Skip to main content
Log in

An Exploratory Framework for the Empirical Measurement of Resilience

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deliberate progress towards the goal of long-term sustainability depends on understanding the dynamics of linked social and ecological systems. The concept of social-ecological resilience holds promise for interdisciplinary syntheses. Resilience is a multifaceted concept that as yet has not been directly operationalized, particularly in systems for which our ignorance is such that detailed, parameter-rich simulation models are difficult to develop. We present an exploratory framework as a step towards the operationalization of resilience for empirical studies. We equate resilience with the ability of a system to maintain its identity, where system identity is defined as a property of key components and relationships (networks) and their continuity through space and time. Innovation and memory are also fundamental to understanding identity and resilience. By parsing our systems into the elements that we subjectively consider essential to identity, we obtain a small set of specific focal variables that reflect changes in identity. By assessing the potential for changes in identity under specified drivers and perturbations, in combination with a scenario-based approach to considering alternative futures, we obtain a surrogate measure of the current resilience of our study system as the likelihood of a change in system identity under clearly specified conditions, assumptions, drivers and perturbations. Although the details of individual case studies differ, the concept of identity provides a level of generality that can be used to compare measure of resilience across cases. Our approach will also yield insights into the mechanisms of change and the potential consequences of different policy and management decisions, providing a level of decision support for each case study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Peterson GD, Cumming GS, Zurek M, Pingali P. 2003. Why global scenarios need ecology. Front Ecol Environ 1:322–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard HR. 2002. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative methods. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P. 1985. The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries. Essex: Longman

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P, Brookfield H. 1987. Degradation and society. London: Methuen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw GA, Borchers JG. 2000. Uncertainty as information: narrowing the science-policy gap. Conserva Ecol 4:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, 2002. Ecological futures: building an ecology of the long now. Ecology 83:2069–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Brock W, Hanson P. 1999. Ecological and social dynamics in simple models of ecosystem management. Conserv Ecol 3(2):4. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art4

  • Carpenter SR, Walker B, Anderies MJ, Abel N. 2001. From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4:765–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudro Dias de Paiva EM, Clarke RT. 1995. Time trends in rainfall records in Amazonia. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 76(11):2203–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS, Carpenter SR, Barber M, Collins S, Dobson A, Foley JA, Lodge DM, Pascual M, Pielke R, Pizer W, Pringle C, Reid WV, Rose KA, Sala O, Schlesinger WH, Wall DH, Wear D. 2001. Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. Science 293:657–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R. 1992. Rural appraisal: rapid, relaxed and participatory. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, GS, Collier J. 2005. Change and identity in complex systems. Ecology and Society 10:29

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPEI 2001. La Intergracion Regional entre Bolivia, Brasil y Peru. Lima: CPEI

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich PR, Goulder L, Lubchenco J, Matson PA, Mooney HA, Postel S, Schneider S, Tilman D, Woodwell GM 1997. Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues Ecol 2:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis S. 1977. Victims of the miracle: development and the Indians of Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Alexander LE. 1998. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:307–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J, Stuckey B. 1973. The territorial basis of national transportation planning. In: DeSalvo JS, ed. Perspectives on regional transportation planning, Lexington (MA): D.C. Heath Company. p 141–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland RJA, Irwin HS. 1975. Amazon jungle: green hell to red desert? an ecological discussion of the environmental impact of the highway construction program in the amazon basin. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall AL. 1989. Developing Amazonia: deforestation and social conflict in Brazil’s carajás program. Manchester: Manchester University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris J, De Renzio P. 1997. The concept of social capital. J Int Dev 9:919–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS. 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems; local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE, eds. Sustainable development of the biosphere, vol 10. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p 292–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS. 1987. Simplifying the complex: the paradigms of ecological function and structure. Eur J Oper Res 30:139–146. Republished 1995 in Futures 26:598–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, social and ecological systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Gunderson LH. 2002. Resilience and adaptive cycles. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Eds. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington (DC): Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Meffe G. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10:328–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kainer KA, Schmink M, Leite ACP, Fadell MJD. 2003 Experiments in forest-based development in Western Amazonia. Society and Natural Resources 16:869–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Laurance SG, Ferreira LV, Rankin-de Merona JM, Gascon C, Lovejoy TE. 1997. Biomass collapse in Amazonian forest fragments. Science 278:1117–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marengo JA, Hastenrath S. 1993. Case studies of extreme climatic events in the Amazon Basin. J Clim 6:617–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge U Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen W. 1987. Transportation and world development. Baltimore (MA): The Johns Hopkins University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson G. 2000. Political ecology and ecological resilience: an integration of human and ecological dynamics. Ecol Econ 35:323–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GD, Cumming GS, Carpenter SR. (2003). Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain future. Conserv Biol 17:358–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Kolasa J, and Jones CG. 1994. Ecological understanding: the nature of theory and the theory of nature. Academic Press, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan HM, Colyvan M, Burgman MA. 2002. A taxonomy of treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Appl 12:618–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan HM, Akcakaya HR, Ferson S, Root KV, Carroll S, Ginzburg LR. 2003. Treatments of uncertainty and variability in ecological risk assessment of single-species populations. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9:889–906

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose KA, Cowan JH. 2003. Data, models, and decisions in US Marine Fisheries management: lessons for ecologists. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:127–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmink M, Wood CH. 1987. The “political ecology” of Amazonia. In: Little PD, Horowitz MM, Nyeres AE, Eds. Lands at risk in the third world: local level perspectives. Boulder: Westview

  • Schmink M, Wood CH. 1992. Contested frontiers in amazonia. New York: Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Treece D,. 1987. Bound in misery and iron: the impact of the grande carajas program on the indians of brazil. London: Survival International

    Google Scholar 

  • Trombulak SC, Frissell CA. 2000. Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol 14:18–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance JE. 1986. Capturing the horizon: the historical geography of transportation. New York (NY): Harper & Row Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Vulinec K. 2000. Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), monkeys, and conservation in Amazonia. Fla Entomol 83:229–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadt LHO, Kainer KA, Gomes-Silva DAP. (2005). Population structure and nut yield of a Bertholletia excitsa stand in Southwestern Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 211:371-384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins D. (1967) Identity and spatio-temporal continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Carpenter S, Anderies J, Abel N, Cumming G, Janssen M, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard R. 2002. Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conserv Ecol 6(1):14

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderle JM. 1997. The role of animal seed dispersal in accelerating native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. Forest Ecol Manage 99:223–235

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the other members of the UF roadies group for their contributions over the past 2 years to the many discussions that have led to the development of this framework. Thanks are also due to Tom Clarke (UCF), Foster Brown, and our partners in Brazil/MAP and Chile. GC is grateful to John Collier of the University of Natal for his collaboration in helping to refine ideas about identity in complex systems. Thoughtful comments were provided on an earlier draft of this manuscript by Frances Westley, Steve Carpenter, and two anonymous referees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. S. Cumming.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cumming, G.S., Barnes, G., Perz, S. et al. An Exploratory Framework for the Empirical Measurement of Resilience. Ecosystems 8, 975–987 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z

Keywords

Navigation