Abstract
Background
Composite mesh, once infected, creates a difficult dilemma. Many times, the mesh is deemed unsalvageable and leads to removal and potentially more morbidity. This article describes successful salvage of infected composite mesh.
Methods
Retrospective chart review of composite mesh placed at a single community hospital from January 2002 to November 2007.
Results
A total of 356 composite mesh implants were placed: 218 Ventralex and 138 Composix Kugel. All had open repairs; 153 were men and 203 were women with a mean age of 45.3 years (range 21–90), and a mean body mass index of 33.3 (range 20–60). Eleven patients developed mesh-related infections, presenting an average of 42 days postoperatively (range 10 days to greater than 4 years post repair). All were treated initially with conservative measures. Four patients ultimately required mesh removal (all had Composix Kugel repairs). Seven patients, however, (one Ventralex and six Composix Kugel) were successfully salvaged with conservative office-based methods, including dressing changes, local wound debridement, partial mesh excision, wound vacuum, and antibiotics. None of the salvaged infected composite mesh patients developed hernia recurrences after at least 3 years.
Conclusions
As long as there is no evidence of extensive mesh infection or overt sepsis, infected composite mesh can be salvaged. Treatment of these often complex patients must be individualized.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Paton BL, Novitisky YW, Zerey M et al (2007) Management of infections of polytetrafluoroethylene-based mesh. Surg Infect 8(3):337–341
Iannitti DA, Hope WH, Norton HJ et al (2008) Technique and outcomes of abdominal incisional hernia repair using a synthetic composite mesh: a report of 455 cases. J Am Coll Surg 206:83–88
Bleichrodt RP, Simmermacher RKJ, Van der B Lei, Schakenraad JM (1993) Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch versus polypropylene mesh for the repair of contaminated defects of the abdominal wall. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176:18–24
Cobb WS, Harris JB, Lokey JS et al (2003) Incisional herniorraphy with intraperitoneal composite mesh: a report of 95 cases. Am Surg 69(9):784–787
Kercher KW, Sing RF, Lohr C et al (2002) Successful salvage of infected PTFE mesh after ventral hernia repair. Ostomy Wound Manage 48(10):40–45
Brown GL, Richardson JD, Malangoni MA et al (1985) Comparison of prosthetic material for abdominal wall reconstruction in the presence of contamination and infection. Ann Surg 201:705–711
Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM Jr, Reines HD et al (1996) Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steriod-dependents and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh. Am J Surg 171:80–84
Malone DL, Genuit T, Tracy JK et al (2002) Surgical site infections: reanalysis of risk factors. J Surg Res 103:89–95
Dindo D, Muller MK, Weber M et al (2003) Obesity in general elective surgery. Lancet 361(9374):2032–2035
Qadan M, Akca O, Mahid SS et al (2009) Perioperative supplemental oxygen therapy and surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 144(4):359–366
Thomas EJ, Goldman L, Mangione CM et al (1997) Body Mass Index as a correlate of postoperative complications and resource utilization. Am J Med 102:277–283
Choban PS, Flancbaum L (1997) The impact of obesity on surgical outcomes: a review. J Am Coll Surg 185:593–603
Pessaux P, Msika S, Atalla D et al (2003) Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications in noncolorectal abdominal surgery: a multivariate analysis based on a prospective multicenter study of 4718 patients. Arch Surg 138:314–324
O’Rourke RW (2009) Inflammation in obesity-related diseases. Surgery 145:255–259
Tanaka S, Inoue S, Isoda F et al (1993) Impaired immunity in obesity: suppressed but reversible lymphocyte responsiveness. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 17(11):631–636
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greenberg, J.J. Can infected composite mesh be salvaged?. Hernia 14, 589–592 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0694-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0694-8