11%), coastal volcanic (4%), inland volcanic (4%), inland river valley (2%), coastal independent (1%), basement infill (3%) and basement hard rock (44%). The coastal basin category represents systems with a coastal boundary and sedimentary surface geology. The location of coastal basin hydrogeological systems is shown in Fig. 1. At these locations, groundwater is a key water supply for municipal, industrial and agricultural uses (Moreau et al. 2019), and includes the Canterbury Plains aquifers which are estimated as containing around 70% of all of New Zealand’s groundwater by volume (Moreau and Bekele 2015). The Canterbury Plains aquifers can be seen in Fig. 1 as the contiguous aquifers to the north and south of Christchurch.
In 2011 a scientific offshore drilling expedition—the International Offshore Drilling Program, which is focused on understanding physical processes controlling continental margin sedimentation–reported low salinity pore water sediments in the Canterbury Bight at location U1353 (Fig. 1), suggesting OFG might be present (Expedition 317 Scientists 2011). Subsequently, a large-scale geophysical investigation has provided evidence from geophysics and borehole data of extensive and relatively shallow OFG at this location (Micallef et al. 2018). Numeric modelling indicates that a high degree of heterogeneity in the sedimentary framework of the Canterbury Bight, in combination with long-term sea-level variation, has likely emplaced groundwater up to 60 km offshore over the past 300 ka (Micallef et al. 2020).
Paleo-groundwater has been found elsewhere in New Zealand including in the northern South Island (Moutere Gravel aquifer; over 27 ka) and in the southern North Island (Whenuakura Formation, 31 ka; Shannon, 40 ka; Stewart et al. 2004). These findings, in combination with New Zealand’s extensive shallow bathymetry (Fig. 1) led Stewart et al. (2004) to conclude that: “The influence of changing sea levels in the recent past (geologically speaking) on the disposition of groundwater in coastal aquifers of New Zealand may have been far greater than we had previously realised, and New Zealand may be surrounded by a ‘skirt’ of pristine paleo-groundwater at deep levels.”
The studies of Stewart et al. (2004) and Micallef et al. (2020) highlight the potential for OFG in New Zealand and provide motivation for further research in this area. The aim of this study is to carry out a first-pass assessment of the scale of OFG in New Zealand. To achieve this, the study will: (1) systematically screen for coastal aquifers in New Zealand that are most likely to contain OFG and, (2) document direct and indirect evidence for OFG in selected New Zealand aquifers.
Methods
The study involves both the development and application of an OFG likelihood-rating scheme. The scheme is applied to all coastal aquifers (i.e., aquifers intersecting the coastline) in New Zealand with an area larger than 10 km2. Datasets include: (1) responses to a survey of local government authorities responsible for managing groundwater; (2) information obtained from national and regional-scale technical documents and journal articles; and (3) aquifer locations from the Ministry of the Environment (2015). All of this information is combined to map the likelihood of OFG in New Zealand aquifer locations. Additionally, for aquifer locations assessed as having high OFG likelihood, the evidence for OFG is documented.
Offshore freshened groundwater likelihood-rating scheme
An OFG likelihood-rating scheme (Table 1) was developed using a set of OFG indicators. The indicators relate to physical properties and processes described in various publications, and detailed in section ‘Introduction’, as being favourable conditions for the emplacement of OFG or as being evidence for OFG. For simplicity, the indicators have been framed as questions and are designed to be answered with ‘Yes’, ‘Unknown’ or ‘No’ responses. The rating value is assigned depending on the answer, with a value of 0 for ‘No’, 1 for ‘Unknown’ and 2 for ‘Yes’. Question 8 is an exception to this, and has a rating system with a value of 0 for ‘Yes’, 1 for ‘Unknown’ and 2 for ‘No’. The rating values for all indicators are summed to arrive at a final rating score out of 22.
It is usual for large-scale screening tools to weight indicators according to the perceived importance of the indicator to the process being screened for (e.g., Lobo-Ferreira et al. 2007; Parizi et al. 2019). The product of the rating and weighting of each indicator are then summed to arrive at a final rating score. However, the value of weightings is generally determined subjectively, which is a drawback of these methods (Parizi et al. 2019). Weightings are not used in this study, to avoid extra and unnecessary subjectivity.
The first question in Table 1 screens for aquifers occurring within coastal basin hydrogeological systems, as defined and delineated for New Zealand by Moreau et al. (2019). The sedimentary geology and high groundwater use documented for these coastal basins suggest aquifers with large groundwater storage and flow, indicating potential for OFG. Also, sedimentary formations (particularly those that are unconsolidated) are often very heterogeneous, with interlayering of high and low permeability materials. As pointed out by Zamrsky et al. (2020), “this heterogeneity is a major control on the fresh groundwater volume and groundwater salinity distribution within such systems”. Questions 2, 3 and 4 relate to aquifer type and geology and reward locations where confined/semiconfined conditions exist with an overlying aquitard and offshore extension (Post et al. 2013; Kooi and Groen 2001; Knight et al. 2018). Questions 5 and 6 identify locations where low salinity water occurs offshore either as low salinity pore water or as springs and seeps. Questions 7 and 8 screen for locations where pumping takes place near to the coast without seawater intrusion occurring, a situation more likely when OFG is present (Knight et al. 2018). For question 8, evidence of seawater intrusion needs to be direct (measured). Question 9 and 10 relate to the two most common OFG emplacement mechanisms i.e., coastal discharge derived from modern-day terrestrial recharge, and paleo-groundwater derived from eustatic change over glacial/interglacial cycles and recharged around 10,000–130,000 years ago (Post et al. 2013; Stewart et al. 2004). In question 9, the water budget refers to the aquifer inflows (e.g., recharge), outflows (e.g., pumping, coastal discharge) and change in storage over a given time period. Question 11 highlights locations where groundwater modelling has indicated that the interface between fresh and seawater in the aquifer is offshore.
Survey of councils
A survey using questions 2–10 in Table 1 was sent to 17 local government bodies (regional councils or unitary authorities) responsible for the allocation and management of groundwater in New Zealand under the Resource Management Act (1991). These local government bodies are simply referred to as ‘councils’ in this paper. It was requested that each coastal aquifer location in the council’s jurisdiction be included in the survey, using aquifer location delineations from Ministry for the Environment (2015), shown in Fig. 1. Also, information sources (e.g., technical documents) were requested to support the responses.
Results
Out of the 153 New Zealand aquifer locations (Ministry for the Environment 2015), 55 are coastal aquifer locations with an area greater than 10 km2. An OFG likelihood-rating assessment was carried out for each of these aquifer locations. The remaining 98 aquifer locations were given an OFG likelihood-rating score of 0.
The OFG likelihood-rating scheme (Table 1) was completed for each aquifer location using a separate worksheet within a spreadsheet. An example application, for the Moutere Valley, is shown in Table 2. The survey response from the Tasman council was incorporated into the assessment and this is noted in the worksheet along with other sources of information used in the assessment.
Nine councils responded to the survey. These were Canterbury, Greater Wellington, Hawkes Bay, Horizons (Manawatu-Wanganui), Marlborough, Otago, Taranaki, Tasman and Waikato. The councils that responded include the four with the largest annual average groundwater use (as a percentage of the national total) i.e., Canterbury (62%), Hawkes Bay (9%), Wellington (7%), Otago (4%) (KC 2019).
The rating score determined for each aquifer location is shown in Table 3. Rating scores ranged between 20 (Hutt Valley in Greater Wellington) and 2 (Coromandel volcanic, Coromandel sand in Waikato). The answer to questions for each aquifer location is shown in Table S1 of the electronic supplementary material (ESM).
A rating score system is used to assign an OFG likelihood between low and high, to all aquifer locations. A rating score of equal to or greater than 16 was classed as high OFG likelihood, 11–15 was classed as moderate OFG likelihood, 5–10 was classed as low OFG likelihood. As noted previously, aquifer locations that were not assessed were given a rating of 0. Evidence for OFG at locations classed as high OFG likelihood is detailed in the following, with locations listed in order of highest to lowest rating score (see Table 3).
Hutt Valley (Greater Wellington)
The Hutt Valley is located on the south of the North Island (Fig. 2). It is a 655 km2 flat alluvial plain formed from fluvial deposition by the Hutt River. The main groundwater system is the Waiwhetu aquifer, comprised of gravels and semiconfined by overlying fine-grained sediments. Aquifer recharge is primarily via infiltration from the Hutt River. Onshore groundwater extraction from the Waiwhetu aquifer delivers up to 70% of the water supply to the Wellington metropolitan region (R. Morris, Senior Groundwater Scientist Greater Wellington Regional Council, personal communication, 2020). The Waiwhetu aquifer is known to extend offshore beneath Wellington Harbour, where there is a monitored offshore freshwater borehole near Matiu Somes Island, and potentially extending out to the harbour mouth (Gyopari et al. 2018). Exploratory drilling in Wellington Harbour found fresh groundwater within the offshore extension of the Waiwhetu aquifer at a distance of 3.4 km from the coast (Gyopari et al. 2018). Groundwater heads are artesian throughout the aquifer, including offshore. Artesian heads indicate that pressure in the aquifer is large enough that groundwater would flow over the land surface (or sea bed) if the groundwater was not confined. Fresh groundwater from the Waiwhetu aquifer discharges through the overlying semiconfining layer via springs in the harbour (Gyopari 2014). Harding (2000) investigated several submarine springs in Wellington Harbour and conducted flow measurements in areas of active OFG expulsion. It was shown that discharge from the springs is related to both tides and onshore extraction. Despite extensive onshore groundwater extraction from the Waiwhetu aquifer, Greater Wellington Regional Council indicated that no reports of seawater intrusion have been recorded for these extraction wells. Groundwater modelling suggests that coastal discharge is a high proportion of the overall water budget (Gyopari 2014) and that the freshwater–saltwater interface occurs offshore (Gyopari et al. 2018).
Central Plains (Canterbury)
The Central Plains aquifer (Fig. 2) are part of the Canterbury Basin. The Canterbury Basin is about 50,000 km2 in size and extends around 200 km down the east coast of the South Island of New Zealand. Onshore, the basin is made up of the Canterbury Plains and offshore it comprises the Canterbury Bight around to Pegasus Bay.
The Canterbury Plains are the largest alluvial plain in New Zealand. The sedimentary sequence is more than 600-m thick and comprises a combination of glacial outwash and interglacial fluvial gravel, sand and silt deposits (Browne and Naish 2003). The main gravel aquifers occur within the upper 150 m depth and are grouped on a geographic basis into sectors bounded by the major rivers draining the Southern Alps. Aquifer recharge is primarily through infiltration from rivers and land surface infiltration from rainfall (Browne 2001). The regional flow of groundwater is eastward from the Southern Alps toward the coast.
The Central Plains aquifer lies within the Canterbury Plains and is geographically delineated as occurring south of the Waimakariri River and north of the Rakaia River. It includes the city of Christchurch, which is the largest by population in the South Island of New Zealand. The Central Plains are comprised of glacial fluvial gravel outwash deposits. At the coast, alternating fluvial gravels (mainly glacial) and interglacial marine and swamp deposits create a vertical sequence of aquitards and semiconfined to confined aquifers (hereafter referred to as confined aquifers; Forsyth et al. 2008). Groundwater heads in the confined aquifers nearby to the coast are artesian.
A widely reproduced conceptual diagram by Talbot et al. (1986) indicates a coastal aquifer system with four confined aquifers at the coast, all of which extend offshore. The upper confined aquifer is conceptualised as outcropping at the seafloor about 40 km offshore and the freshwater–seawater interface in this aquifer was predicted to occur ‘considerably offshore’. All of the deeper aquifers were conceptualised as pinching out and not outcropping at the seafloor. More recently, seismic data suggests that the first and second confined aquifers continue offshore for at least 33 km, outcrop at the seabed further than 30 km from the shoreline, and are about 20–25 m thick (Barnes 2015). Extensive pumping occurs in the aquifers nearby to the coast and seawater intrusion has not been recorded in recent years. Previously, there was one instance of downward leakage from an overlying estuary caused by over pumping (PDP 2011).
Mandel (1974) was the first to assert that the freshwater–saltwater interface was everywhere offshore, below the confining layers that extend out to sea. He also suggested that the lack of head decline in the aquifers underlying Christchurch over the long term may be due to inland movement of the interface that ‘props up’ the groundwater. A variable density numerical model developed by Hertel (1998) estimated the steady-state position of the freshwater–saltwater interface to be 3–4 km offshore in the upper confined aquifer. Knight et al. (2018) subsequently estimated that the interface could be up to 9 km offshore.
Age dating by Stewart (2012) shows that wells located near the coast of Christchurch draw older water than the rest of the city. Stewart (2012) attributed this to a large body of much older (perhaps glacial age) water stored beneath Christchurch and offshore. Stewart (2012) proposes that this old freshwater body will continue to provide Christchurch with water but will eventually be depleted and replaced by younger water derived from the Waimakariri River, which is the main source of recharge to this aquifer.
Ashburton-Rangitata Plains (Canterbury)
The Ashburton-Rangitata Plains (Fig. 2) are located in Canterbury between the Ashburton and Rangitata rivers, which are to the north and south respectively. The Ashburton-Rangitata Plains have a similar depositional/stratigraphic framework to the Central Plains described previously. Groundwater is predominantly used for irrigation but also forms an important drinking water source (Hanson and Abraham 2013).
The International Offshore Drilling Program (IODP) identified pore water salinity less than seawater at depths between 40 and 65 m below the sea floor (Expedition 317 Scientists 2011) in the mid to outer Canterbury Bight in the vicinity of the Ashburton-Rangitata Plains region. The location of IODP drill site U1353 is shown in Figs. 1 and 2. Subsequently, Micallef et al. (2020) characterised OFG at this location by combining geophysical and borehole data with groundwater modelling. They found an OFG system comprising low salinity groundwater extending up to 60 km offshore with a seawater depth of 110 m. Two smaller bodies of low salinity groundwater were also found. The modelling results indicate that most of the OFG was emplaced by topography-driven flow during glacial periods over the past 300,000 years. Although paleo-groundwater has not been detected onshore, the modelling of Micallef et al. (2020) suggests that it may be present offshore.
Waimakariri-Ashley Plains (Canterbury)
The Waimakariri-Ashley Plains (Fig. 2) occur in Canterbury, between the Ashley River to the north and the Waimakariri River to the south. The geological setting described previously for the Central Plains also applies in this region. However, the permeability contrast between interglacial and glacial period deposits is expected to reduce northwards (Etheridge 2019). Paleo-groundwater has been detected close to the coast at depths of over 100 m (Van der Raaij 2011; Etheridge 2019). Extensive pumping occurs in the aquifers nearby to the coast and seawater intrusion has not been recorded (Etheridge 2019; PDP 2011). It is not known whether coastal discharge is a large proportion of the overall water budget; however, Etheridge (2019) has estimated it within a range of 1.5–5.4 m3/s. This discharge rate is expected to be variable along the coastline, with values increasing northward of the Waimakariri River (Etheridge 2019).
Moutere Valley (Tasman)
The Moutere Valley (Fig. 2) covers an area of about 205 km2 and is underlain by glacial outwash gravel from the Moutere Gravel Formation. The hydrogeology of the Moutere Valley has been detailed by Thomas (2001). The Moutere Valley has three gravel aquifers in vertical layers, the Shallow Moutere, Middle Moutere, and Deep Moutere. Intervening aquitards are comprised of clays with carbonaceous materials. Groundwater heads increase with depth and many bores deeper than 50 m are artesian (Stewart et al. 2004). Groundwater of the Moutere aquifers is recharged by direct rainfall infiltration through unconfined sections of the aquifer in the southwest of the catchment (Thomas 2001). Radiocarbon, oxygen-18, and chemical concentrations were used by Stewart et al. (2004) to identify paleo-groundwater in the Deep Moutere aquifer, recharged during the last ice age. Stewart et al. (2004) noted that the presence of this deep paleo-groundwater “suggests that there may be a large body of such water onshore and offshore at deep levels.”
Appleby Gravel, Hope Minor, Upper and Lower Confined (Tasman)
These aquifers occur under the Waimea Plains in the north of the South Island (Fig. 2). The Waimea Plains are comprised of gravels deposited by the Waimea River and its major tributaries during the late Quaternary (Thomas 2001). The Upper and Lower Confined aquifers are of most relevance to OFG and consist of river-deposited gravels, have high transmissivity and are confined by extensive low permeability overlying aquitards. The Lower Confined aquifer is known to extend offshore into Tasman Bay. However, “the nature of the seaward contact of the aquifer is unclear” (Thomas 2001). Despite extensive extraction close to the coast and declines in head (that have been linked to extraction), seawater intrusion has not occurred (Song and Zemansky 2013).
Heretaunga Plains (Hawkes Bay)
The Heretaunga Plains are on the east coast of the North Island (Fig. 2). The Heretaunga Plains consist of a broad floodplain of alluvial gravel sand and silt deposits inter-fingered with shallow marine sediments nearer the coast. Aquifer units span three glacial/interglacial climate cycles and form a multi-layered interconnected aquifer system to a depth of 250 m with high transmissivities of up to 20,000 m2/day (Brown et al. 1999). The aquifers are confined and artesian nearby to the coast, and extend offshore as an 11–18 km wide basin that extends across Hawke Bay to the west of Mahia Peninsula (see Fig. 2) (Mountjoy 2019). Note that the onshore region is called Hawkes Bay and the offshore region is known as Hawke Bay.
Extensive groundwater extraction is occurring at the coast for industrial and public water supply. Despite this, seawater intrusion has not been recorded. Groundwater modelling by Rakowski and Knowling (2018) indicated that coastal discharge is around 30% of the water budget. However, lower coastal discharge values have been estimated through other modelling activities indicating a high degree of uncertainty for these values (A. Elwan, Senior Scientist Hawkes Bay Regional Council, personal communication, 2020).
The navigation chart for Hawke Bay shows a number of submarine freshwater springs around 30 km from the coast (LINZ 2017). However, it is not certain how they were identified originally and Ridgeway and Stanton (1969) found no evidence of their presence; only high salinities were found at the bottom. More recently, Meyniel (2015) did find some evidence of reduced salinities in the vicinity of the springs but further work is needed to confirm that springs occur at this location. Mountjoy (2019) found that these spring locations do not coincide with the likely offshore extent of the Heretaunga aquifer.
Wairau (Marlborough)
The Wairau Plain is in the northeast of the South Island (Fig. 2). It is an alluvial aquifer system consisting of fluvial reworked gravels (Brown 1981). The Wairau aquifer is the largest of the aquifers in the Wairau Plain. It is recharged from the Wairau River and has high groundwater flow rates. It is confined nearby to the coast, with artesian pressures (Davidson 2001; Morgenstern et al. 2019).
The Wairau aquifer supplies all of the drinking water for the city of Blenheim and other townships in the area as well as water for agricultural irrigation. Extensive groundwater extraction is occurring close to the coast, but seawater intrusion has not been recorded. Coastal discharge is not thought to be a large proportion of the overall water budget, based on a regional-scale water balance (P. Davidson, Groundwater Scientist Marlborough District Council, personal communication, 2020).
Seismic reflection data indicates that the Wairau Plain aquifers could extend offshore beneath Cloudy Bay (BECA 2020). It is not known if springs occur in Cloudy Bay but it is feasible, based on seismic reflection profiles that show erosion and exposure of the Rapaura Formation over 20 km offshore (BECA 2020). There has not been any drilling to ascertain whether fresh groundwater occurs in subsea porewater. Groundwater ages up to 40,000 years have been found at depth in the Wairau aquifer nearby to the coast (Stewart 2008; Morgenstern et al. 2019).
Discussion
The rating scheme applies broadly to various coastal aquifer situations globally, but can be easily modified to suit specific locations if needed. Question 1 reads as quite specific to New Zealand but can be easily altered to instead reflect the general intent of the question, which is to identify coastal hydrogeological systems where there is large potential for groundwater storage and flow. Use of the rating scheme for other large-scale assessments will enable a direct comparison with results from this assessment, and provides the opportunity for ranking and benchmarking against this and future assessments that use the rating scheme presented here. The conversion of rating scores to descriptive OFG likelihood classifications (i.e., high, moderate and low) was determined in this study after application of the rating scheme to 53 aquifer locations. This process can benefit from refinement when more comprehensive methods of analysis have been applied.
While the rating scheme has been used in this study to determine areas most likely to contain OFG at the national level for New Zealand, it could also be used as a feasibility assessment tool to compare the likelihood of OFG in a list of prospective systems and assist in decisions relating to the allocation of resources for further exploration.
To assess whether the described ranking scheme makes sense, the results were considered with reference to the known framework for groundwater systems now and during past glacial periods. The aquifer locations assessed in this study as having high OFG likelihood are all associated with major fluvial depositional systems, including glacial outwash gravels. These systems are known to have continued offshore during sea level lowstands when the shoreline was significantly further offshore than its current position (Gibb 1986). The groundwater-bearing gravel deposits on the east coast of the South Island are an excellent example. These deposits were emplaced by the large braided rivers draining the Southern Alps, and are known to extend well out onto the continental shelf (Browne and Naish 2003). Other groundwater-bearing sedimentary systems associated with large rivers in more confined geographic settings, e.g., the Hutt Valley, Heretaunga Plains and Wairau, are also interpreted to extend offshore during sea-level-lowstand periods (Begg et al. 2004; Paquet et al. 2009; Barnes and Pondard 2010). Even without additional supporting information, the potential for OFG in these regions could reasonably be inferred, and with the additional evidence provided here, a compelling case is made for the presence of low salinity groundwater in offshore extensions of aquifers at these locations. Conversely, in other locations where the depositional environment is not dominated by large fluvial systems, e.g., the Auckland and Northland regions (in the northern half of the North Island). In these regions, steep hill country occurs adjacent to the coast and there are few large fluvial systems and depositional plains and it is therefore unlikely that any shelf scale OFG was able to form during sea level lowstand. This interpretation is borne out by the low likelihood of OFG in these regions.
It is important to note that the analysis uses the Ministry for the Environment (2015) aquifer locations model, which groups aquifers regionally. This means that, in some cases, multiple discrete aquifers are attributed with the same ranking. As an example, all aquifers in the Southland region (located at the most southern end of the South Island) have been given a ranking score of 11, including aquifers that are not coastal (Fig. 2). This is because all of the Southland aquifers are classified by Ministry of the Environment (2015) as a single aquifer location (called Southland colluvial, alluvial, coastal, etc., see Table 3).
The analysis in this study is intended to provide a framework for understanding the full extent of New Zealand’s coastal hydrogeological systems. The reviewed material provides some valuable insight into the potential for OFG; however, there is very little direct evidence (i.e., from physical samples) for freshwater beyond the coastline (notably this exists only in Hutt Valley and the Canterbury Bight). Increasing interest in OFG within New Zealand is likely to create more opportunities for the detection of OFG.
All of the aquifer locations determined as having high OFG likelihood had no reports of seawater intrusion in recent years, despite extensive groundwater extraction close to the coast. This suggests that extraction from onshore pumping wells is being augmented by OFG, and that the freshwater–seawater interface is offshore at these locations. There appears to be evidence for this in Christchurch where decadal monitoring (since 1976) of groundwater age at the coast is showing an increase, which is thought to be evidence that groundwater extraction is pulling in older water from depth and from offshore (Stewart 2012; Stewart and van der Raaij 2019). Recently, Knight et al. (2021) showed that alongshore freshwater circulation, driven by hydraulic gradients in the alongshore direction, are an additional mechanism for protection of coastal wells from salinisation.
The extension of this study is to develop specific stratigraphic framework models for aquifer locations determined in this study as having high OFG likelihood. These models can then be used, in combination with information relating to onshore system hydrology, to develop variable density numerical groundwater models. These models can be used to estimate the position of the freshwater–seawater interface, and the dynamics of the interface under various emplacement hypotheses, degrees of onshore-offshore connectivity and extraction and climate change scenarios.
Conclusions
This study is a first step in determining where significant offshore freshened groundwater occurs around New Zealand. All available information was reviewed, and groundwater managers in regional councils were communicated with directly, to enable a rating scheme developed as part of the project. The methodology used in this study can easily be modified for application to other countries or regions where wide continental shelves favour the development of offshore aquifers, and where groundwater resources are managed by local authorities.
In this study, eight aquifer locations (within five regions) were found to have a high likelihood of OFG: Hutt Valley (Greater Wellington), Central Plains (Canterbury), Ashburton-Rangitata Plains (Canterbury), Waimakariri-Ashley Plains (Canterbury), Moutere Valley, Marahau River (Tasman), Appleby Gravel, Hope Minor, Upper and Lower Conf. (Tasman), Heretaunga Plains aquifer system (Hawkes Bay), Wairau, Southern Valleys (Marlborough). There is also potential for OFG in other areas. Coastal aquifers form a critical resource in New Zealand and this study has implications for how this resource is managed. Direct information about the location and dynamics of the freshwater–saline-water interface offshore will be critical to managing coastal groundwater abstraction with changing climates and increasing industrial pressure.
References
Bakken TH, Ruden F, Mangset LE (2012) Submarine groundwater: a new concept for the supply of drinking water. Water Resour Manag 26:1015–1026
Bakker M (2006) Analytic solutions for interface flow in combined confined and semi-confined, coastal aquifers. Adv Water Resour 29:417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.05.009
Bakker M, Miller AD, Morgan LK, Werner AD (2017) Evaluation of analytic solutions for steady interface flow where the aquifer extends below the sea. J Hydrol 551:660–664
Barnes P (2015) Seismic reflection imaging of shallow gravel formations beneath Pegasus Bay. Prepared for Environment Canterbury, Client report no. WLG2015-64. NIWA, Auckland, New Zealand
Barnes PM, Pondard N (2010) Derivation of direct on-fault submarine paleoearthquake records from high-resolution seismic reflection profiles: Wairau Fault, New Zealand. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 11(11)
BECA (2020) Wairau offshore groundwater geological assessment: Marlborough, Letter to Marlborough District Council. https://www.marlborough.govt.nz/repository/libraries/id:1w1mps0ir17q9sgxanf9/hierarchy/Documents/Environment/Groundwater/Groundwater%20Reports%202020%20List/MDC_Wairau_Aquifer_offshore%20sea%20discharge%20assessment%20BECA%202020.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2021
Begg JG, Van Dissen RJ, Rhoades DA (2004) Subsidence in the Lower Hutt Valley and the interplay between Wellington and Wairarapa Fault earthquakes. 2004 NZSEE Conference paper, http://db.nzsee.org.nz/2004/Paper43.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2021
Boone S, Fragaszy S (2018) Emerging scarcity and emerging commons: water management groups and groundwater governance in Aotearoa New Zealand. Water Altern 11(3):795–823
Bratton JF (2010) The three scales of submarine groundwater flow and discharge across passive continental margins. J Geol 118:565–575. https://doi.org/10.1086/655114
Brown LJ (1981) Late Quaternary geology of the Wairau Plain, Marlborough, New Zealand. N Z J Geol Geophys 24(4):477–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.1981.10422739
Brown LJ, Dravid PN, Hudson NA, Taylor CB (1999) Sustainable groundwater resources, Heretaunga Plains, Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand. Hydrogeol J 7(5):440–453
Browne GH, Naish TR (2003) Facies development and sequence architecture of a late Quaternary fluvial-marine transition, Canterbury Plains and shelf, New Zealand: implication for forced regressive deposits. Sediment Geol 158:57–86
Browne LJ (2001) Canterbury. In: Rosen MR, White P (Eds) Groundwaters of New Zealand. New Zealand Hydrological Society, Wellington
Davidson P (2001) Marlborough. In: Rosen MR, White P (eds) Groundwaters of New Zealand. New Zealand Hydrological Society, Wellington
Etheridge Z (2019) Coastal groundwater discharge in the Waimakariri zone. Report no. R19/79. Environment Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. https://komanawa.com/mdocs-posts/coastal-groundwater-discharge-in-the-waimakariri-zone/. Accessed 3 Aug 2021
Expedition 317 Scientists (2011) Site U1353. In: Fulthorpe CS, Hoyanagi K, Blum P, and the Expedition 317 Scientists (eds) Proc. IODP, 317, Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management International Inc., Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.2204/iodp.proc.317.105.2011
Ferguson G, Gleeson T (2012) Vulnerability of coastal aquifers to groundwater use and climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2(5):342–345 https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate1413
Forsyth PJ, Barrell DJA, Jongens R (2008) Geology of the Christchurch area. GNS, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Gibb JG (1986) A New Zealand regional Holocene eustatic sea-level curve and its application to determination of vertical tectonic movements. Royal Soc New Zealand Bull 24:377–395
Gyopari M (2014) Lower Hutt Aquifer Model Revision (HAM3): sustainable management of the Waiwhetu Aquifer. Report for Bulk Water Division. Greater Wellington Regional Council, New Zealand. https://www.gw.govt.nz/document/916/lower-hutt-aquifer-model-revision-ham3-sustainable-management-of-the-waiwhetu-aquifer. Accessed 14 Dec 2021
Gyopari M, Grant K, Begg J, Nodder S, Knowling M, van der Raaij R (2018) Wellington Harbour Exploration Bores Project: hydrogeological analysis of SP1a exploration phase—abstraction feasibility assessment and recommendations. Wellington Water, Wellington, New Zealand. http://www.gw.govt.nz/document-library-2/Form?keywords=wellington+harbour+bores&publishedFrom=&publishedTo=&activityID=&action_search=Search. Accessed 3 Aug 2021
Hanson C, Abraham P (2013) Cross sections of groundwater chemistry through the Ashburton-Rangitata plain. Report no. R13/30, Environment Canterbury Regional Council, Christchurch, New Zealand
Harding S (2000) The characteristics of the Waiwhetu artesian aquifer beneath Wellington Harbour including the spatial distribution and causes of submarine spring discharge. MSc Thesis, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand
Hertel I (1998) Groundwater contamination in the Heathcote/Woolston area, Christchurch, New Zealand. MSc Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Ingham M (2006) Measuring and monitoring saltwater intrusion in shallow unconfined coastal aquifers using direct current resistivity traverses. J Hydrol (NZ) 45(2):69–82
Jiao J, Post V (2019) Coastal hydrogeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
KC JB (2019) New Zealand Groundwater Atlas: Use and drinking supply wells serving more than 100 people. Prepared for The Ministry for the Environment (MfE), Aqualinc Research. https://environment.govt.nz/publications/new-zealand-groundwater-atlas-groundwater-use-and-drinking-water-supply-wells-serving-more-than-100-people/. Accessed 14 Dec 2021
Knight AC, Werner AD, Morgan LK (2018) The onshore influence of offshore fresh groundwater. J Hydrol 561:724–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.028
Knight AC, Werner AD, Irvine DJ (2019) Combined geophysical and analytical methods to estimate offshore freshwater extent. J Hydrol 576:529–540
Knight AC, Irvine DJ, Werner AD (2021) Alongshore freshwater circulation in offshore aquifers. J Hydrol 593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125915
Kooi H, Groen J (2001) Offshore continuation of coastal groundwater systems; predictions using sharp-interface approximations and variable-density flow modelling. J Hydrol 246:19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00354-7
Land Air Water Aotearoa (2022) Tasman Region Moutere deep groundwater zone. https://www.lawa.org.nz/explore-data/tasman-region/water-quantity/groundwater-zones/moutere-deep-groundwater-zone/. Accessed 14 July 2022
Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) (2017) Hydrographic chart NZ56 Kahutara Point to Blackhead Point, 2nd edn. LINZ, Wellington
Lobo-Ferreira JP, Chachadi AG, Diamantino C, Henriques MJ (2007) Assessing aquifer vulnerability to seawater intrusion using the GALDIT method: part 1, application to the Portuguese Monte Gordo aquifer. In: Lobo Ferreira JP, Viera JMP (eds) Proceedings of Water in Celtic Countries: Quantity, Quality and Climate Variability. IAHS Publ. 310, International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, UK, pp 161–171
Lovett AP, Cameron SG (2015) Development of a national groundwater atlas for New Zealand. GNS Science report 2014/30, GNS, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Mandel S (1974) The groundwater resources of the Canterbury Plains, New Zealand. Agricultural Engineering Institute, Lincoln College, Canterbury, New Zealand. https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10182/3745/LPIWR_12.pdf;sequence=4. Accessed 30 Feb 2021
Meyniel C (2015) From studies in the Heretaunga aquifer to the research of sea groundwater discharge in the Hawke’s Bay region. Final year project, Mines Nancy-Master GR2E (Universite de Lorraine), Baylis Bros. https://www.hbrc.govt.nz/documents-and-forms/reports-search/. Accessed 15 July 2021
Micallef A, Mountjoy J, Schwalenberg K, Jegen M, Weymer B, Woelz S, Gerring P, Luebben N, Spatola D, Cunarro Otero D, Mueller C (2018) How offshore groundwater shapes the seafloor. Eos 99. https://eos.org/science-updates/how-offshore-groundwater-shapes-the-seafloor. Accessed July 2022
Micallef A, Person M, Haroon A, Weymer BA, Jegen M, Schwalenberg K, Faghih Z, Duan S, Cohen D, Mountjoy JJ, Woelz S, Gable CW, Averes T, Tiwari AK (2020) 3D characterisation and quantification of an offshore freshened groundwater system in the Canterbury Bight. Nat Commun 11:1372. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14770-7
Michael HA, Scott KC, Koneshloo M, Yu X, Khan MR, Li K (2016) Geologic influence on groundwater salinity drives large seawater circulation through the continental shelf. Geophys Res Lett 43(20):10782–10791. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl070863
Michael HA, Post VEA, Wilson AM, Werner AD (2017) Science, society, and the coastal groundwater squeeze. Water Resour Res 53(4):2610–2617. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020851
Ministry for the Environment (2015) Location and extent of NZ’s aquifers. https://data.mfe.govt.nz/document/11940-location-and-extent-of-nzs-aquifers-2015/. Accessed 30 July 2020
Ministry for the Environment & Stats NZ (2019) New Zealand’s environmental reporting series: environment Aotearoa 2019. www.mfe.govt.nz. Accessed 14 Dec 2021
Moreau M, Bekele M (2015) Groundwater Component of the Water Physical Stock Account (WPSA), GNS Science report 2014/290. GNS, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Moreau M, White PA, Mourot F, Rawlinson Z, Tschritter C, Cameron SC, Westerhoff R (2019) Classification of New Zealand hydrogeological systems. GNS science report 2018/35, GNS, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. https://doi.org/10.21420/42QW-MC74
Morgan LK, Werner AD (2015) A national inventory of seawater intrusion vulnerability for Australia. J Hydrol: Regional Stud 4:686–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.10.005
Morgan LK, Werner AD, Patterson AE (2018) A conceptual study of offshore fresh groundwater behaviour in the Perth Basin (Australia): modern salinity trends in a prehistoric context. J Hydrol: Regional Stud 19:318–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.10.002
Morgenstern U, Davidson P, Townsend D, White PA, van der Raaij R, Stewart M, Moreau M, Daughney C (2019) From rain through river catchment to aquifer: the flow of water through the Wairau hydrologic system. GNS Science report 2019/63, GNS, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, pp. 83. https://doi.org/10.21420/7125-ST46
Mountjoy JJ (2019) Offshore framework of the Heretaunga Aquifer in Hawkes Bay: a desktop study into the likely offshore extent of freshwater aquifers in Hawke’s Bay and the relationship to mapped seeps. Prepared for Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, NIWA Client report no. 2019058WN, NIWA, New Zealand. https://envirolink.govt.nz/assets/1937-HBRC242-Offshore-framework-of-the-Heretaunga-Aquifer-in-Hawke-Bay.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2021
OECD (2018) Water withdrawals (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/17729979-en. Accessed 14 Dec 2021
Paquet F, Proust JN, Barnes PM, Pettinga JR (2009) Inner-forearc sequence architecture in response to climatic and tectonic forcing since 150 ka: Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand. J Sediment Res 79(3):97–124
Parizi E, Hosseinia SM, Ataie-Ashtiani B, Simmons CT (2019) Vulnerability mapping of coastal aquifers to seawater intrusion: review, development and application. J Hydrol 570(2019):555–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.021
PDP (Pattle Delamore Partners Ltd) (2011) New Zealand guidelines for the monitoring and management of sea water intrusion risk on groundwater. https://envirolink.govt.nz/assets/Envirolink/420-NLRC50-Guidelines-for-the-monitoring-and-management-of-sea-water-intrusion-risks-on-groundwater.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2021
Person M, Dugan B, Swenson J, Urbano L, Stott C, Taylor J, Willet M (2003) Pleistocene hydrogeology of the Atlantic continental shelf, New England. Geol Soc Am Bull 115:1324–1343. https://doi.org/10.1130/B25285.1
Post VEA, Groen J, Kooi H, Person M, Ge S, Edmunds WM (2013) Offshore fresh groundwater reserves as a global phenomenon. Nature 504:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12858
Radio New Zealand (2017) Drilling to begin to access Wellington’s undersea freshwater. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/330521/drilling-to-begin-to-access-wellington%27s-undersea-freshwater. Accessed 14 De 2021
Rajanayaka C, Donaggio J, McEwan H (2010) Update of water allocation and estimates of actual water use of consented takes—2009–2010. Report H10002/3, Prepared for the Ministry for the Environment, Aqualinc Research, Christchurch, New Zealand. https://environment.govt.nz/assets/Publications/Files/Update-of-water-allocation-data-and-estimate-of-actual-water-use-of-consented-takes-200910.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2021
Rakowski P, Knowling M (2018) Heretaunga aquifer groundwater model executive summary for development report. HBRC report no. RM18-16. https://www.hbrc.govt.nz/assets/Document-Library/Publications-Database/4999-Executive-summary-of-Heretaunga-Aquifer-Groundwater-Model-Development-Report1.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2021
Resource Management Act (1991) Government of New Zealand. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1991/0069/latest/DLM230265.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2021
Ridgeway NM, Stanton BR (1969) Some hydrological features of Hawke Bay and nearby shelf waters. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 4:545–559
Song S, Zemansky G (2013) Groundwater level fluctuation in the Waimea Plains, New Zealand: changes in a coastal aquifer within the last 30 years. Environ Earth Sci 70(5):2167–2178
Stewart MK (2008) Age and source of Wairau Plains groundwater, GNS Science report 2008/18, GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Stewart MK (2012) A 40-year record of carbon-14 and tritium in the Christchurch groundwater system, New Zealand: dating of young samples with carbon-14. J Hydrol 430–431:50–68
Stewart MK, van der Raaij RW (2019) Interpretation of the 2017 groundwater age tracer and isotope results for the Christchurch aquifer system. GNS Science report 2019/65, GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. https://shop.gns.cri.nz/sr_2019-65-pdf/. Accessed 14 Dec 2021
Stewart MK, Thomas JT, Norris M, Trompetter V (2004) Paleogroundwater in the Moutere Gravel aquifers near Nelson, New Zealand. Radiocarbon 46(2):517–529
Talbot JD, Weeber JH, Freeman MC, Mason CR, Wilson DD (1986) The Christchurch artesian aquifers. Northern Canterbury Catchment Board and Regional Water Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
Thomas JT (2001) Tasman. In: Rosen MR, White P (eds) Groundwaters of New Zealand. New Zealand Hydrological Society, Wellington, pp 411–425
UN-Water (2020) UN-Water analytical brief on unconventional water resources. United Nations, Geneva. https://www.unwater.org/publications/un-water-analytical-brief-on-unconventional-water-resources/. Accessed 14 Dec 2021
Van der Raaij R (2011) Age determination and hydrochemistry of groundwater from the Ashley – Waimakariri Plains, Canterbury, New Zealand, GNS Science report 2011/2012. GNS, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Werner AD, Robinson NI (2018) Revisiting analytical solutions for steady interface flow in subsea aquifers: aquitard salinity effects. Adv Water Resour 116:117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.01.002
White PA (2001) Groundwater resources in New Zealand. In: Rosen MR, White P (eds) Groundwaters of New Zealand. New Zealand Hydrological Society, Wellington, pp 45–75
Yu X, Michael HA (2019) Offshore pumping impacts onshore groundwater resources and land subsidence. Geophys Res Lett 46(5):2553–2562. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL081910
Zamrsky D, Karssenberg ME, Cohen KM, Bierkens MFP, Oude Essink GHP (2020) Geological heterogeneity of coastal unconsolidated groundwater systems worldwide and its influence on offshore fresh groundwater occurrence. Front Earth Sci 7(339)
Acknowledgements
Thanks to the following regional councils for responding to the survey sent out as part of this project: Canterbury, Greater Wellington, Hawkes Bay, Horizons (Manawatu-Wanganui), Marlborough, Otago, Taranaki, Tasman and Waikato.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions Leanne Morgan is supported by Canterbury Regional Council, New Zealand and the New Zealand Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment Future Coasts Funding Contract C01X2107. Joshu Mountjoy is supported by NIWA’s Oceans Centre Strategic Science Investment Funding from MBIE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(PDF 244 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Morgan, L.K., Mountjoy, J.J. Likelihood of offshore freshened groundwater in New Zealand. Hydrogeol J 30, 2013–2026 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02525-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02525-1