Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying fascial tension in ventral hernia repair and component separation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Excessive fascial tension is a major cause of ventral hernia recurrence. Although hernias are commonly characterized by area, the tension experienced by fascia is directly proportional to the surrounding tissue stiffness. We demonstrate an accurate and simple technique for intra-operative measurement of fascial closing tension and quantify the decrease in tension following Component Separation (CS).

Methods

A tensiometer was created using a spring with a known recoil constant (k) and a surgical clamp. Using Hooke’s law (Force = kX; X = spring displacement), fascial tension was calculated. This method was first validated on a bench-top model and then applied to the anterior fascia of 4 fresh cadavers (8 hemi-abdomens) over a range of simulated hernia defect sizes. When fascia could no longer reach midline, CS was performed and measures repeated. Tissue stiffness was calculated by plotting defect size versus resulting tension.

Results

Fascial defects ranged from 1- to 18-cm wide with average midline closing tension prior to release 36.1 N (range 17–48) and 8.2 N (range 5–11) after CS, a mean 76% decrease (range 70%–85%). Mean R2 values between defect size and tension for the synthetic and cadaver models were 0.99 (p < 0.01) and 0.91 (p = 0.01; all hemi-abdomen measurements significant). Inter-rater Pearson’s correlation consistently found R2 values > 0.95 (p < 0.01) for each hemi-abdomen, showing high precision and reproducibility.

Conclusion

We have applied a cheap, simple, and precise method to sterilely assess fascial tension during herniorrhaphy and also quantified the decrease in tension following component separation. This technique may be rapidly translated into the operating room with minimal equipment to provide objective data critical for intraoperative decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burger JWA, Lange JF, Halm JA et al (2005) Incisional hernia: early complication of abdominal surgery. World J Surg 29:1608–1613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7929-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gray SH, Vick CC, Graham LA et al (2008) Variation in mesh placement for ventral hernia repair: an opportunity for process improvement? Am J Surg 196:201–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2002) Einflussfaktoren der narbenhernienentstehung retrospektive untersuchung an 2.983 laparotomierten patienten über einen zeitraum von 10 jahren. Chirurg 73:474–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-002-0425-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. BJS (Br J Surg) 72:70–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800720127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. New Engl J Med Boston 343:392–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 237:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200301000-00018

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S et al (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148:544–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F et al (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13:407–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Afifi AM, Hartmann E, Talaat A et al (2017) Quantitative assessment of tension reduction at the midline closure during abdominal component separation. J Am Coll Surg 224:954–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dragu A, Klein P, Unglaub F et al (2009) Tensiometry as a decision tool for abdominal wall reconstruction with component separation. World J Surg 33:1174–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-9991-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klein P, Schmidt O, Reingruber B, Hohenberger W (1998) Reconstruction of incisional hernias with defined tensiometrically controlled tension–a possibility for anatomically correct reconstruction of the abdominal wall. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 115:1027–1030

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Klein P, Konzen G, Schmidt O, Hohenberger W (1996) Reconstruction of scar hernias–intraoperative tensiometry for objective determination of procedure of choice. Chirurg 67:1020–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001040050098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramirez OMMD, Ruas EMD, Dellon ALMD (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:519–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reingruber B, Kastl S, Stremmel C, Klein PD (2001) Incisional hernia repair: tensiometry for the selection of the appropriate procedure. Eur J Surg 167:903–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/110241501753361587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hooke R (1678) Lectures de potentia restitutiva, or of spring explaining the power of springing bodies. John Martyn

  16. Botsford T (1941) The tensile strength of sutured skin wound during healing. Surg Gynecol Obst 72:690

    Google Scholar 

  17. Capek L, Jacquet E, Dzan L, Simunek A (2012) The analysis of forces needed for the suturing of elliptical skin wounds. Med Biol Eng Comput 50:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0857-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Howes EL, Sooy JW, Harvey SC (1929) The healing of wounds as determined by their tensile strength. JAMA 92:42–45. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1929.02700270046011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Högström H, Haglund U, Zederfeldt B (1990) Tension leads to increased neutrophil accumulation and decreased laparotomy wound strength. Surgery 107:215–219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Horeman T, Meijer E-J, Harlaar JJ et al (2013) Force sensing in surgical sutures. PLoS ONE 8:e84466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hwang K, Kim HJ, Kim KY et al (2015) Skin tension related to tension reduction sutures. J Craniofac Surg 26:e48–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klink CD, Binnebösel M, Alizai HP et al (2011) Tension of knotted surgical sutures shows tissue specific rapid loss in a rodent model. BMC Surg 11:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Paul SP, Matulich J, Charlton N (2016) A new skin tensiometer device: computational analyses to understand biodynamic excisional skin tension lines. Sci Rep 6:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Roca J, Nogués M, Villalobos R et al (2018) Surgical dynamometer to simultaneously measure the tension forces and the distance between wound edges during the closure of a laparotomy. Sens (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schachtrupp A, Wetter O, Höer J (2016) An implantable sensor device measuring suture tension dynamics: results of developmental and experimental work. Hernia 20:601–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1433-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Presented in part at the American College of Surgeons Annual Meeting 2018 (Boston, MA), and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Annual Meeting 2018 (Chicago, IL).

Funding

This article was funded by Plastic Surgery Foundation Pilot (PSF) Pilot Research Grant #512973. The PSF had no role in the study design, implementation or interpretation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Spector.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors have no relevant financial interests or relationships to disclose.

Ethics approval

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards and institutional review board approval was obtained (IRB #512973).

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levy, A.S., Bernstein, J.L., Celie, KB. et al. Quantifying fascial tension in ventral hernia repair and component separation. Hernia 25, 107–114 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02268-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02268-6

Keywords

Navigation