Abstract
Introduction
Local anesthetics are generally much less effective when administered in inflamed tissues.
Purpose
This study was conducted to validate the addition of sodium bicarbonate in local anesthetics to increase its effectiveness as local infiltrations in teeth associated with periapical infections.
Methods
Two hundred subjects requiring extraction of maxillary teeth with periapical infections were enrolled. These subjects were divided in two groups of 100 subjects each. One group received local infiltration with 2 % lignocaine and 1:80,000 adrenaline, and the other group received local infiltration with sodium bicarbonate as an adjunct to the above mentioned local anesthetic solution. All extractions were performed using a consistent intra-alveolar technique by a single operator. Both the patient and the operator were blinded to the contents of local anesthetic solution. Data related to the onset of action of local anesthesia, pain experienced by the patient while undergoing extraction on two scales—"the visual analog scale and the verbal response scale", and any requirement of repeated injections during the procedure was recorded.
Results
Clinical and statistical data confirmed that the addition of sodium bicarbonate in local anesthetics did increase the efficacy of local anesthesia in inflamed tissues.
Conclusion
It has been observed in this study that the action of sodium bicarbonate in local anesthetics increases the pH levels of these solutions, thus possibly making them more effective in an acidic environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Modaresi J, Dianat O, Soluti A (2008) Effect of pulp inflammation on nerve impulse quality with or without anesthesia. J Endod 34(4):438–441
Malamed SF, DDS (2004) Neurophysiology. In: Malamed SF (ed) Handbook of Local Anesthesia, 5th edn. Elsevier, India, p 16
Berrada R, Chassard D, Bryssine S, Berthier S, Bryssine B, Bouletreau P (1994) In vitro effects of the alkalinization of 0.25 % bupivacaine and 2 % lidocaine. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 13(2):165–168
Gupta RP Col, Kapoor G Maj (2006) Safety and efficacy of sodium bicarbonate versus hyaluronidase in peribulbar anesthesia. MJAFI 62:116–118
Kashyap VM, Desai R, Reddy PB, Menon S (2011) Effect of alkalinization of lignocaine for intraoral nerve block on pain during injection and speed of onset of anesthesia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49(8):e 72–e 75
Whitcomb M, Melissa d, Nusstein J, Beck M (2010) A prospective, randomized, and double blind study of the anesthetic efficacy of sodium bicarbonate buffered 2 % lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in interior alveolar nerve blocks. Anesth Prog 57:59–66
Orlinsky M, Hudson C, Chan L, Deslauriers R (1992) Pain comparison of unbuffered versus buffered lidocaine in local wound infiltration. J Emerg Med 10(4):411–415
Wong DL, Hockenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein ML, Schwartz P (2001) Wong’s Essentials of Pediatric Nursing. Mosby Inc, St Louis, 6/e
Malamed SF, DDS (2004) Neurophysiology. In: Malamed SF (ed) Handbook of Local Anesthesia, 5th edn. Elsevier, India, pp 24–25
Danielsson K, Evers H, Nordenram A (1985) Long-acting local anesthetics in oral surgery: an experimental evaluation of bupivacaine and etidocaine for oral infiltration anesthesia. Anesth Prog 32:65–68
Malamed SF, DDS (2004) Neurophysiology. In: Malamed SF (ed) Handbook of Local Anesthesia, 5th edn. Elsevier, India, pp 18–19
Richie JM, Greengard P (1996) On the mode of action of local anesthetics. Ann Rev Pharmacother 6:405–430
Luhmann J, Hurt S, Shootman M, Kennedy R (2004) A comparison of buffered lidocaine versus ELA-Max before peripheral intravenous catheter insertions in children. Pediatrics 113:e217–e220
Davies RJ (2001) Buffering the pain local anesthetics: a systematic review. Emerg Med 15:81–88 (fremantle)
da Lopes Fonseca N Jr, Dumont Lucci LM, Badessa MPSG, Lima rehder JRC (2009) Comparison of two modified lidocaine solutions for local anesthesia in blepharoplasty. Arq Bras Ophthalmol 72(2):211–214
Stanley. F. Malamed DDS, Handbook of Local Anesthesia, 5th ed.,Los Angeles,Califonia;Mosby:57.
Katz S, Drum M, Nusstein J, Beck M (2010) A prospective, randomized, and double-blind comparison of 2 % lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4 % prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4 % prilocaine for maxillary infiltrations. Anesth Prog 57(2):45–51
Gunetti R, Bonicalzi V, Riolo C, Pagni CA (2000) Peri and postoperative pain valuation in carpal tunnel release of median nerve compression. J Neurosurg Sci 44:85–88
Yiannakopoulos CK (2004) Carpal ligament decompression under local anesthesia: the effect of lidocaine warming and alkalinization on infiltration pain. J Hand Surg Br 29:32–34
Vossinakis IC, Stavroulaki P (2004) Reducing the pain associated with local anesthetic infiltration for open carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Br 29(4):399–401
Masters JE (1998) Randomized control trial of pH buffered lignocaine with adrenaline in outpatient operations. Br J Plast Surg 51(5):385–387
Richard C, Leslie B, Kimberly B, Schwartz S (1988) Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering. Ann Emerg Med 17(2):117–120
Milner QJ, Guard BC, Allen JG (2000) Alkalinization of amide local anesthetics by addition of 1 % sodium bicarbonate solution. Eur J Anaesthesiol 17(1):38–42
Serour F, Levine A, Mandelberg A, Ben Yehuda Y, Boaz M, Alkalinizing MJ (1999) Local anesthetic does not decrease pain during injection for dorsal penile nerve block. J Clin Anesth 11:563–566
Chassard D, Berrada K, Bouletreau P (1996) Alkalinization of local anesthetics: theoretically justified but clinically useless. Can J Anaesth 43:384–393
Watts AC, Gaston P, Hooper G (2004) Randomized trial of buffered versus plain lidocaine for local anesthesia in open carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Br 29(1):30–31
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, S., Mandlik, G., Padhye, M.N. et al. Combating inadequate anesthesia in periapical infections, with sodium bicarbonate: a clinical double blind study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 18, 325–329 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-013-0418-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-013-0418-1