Skip to main content
Log in

Combined anterior and posterior inguinal hernia repair: Intermediate recurrence rates with three groups of surgeons

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Use of a bilayer polypropylene mesh device (BPMD) for inguinal hernia repair began in 1998. Intermediate follow-up is now available for patients undergoing repair by three groups of surgeons.

Methods

Surgeons whose practice is dedicated to hernia repair trained preceptors who, in turn, assisted in the training of other surgeons in this new technique. All three groups provided information regarding their recurrence rates with this technique.

Results

Recurrence rates were similar for all three groups. Hernia specialists reported three recurrences out of 4,801 repairs. Preceptors reported one recurrence in 3,780 repairs. Other surgeons reported one failure in 3,369 repairs.

Conclusions

Use of the BPMD (Prolene Hernia System) provides reliable results in the hands of hernia specialists, as well as general surgeons whose practices are not concentrated on the management of hernias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilbert AI, Graham MF, Voigt WJ (1999) A bilayer patch device for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 3:161–166

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H (2001) Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 233:1–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Poobalan AS, King BJ, Chambers WA, Krukowski ZH, Smith WC (2001) Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair Br J Surg 88:1122–1126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Courtney CA, Duffy K, Serpell MG, O’Dwyer MG (2001) Outcomes of patients with severe chronic pain following repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1310–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rutkow IM (2003) The PerFix plug repair for groin hernias. Surg Clin North Am 83:1079–1098

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clopper CJ, Pearson ES (1934) The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 26:404–13

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hasan A, Pozzi M, Hamilton JRL (2000) New surgical procedures: can we minimize the learning curve? BMJ 320:171–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Usher FC, Cogan IE, Lowry TI (1960) A new technique for the repair of inguinal and incisional hernias. Arch Surg 81:847–854

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Usher FC, Allen JE, Crosthwait RW (1962) Polypropylene monofilament. A new, biologically inert suture for closing contaminated wounds. JAMA 179:780

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. LeBlanc K, Ger R (2001) Evolution of laparoscopic hernia repair. In: Bendavid R (ed) Abdominal wall hernias: Principles and management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York pp 33–36

  11. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG (1986) Ambulatory outpatient hernia surgery, including a new concept, introducing tension-free repair. Int Surg 71:1–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlert H, Strand L, Malmstrom J, Andersen FH, Wara P, et al. (2001) Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective national study. Lancet 358:1124–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL(1998) Long-term results and current status of the Lichtenstein open tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia 2:89–94

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kugel RD (2001) The Kugel repair for inguinal hernias. In: Bendavid R (ed); Abdominal wall hernias: Principles and management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York pp 504–507

  15. Nyhus LM, Pollak R, Bombeck CT (1988) The preperitoneal approach and prosthetic buttress repair for recurrent hernia. The evolution of a technique. Ann Surg 208:733–737

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Robbins AW, Rutkow IM (1993) The mesh-plug hernioplasty. Surg Clin North Am 73:501–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Witkowski P, Pirski MI, Adamonis W, Smietanski M, Draczkowski T, Sledzinski Z (2000) Mesh plug vs Bassini operation: A randomized prospective study. Hernia 4:305–310

    Google Scholar 

  18. Amid PK (2003) The Lichtenstein repair in 2002: An overview of causes of recurrence after Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia 7:13–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Forte A, D’Urso A, Palumbo P, Lo Storto G, Gallianaro LS, Bezzi M, Beltrami V (2003) Inguinal hernioplasty: The gold standard of hernia repair. Hernia 7:35–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Balen EM, Ferrer JV, Vincente F, Blazquez L, Herrera J, Lera JM (2000) Recurrences after prosthetic repair of inguinal hernias by the Lichtenstein technique. Hernia 4:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kingsnorth AN, Wright D, Porter CS, Robertson G (2002) PROLENE hernia system compared with Lichtenstein patch: A randomised double-blind study of short-term and medium-term outcomes in primary inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 6:113–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Palot JP, Avisse C, Cailliez-Tomasi JP, Greffier D, Flament JB (1998) The mesh plug repair of groin hernias: A three-year experience. Hernia 2:31–34

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spier N, Berliner SD (1998) The open tension-free mesh repair of inguinal hernia: Analysis of 1,235 cases. Hernia 2:81–83

    Google Scholar 

  24. Annandale T (1876) Case in which a reducible oblique and direct inguinal and femoral hernia existed on the same side and were successfully treated by operation. Edinb Med J 21:1087

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cheatle GL (1920) An operation for the radical cure of inguinal and femoral hernia. Br Med J 2:68

    Google Scholar 

  26. Henry AK (1936) Operation for a femoral hernia by a midline extraperitoneal approach: with a preliminary note on the use of this route for reducible inguinal hernia. Lancet 1:531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nyhus LM, Stevenson JK, Listerud MB (1959) Preperitoneal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on fifty patients. West J Surg Obstet Gynecol 67:48

    Google Scholar 

  28. Read RC (1976) Preperitoneal prosthetic inguinal herniorrhaphy without a relaxing incision. Am J Surg 132:749–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rives J, Stoppa R, Fortesa L (1968) Les pieces en Dacron et leur place dans la chirugie des hernies de l’aine. Ann Chir 22:159

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stoppa R, Petit J, Abourachid H (1973) Procede original de plastic des hernies de l’aine. L’interposition sans fixation d’une prostheses en tulle de Dacron par voie mediane sous-peritoneale. Chirurgie 99:119

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wantz GE, Stoppa R (1998) Technical aspects: Surgical approaches in hernia repair. Husser (ed); In: Hernia Healers: An Illustrated History, France: Arnette pp 103–118

  32. Ger R (1982) The management of certain intra-abdominal hernias by intra-abdominal closure of the sac. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 64:342–344

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Usher FC (1962) Hernia repair with Marlex mesh. Arch Surg 84:73–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Gilbert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbert, A.I., Young, J., Graham, M.F. et al. Combined anterior and posterior inguinal hernia repair: Intermediate recurrence rates with three groups of surgeons. Hernia 8, 203–207 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-004-0238-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-004-0238-1

Keywords

Navigation