Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The accuracy of soft tissue movement using virtual planning for non-syndromic facial asymmetry cases—a systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 3D prediction of post-operative changes is an inevitable tool for the surgical correction of facial asymmetry. The objective is to execute an evidence-based review answering the following question. Does the 3D virtual prediction planning draw reliable and accurate results in the surgical outcome related to the soft tissues of the face in facial asymmetry? This systematic review of the literature is based on the 3D soft tissue prediction planning of facial asymmetry correction to draw conclusions on the reliability and accuracy of these methods in the surgical outcome related to the soft tissues of the face. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Ovid databases were adopted for the literature search. Studies published between years 2000 and 2020, aimed at the assessment of soft tissue predictions using software prediction packages for facial asymmetry, were selected. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) was applied. Quadas-2 tool was used for the qualitative evaluation of selected studies. Initial search yielded 248 articles. Twenty articles fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria and selected for qualitative analysis. Finally, 12 articles were selected for quantitative analysis. The results indicate 3D imaging prediction methods provided more accurate information with less distortion for soft tissue prediction regardless of various softwares currently available. The prediction of soft tissue accuracy in facial asymmetry was less accurate in lower face regardless of the type of surgery for facial asymmetry. The mean prediction error was less than 2 mm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References 

  1. Kim SC, Kwon JG, Jeong WS, Lee JY, Kwon SM, Choi JW (2018) Three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis of facial soft-to-hard tissue ratios after bimaxillary surgery in facial asymmetry patients with and without sturge-weber syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 81(2):178–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Proffit W, Turvey T, Phillip C (2007) The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: an update and extension. Head Face Med 3:21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Severt TR, Proffit WR (1997) Post-surgical stability following correction of facial asymmetry. Int J Adult Orthod Orthogn Surg 12:251–262

    Google Scholar 

  4. Swennen GR, Mollemans W, De Clercq C, Abeloos J, Lamoral P, Lippens F et al (2009) A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning. J Craniofac Surg 20:297–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Agbaje JO, Schepers S, Vrielinck L, Lambrichts I et al (2013) Accuracy of upper jaw positioning with intermediate splint fabrication after virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 24:1871–1876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zinser MJ, Mischkowski RA, Dreiseidler T, Thamm OC, Rothamel D, Zoller JE (2013) Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: waferless maxillary positioning, versatility, and accuracy of an image-guided visualisation display. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:827–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ho CT, Lin HH, Liou EJ, Lo LJ (2017) Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: a qualitative and quantitative study. Sci Rep 7:40423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu TY, Lin HH, Lo LJ, Ho CT (2017) Postoperative outcomes of two- and three-dimensional planning in orthognathic surgery: a comparative study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:1101–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrell BB, Franco PB, Tucker MR (2014) Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 26:459–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Polley JW, Figueroa AA (2013) Orthognathic positioning system: intraoperative system to transfer virtual surgical plan to operating field during orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:911–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li B, Zhang L, Sun H, Yuan J, Shen SG, Wang X (2013) A novel method of computer aided orthognathic surgery using individual CAD/CAM templates: a combination of osteotomy and repositioning guides. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:e239–e244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eckardt C Cunningham S (2004) How predictable is orthognathic surgery? Eur. J. Orthod, 26, 303–309. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

  13. Olivetti EC, Nicotera S, Marcolin F, Vezzetti E, Sotong JPA, Zavattero E, Ramieri G (2019) 3D soft-tissue prediction methodologies for orthognathic surgery—a literature review. Appl Sci 9(21):4550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Demétrio MS, Marlière DAA, Barbosa SM et al (2021) Different modalities to record and transfer natural head position to virtual planning in Orthognathic surgery: Case reports of Asymmetric patients. J. Maxillofac Oral Surg 20:443–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01376-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529–36. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. PMID: 22007046.

  16. Elshebiny T, Morcos S, Mohammad A, Quereshy F, Valiathan M (2019) Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue prediction in orthognathic cases using dolphin three-dimensional software. [Evaluation Study]. J Craniofac Surg 30(2):525–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lo LJ, Yamaguchi K, Niu LS, Liao CH, Lin HH (2020) Fat grafting in patients with extensive unilateral facial deficiency: three-dimensional computer-assisted planning, implementation and outcome assessment. Ann Plast Surg 84(1S Suppl 1):S94–S99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jayaratne YS, Lo J, Zwahlen RA, Cheung LK (2010) Three-dimensional photogrammetry for surgical planning of tissue expansion in hemifacial microsomia [Case Reports]. Head Neck 32(12):1728–1735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arias E, Huang YH, Zhao L, Seelaus R, Patel P, Cohen M (2019) Virtual surgical planning and three-dimensional printed guide for soft tissue correction in facial asymmetry. J Craniofac Surg 30(3):846–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mundluru T, Almukhtar A, Ju X, Ayoub A (2017) The accuracy of three-dimensional prediction of soft tissue changes following the surgical correction of facial asymmetry: An innovative concept. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(11):1517–1524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Christou T, Kau CH, Waite PD, Kheir NA, Mouritsen D (2013) Modified method of analysis for surgical correction of facial asymmetry. Annals of maxillofacial surgery 3(2):185–191. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.119218

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tiwari R, Chakravarthi PS, Kattimani VS, Lingamaneni KP (2018) A perioral soft tissue evaluation after orthognathic surgery using three-dimensional computed tomography scan. Open Dentistry Journal 12:366–376. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812010366

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT (2004) Three-dimensional assessment of facial soft-tissue asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(5):396–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suzuki-Okamura E, Higashihori N, Kawamoto T, Moriyama K (2015) Three-dimensional analysis of hard and soft tissue changes in patients with facial asymmetry undergoing 2-jaw surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 120(3):299–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jung YJ, Kim MJ, Baek SH (2009) Hard and soft tissue changes after correction of mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry by mandibular setback surgery: three-dimensional analysis using computerized tomography [Comparative Study]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107(6):763–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi JW, Lee JY, Oh TS, Kwon SM, Yang SJ, Koh KS (2014) Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42(3):220–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Igelbrink S, Zanettini LMS, Bohner L, Kleinheinz J, Jung S (2020) Three-dimensional planning of the mandibular margin in hemifacial microsomia using a printed patient-specific implant. J Craniofac Surg 31(8):2297–2301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alkhayer A, Piffkó J, Lippold C, Segatto E. Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Head Face Med. 2020 Dec 4;16(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2. PMID: 33272289; PMCID: PMC7716456

  29. Chabanas M, Marrecaux C, Chouly F, Boutault F, Payan Y (2004) Evaluating soft tissue simulation in maxillofacial surgery using preoperative and postoperative CT scans. In Proc of CARS 2004:419e424

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liebregts JHF, Timmermans M, De Koning MJJ, Bergé SJ, Maal TJJ (2015) Three-dimensional facial simulation in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a validation study of 100 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73(5):961–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaipatur NR, Flores-Mir C (2009) Accuracy of computer programs in predicting orthognathic surgery soft tissue response. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(4):751–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wermker K, Kleinheinz J, Jung S, Dirksen D. Soft tissue response and facial symmetry after orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;42(6):e339-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.032. Epub 2014 Jan 15. PMID: 24529350

  33. Joss CU, Joss-Vassalli IM, Kiliaridis S, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2010) Soft tissue profile changes after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68(6):1260–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hsu SS, Gateno J, Bell RB, Hirsch DL, Markiewicz MR, Teichgraeber JF et al (2013) Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study. [Multicenter Study Research Support N I H ,Extramural Research Support Non-U S Gov’t]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71(1):128–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cavalcanti M, Rocha S, Vannier M (2004) Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 33(3):170–176. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/13603271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee D-Y, Bailey LJ, Proffit WR (1996) Soft tissue changes after superior repositioning of the maxilla with Le Fort I osteotomy: 5-year follow-up. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 11(4):301–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ullah R, Turner PJ, Khambay BS (2015) Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue predictions in orthognathic surgery after Le Fort I ad-vancement osteotomies. Br J Oral Maxillo-fac Surg 53(153–7):1

    Google Scholar 

  38. Alkhayer A, Piffkó J, Lippold C, Segatto E. Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Head Face Med. 2020 Dec 4;16(1):34 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2. PMID: 33272289; PMCID: PMC7716456

  39. van Hemelen G, van Genechten M, Renier L, Desmedt M, Verbruggen E, Nadjmi N (2015) Three-dimensional virtual planning in orthognathic surgery enhances the accuracy of soft tissue prediction. [Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43(6):918–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Xia JJ, Shevchenko L, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, Taylor TD, Lasky RE, McGrory KR (2011) Outcome study of computer-aided surgical simulation in the treatment of patients with craniomaxillofacial deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(7):2014–2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.018

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hertanto M, Ayoub AF, Benington PCM, Naudi K, and McKenzie P. (2021). Orthognathic patient perception of 3D facial soft tissue prediction planning.Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgeryhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2021.03.009

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Deanship of Scientific Research of King Saud University for the funding received through the Vice Deanship of Scientific research chairs no RG-1439-062. The authors would like to thank the faculty and staff of the department of maxillofacial surgery and CDRC (College of Dentistry Research Centre) of their respective institutions for their support and guidance in this study. We would like to express our gratitude and respect to Professor Dr A Ayoub, Head of Maxillofacial surgery, College of Dentistry, University of Glasgow for the guidance and support in this study.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University for the funding received through the Vice-Deanship of Scientific Research Chairsno RG-1439–062.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manju Roby Philip.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This review is registered and approved by the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), CRD 42020219671.

Consent to participate

All participants have given their consent to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

All authors have given consent to publish the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Philip, M.R., AlFotawi, R. The accuracy of soft tissue movement using virtual planning for non-syndromic facial asymmetry cases—a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg 27, 187–200 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01059-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01059-w

Keywords

Navigation