Skip to main content
Log in

Calculation of conductive polymer-based SO2 and SO3 gas sensor mechanisms by using the DFT method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we carried out with the DTP (dithieno(3,2-b:2,3-d) pyrrole) molecule which is a member of the conductive polymer class that is one of the topics that have been studied prevalently in recent times, and the density functional theory’s (DFT) calculation methods were used to shed light on the sensor mechanisms of its interactions with SOx (SO2 and SO3) sulfur oxides. The changes in the geometric and electronic characteristics of a sensor mechanism designed with the DTP molecule when it encountered sulfur oxides were examined. With these changes, the usability of DTP as a sensor material was proven. DTP sensor applications using this method were not investigated in previous studies. The B3LYP 6–31 G(d) levels of DFT were used in the calculations. In the calculations, during the interaction between analyte (SO2-SO3) and the conductive polymer DTP (dithieno(3,2-b:2,3-d) pyrrole), especially, the changes in its geometric and electronic structures were observed. With these changes that were observed in the geometric structure, as a result of the interaction between the conductive polymer and gas molecules, the resistance on the polymer’s main chain decreased, and conductivity increased. Calculations on the bandgap on HOMO-LUMO energy levels were observed to decrease. Thus, the structural conductivity of the molecule increased. Additionally, the experiments showed that, as a result of interaction with gas molecules, the bandgap in the ionization potential, electron affinity, and HOMO-LUMO energy levels varied. These variations showed the detection mechanisms for sulfur oxides by the DTP (dithieno(3,2-b:2,3-d) pyrrole) molecule that may be used to design sensors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iwasawa S, Kikuchi Y, Nishiwaki Y et al (2009) Effects of SO2 on respiratory system of adult Miyakejima resident 2 years after returning to the island. J. Occup. Health 51:38–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Du SX, JinHF BDF, ZhaoX TCS, Du JB (2008) Endogenously generated sulfur dioxide and its vasorelaxant effect in rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin 29:923–930

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rad AS, Valipour P, Gholizade A, Mousavinezhad SE (2015) Interaction of SO2 and SO3 on terthiophene (as a model of polythiophenegassensor): DFT calculations. ChemPhysLett 639(29–35):306

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ali SR, Nazanin N, Maryam J, Dorsa SS, Elahe G (2015) Ab-initiostudy of interaction ofsomeatmosphericgases (SO2, NH3, H2O, CO, CH4 and CO2) withpolypyrrole (3PPy) gassensor: DFT calculations. SensorsActuators. B: Chemical 220:641–651

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ullah H, Ayub K, Ullah Z (2013) Theoretical insight of polypyrrole ammonia gas sensor. Synthetic Metals 172:14–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sajid H, Mahmood T, Ayub K (2018) High sensitivity of polypyrrole sensor for uricacid over urea, acetamide and sulfonamide: a density functional theory study. Synth. Met. 235:49–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shokuhi Rad A, Zardoost MR, Abedini E (2015) First-principles study of terpyrrole as a potential hydrogencyanide sensor: DFT calculations. J. Mol. Model. 21:273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bibi S, Ullah H, Ahmad SM (2015) Molecular and electronic structure elucidation of polypyrrole gas sensors. J PhysChem C 119:15994–16003

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sajid H, Mahmood T, Ayub K (2017) An accurate comparative theoretical study of the interaction of furan, pyrrole, and thiophene with various gaseous analytes. J Mol Model 23:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu SS, Bian LJ, Luan F (2012) Theoretical study on polyaniline gas sensors: examinations of response mechanism for alcohol. Synth. Met. 162:862–867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bredas JL, Street GB (1985) Polarons, bipolarons, andsolitons in conductingpolymers. AccChemRes 18:309–315

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hacer A, Sevınc K, Huseyın Bekır Y, Sıbel AO (2016) Electrochemical glucose biosensing via new generation DTP type conducting polymers/gold nanoparticles/glucose oxidase modified electrodes. Journal of Elecanalytical Chemistry 770:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.03.034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bai H, Shi G, Bai H, Shi G (2007) Gas Sensors Based on Conducting Polymers. Sensors 7:267–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gospodinova N, Mokreva P, Terlemezyan L (1993) Chemical oxidative polymerization of aniline in aqueous medium without added acids. Polymer. 34:336

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sahiner N, Demirci S (2016) Conducting semi-inter penetrating polymeric composites via the preparation of poly(aniline), poly(thiophene), and poly(pyrrole) polymers within superporous poly(acrylicacid) cryogels. React. Funct. Polym. 340(105):60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zade SS, Bendikov M (2009) In: Perepichka IF, Perepichka DF (eds) Theoretical studies on thiophene-containing compounds. John Wiley&Sons, Ltd., New York ISBN: 978-0-470-05732-2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Puodziukynaite E, Wang H-W, Lawrence J et al (2014) Azulene methacrylate polymers: synthesis, electronic properties, and solar cell fabrication. J AmChemSoc 136:11043–11049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bozkurt A, Akbulut U, Toppare L (1996) Conducting polymer composites of polypyrrole and polyindene. Synth. Met. 82:41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ullah H, Shah A-HA, Bilal S, Ayub K (2014) Doping and dedoping processes of polypyrrole: DFT study with hybrid functionals. J. Phys. Chem. C 118:17819–17830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kassim A, Basar ZB, Mahmud HNME (2002) Effects of preparation temperature on the conductivity of polypyrrole conducting polymer. J ChemSci 114:155–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alex LG, Jordi C, Oscar B, JoãoSinézio CC, Elaine A, Carlos A (2011) Electronic properties of poly(thiophene-3-methyl acetate). J PolymRes 18:1509–1517

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zade SS, Bendikov M (2006) From oligomers to polymer: convergence in the HOMO-LUMO gaps of conjugated oligomers. Org Lett 8:5243–5246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoon H (2013) Current trends in sensors based on conducting polymer nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 3:524–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hutchison GR, Zhao Y-J, Delley B et al (2003) Electronic structure of conducting polymers: limitations of oligomer extra polation approximation sand effects of heteroatoms. PhysRev B 68:035204

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alemán C, Estrany F, Armelin E (2007) A theoretical study on the interaction between N-methylpyrroleand 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene units in copolymermolecules. Polymer (Guildf) 48:6162–6169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rikukawa M, Sanui K (2000) Proton-conducting polymer electrolyte membranes based on hydrocarbon polymers. ProgPolymSci 25:1463–1502

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gustafsson G, Cao Y, Treacy GM, Klavetter F, Colaneri N, Heeger AJ (1992) Flexible light-emitting diodes made from soluble conducting polymers. Nature 357:477–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Watt A, Blake D, Warner JH, Thomsen EA, Tavenner EL Dunlop HR, Meredith P (2005). J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 38:2006–2012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Masoumeh M, Morteza MK, Mina G (2019) Exploringtheeffect of phosphorusdoping on theutility of g-C3N4 as an electrodematerial in Na- ionbatteriesusing DFT method. Journal of MolecularModeling 375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4109-1

  30. Frisch MJEA, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman, JR.(2000) Gaussian 09, Revision a. 02, Inc.,Wallingford, CT

  31. Foresman JB, Frish E (1996) Exploring chemistry with electronic structure methods2nd edn. Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA USA, p 253

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mulliken RS (1934) A new electron affinity scale; together with data on valence states and on valence ionization potentials and electron affinities. J. Chem. Phys. 2:782–793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Koch W, Holthausen MC (2001) A chemist’s guide to density functional theory. Wiley-VCH VerlagGmbH

  34. Hasnain S, Tarıq M, Mian HRM, Khurshid A (2019) Comparative investigation of sensor application of polypyrrole for gaseous analytes. Journal of physical organic chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.3960

  35. Pandule SS, Shisodia SU, Pawar RP, Chabukswar VV (2017) Synthesis, properties, and ammonia gas sensing applications of poly-[1-(4-nitronaphthalen-1-yl)-2,5- di(thiophen-2-yl)-1 H -pyrrole]. Polym Plast Technol Eng. 56:268–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Xiaohua X, Wei S, Yangwu F, Ming L (2010) DFT study of conductive properties of three polymers formed by bicyclic furans. Journal Molecular Simulation 36:836–398 846

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ali SR, PeimanV AG, Seyed EM (2015) Interaction of SO2 and SO3 on terthiophene (as a model of polythiophene gas sensor): DFT calculations. Chemical Physics Letters 639:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sajid H, Mahmood T, Ayub K (2018) High sensitivity of polypyrrole sensor for uric acid over urea, acetamide and sulfonamide: a density functional theory study. Synth Met 235:49–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Shokuhi RA, GhasemiAteni S, Tayebi H (2016) First-principles DFT study of SO2 and SO3 adsorption on 2PANI: a model for polyaniline response. J Sulfur Chem.:1–10

  40. Shokuhi RA, Esfahanian M, Ganjian E, Tayebi H (2016) Ab-initio study of physisorption of hydrogen cyanide on 2PANI: a model for polyaniline gas sensor. Z. Phys. Chem. 230:1487–1498

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rasmussen SC, Evenson SJ, McCausland CB (2015) Fluorescent thiophene-based materials and their Outlook for Emissive Applications. Chem. Commun. 51:4528–4543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Research Foundation (grant number 14-M-17; 02-YL-18).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hacer AZAK.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• We theoretically studied the interactions of SO2 and SO3 with conductive polymer through DFT calculations.

• Geometric optimization orbital analysis and UV-VIS results were calculated theoretically.

• The results show dithieno(3,2-b:2,3-d) pyrrole (DTP) that is a member of the conductive polymer class interacts strongly with SO2 and SO3 gas molecules and can be used in gas sensors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

AZAK, H., GORGUL, R., TEKIN, B. et al. Calculation of conductive polymer-based SO2 and SO3 gas sensor mechanisms by using the DFT method. J Mol Model 25, 367 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4219-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4219-9

Keywords

Navigation