Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Machine learning, deep learning and hernia surgery. Are we pushing the limits of abdominal core health? A qualitative systematic review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This systematic review aims to evaluate the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence in hernia surgery.

Methods

The PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout this systematic review. The ROBINS—I and Rob 2 tools were used to perform qualitative assessment of all studies included in this review. Recommendations were then summarized for the following pre-defined key items: protocol, research question, search strategy, study eligibility, data extraction, study design, risk of bias, publication bias, and statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 13 articles were ultimately included for this review, describing the use of machine learning and deep learning for hernia surgery. All studies were published from 2020 to 2023. Articles varied regarding the population studied, type of machine learning or Deep Learning Model (DLM) used, and hernia type. Of the thirteen included studies, all included either inguinal, ventral, or incisional hernias. Four studies evaluated recognition of surgical steps during inguinal hernia repair videos. Two studies predicted outcomes using image-based DMLs. Seven studies developed and validated deep learning algorithms to predict outcomes and identify factors associated with postoperative complications.

Conclusion

The use of ML for abdominal wall reconstruction has been shown to be a promising tool for predicting outcomes and identifying factors that could lead to postoperative complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choi RY, Coyner AS, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Chiang MF, Campbell JP (2020) Introduction to machine learning, neural networks, and deep learning. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 27(9(2)):14. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Loftus TJ, Tighe PJ, Filiberto AC, Efron PA, Brakenridge SC, Mohr AM et al (2020) Artificial intelligence and surgical decision-making. JAMA Surg 155(2):148–158. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2013) An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Delahanty RJ, Kaufman D, Jones SS (2018) Development and evaluation of an automated machine learning algorithm for in-hospital mortality risk adjustment among critical care patients. Crit Care Med 46(6):e481–e488. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Adhikari L, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Ruppert M, Madushani RWMA, Paliwal S, Hashemighouchani H et al (2019) Improved predictive models for acute kidney injury with IDEA: intraoperative data embedded analytics. PLoS ONE 14(4):e0214904. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hao Du, Ghassemi MM, Feng M (2016) The effects of deep network topology on mortality prediction. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016:2602–2605. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi E, Schuetz A, Stewart WF, Sun J (2017) Using recurrent neural network models for early detection of heart failure onset. J Am Med Inform Assoc 24(2):361–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ayuso SA, Elhage SA, Zhang Y, Aladegbami BG, Gersin KS, Fischer JP et al (2023) Predicting rare outcomes in abdominal wall reconstruction using image-based deep learning models. Surgery 173(3):748–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baig SJ, Priya P (2021) Management of ventral hernia in patients with BMI > 30 Kg/m2: outcomes based on an institutional algorithm. Hernia 25(3):689–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02318-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi JH, Janjua H, Cios K, Rogers MP, Read M, Docimo S et al (2023) Machine learning analysis of postlaparoscopy hernias and “I’m leaving you to close” strategy. J Surg Res 290:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.04.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cui P, Zhao S, Chen W (2021) Identification of the vas deferens in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgery using the convolutional neural network. J Healthc Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5578089

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Elhage SA, Deerenberg EB, Ayuso SA, Murphy KJ, Shao JM, Kercher KW et al (2021) Development and validation of image-based deep learning models to predict surgical complexity and complications in abdominal wall reconstruction. JAMA Surg 156(10):933–940. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gao J, Zagadailov P, Merchant AM (2021) The use of artificial neural network to predict surgical outcomes after inguinal hernia repair. J Surg Res 259:372–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.09.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan AM, Lu SC, Asaad M, Liu J, Offodile AC, Sidey-Gibbons C et al (2022) Novel machine learning approach for the prediction of hernia recurrence, surgical complication, and 30-day readmission after abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 234(5):918–927. https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000000141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McAuliffe PB, Desai AA, Talwar AA, Broach RB, Hsu JY, Serletti JM et al (2022) Preoperative computed tomography morphological features indicative of incisional hernia formation after abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 276(4):616–625. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Brien WJ, Ramos RD, Gupta K, Itani KMF (2021) Neural network model to detect long-term skin and soft tissue infection after hernia repair. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 22(7):668–674. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2020.354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takeuchi M, Collins T, Ndagijimana A, Kawakubo H, Kitagawa Y, Marescaux J et al (2022) Automatic surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with artificial intelligence. Hernia 26(6):1669–1678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02621-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan YD, Yu Z, Ding LP, Zhou M, Zhang C, Pan MM et al (2023) Machine learning to dynamically predict in-hospital venous thromboembolism after inguinal hernia surgery: results from the CHAT-1 study. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 29:10760296231171082. https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296231171082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zang C, Turkcan MK, Narasimhan S, Cao Y, Yarali K, Xiang Z et al (2023) Surgical phase recognition in inguinal hernia repair-AI-based confirmatory baseline and exploration of competitive models. Bioengineering (Basel) 10(6):654. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10060654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ortenzi M, Rapoport Ferman J, Antolin A, Bar O, Zohar M, Perry O et al (2023) A novel high accuracy model for automatic surgical workflow recognition using artificial intelligence in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP). Surg Endosc 37(11):8818–8828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10375-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ortega-Deballon P, Renard Y, de Launay J, Lafon T, Roset Q, Passot G (2023) Incidence, risk factors, and burden of incisional hernia repair after abdominal surgery in France: a nationwide study. Hernia 27(4):861–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02825-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matheny ME, Whicher D, Thadaney IS (2020) Artificial intelligence in health care: a report from the national academy of medicine. JAMA 323(6):509–510. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.21579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE, Setio AAA, Ciompi F, Ghafoorian M et al (2017) A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 42:60–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no funding for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. L. Lima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Diego L Lima, Raquel Nogueira, Joao Kasakewitch and Diana Nguyen declare no conflict of interest. Leandro Totti Cavazzola disclosure consulting fees from BD. Flavio Malcher discloses consulting fees from BD, Intuitive, Integra, DeepBlue, Allergan & Medtronic, outside the submitted study. Todd Heniford discloses surgical research and education grants and speaking honoraria from WL Gore.

Ethical approval, Human and animal rights and Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lima, D.L., Kasakewitch, J., Nguyen, D.Q. et al. Machine learning, deep learning and hernia surgery. Are we pushing the limits of abdominal core health? A qualitative systematic review. Hernia (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03069-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03069-x

Keywords

Navigation