Skip to main content
Log in

Recurrence of inguinal herniae following removal of infected prosthetic meshes: a review of the literature

  • Review
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Late-onset mesh infection, occurring months to years following hernia repair, is a rare complication of hernia surgery. Its management usually requires removal of the mesh. The aim of this paper was to assess the rate of recurrence of inguinal herniae following removal of the mesh for late onset deep mesh infection.

Methods

We performed a literature review to assess the rate of recurrence of herniae following the removal of a delayed onset infected mesh. Relevant studies from January 1966 to June 2010 were identified from a Medline, Pub Med, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane database search. Studies that reported recurrence of the hernia following removal of delayed onset infected meshes were included. Results were tabulated and analysed to derive conclusions.

Results

Some 153 abstracts were reviewed and 12 potential studies initially identified; of these, only 7 were finally included in this review. The included studies were six case series and one case report and comprised a total of 40 patients in whom delayed-onset infected mesh was removed. The median follow-up period after the removal of the infected mesh was 26 months. Of these 40 patients, only 2 (<5%) developed a recurrent hernia. Removal of the mesh resulted in resolution of symptoms in the majority of the patients.

Conclusion

Based on this review, removal of a late-onset infected mesh results in resolution of symptoms in the majority of cases, whereas recurrence of hernia is not common. However, further research is required as the number of patients in our review is relatively small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fawole AS, Chaparala RP, Ambrose NS (2006) Fate of the inguinal hernia following removal of infected prosthetic mesh. Hernia 10(1):58–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Neilsen M et al (2009) European hernia society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Delikoukos S, Tzovaras G, Laikou P, Matzos F (2007) Late-onset deep mesh infection after inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 11:15–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ismail W, Agrawal A, Zia MI (2002) Fate of chronically infected onlay mesh in groin wound. Hernia 6:79–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aufenacker T, Geldere D, Mesdag T et al (2004) The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of wound infection after Lichtenstein open mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 240(6):955–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor SG, O’Dwyer PJ (1999) (1999) Chronic groin sepsis following tension-free hernioplasty. Br J Surg 86(4):562–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roller Jonas, Matthias W, Langenbecks L (2008) Prolene–Monocryl-composite meshes do no increase micro vascular Staphylococcus aureus adherence and do not sensitize for leukocytic inflammation. Arch Surg 393:349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karatepe O, Ozturk A, Koculu S (2008) To what extent is cyanoacrylate useful to prevent early wound infections in hernia surgery? Hernia 12:603–607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Avtan L, Avci C, Bulut T, Fouranier G (1997) Mesh infections after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:192–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodríguez-Cuéllar E, Villeta R, Ruiz PT et al (2005) National project for the management of clinical processes (in Spanish). Surgical treatment of inguinal hernia. Cir Esp 77(4):194–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant AM (2002) Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4, CD002197

  12. Yerdel M, Akin E, Dolalan S, Turkcapar A, Pehlivan M (2001) Effect of single-dose prophylactic antibiotic on wound infection after tension-free inguinal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh: the randomised, double blind, prospective trial. Ann Surg 233:26–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Foschi D, Corsi F, Cellerino P, Trabucchi A, Trabucchi E (1998) Late rejection of the mesh after laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 12(5):455–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kucuk HF, Sikar HE, Kurt N, Uzun H, Eser M (2010) Lichtenstein or darn procedure in inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomised comparative study. Hernia 14(4):357–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Leibl BJ, Daubler P, Schmidt CG, Kraft K, Biitner R (2000) Long term results of a randomized clinical trial between laparoscopic hernioplasty and shouldice repair. Br J Surg 87:780–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Greenberg JJ (2010) Can composite infected mesh be salvaged? Hernia 14:589–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Rehman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rehman, S., Khan, S., Pervaiz, A. et al. Recurrence of inguinal herniae following removal of infected prosthetic meshes: a review of the literature. Hernia 16, 123–126 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0873-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0873-2

Keywords

Navigation