Abstract
Solvated electrons (\(e_{aq}^ - \)) are produced during water radiolysis and can interact with biological substrates, including DNA. To augment DNA damage, radiosensitizers such as bromo-deoxyuridine (BUdR), often referred to as an “electron affinic radiosensitizer”, are incorporated in place of isosteric thymidine. However, little is known about the primary interactions of \(e_{aq}^ - \) with DNA. In the present study we addressed this problem by applying molecular modeling and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to a system of normal (BUdR·A)-DNA and a hydrated electron, where the excess electron was modeled as a localized \(e^ - \)(H2O)6 anionic cluster. Our goals were to evaluate the suitability of the MD simulations for this application; to characterize the motion of \(e_{aq}^ - \) around DNA (e.g., diffusion coefficients); to identify and describe configurational states of close \(e_{aq}^ - \) localization to DNA; and to evaluate the structural dynamics of DNA in the presence of \(e_{aq}^ - \). The results indicate that \(e_{aq}^ - \) has distinct space-preferences for forming close contacts with DNA and is more likely to interact directly with nucleotides other than BUdR. Several classes of DNA - \(e_{aq}^ - \) contact sites, all within the major groove, were distinguished depending on the structure of the intermediate water layer H-bonding pattern (or its absence, i.e., a direct H-bonding of \(e_{aq}^ - \) with DNA bases). Large-scale structural perturbations were identified during and after the \(e_{aq}^ - \) approached the DNA from the major groove side, coupled with deeper penetration of sodium counterions in the minor groove.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
von Sonntag C (2006) Free Radical Induced DNA damage and repair: A chemical perspective, Springer, Berlin
Bernas A, Feradini C, Jay-Gerin JP (1996) Can J Chem 74:1–23
Clark T, Illing G (1987) J Am Chem Soc 109:1013–1020
Schnitker J, Rossky PJ (1989) J Phys Chem 93:6965–6969
Pommeret S, Gauduel Y (1991) J Phys Chem 95:4126–4130
Tachikawa H, Lund A, Ogasawara M (1993) Can J Chem 71:118–124
Wong KF, Rossky PJ (2001) J Phys Chem A 105:2546–2556
Sommerfield T, Jordan KD (2006) J Am Chem Soc 128:5828–5833
Coe JV, Lee GH, Eaton JG, Arnold ST, Sarkas HW, Bowen KH, Ludewigt C, Haberland H, Worsnop DR (1990) J Chem Phys 92:3980–3982
Kim J, Becker I, Cheshnovsky O, Johnson MA (1998) Chem Phys Lett 297:90–96
Kelley JA, Weddle GH, Robertson WH, Johnson MA (2002) J Chem Phys 116:1201–1203
Tauber MAJ, Mathies RA (2003) J Am Chem Soc 125:1394–1402
Symons MCR (1988) J Phys Chem 92:7260–7262
Schlick S, Narayana PA, Kevan L (1976) J Chem Phys 64:3153–3160
Feng D-F, Kevan L (1980) Chem Rev 80:1–20
Boudaiffa B, Cloutier P, Hunting DJ, Huels MA, Sanche L (2000) Science 287:1658–1660
Wagenknecht H-A (2003) Angew Chem Int Ed 42:2454–2460
Manetto A, Breeger S, Chatgilialoglu C, Carell T (2006) Angew Chem Int Ed 45:318–321
Cai Z, Sevilla MD (2000) J Phys Chem B 104:6942–6949
Cook GP, Greenberg MM (1996) J Am Chem Soc 118:10025–10030
Fuciarelli AF, Sisk EC, Zimbrick JD (1994) Int J Radiat Biol 65:409–418
Nese C, Yuan Z, Schuchmann MN, von Sonntag C (1992) Int J Radiat Biol 62:527–541
Colson AO, Sevilla MD (1995) Int J Radiat Biol 67:627–645
Cecchini S, Girouard S, Huels MA, Sanche L, Hunting DJ (2004) Rad Res 162:604–615
Cecchini S, Girouard S, Huels MA, Sanche L, Hunting DJ (2005) Biochem 44:1932–1940
Dextraze M-E, Wagner RJ, Hunting DJ (2007) Biochem 46:9089–9097
Gantchev TG, Cecchini S, Hunting DJ (2005) J Mol Model 11:141–159
Young MA, Ravishanker G, Beveridge DL (1997) Biophys J 73:2313–2336
Westhof E, Rubin-Carrez C, Fritsch V (1995) In: Goodfellow JM (ed) Computer modelling in molecular biology, Chapter 5. Wiley VCH, Weinheim, pp 101–131
Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR (1984) J Chem Phys 81:3684–3690
Essman U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen L (1995) J Chem Phys 103:8577–8593
Beveridge DL, Ravishanker G (1994) Curr Opin Struct Biol 4:246–255
Kollman PA, Dixon R, Cornell W, Fox T, Chipot C, Pohorille, A (1997) 3:83–96 The development/application of a “minimalist” organic/biochemical molecular mechanic force field using a combination of ab initio calculations and experimental data In: Wilkinson A, Weiner N, van Gunsteren W (eds.) Computer simulations of biomolecular systems: Theoretical and experimental applications
Bonvin AMJJ, Sunnerhagen M, Otting G, van Gunsteren WF (1998) J Mol Biol 282:859–873
Feig M, Montgomery Pettitt B (1999) J Mol Biol 286:1075–1095
Várnai P, Zakrzewska K (2004) Nucl Acids Res 32:4269–4280
Sherer EC, Cramer CJ (2004) Theor Chem Acc 111:311–327
Schmidt KH, Han P, Bartels DN (1995) J Phys Chem 99:10530–10539
Feig M, Pettitt BM (1998) Biophys J 75:134–149
Koneshan S, Rasaiah JC, Lynden-Bell RNM, Lee SH (1998) J Phys Chem B 102:4193–4204
Marcus RA (1998) Acta Chem Scand 52:858–863
Bertran J, Gallardo I, Moreno M, Savéant J-M (1992) J Am Chem Soc 114:9576–9583
Close DM (2004) J Phys Chem A 108:10376–10379
Gaballah ST, Collier G, Netzel TL (2005) J Phys Chem B 109:12175–12181
Schröder C, Rudas T, Boresch S, Steinhauser O. J. Chem. Phys 124:234907–234907
Pearson RG (1989) J Org Chem 54:1423–1430
Gantchev TG, van Lier JE, Hunting DJ (2005) Rad Phys Chem 72:367–379
Yoon C, Prive GG, Goodsell DS, Dickerson RE (1988) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:6332–6336
Umezawa Y, Nishio M (2002) Nucl Acid Res 30:2183–2192
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Cancer Research Society (Canada).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gantchev, T.G., Hunting, D.J. Probing the interactions of the solvated electron with DNA by molecular dynamics simulations: bromodeoxyuridine substituted DNA. J Mol Model 14, 451–464 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-008-0296-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-008-0296-x