Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
We congratulate Lombardi and the Allergan team [1] for their pre-clinical comparison of the reinforced biologic, Ovitex® and biologic Strattice®, both indicated and widely used clinically for hernia repair.
The authors do appropriately indicate that “the need for adequate education and comparative studies… are especially important for informing the selection of an appropriate mesh in the clinical setting where reduction of postoperative pain, stiffness, and other complications at the surgical site is paramount for hernia patients.” We concur with the authors on this point, however, we disagree that clinical decisions should be made based on the bench testing and short-term small animal studies performed, particularly when comparative human clinical studies exist.
We would like to bring to the readers’ attention the published clinical investigations of Sivaraj et al. [2] and Goetz et al. [3], among several others [4,5,6]. Sivaraj et al. compared clinical outcomes following ventral hernia repair with either Ovitex (n = 36) or Strattice (n = 51) along with several other biologic products. There were no statistical differences in the cohorts with respect to patient co-morbidities, surgical characteristics or hernia type. Recurrence rates between the two cohorts were not statistically different, while overall complication rates (including recurrence) were significantly lower in the OviTex cohort compared to the Strattice cohort. Poisson Regression analysis demonstrates the overall relative risk of post-operative complications is significantly less in the OviTex cohort versus the Strattice cohort (RR = 2.64, p = 0.0182).
Goetz et al. compared OviTex to three other biologic meshes, including Strattice, in the setting of possible wound contamination. Patients with abdominal wall reconstruction, from either a ventral hernia or open abdomen closure, were included in the study. There were no differences in age, gender, BMI, operation duration, hernia size or Charlson comorbidity index in the 28 OviTex patients or 43 biologic mesh patients studied. Hernia recurrence within 24 months of repair was significantly lower in the OviTex group (3.6 vs. 28.9%; p = 0.03) while seroma requiring intervention (61.4 vs. 55.5%, p = 0.43) and operative revision (28.6 vs. 16.3%, p = 0.22) were not statistically different between groups.
We believe that the pre-clinical results presented by Lombardi et al. are likely an artifact of cutting the mesh into a non-representative 1 × 7 cm coupon sized which was placed into a subcutaneous pocket of a rat. In our experience, when appropriately placed and fixated, the OviTex layers rapidly and completely integrate into the surrounding tissue, contributing to the strength of the repair. Conversely, Strattice poorly integrates, encapsulates and never fully integrates into the surrounding host tissue. In the clinical setting, we see that the limited stretch of OviTex, compared to the relatively high stretch of Strattice, enables us to offload tension and maintain the integrity of the repair. The authors infer that “stronger is better” without accounting for the biomechanical properties of the native abdominal wall (including stretch and compliance), calling into question the clinical validity of this research.
In summary, we propose the “preferable host biologic response” is the one that delivers substantiated human clinical results. The pre-clinical work presented are incomplete and unsubstantiated. Objective and robust pre-clinical and clinical data must remain our gold standard.
References
Lombardi J et al (2023) Comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to OviTex and Strattice surgical meshes. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02769-0
Sivaraj D et al (2022) Reinforced biologic mesh reduces postoperative complications compared to biologic mesh after ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 10(2):e4083
Goetz M, Jurczyk M, Junger H et al (2022) Semiresorbable biologic hybrid meshes for ventral abdominal hernia repair in potentially contaminated settings: lower risk of recurrence. Updates Surg 74:1995–2001
Parker MJ, Kim RC, Barrio M, Socas J, Reed LR, Nakeeb A, House MG, Ceppa EP (2021) A novel biosynthetic scaffold mesh reinforcement affords the lowest hernia recurrence in the highest-risk patients. Surg Endosc 35(9):5173–5178
DeNoto G 3rd, Ceppa EP, Pacella SJ, Sawyer M, Slayden G, Takata M, Tuma G, Yunis J (2022) 24-month results of the BRAVO study: a prospective, multi-center study evaluating the clinical outcomes of a ventral hernia cohort treated with OviTex® 1S permanent reinforced tissue matrix. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 27(83):104745
Sivaraj D, Fischer KS, Kim TS et al (2022) Outcomes of biosynthetic and synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 10(12):e4707 (Published 2022 Dec 12)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Salvatore J. Pacella is a consultant for Mentor Worldwide and TELABio Inc. Rahim Nazerali is a consultant for Mentor Worldwide, the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation and TELABio Inc.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pacella, S.J., Nazerali, R. Comment to: Comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to OviTex™ and Strattice™ surgical meshes. Hernia 28, 279–280 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02822-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02822-y