Skip to main content
Log in

Improving design engineers’ performance through novelly structured design guidelines: a study in and with industry

Verbesserung der Konstrukteursleistung durch neuartig strukturierte Konstruktionsrichtlinien: Eine Studie in und mit der Industrie

  • Originalarbeiten/Originals
  • Published:
Forschung im Ingenieurwesen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Engineering design guidelines are a means of sharing knowledge and information explicitly. Past work points out that the structure of a design guideline is key to improve its usefulness, but that there is still a lack of a uniform specification. This paper presents a mobile eye tracking study with sixteen practitioners from industry and investigates how novelly structured design guidelines, which aim to support the embodiment design of screw joints, impact design engineers’ performance. A baseline group with access to a former design guideline and a follow-up group with access to a novel design guideline structure were compared. Results show that design engineers’ performance during embodiment design was improved through access to the novel structure, compared to the performance of those participants with access to the former design guideline structure. The novel structure allowed design engineers to spend less time on the design guideline, while achieving significantly better designs at the same time.

Zusammenfassung

Konstruktionsrichtlinien sind ein Mittel, Wissen und Informationen explizit zu teilen. Frühere Arbeiten zeigen auf, dass die Struktur einer Konstruktionsrichtlinie entscheidend sei, um deren Nützlichkeit zu verbessern, es an einheitlichen Spezifikationen einer Struktur jedoch mangle. Dieser Beitrag untersucht mittels einer Mobile Eye Tracking-Studie mit sechzehn Teilnehmern, wie neuartig strukturierte Konstruktionsrichtlinien, die den Konstrukteur beim Gestalten von Schraubverbindungen unterstützen sollen, die Konstrukteursleistung beeinflussen. Verglichen wurde die Leistung von Konstrukteuren, die Zugang zu einer Konstruktionsrichtlinie mit bisheriger Struktur hatten mit der von Konstrukteuren, die Zugang zu einer neuartig stukturierten Konstruktionsrichtlinie hatten. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Leistung der Konstrukteure mit Zugang zur neuartig strukturierten Konstruktionsrichtlinie im Vergleich zur Leistung derer mit Zugang zur Konstruktionsrichlinie mit bisheriger Struktur verbessert wurde. Die neuartige Struktur ermöglichte es den Konstrukteuren, weniger Zeit mit der Konstruktionsrichtlinie zu verbringen und gleichzeitig signifikant bessere Konstruktionen zu erzielen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anthony LJ (1985) Information sources in engineering. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashby MF (2005) Materials selection in mechanical design. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. BASF Corporation (ed) (2007a) Design solutions guide

    Google Scholar 

  4. BASF Corporation (ed) (2007b) Snap-fit design manual

    Google Scholar 

  5. Busby JS (1998) Effective practices in design transfer. Res Eng Design 10(3):178–188

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Butenko V, Albers A (2018) Improving the knowledge transfer from research to industry by developing demand-oriented design guidelines for fibre-reinforced plastics. Procedia CIRP 70:41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dieter GE (1991) Engineering design: a materials and processing approach, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duchowski AT (2017) Eye tracking methodology, 3rd edn. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Ehrlenspiel K, Meerkamm H (2013) Integrierte Produktentwicklung, 5th edn. Hanser, München

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. EI du Pont de Nemours and Company (ed) (2000) General design principles for DuPont engineering polymers

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erridge S, Ashraf H, Purkayastha S, Darzi A, Sodergren MH (2018) Comparison of gaze behaviour of trainee and experienced surgeons during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Br J Surg 105(3):287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feldhusen J, Grote KH (eds) (2013) Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung, 8th edn. Springer Vieweg, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  13. Girczyc E, Carlson S (1993) Increasing design quality and engineering productivity through design reuse. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Design Automation Conference, Dallas, Texas, USA. June 14–18, 1993, pp 48–53

  14. Gouvinhas RP, Corbett J (1999) The development of a design method for production machinery companies. J Eng Design 10(4):351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Holmqvist K, Nyström M, Andersson R, Dewhurst R, Jarodzka H, van de Weijer J (2011) Eye tracking: a comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hubka V, Eder WE (1990) Design knowledge: theory in support of practice. J Eng Design 1(1):97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jakobsen K (1988) Functional requirements in the design process. Modern Design Principles. Tapir, Trondheim, pp 41–53

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jakobsen K (1989) The interrelation between product shape, material and production method. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Harrogate. August 22–25, 1989, pp 775–784

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koller R (1998) Konstruktionslehre für den Maschinenbau, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. LANXESS Corporation (ed) (2005) Joining techniques – a design guide

    Google Scholar 

  21. LANXESS Corporation (ed) (2007) Part and mold design – a design guide

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leake DB, Wilson DC (2001) A case-based framework for interactive capture and reuse of design knowledge. Appl Intell 14(1):77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Matousek R (1963) Engineering design. Blackie & Son Limited, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Nowack ML (1997) Design guideline support for manufacturability. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

  25. Ponn J, Lindemann U (2011) Konzeptentwicklung und Gestaltung technischer Produkte, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Pugh S (1991) Total design: integrated methods for successful product engineering. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reed N, Scanlan J, Wills G, Halliday ST (2011) Knowledge use in an advanced manufacturing environment. Design Stud 32(3):292–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Suh NP (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tien T, Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Sriskandarajah K, Yang GZ, Darzi A (2015) Differences in gaze behaviour of expert and junior surgeons performing open inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 29(2):405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tomiyama T (2003) Knowledge deployment: how to use design knowledge. In: Lindemann U (ed) Human behaviour in design: individuals, teams, tools. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 261–271

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Ullman DG (2010) The mechanical design process, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vansteenkiste P, Cardon G, Philippaerts R, Lenoir M (2015) Measuring dwell time percentage from head-mounted eye-tracking data – comparison of a frame-by-frame and a fixation-by-fixation analysis. Ergonomics 58(5):712–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (ed) (2004-01) VDI-Richtlinie 2223: Systematic embodiment design of technical products. Beuth Verlag, Berlin

  34. Wallace K, Burgess S (1995) Methods and tools for decision making in engineering design. Design Stud 16(4):429–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedikt Reimlinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reimlinger, B., Lohmeyer, Q., Moryson, R. et al. Improving design engineers’ performance through novelly structured design guidelines: a study in and with industry. Forsch Ingenieurwes 84, 11–19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10010-019-00380-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10010-019-00380-3

Navigation