, Volume 8, Issue 8, pp 928–940 | Cite as

Plant Communities, Soil Microorganisms, and Soil Carbon Cycling: Does Altering the World Belowground Matter to Ecosystem Functioning?



Soil microorganisms mediate many critical ecosystem processes. Little is known, however, about the factors that determine soil microbial community composition, and whether microbial community composition influences process rates. Here, we investigated whether aboveground plant diversity affects soil microbial community composition, and whether differences in microbial communities in turn affect ecosystem process rates. Using an experimental system at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica, we found that plant diversity (plots contained 1, 3, 5, or > 25 plant species) had a significant effect on microbial community composition (as determined by phospholipid fatty acid analysis). The different microbial communities had significantly different respiration responses to 24 labile carbon compounds. We then tested whether these differences in microbial composition and catabolic capabilities were indicative of the ability of distinct microbial communities to decompose different types of litter in a fully factorial laboratory litter transplant experiment. Both microbial biomass and microbial community composition appeared to play a role in litter decomposition rates. Our work suggests, however, that the more important mechanism through which changes in plant diversity affect soil microbial communities and their carbon cycling activities may be through alterations in their abundance rather than their community composition.


biodiversity microbial community carbon cycling decomposition enzyme activity PLFA catabolic potential tropics La Selva Biological station 


  1. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev 59:143–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Angers DA, Caron J. 1998. Plant-induced changes in soil structure: processes and feedbacks. Biogeochemistry 42:55–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baath E, Anderson T.-H. 2003. Comparison of soil fungal/bacterial ratios in a pH gradient using physiological and PLFA-based techniques. Soil Biol Biochem 35:955–63Google Scholar
  4. Bardgett RD, Shine A. 1999. Linkages between plant litter diversity, soil microbial biomass and ecosystem function in temperate grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem 31:317–21Google Scholar
  5. Borga P, Nilsson M, Tunlid A. 1994. Bacterial communities in peat in relation to botanical composition as revealed by phospholipid fatty-acid analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 26:841–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bossio DA, Scow KM. 1998. Impacts of carbon and flooding on soil microbial communities: Phospholipid fatty acid profiles and substrate utilization patterns. Microb Ecol 35:265–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Broughton LC, Gross KL. 2000. Patterns of diversity in plant and soil microbial communities along a productivity gradient in a Michigan old-field. Oecologia 125:420–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carney KM. 2003. The influence of plant diversity and land use on the composition and function of soil microbial communities. Stanford (CA): Doctoral Dissertation Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. Carney K, Matson PA, Bohannan BJM. 2004. Diversity and composition of tropical soil nitrifiers across a plant diversity gradient and among land-use types. Ecology Letters. 7:684–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavigelli MA, Robertson GP. 2000. The functional significance of denitrifier community composition in a terrestrial ecosystem. Ecology 81:1402–14Google Scholar
  11. Chapin FS, Sala OE, Burke IC, Grime JP, Hooper DU, Lauenroth WK, Lombard A, Mooney HA, Mosier AR, Naeem S, Pacala SW, Roy J, Steffen WL, Tilman D. 1998. Ecosystem consequences of changing biodiversity: Experimental evidence and a research agenda for the future. Bioscience 48:45–52Google Scholar
  12. Clarke KR, Warwick RM. 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. 2nd edn. Plymouth (UK): Plymouth Marine LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  13. Coyne MS. 1999. Soil microbiology: an exploratory approach. 2nd edn. Albany (NY): Delmar PublishersGoogle Scholar
  14. Degens BP. 1998. Decreases in microbial functional diversity do not result in corresponding changes in decomposition under different moisture conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1989–2000Google Scholar
  15. Degens BP, Harris JA. 1997. Development of a physiological approach to measuring the catabolic diversity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1309–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Degens BP, Schipper LA, Sparling GP, Duncan LC. 2001. Is the microbial community in a soil with reduced catabolic diversity less resistant to stress or disturbance? Soil Biol Biochem 33:1143–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Degens BP, Schipper LA, Sparling GP, VojvodicVukovic M. 2000. Decreases in organic C reserves in soils can reduce the catabolic diversity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 32:189–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fernandez A, Huang SY, Seston S, Xing J, Hickey R, Criddle C, Tiedje J. 1999. How stable is stable? Function versus community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3697–04PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gartner T, Cardon Z. 2004. Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos 104:230–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gholz H, Wedin D, Smitherman S, Harmon M, Parton W. 2000. Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition. Glob Change Biol 6:751–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grayston SJ, Griffith GS, Mawdsley JL, Campbell CD, Bardgett RD. 2001. Accounting for variability in soil microbial communities of temperate upland grassland ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 33:533–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffiths B, Ritz K, Bardgett R, Cook R, Christensen S, Ekelund F, Sorensen S, Baath E, Bloem J, de Ruiter P, Dolfing J, Nicolardot B. 2000. Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship. Oikos 90:279–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Wheatley R, Kuan HL, Boag B, Christensen S, Ekelund F, Sorensen SJ, Muller S, Bloem J. 2001. An examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship in arable soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1713–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haack SK, Garchow H, Odelson DA, Forney LJ, Klug MJ. 1994. Accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretation of fatty-acid methyl-ester profiles of model bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:2483–93Google Scholar
  25. Haggar JP, Ewel JJ. 1995. Establishment, resource acquisition, and early productivity as determined by biomass allocation patterns of 3 tropical tree species. For Sci 41:689–708Google Scholar
  26. Hammel KE. 1997. Fungal degradation of lignin. In: Giller KE, Ed. Driven by nature: plant litter quality and decomposition. Wallingford (UK): CAB International, p 33–45Google Scholar
  27. Hobbie S. 1996. Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecol Monogr 66:503–22Google Scholar
  28. Hooper DU, Bignell DE, Brown VK, Brussaard L, Dangerfield JM, Wall DH, Wardle DA, Coleman DC, Giller KE, Lavelle P, Van der Putten WH, De Ruiter PC, Rusek J, Silver WL, Tiedje JM, Wolters V. 2000. Interactions between aboveground and belowground biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems: Patterns, mechanisms, and feedbacks. Bioscience 50:1049–61Google Scholar
  29. Hooper DU, Vitousek PM. 1997. The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1302–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huston MA. 1997. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: Re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson D, Booth R, Whiteley A, Bailey M, Read D, Grime J, Leake J. 2003. Plant community composition affects the biomass, activity and diversity of microorganisms in limestone grassland soil. Eur J Soil Sci 54:671–7Google Scholar
  32. Karthikeyan S, Wolfaardt GM, Korber DR, Caldwell DE. 1999. Functional and structural responses of a degradative microbial community to substrates with varying degrees of complexity in chemical structure. Microb Ecol 38:215–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Konopka A, Oliver L, Turco RF. 1998. The use of carbon substrate utilization patterns in environmental and ecological microbiology. Microb Ecol 35:103–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lawton JH, Naeem S, Thompson LJ, Hector A, Crawley MJ. 1998. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: getting the Ecotron experiment in its correct context. Funct Ecol 12:848–52Google Scholar
  35. Leckie S, Prescott C, Grayston S, Neufeld J, Mohn W. 2004. Comparison of chloroform fumigation-extraction, phospholipid fatty acid, and DNA methods to determine microbial biomass in forest humus. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 36:529–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Parker J. 2000. Biology of Microorganisms. 9th edn. New Jersey: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  37. Magurran AE. 1988. Ecological diversity and its meausurement. Princeton (N J): Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Marschner P, Yang CH, Lieberei R, Crowley DE. 2001. Soil and plant specific effects on bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 33:1437–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McGrady-Steed J, Harris PM, Morin PJ. 1997. Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature 390:162–165Google Scholar
  40. Naeem S, Hahn DR, Schuurman G. 2000. Producer-decomposer co-dependency influences biodiversity effects. Nature 403:762–4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Naeem S, Thompson LJ, Lawler SP, Lawton JH, Woodfin RM. 1994. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368:734–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Navarrete A, Peacock A, McNaughton S, Urmeneta J, Mas-Castella J, White DC, Guerrero R. 2000. Physiological status and community composition of microbial mats of the Ebro Delta, Spain, by signature lipid biomarkers. Microb Ecol 39:92–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Olsen SR, Sommers LE. 1982. Phosphorus. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, Eds. Methods of soil analysis Part 2. Madison: American Society of Agronomy p 401–30Google Scholar
  44. Reichardt W, Mascarina G, Padre B, Doll J. 1997. Microbial communities of continuously cropped, irrigated rice fields. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:233–8Google Scholar
  45. Rosenzweig ML. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  46. Russell AE, Cambardella CA, Ewel JJ, Parkin TB. 2004. Species, rotation, and life-form diversity effects on soil carbon in experimental tropical ecosystems. Ecology 14:47–60Google Scholar
  47. Schimel J. 1995. Ecosystem consequences of microbial diversity and community structure. In: Chapin FS, Koerner C, Eds. Arctic and alpine biodiversity: patterns, causes, and ecosystem consequences. Berlin Heildelberg New York: Springer, p 239–354Google Scholar
  48. Schipper L, Degens B, Sparling G, Duncan L. 2001. Changes in microbial heterotrophic diversity along five plant successional sequences. Soil Biol Biochem 33:2093–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schlesinger WH. 1997. Biogeochemistry: an analysis of global change. 2nd edn. San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  50. Smalla K, Wieland G, Buchner A, Zock A, Parzy J, Kaiser S, Roskot N, Heuer H, Berg G. 2001. Bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: Plant-dependent enrichment and seasonal shifts revealed. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4742–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Stephan A, Meyer A, Schmid B. 2000. Plant diversity affects culturable soil bacteria in experimental grassland communities. J Ecol 88:988–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sugai SF, Schimel JP. 1993. Decomposition and biomass incorporation of C-14-Labeled glucose and phenolics in taiga forest floor: effect of substrate quality, successional state, and season. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1379–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tabachnik BG, Fidell LS. 1996. Using multivariate statistics. 3rd edn. New York: HarperCollins College PublisherGoogle Scholar
  54. Tilman D. 1996. Biodiversity: Population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77:350–363Google Scholar
  55. Tilman D. 1999. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: A search for general principles. Ecology 80:1455–74Google Scholar
  56. Tilman D, Downing JA. 1994. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367:363–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Torsvik V, Goksoyr J, Daae, FL. 1990. High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:782–787PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, StreitwolfEngel R, Boller T, Wiemken A, Sanders IR. 1998. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396:69–72Google Scholar
  59. Vitousek PM. 1994. Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology 75:1861–76Google Scholar
  60. Waldrop MP, Balser TC, Firestone MK. 2000. Linking microbial community composition to function in a tropical soil. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1837–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wardle D, Yeates G, Williamson W, Bonner K. 2003. The response of a three trophic level soil food web to the identity and diversity of plant species and functional groups. Oikos 102:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wardle DA. 1999. Is “‘sampling effect” a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships? Oikos 87:403–7Google Scholar
  63. Wardle DA, Bonner KI, Nicholson KS. 1997. Biodiversity and plant litter: Experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos 79:247–58Google Scholar
  64. White DC, Ringelberg DB. 1998. Signature lipid biomarker anlaysis. In. Burlage RS, Atals R, Stahl D, Geesey G, Sayler G, Eds. Techniques in microbial ecology. New York: Oxford University Press, p 255–72Google Scholar
  65. Wieland G, Neumann R, Backhaus H. 2001. Variation of microbial communities in soil, rhizosphere, and rhizoplane in response to crop species, soil type, and crop development. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:5849–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Zak DR, Holmes WE, White DC, Peacock AD, Tilman D. 2003. Plant diversity, microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links? Ecology 84:2042–50Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewaterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geological and Environmental SciencesStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations