Abstract
Climate change has a pronounced effect on water resources in many semiarid climates, causing populated areas such as San Diego County (USA), to become more vulnerable to water shortages in the coming decades. To prepare for decreased water supply, San Diego County is adopting policies to decrease water use and to develop additional local sources of water. One new local source of freshwater is produced by a desalination facility that purifies brackish groundwater from the coastal San Diego Formation. This formation has been studied extensively onshore, but little is known about the geology or groundwater quality offshore in the adjacent continental shelf. Because most groundwater systems are interconnected and complex, further analysis is needed to identify offshore geology, possible sequestration of freshwater in the shelf, and potential pathways for saltwater intrusion. This comprehensive understanding is important because seawater intrusion may limit use of the San Diego Formation and longevity of desalination facilities. Controlled-source electromagnetic methods are uniquely suited to detecting offshore groundwater as they are sensitive to changes in pore fluids such as the transition from fresh to brackish groundwater. This paper describes results from surface-towed electromagnetic surveys that mapped the pore-fluid salinity and possible fluid pathways in the continental shelf off the coast of San Diego. The results indicate a considerable volume of fresh-to-brackish groundwater sequestered in the shelf, both in continuous lenses and isolated pockets, that appear influenced by fault systems and shallow stratigraphy.
Résumé
Le changement climatique a un effet prononcé sur les ressources en eau dans de nombreux climats semiarides, rendant des régions peuplées, telles que le Comté de San Diégo (Etats-Unis d’Amérique), plus vulnérables aux pénuries d’eau dans les décennies à venir. Pour se préparer à une diminution de l’approvisionnement en eau, le Comté de San Diégo est en train d’adopter des politiques visant à réduire l’utilisation de l’eau et à développer des ressources en eau supplémentaires locales. Une ressource locale nouvelle d’eau douce est fournie par une installation de dessalement qui adoucit l’eau souterraine saumâtre de la Formation côtière de San Diégo. Cette formation a été largement étudiée à terre, mais on connaît peu de choses sur la géologie ou la qualité de l’eau souterraine au large, au sein du plateau continental adjacent. Parce la plupart des systèmes d’eaux souterraines sont interconnectés et complexes, une analyse plus poussée est nécessaire pour identifier la géologie au large de la côte, le possible piégeage de l’eau douce au sein du plateau continental et les cheminements possibles offerts à l’intrusion de l’eau salée. Cette compréhension globale est importante car l’intrusion d’eau de mer peut limiter l’utilisation de la Formation de San Diégo et la longévité des installations de dessalement. Les méthodes électromagnétiques à sources contrôlées sont particulièrement adaptées à la détection des eaux souterraines au large des côtes, car elles sont sensibles aux modifications des fluides interstitiels, telles que la transition d’eau douce souterraine douce en eau souterraine saumâtre. Le présent article décrit les résultats issus des levés électromagnétiques embarqués, qui ont cartographié la salinité du fluide interstitiel et les cheminements possibles du fluide au sein du plateau continental au large de la côte de San Diégo. Les résultats indiquent un volume considérable d’eaux souterraines douce à eau saumâtre séquestrées dans le plateau, tant dans des lentilles continues que dans des poches isolées, et qui semble sous l’influence de systèmes de failles et d’une stratigraphie peu profonde.
Resumen
El cambio climático tiene un efecto pronunciado sobre los recursos hídricos en muchos climas semiáridos, lo que hace que las zonas pobladas, como el condado de San Diego (EE.UU.), sean más vulnerables a la escasez de agua en las próximas décadas. Para prepararse para la disminución del suministro de agua, el condado de San Diego está adoptando políticas para disminuir el uso del agua y desarrollar fuentes locales adicionales de agua. Una nueva fuente local de agua dulce es la producida por una instalación de desalinización que purifica el agua subterránea salobre de la formación costera de San Diego. Esta formación se ha estudiado ampliamente en tierra, pero se sabe poco sobre la geología o la calidad de las aguas subterráneas en la plataforma continental adyacente. Dado que la mayoría de los sistemas de aguas subterráneas están interconectados y son complejos, es necesario realizar más análisis para identificar la geología de alta mar, el posible almacenamiento de agua dulce en la plataforma y las posibles vías de intrusión de agua salada. Este conocimiento exhaustivo es importante porque la intrusión de agua de mar puede limitar el uso de la Formación San Diego y la vida útil de las instalaciones de desalinización. Los métodos electromagnéticos de fuente controlada son especialmente adecuados para detectar el agua subterránea de alta mar, ya que son sensibles a los cambios en los fluidos de los poros, como la transición de agua dulce a salobre. En este artículo se describen los resultados de los estudios electromagnéticos realizados en la superficie, que han permitido cartografiar la salinidad de los fluidos de los poros y las posibles trayectorias de los fluidos en la plataforma continental de la costa de San Diego. Los resultados indican un volumen considerable de agua subterránea dulce a salobre almacenada en la plataforma, tanto en lentes continuas como en bolsas aisladas, que parecen estar influenciadas por sistemas de fallas y estratigrafía poco profunda.
摘要
气候变化对许多半干旱气候的水资源产生了显著影响, 导致如美国圣地亚哥县的人口聚焦区在未来几十年内更容易受到水资源短缺的影响。为应对供水减少, 圣地亚哥县正在采取政策减少用水量并开发更多的当地水源。一种新的当地淡水来源是由一个海水淡化设施生产的, 该设施净化圣地亚哥沿海地层的微咸地下水。这种地层已在陆上进行了广泛的研究, 但对邻近大陆架近海的地质或地下水质量知之甚少。由于大多数地下水系统是相互关联且复杂的, 因此需要进一步分析以确定近海地质情况、陆架中可能的淡水封存情况以及咸水入侵的潜在途径。这种全面的理解很重要, 因为海水入侵可能会影响圣地亚哥组的使用和海水淡化设施的寿命。受控源电磁方法特别适用于检测近海地下水, 因为它们对孔隙流体的变化很敏感, 例如从淡水到微咸水的转变。本文描述了地面拖曳电磁勘测的结果, 这些勘测绘制了圣地亚哥海岸外大陆架的孔隙流体盐度和可能的流体路径。结果表明, 有相当数量的淡水和微咸水被赋存在陆架中, 无论是连续透镜体还是孤立储水体, 似乎都受到断层系统和浅层地层的影响。
Resumo
As mudanças climáticas têm um efeito pronunciado sobre os recursos hídricos em muitos climas semiáridos, fazendo com que áreas povoadas, como o condado de San Diego (EUA), se tornem mais vulneráveis à escassez de água nas próximas décadas. Para se preparar para a diminuição do abastecimento de água, o condado de San Diego está adotando políticas para diminuir o uso de água e desenvolver fontes locais adicionais de água. Uma nova fonte local de água doce é produzida por uma instalação de dessalinização que purifica águas subterrâneas salobras da formação costeira de San Diego. Esta formação tem sido estudada extensivamente em terra, mas pouco se sabe sobre a geologia ou qualidade das águas subterrâneas fora da costa na plataforma continental adjacente. Como a maioria dos sistemas de águas subterrâneas é interconectado e complexo, é necessária uma análise mais aprofundada para identificar a geologia fora da costa, o possível sequestro de água doce na plataforma e os caminhos potenciais para a intrusão de água salgada. Essa compreensão abrangente é importante porque a intrusão de água do mar pode limitar o uso da Formação San Diego e a longevidade das instalações de dessalinização. Os métodos eletromagnéticos de fonte controlada são especialmente adequados para detectar águas subterrâneas fora da costa, pois são sensíveis a mudanças nos fluidos dos poros, como a transição de águas subterrâneas frescas para salobras. Este artigo descreve os resultados de levantamentos eletromagnéticos rebocados à superfície que mapearam a salinidade dos fluidos dos poros e possíveis caminhos de fluidos na plataforma continental ao largo da costa de San Diego. Os resultados indicam um volume considerável de água subterrânea doce a salobra sequestrada na plataforma, tanto em lentes contínuas quanto em bolsões isolados, que parecem influenciados por sistemas de falhas e estratigrafia rasa.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Climate change significantly impacts the water resources available in semiarid climates and populations living within these regions are likely to become more vulnerable to water shortages. The southwestern United States is a semiarid region hosting several large population centers, including coastal southern California with the three highest population density counties in the state (Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego). This region is dependent upon water from snowpack in northern California which is expected to experience a 48–65% loss by the end of this century and the Colorado River which is expected to see an additional 20% drop in flow by 2050 (Udall and Overpeck 2017). San Diego County is especially vulnerable to these predicted water disruptions as the county currently purchases 85–90% of its water from northern California and the Colorado River.
So that water supply agencies can adapt to the changing climate in semiarid regions, groundwater resources could be further developed to account for an expected decrease in overall water supplies. In coastal semiarid areas such as San Diego County, development of groundwater resources is complicated by saltwater intrusion and the potential presence of fresh groundwater reservoirs offshore. Groundwater in the San Diego region is further complicated by its location along the North American-Pacific Plate boundary where several strike-slip fault systems influence coastal geomorphology and subsurface geology.
The San Diego Formation (SDF) is a heavily faulted coastal aquifer that is currently supplying about 5% of the total water used in the San Diego area. The salinity of water extracted from the SDF generally ranges between slightly-saline to brackish (1,500–2,500 ppm), with some regions producing freshwater (defined as less than 500 ppm). The combination of increasing water demand and diminishing sources of imported water suggests that groundwater extraction from the SDF may increase, in particular to supply municipal water to communities in southwestern San Diego area (San Diego County Water Authority 2021). Groundwater extracted from the SDF could originate from naturally recharged precipitation, or alternatively, from aquifer storage and recovery, a method that involves artificial recharge of the SDF with excess water during periods of low water use followed by extraction of this water during periods of high-water use (Keller and Ward 2001).
To provide water agencies with the scientific understanding to evaluate these water-management scenarios, the United States Geological Survey (USGS)—in cooperation with the Sweetwater Authority, the City of San Diego, and the Otay Water District—began an extensive hydrogeology project in 2001 to map the geology and the water resources of the San Diego area (US Geological Survey 2020). A major part of this project focused on mapping the San Diego coastal aquifer, determining groundwater recharge and discharge rates, identifying groundwater flowpaths, and assessing groundwater quality. Installation of 16 USGS multiple-depth, monitoring-well sites enabled collection of three-dimensional (3D) geologic data, groundwater levels, and groundwater quality. The project study area, the generalized geology of the San Diego area, and the locations of USGS monitoring-well sites are shown in Fig. 1. Hydrogeologic understanding gained from these sites and from development and testing of geologic and hydrologic models helped to define the onshore coastal geology, groundwater recharge and discharge rates, and groundwater flowpaths.
Map illustrating the USGS San Diego Hydrogeology project study area, which extends offshore of San Diego. Sedimentary deposits are shown in yellow; hard rock is shown in pink; streams and water bodies are shown in blue; USGS monitoring-well sites are indicated by red dots (US Geological Survey 2021)
Data collected from these onshore USGS monitoring sites from 2001 to 2020 indicate that fresh and brackish groundwater flows onshore from the continental shelf under San Diego Bay, driven by onshore groundwater extraction from the SDF (Anders et al. 2013). Additionally, noble gas isotope analyses of sampled well water indicate that groundwater age generally increases with proximity to the coastline (Seltzer et al. 2019). These observations, combined with the geologic model of the San Diego coastal aquifer, suggest that the SDF extends about 5 km west of the present shoreline and indicate that freshwater may have been sequestered in the SDF when the continental shelf was subaerially exposed approximately 20,000 years ago (Danskin 2012). Because most hydrogeologic information has been collected onshore, the location and extent of offshore groundwater are not well understood. Historically, electromagnetic (EM) surveying has been used on land to map groundwater resources with great success (Knight et al. 2018; McNeill 1988). Also, EM methods have been proposed by many authors to identify salinity of submarine groundwater (Cohen et al. 2010; Haroon et al. 2021; Micallef et al. 2020, 2021; Post et al. 2013) and several controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) surveys have been successful at identifying groundwater offshore, most notably offshore Martha’s Vineyard (Gustafson et al. 2019) and Hawaii (Attias et al. 2021). The geologic setting of San Diego varies from these previous studies in that the presence of offshore groundwater has not yet been confirmed, and the SDF is heavily faulted, possibly isolating pockets of freshwater offshore. This current study aims to further the understanding of the onshore groundwater system by characterizing and mapping pore fluids within the offshore part of the SDF using CSEM methods.
The CSEM method
The marine CSEM method uses a human-made source of EM energy that passes through seawater and propagates into the seafloor and to receivers, deployed either on the seafloor or towed through the water, which measure the resulting electric fields. The recorded fields are proportional to electrical resistivity, making the method suitable for detecting fresh groundwater, which is significantly more resistive in comparison to seawater or the surrounding seafloor sediment. Additionally, as the porosity and cementation of the SDF are well studied onshore, the salinity of the submarine aquifer can be predicted with electrical conductivity data by applying Archie’s Law. Using observations and data collected from USGS monitoring-well sites and hydrogeologic models, the porosity of the SDF is constrained to values between 30–45% with a mean value of 38% and the cementation exponent used in Archie’s Law was determined to be 1.8. Of these two variables, porosity has the greatest effect on the predicted salinity of the pore fluids. The relationship between salinity and bulk resistivity given these values is shown in Fig. 2.
Graph illustrating the predicted changes in bulk resistivity with changing pore fluid salinity using characteristic SDF attributes such as porosity values between 30 and 45%. Pore fluid salinity can be estimated from the resistivity models generated with controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) data using Archie’s Law which describes the relationship between cementation factor, porosity, bulk resistivity, and pore fluid conductivity of a material
Because the water depths on the continental shelf are shallow and the SDF is not expected to extend more than 500 m below sea level, the small and low-power surface-towed CSEM system of Sherman et al. (2017) can be used effectively to map the SDF. This system has the added benefit that it is inexpensive to use, can be hand-deployed, and requires a nonspecialized vessel to efficiently survey the shelf. The system, illustrated in Fig. 3, consists of an EM transmitter that generates an electric dipole, four electric field receivers, and a dorsal device that collects water-conductivity and water-depth data. The electric dipole, four receivers (referred to as porpoises), and dorsal are towed on the surface of the water behind a vessel traveling between 2 and 4 knots (approximately 1–2 m/s) on floating high-molecular-weight polyethylene rope. The frames of the receivers and dorsal are made from rigid plastic that is designed to slough off kelp or other ocean debris, hold a rigid dipole 0.67 m beneath the sea surface, and provide mounting for a vertical global positioning system (GPS) mast that doubles as a flashing beacon for better visibility to other vessels. To maximize sensitivity to the predicted geometry of the SDF, the receivers were separated by 100 m, creating a maximum source-receiver spacing of 400 m and a total towed array length of 430 m.
The EM transmitter operates on 110–240 VAC power and can output a GPS stabilized binary or ternary waveform of as much as 50 amps on an antenna typically 50 m long. For this survey, the transmitter outputs a 30-amp current-controlled 2.5-Hz fundamental waveform-D, described by Meyer et al. (2011), on a 10-m antenna. This configuration resulted in a 300-amp-m horizontal electric dipole moment, which is a signal strength well suited to the source-receiver spacing chosen for this survey. Waveform-D was chosen as it generates higher amplitude responses in the 1st, 3rd, 7th, and 13th harmonics than other binary and ternary waveforms, allowing the collection of data across a broad frequency range (Meyer et al. 2011).
Survey data quality
The data presented here were collected from September 2019 to September 2020 on 5 separate days of surveying aboard the Scripps Institution of Oceanography research vessel Bob and Betty Beyster. The cruises were designed to initially survey the shelf with a broad exploration method followed by increasingly focused surveys targeting resistive anomalies identified within the SDF from the initial results. The location of the survey lines presented here are shown in Fig. 4.
Map of San Diego area with simplified geology. Sedimentary deposits are shown in yellow; hard, mostly crystalline and metamorphic, rock is shown in pink; known and inferred fault locations are shown in black. CSEM survey lines presented here are shown in green. The dashed green box indicates the boundary of Fig. 6. The location of the two-dimensional (2D) geologic interpretation from Darigo (1984) used in Fig. 5 is shown here in purple. USGS monitoring-well sites are indicated with red dots (US Geological Survey 2021)
A total of 141 km of high-quality inline electric field response data were collected. For each day of survey, the data were inspected for quality before further processing. GPS data from the towed receivers were lost on the first day of data collection because of user error; however, redundant onboard GPS data were found to be sufficient and thus used. For the following three survey days, all instruments functioned as designed.
Results
Amplitude and phases of the CSEM response functions were extracted from the collected raw time-series data using a method detailed by Meyer et al. (2011). To increase the signal-to-noise ratio, the resulting transfer function estimates were stacked using an arithmetic mean to obtain the transfer function estimates for every 30 s along with an error estimate. This method yielded high quality amplitude and phase response data for all four receivers as a function of position and frequency. Amplitude data for all four receivers at 2.5, 7.5, 13.5, and 32.5 Hz and phase data for 7.5 and 13.5 Hz were included in the inversion code. The amplitude data for these frequencies were well above the noise floor and sensitive to the known depths of the SDF. Phase was neglected at 2.5 Hz as there was little variability in the signal and addition of these data in the models resulted in an unbalanced misfit between frequencies due to the model fitting noise in the 2.5 Hz phase. Phase was also neglected at 32.5 Hz as there was significant impact from clock drift at this frequency.
The modeling software used in this study is the publicly available, goal-oriented, adaptive, finite-element two-dimensional (2D) MARE2DEM inversion and modeling code of Key (2016). This code uses Occam’s Inversion, a method that regularizes the inversion to the smoothest resistivity model that fits the data to a specified misfit (Constable et al. 1987). CSEM data were scrutinized manually for obvious outliers and subjected to a 2% error floor before being included in the inversion as finite-length dipoles.
The starting models included the seawater as a fixed parameter, using conductivity data collected by the dorsal and available bathymetric data. Therefore, the free inversion regions were reduced to the area below the seafloor and set to a uniform starting resistivity of 1 Ωm. Inversion parameter grids were constructed using 30-m-wide quadrilateral cells that increased in height with depth to mimic the loss of resolution of the EM method. Due to the adaptive nature of the MARE2DEM code, the computation mesh was allowed to fine where necessary to produce accurate responses. The resolution depth was investigated by including a highly conductive (0.1 Ωm) or highly resistive (1,000 Ωm) layer as a base to the model at varying depths. From these tests, the limits of sensitivity are estimated to be at a depth between 400 to 500 m below sea level; thus, the final model interpretation and presentation is limited to these depths. Isotropic inversions fit the amplitude data, but these models produced biased phase residuals and a normalized root-mean-square of 1 was not achieved, suggesting the need to include anisotropy in the models (Sherman and Constable 2018). Thus, differing resistivity values in the vertical and horizontal directions were included in the models, and allowed for simultaneous fit of both the amplitude and phase data. These inversions resulted in anisotropic ratio (vertical resistivity/horizontal resistivity) of up to 5 in the SDF, consistent with the geology of the SDF which has been observed to have a series of fining-upward stratigraphic sequences. The anisotropic resistivity inversions fit the data to a normalized root-mean-square of 1 with a two-percent error floor. See Fig. 5a for an example resistivity model and Fig. 5b for the data and data fits from this model, which are representative of the data quality and model fit of the surveys and resulting models discussed in this paper. The final resistivity models that focus on the main resistive anomalies offshore Imperial Beach, located in the southern coastal San Diego area, are shown in Fig. 6.
a Plot of 2D vertical resistivity model from one line of data, with data and data fits from the third receiver in the array (300-m transmitter to receiver offset). 2D vertical resistivity model with overlain geologic interpretations (marked in white) by Darigo (1984) are shown (a). The location of the vertical resistivity model is shown in Figs. 4 and 6 and the location of the geologic interpretations by Darigo (1984) are shown on Fig. 4. The resistivity model is run with an anisotropic penalty weight of 0.05 and is fit to a normalized root mean square of 1. Warm colors (red, yellow) indicate areas where pore fluids are fresh-to-slightly saline (<3,000 ppm total dissolved solids), assuming a porosity value between 30 and 45%. Cool colors (blue) indicate moderately-saline-to-highly-saline pore fluids. The white labels are from Darigo (1984): H Holocene sediment; P Pleistocene channel fill; Tmp undifferentiated Miocene and Pliocene (SDF). Conductive U-shaped features interpreted as paleochannels are labeled EPC (eastern paleochannel) and WPC (western paleochannel). b Plots the data and error (error bars) and modeled response (black lines) for all data used in the inversion from the third receiver in the array. The data quality and data fit presented here are representative of both the data quality of the other receivers in the array and the data fit achieved by the other inversion results discussed in this paper
Fence plot of 2D vertical resistivity models offshore Imperial Beach; CSEM survey lines and fence plot extent also are shown in Fig. 4. Models are run with an anisotropic penalty weight of 0.05 and are fit to a root mean square of 1. Black lines indicate the surface locations of known faults (USGS Interactive Fault Database 2019); thin blue lines indicate the present-day shoreline. Red dots onshore indicate locations of USGS monitoring-well sites (US Geological Survey 2021). Warm colors (red, yellow) indicate areas where pore fluids are fresh-to-slightly saline (<3,000 ppm total dissolved solids), assuming a porosity value between 30 and 45%. Cool colors (blue) indicate moderately-saline-to-highly-saline pore fluids. Conductive U-shaped features interpreted as paleochannels are labeled EPC (eastern paleochannel) and WPC (western paleochannel)
Discussion
The structural San Diego basin is a pull-apart sedimentary basin which underlies much of the San Diego area and was formed concurrently with deposition of the SDF during the middle-to-late Pliocene to Pleistocene (Kennedy and Peterson 1973. The San Diego basin is observed to increase in depth from north to south, with the SDF also thickening until both the basin and the SDF gradually shallow and flatten near the USA–Mexico border. The SDF also shallows and thins both to the east and west and is interpreted to be thickest beneath the city of Imperial Beach (Huntley et al. 1996). The western edge of the SDF is not well defined, but current hydrogeologic models which incorporate gravity, seismic, and borehole data indicate that the western boundary occurs approximately 5 km west of the present shoreline.
The 2D models of vertical resistivity contain numerous highly resistive anomalies offshore Imperial Beach. The depth to these resistive anomalies is approximately 50–80 m below sea level, which is consistent with the depth at which the SDF is encountered in nearby USGS monitoring-well sites. Additionally, Darigo (1984), using acoustic reflection methods, interpreted the locations of these resistive features to be the SDF (see Fig. 5a). As such, the locations of these resistive anomalies are interpreted to be within the SDF. Archie’s law, the resistivity models, and known geologic parameters of the SDF were used to predict the salinity of the pore fluids within these resistive anomalies. The resistive anomalies (>10 Ωm) offshore Imperial Beach correspond to areas where pore fluids are fresh-to-slightly saline (<3,000 ppm). Assuming a porosity of 30% and a thickness of 100 m, consistent with model geometries, the volume of the mapped fresh-to-slightly-saline groundwater is approximately 390 million m3 (103 billion gallons). The onshore volume of the SDF is estimated to be between 341 and 532 million m3 (City of San Diego 2016). The estimated offshore volume of groundwater nearly doubles the total volume of the SDF which is consistent with predictions by Keller and Ward (2001).
The resistive anomalies appear to be north-south trending and are separated by down-dropped blocks controlled by segments of the Silver Strand fault zone. In previous seismic surveys, the down-dropped blocks have been observed to be collocated with Pleistocene and Quaternary paleochanlnels that were incised into the continental shelf during the last glacial maximum, a time when the continental shelf was subaerially exposed (Darigo 1984; Graves et al. 2021). Similar west (W) and east (E) paleochannels (PC) were found in this CSEM survey and are indicated by conductive U-shaped features labeled respectively as WPC and EPC on Figs. 5a and 6.
The paleochannels marked EPC are collocated with areas in which the SDF appears to be conductive, signifying saline pore fluids. This observation indicates, in these areas, that the paleochannels may have been incised into the lower-permeability sediment that functionally trapped the fresh SDF pore fluids, allowing for fluid migration into and out of the SDF. As sea level rose, drowning the shelf, these incisions would allow for diffusion of saltwater into the SDF below the paleochannels. Saline pore fluids appear to have infilled the SDF below the paleochannels marked EPC. Conversely, the paleochannels marked WPC, which run parallel and west of Silver Stand section 1, also appear to have been incised into the SDF, but the resistive anomalies remain intact below these paleochannels. This preservation of fresh-to-slightly-saline pore fluids within the SDF, despite the presence of overlying paleochannels, may result from locational differences in the SDF stratigraphy.
Depositionally, the SDF is a mixture of shallow marine and nonmarine sediment (Keller and Ward 2001). As a result, the SDF contains multiple fining-upward sequences, sandy marls, conglomerates, and clayey layers (Ellis 1919) which is evident in the anisotropic ratios generated from the final resistivity models. The fining-upward sequences and clayey layers may form a series of less permeable sediment, which could aid in preserving freshwater in the more permeable layers below. This vertical restriction to groundwater flow is illustrated in the confined response observed during regional-scale, multiple-well aquifer tests and single-well pumping tests (Brandt et al. 2020). The depositional character of the SDF may be one reason that the fresh-to-slightly-saline pore fluids are preserved below the paleochannels marked WPC, west of Silver Strand section 1. In these areas, the fining-upward sequences may form a series of caps to pore fluids within the SDF. The WPC paleochannels may have been incised into some, but not all, of these caps, which could leave parts of the SDF undisturbed.
An additional reason for irregularities in the highly resistive locations could be the discontinuous nature of the more permeable parts of the SDF, which are separated by clayey sediment (Huntley et al. 1996). This depositional pattern may explain the discontinuous nature of the resistors offshore, but it does not explain the boundaries being collocated with fault traces. Therefore, geometries and locations of the highly resistive features mapped via CSEM may result from a combination of stratigraphy, regional faulting, and lithification.
Finally, the Silver Strand fault zone is made up of a series of strike-slip, right-lateral faults within a generally transtensional regime (Maloney et al. 2016). These faults transect the offshore SDF, creating migration pathways for freshwater flushing. This phenomenon, in the form of freshwater springs along the fault zone, has been noted in historical records of Coronado Island (Keller and Ward 2001). The 2D resistivity models suggest upward fluid migration from the lower fresh-to-slightly-saline anomalies along the Silver Stand fault sections 1 and 3. These anomalies extend in some cases to the seafloor. The vertical orientation of, depth to the tops of, and collocation with known faults of these resistive features suggest the presence of freshwater flushing along Silver Stand fault sections 1 and 3.
Conclusion
The use of CSEM offshore San Diego, California, USA, has resulted in a resistivity model identifying sections of the SDF with substantial volumes of fresh-to-slightly-saline pore fluids, sequestered offshore. These results also indicate that CSEM could be a useful and efficient tool for mapping the extent of other coastal aquifers across diverse geologic settings. The results, however, also illustrate the potential complications related to withdrawing water from the naturally charged SDF or using the SDF for aquifer storage and recovery. Possible freshwater flushing from these sections has been interpreted along the transtensional faults related to the Silver Strand fault zone. In this case, offshore faulting may act as conduits for saltwater intrusion into the onshore SDF. Conversely, offshore faulting may act as partial barriers to groundwater flow and inhibit movement of fresh or saline groundwater into the onshore SDF. Further research and data collection are needed to understand how well this offshore, submarine groundwater is connected hydraulically to the onshore SDF.
References
Anders R, Mendez GO, Futa K, Danskin WR (2013) A geochemical approach to determine sources and movement of saline groundwater in a coastal aquifer. Ground Water 52:756–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12108
Attias E, Constable S, Sherman D, Ismail K, Shuler C, Dulai H (2021) Marine electromagnetic imaging and volumetric estimation of freshwater plumes offshore Hawai′i. Geophys Res Lett 48(7):e2020GL091249
Brandt JT, Sneed M, Danskin WR (2020) Detection and measurement of land subsidence and uplift using interferometric synthetic aperture radar, San Diego, California, USA, 2016–2018. Proc IAHS 382:45–49. https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-382-45-2020
City of San Diego (2016) 2015 San Diego Urban Water Management Plan. City of San Diego. https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/2015_uwmp_report.pdf. Accessed February 2022
Cohen D, Person M, Wang P, Gable CW, Hutchinson D, Marksamer A, Dugan B, Kooi H, Groen K, Lizarralde D, Evans RL, Day-Lewis FD, Lane JW Jr (2010) Origin and extent of fresh paleowaters on the Atlantic continental shelf, USA. Groundwater 48(1):143–158
Constable SC, Parker RL, Constable CG (1987) Occam’s inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 52(3):289–300
Danskin WR (2012) Gaining the necessary geologic, hydrologic, and geochemical understanding for additional brackish groundwater development, coastal San Diego, California, USA. Extended abstract. 22nd Salt Water Intrusion Meeting, Buzios, Brazil, June 2012
Darigo NJ (1984) Quaternary stratigraphy and sedimentation of the mainland shelf of San Diego County, California. PhD Thesis, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
Ellis AJ (1919) Geology and ground waters of the western part of San Diego County, California. Nos. 444–446, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Graves LG, Driscoll NW, Maloney JM (2021) Tectonic and eustatic control on channel formation, erosion, and deposition along a strike-slip margin, San Diego, California, USA. Cont Shelf Res 231:104571
Gustafson C, Key K, Evans RL (2019) Aquifer systems extending far offshore on the US Atlantic margin. Sci Rep 9(1):1–10
Haroon A, Micallef A, Jegen M, Schwalenberg K, Karstens J, Berndt C, Garcia X, Kuehn M, Rizzo E, Fusi NC, Ahaneku CV, Petronio L, Faghih Z, Weymer BA, Biase MD, Chidichimo F (2021) Electrical resistivity anomalies offshore a carbonate coastline: evidence for freshened groundwater? Geophys Res Lett 48(14):e2020GL091909
Huntley D, Biehler S, Marshall CM (1996) Distribution and hydrogeologic properties of the San Diego Formation, southwestern San Diego County. San Diego Formation Task Force, Report of Investigation 2005-1032. Cal Groundw Bull 118
Keller B, Ward A (2001) Tectonic setting of the San Diego formation aquifer, considered for conjunctive use storage. J S Am Earth Sci 14(5):533–540
Kennedy MP, Peterson GL (1973) Geology of the San Diego metropolitan area, California, vol 200. California Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento, CA
Key K (2016) MARE2DEM: a 2-D inversion code for controlled-source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric data. Geophys J Int 207(1):571–588
Knight R, Smith R, Asch T, Abraham J, Cannia J, Viezzoli A, Fogg G (2018) Mapping aquifer systems with airborne electromagnetics in the Central Valley of California. Groundwater 56(6):893–908
Maloney JM, Driscoll N, Kent G, Duke S, Freeman T, Bormann J, Anderson R, Ferriz H (2016) Segmentation and step-overs along strike-slip fault systems in the inner California borderlands: implications for fault architecture and basin formation. Appl Geol Cal 26:655–677
McNeill JD (1988) Advances in electromagnetic methods for groundwater studies. In: 1st EEGS symposium on the application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems. cp-214-00003, European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, Houten, The Netherlands
Meyer D, Constable S, Key K (2011) Broad-band waveforms and robust processing for marine CSEM surveys. Geophys J Int 184(2):689–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04887.x
Micallef A, Person M, Berndt C, Bertoni C, Cohen D, Dugan B, Evans R, Haroon A, Hensen C, Jegen M, Key K, Kooi H, Liebetrau V, Lofi J, Mailoux BJ, Martin-Nagle R, Michael HA, Muller T, Schmidt M et al (2021) Offshore freshened groundwater in continental margins. Rev Geophys 59(1):e2020RG000706
Micallef A, Person M, Haroon A, Weymer BA, Jegen M, Schwalenberg K, Faghih Z, Duan S, Cohen D, Mountjoy JJ, Woelz S, Gable CW, Averes T, Tiwari AK (2020) 3D characterisation and quantification of an offshore freshened groundwater system in the Canterbury Bight. Nat Commun 11(1):1–15
Post VE, Groen J, Kooi H, Person M, Ge S, Edmunds WM (2013) Offshore fresh groundwater reserves as a global phenomenon. Nature 504(7478):71–78
San Diego County Water Authority (2021) 2020 Urban water management plan. San Diego County Water Authority, San Diego
Seltzer AM, Ng J, Danskin WR, Kulongoski JT, Gannon RS, Stute M, Severinghaus JP (2019) Deglacial water-table decline in southern California recorded by noble gas isotopes. Nat Commun 10(1):1–6
Sherman D, Constable SC (2018) Permafrost extent on the Alaskan Beaufort shelf from surface-towed controlled-source electromagnetic surveys. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 123(9):7253–7265
Sherman D, Kannberg P, Constable S (2017) Surface towed electromagnetic system for mapping of subsea Arctic permafrost. Earth Planet Sci Lett 460:97–104
US Geological Survey (2020) San Diego hydrogeology. https://ca.water.usgs.gov/sandiego/. Accessed December 2021
US Geological Survey (2020–2021) USGS water data for USA. National Water Information System: Web Interface. https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN. Accessed May 10, 2021
US Geological Survey and California Geological Survey (2019) Quaternary fault and fold database of the United States. https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/faults. Accessed April 10, 2019
Udall B, Overpeck J (2017) The twenty-first century Colorado River hot drought and implications for the future. Water Resour Res 53(3):2404–2418
Acknowledgements
Thanks to the captain, Brett Pickering, of the research vessel Beyster, for skillful piloting during cruise days as well as to the technicians and engineers of the EM marine laboratory for technical support in the laboratory and offshore. We thank Sarah Ogle and Greg Mendez for their assistance collecting the EM data. The ARCS Foundation generously supplements the PhD studies of Roslynn King. We would like to thank Marion Jegen, the USGS internal review team, an anonymous reviewer, and the Hydrogeology Journal editors for their insightful and useful comments and edits during the review process.
Funding
Funding for data collection associated with this project was received from the United States Geological Survey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Any use of trade, firm, or product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
King, R.B., Danskin, W.R., Constable, S. et al. Identification of fresh submarine groundwater off the coast of San Diego, USA, using electromagnetic methods. Hydrogeol J 30, 965–973 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02463-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02463-y