Advertisement

Ecosystems

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 1104–1123 | Cite as

An Ecohydrological Cellular Automata Model Investigation of Juniper Tree Encroachment in a Western North American Landscape

  • Domenico CaraccioloEmail author
  • Erkan Istanbulluoglu
  • Leonardo Valerio Noto
Article

Abstract

Woody plant encroachment over the past 140 years has substantially changed grasslands in western North American. We studied encroachment of western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis var. occidentalis) into a previously mixed shrub–grassland site in central Oregon (USA) using a modified version of Cellular Automata Tree–Grass–Shrub Simulator (CATGraSS) ecohydrological model. We developed simple algorithms to simulate three encroachment factors (grazing, fire frequency reduction, and seed dispersal by herbivores) in CATGraSS. Local ecohydrological dynamics represented by the model were first evaluated using satellite-derived leaf area index and measured evapotranspiration data. Reconstructed pre-encroachment vegetation cover percentages and the National Land Cover Database (NLCD 2006) vegetation map were used to estimate parameters for encroachment factors to represent juniper encroachment in CATGraSS. Model sensitivity experiments examined the influence of each encroachment factor and their combinations on trajectories of modeled percent cover of each plant functional type and emergent spatial vegetation patterns in the modeled domain. Simulation results identified grazing as the key factor leading to juniper encroachment, by reducing shrub and grass cover and promoting the formation of juniper tree clusters. Reduced fire frequency and increased seed dispersal by grazers further amplified juniper encroachment into grassland patches between clusters of juniper trees. Each encroachment factor showed different consequences on modeled vegetation patterns. Time series of modeled plant cover and spatial patterns of plant functional types were found to be consistent with an existing conceptual model described in the literature. The proposed model provides a tool that can be used to improve our understanding of the drivers and processes of woody plant encroachment and vegetation response to global change.

Keywords

ecohydrology fire grazing seed dispersal shrubland grassland woody plants 

References

  1. Accatino F, De Michele C, Vezzoli R, Donzelli D, Scholes RJ. 2010. Tree-grass co-existence in savanna: interactions of rain and fire. Journal of Theoretical Biology 267:235–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen CD, Betancourt J, Swetnam T. 2002. Range expansion of woody plants on the Colorado Plateau. Grahame JD, Sisk TD. (Eds.). http://www.cpluhna.nau.ed/.
  3. Allen RG, Trezza R, Tasumi M. 2006. Analytical integrated functions for daily solar radiation on slopes. Agric. For. Meteorol. 139:55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer S. 1994. Woody plant encroachment into southwestern grasslands and savannas: rates, patterns and proximate causes. Ecological Implications of Livestock Herbivory in the West. Denver: Soc. Range Manage. pp 13–69.Google Scholar
  5. ASCE-EWRI. 2005. The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation. Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI) of the American Society of Civil Engineers Task Committee on Standardization of Reference Evapotranspiration Calculation. Washington DC: ASCE. p 190.Google Scholar
  6. Bahre CJ, Shelton ML. 1993. Historic vegetation change, mesquite increases, and climate in southeastern Arizona. Journal of Biogeography 20:489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beven KJ. 1993. Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modeling. Adv. in Water Resour. 16:41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowers JE, Webb RH, Rondeau RJ. 1995. Longevity, recruitment and mortality of desert plants in Grand Canyon, USA. J. of Veget. Sci. 6:551–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buffington LC, Herbel H. 1965. Vegetational Changes on a semidesert grassland range from 1858 to 1963. Ecological Monographs 35(2):139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burkhardt JW, Tisdale EW. 1976. Causes of juniper invasion in southwestern Idaho. Ecology 57:472–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caracciolo D, Noto LV, Istanbulluoglu E, Fatichi S, Zhou X. 2014. Climate change and Ecotone boundaries: insights from a cellular automata ecohydrology model in a Mediterranean catchment with topography controlled vegetation patterns. Advances in Water Resources 73:159–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caracciolo D, Istanbulluoglu E, Noto LV, Collins SL. 2016. Mechanisms of shrub encroachment into Northern Chihuahuan Desert grasslands and impacts of climate change investigated using a cellular automata model. Advances in water resources 91:46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Casagrandi R, Rinaldi S. 1999. A minimal Model for Forest Fire Regimes. The American naturalist 153(5):527–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caylor KK, Manfreda S, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2005. On the coupled geomorphological and ecohydrological organization of river basins. Adv. Water Resour. 28(1):69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chew RM, Chew AE. 1965. The Primary Productivity of a Desert-Shrub (Larrea tridentata) Community. Ecol. Monogr. 35(4):355–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coop JD, Givnish TJ. 2007. Spatial and temporal patterns of recent forest encroachment in montane grasslands of the Valles Caldera, New Mexico, USA. Journal of Biogeography 34:914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fatichi S, Ivanov VY, Caporali E. 2011. Simulation of future climate scenarios with a weather generator. Adv. Water Resources 34(4):448–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fleischner TL. 1994. Ecological Costs of Livestock Grazing in Western North America. Conservation Biology 8(3):629–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Francipane A, Fatichi S, Ivanov VY, Noto LV. 2015. Stochastic assessment of climate impacts on hydrology and geomorphology of semiarid headwater basins using a physically based model. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 120:507–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guan H, Wilson JL. 2009. A hybrid dual-source model for potential evaporation and transpiration partitioning. J. Hydrol. 377:405–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gutiérrez-Jurado HA, Vivoni ER, Harrison JBJ, Guan H. 2006. Ecohydrology of root zone water fluxes and soil development in complex semiarid rangelands. Hydrological Processes 20:3289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holmgren CA, Norris J, Betancourt JL. 2007. Inferences about winter temperatures and summer rains from the late Quaternary record of C4 perennial grasses and C3 desert shrubs in the northern. Journal of Quaternary science 22(2):141–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Istanbulluoglu E, Wang T, Wedin D. 2012. Evaluation of Ecohydrologic Model Parsimony at Local and Regional Scales in a Semiarid Grassland Site. Ecohydrology 5:121–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ivanov VY, Bras RL, Curtis DC. 2007. A weather generator for hydrological, ecological, and agricultural applications. Water Resour Res; 43(10): W10406. doi: 10.1029/2006WR005364.
  25. Jeltsch F, Milton SJ, Dean WRJ, van Rooyen N. 1996. Tree spacing and coexistence in semi-arid savannas. J. Ecol. 84:583–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knapp AK, McCarron JK, Silletti GA, Hoch GI, Heisler MS, Lett JM, Blair JM, Briggs JM, Smith MD. 2008. Ecological consequences of the replacement of the native grassland by Juniper virginiana and other woody plants. van Auken OW, editor. Western North American Juniperus Communities: a Dynamic Vegetation Type. New York: Springer. p156–169Google Scholar
  27. Knipe D, Herbel CH. 1966. Germination and growth of some semidesert grassland species treated with aqueous extract from creosotebush. Ecol 47(5):775–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laio F, Porporato A, Ridolfi L, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2001. Plants in water controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress II. Probabilistic soil moisture dynamics. Advances in Water Resources 24:707–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liuzzo L, Noto LV, Arnone E, Caracciolo D, La Loggia G. 2015. Modifications in water resources availability under climate changes: a case study in a Sicilian basin. Water Resources Management 29(4):1117–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller RF, Rose JA. 1995. Historic expansion of Juniperus occidentalis (western juniper) in southeastern Oregon. Great Basin Naturalist 55:37–45.Google Scholar
  31. Miller RF, Rose JA. 1999. Fire history and western juniper encroachment in sagebrush steppe. Journal of Range Management 52:550–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller RF, Svejcar TJ, Rose JA. 2000. Impacts of western juniper on plant community composition and structure. Journal of Range Management 53:574–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller RF, Tausch RJ. 2001. The role of fire in pinyon and juniper woodlands: a descriptive analysis. Tall Timbers Research Station Miscellaneous Publication 11:15–30.Google Scholar
  34. Miller RF, Bates JD, Svejcar TJ, Pierson FB, Eddleman LE. 2005. Biology, Ecology, and Management of Western Juniper. Technical Bulletin 152, Oregon State University, Agricultural Experiment Station. p 77.Google Scholar
  35. Miller RF, Tausch RJ, McArthur ED, Johnson DD, Sanderson SC. 2008. Age Structure and Expansion of Piñon-Juniper Woodlands: A Regional Perspective in the Intermountain West. USDA Forest Service RMRS-RP-69. p 21.Google Scholar
  36. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part 1. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10(3):282–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parmenter RR. 2008. Long-Term Effects of Summer Fire on Desert Grassland Plant Demographics in New Mexico. Rangeland Ecol Manage 61:156–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Porporato A, Laio F, Ridolfi L, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2001. Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrological processes and response to water stress, III, Vegetation water stress. Adv. Water. Resour. 24:725–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pumo D, Caracciolo D, Viola F, Noto LV. 2016. Climate change effects on the hydrological regime of small non-perennial river basins. Science of the Total Environment 542:76–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ravi S, D’Odorico P. 2009. Post-fire resource redistribution and fertility island dynamics in shrub encroached desert grasslands: a modeling approach. Landscape Ecol 24:325–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schaefer MG, Barker BL, Taylor GH, Wallis JR. 2008. Regional precipitation-frequency analysis and spatial mapping of 24-hour precipitation for Oregon final report. SPR 656, January 2008.Google Scholar
  42. Shuttleworth WJ. 1992. Evaporation. Maidment DR editor. Handbook of Hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp 4.1–4.53.Google Scholar
  43. Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice IC. 2003. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biol. 9:161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Auken OW. 2009. Causes and consequences of woody plant encroachment into western North American grasslands. Journal of Environmental Management 90:2931–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. van Langevelde F, van de Vijver C, Kumar L, van de Koppel J, de Ridder N, van Andel J, Skidmore A, Hearne J, Stroosnijder L, Bond W, Prins H, Rietkerk M. 2003. Effects of fire and herbivory on the stability of savanna ecosystems. Ecology 84:337–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Wijk MT, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2002. Tree-grass competition in space and time: insights from a simple cellular automata model based on ecohydrological dynamics. Water Resour. Res. 38(18):1–15.Google Scholar
  47. Yu K, D’Odorico P. 2014. An ecohydrological framework for grass displacement by woody plants in savannas. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 119:192–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhou X, Istanbulluoglu E, Vivoni ER. 2013. Modeling the ecohydrological role of aspect-controlled radiation on tree-grass-shrub coexistence in a semiarid climate. Water Resources Research 49(5):2872–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhu Z, Yang L, Stehman S, Czaplewski R. 1999. Designing an Accuracy Assessment for USGS Regional Land Cover Mapping Program. Lowell K, Jaton A, editors. Spatial Accuracy Assessment: Land Information Uncertainty in Natural Resources. pp 393–398.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Domenico Caracciolo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Erkan Istanbulluoglu
    • 2
  • Leonardo Valerio Noto
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali (DICAM)Università degli Studi di PalermoPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations