Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Research is essential for the continuous improvement of our current practices in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP)—it is the basis for more accurate early detection and diagnosis of mental disorders as well the refinement and tailoring of our preventive and therapeutic strategies.
The current issue of European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry demonstrates how research can impact clinical practice. For example, the case–control study by Wan-Chen Lee et al. investigated healthcare contacts and comorbid disorders in 159 adolescent suicides and nearly 3200 matched controls [1]. Patient health care utilization was significantly higher during the 3 months prior to suicides and higher rates of mental but also physical comorbidities were observed among those who committed suicide than among controls. Thus, patients seeking help could potentially be identified as at risk and benefit from suicide prevention measures. The work of Marie Deserno et al. [2] challenges the traditional distinction between autism spectrum disorders and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder using a novel, data-driven approach to describe and understand psychiatric nosology. Suzanne de Jong [3] investigated the effectiveness of a new, self-help parenting program that integrates psychoeducative and behavioral parenting techniques for children with externalizing behaviors. Fifteen weeks after program completion, significantly higher effects that lasted at least 7 months were found in the intervention group compared to the control group. These research findings are just three examples from the collection of highly relevant publications in this issue that demonstrate that research has the potential to be translated into clinical practice in meaningful ways.
While research generally arouses interest and enthusiasm among doctors and can be a stimulating factor that enriches the work environment, research can also be perceived as laborious and cumbersome [4]. Despite the fact that research training is one of the four consensus priorities defined by the World Psychiatric Association, the World Association for Infant Mental Health, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health (WHO) and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP) international societies, CAP’s research culture is relatively underdeveloped in comparison to other medical specialities [5]. Is this situation related to resident’s attitudes towards and interests in research or the way they perceive their career opportunities? What are the parameters facilitating or hindering research from their point of view?
To shed light on these questions, a survey was conducted in September 2022 at the Residents’ Day of the Swiss Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Congress in Zürich. CAP residents from all regions of Switzerland attended the Residents’ Day and answered questions about their involvement in research and factors that could influence it. The survey aimed to evaluate current and past research activities, subjective attitudes towards research as well as basic demographic information. All the participants were enrolled in a CAP residency program somewhere in Switzerland and a total of 97 CAP residents completed the survey.
About two-thirds of the participants had received their medical degree outside of Switzerland (62.9%). Their place of work was in 1 of 16 Swiss cantons, and their primary language was Italian, French, or German. The largest percentage worked in cantons with a university hospital (i.e., Geneva, Vaud, Zurich, Bern, and Basel). About a third of the participants were in their first year of training (30.9%), a minority (9.3%) was nearing its completion (i.e., 6th year or later), and about 60% were equally distributed between their second and fifth year of training.
About a quarter of the residents had completed a doctoral thesis (27.8%, MD n = 26, MD-PhD n = 1) but most of those holding a doctoral degree were not currently involved in research activities (74.1%). Among residents without a doctoral degree (n = 70), 25.7% were currently registered as an MD or PhD candidate. Among those who were not registered, 42.1% were planning to do a thesis at some point in their career and 35.1% did not know. Only a minority (22.8%) did not intend to write a thesis, the main reasons being “not seeing the point of completing a thesis” (38.5%), “not knowing anyone who could supervise a thesis" (30.8%), and lack of time (23.1%). Although almost half of the participants (44.3%) were aware of colleagues doing research, less than a quarter of them (22.7%) previously participated in research at their current workplace.
Among those not involved in research (n = 75), only 13.3% could name and briefly describe at least one project currently underway at their workplace, despite that almost two-thirds (64%) indicated that research was of importance at their institution. Only 8 (10.7%) of the participants not involved in research indicated that research (e.g., clinical studies, meta-analyses, or reviews) was regularly discussed, while 17 (22.7%) indicated that research was never discussed or shared by their supervisors at work.
In contrast, most residents involved in research could name and briefly describe at least one research project (59.1%) and indicated that research is valued and promoted at their institution (90.9%). However, among those involved in research, only 18.2% reported that scientific results were discussed regularly and reported that research was never discussed by their supervisors.
Among the residents involved in research (n = 22), the majority help recruit patients for research projects (63.6%), collect data (54%), analyze data (54%), and write manuscripts (54%). Time per week dedicated to research among the residents was reported to be very minimal (i.e., < 1 h) for nearly half (45.5%), half a day for a about a fifth (18.2%), 1 day for about a quarter (22.7%) and 2 days or more for a minority (13.6%, see Fig. 1).
Overall, these outcomes have several implications:
-
The vast majority of CAP residents plan to participate in research. Only a minority of those not already holding a doctorate or being registered for a thesis have no intention to write a thesis at some point in their career.
-
Apart from the lack of motivation, the main reasons residents do not plan to participate in research are related to lack of time and not knowing someone who could supervise their work.
-
Most residents who are involved in research believe research is important and research activities and/or the discussion of research would have a positive impact (e.g., on their clinical work).
-
However, research support and research teaching norms do not exist in many working environments (i.e., supervisors do not commonly discuss research questions or act as thesis supervisors).
Thus, we conclude there is an untapped potential in the current generation of CAP residents. A substantial number of residents are interested either in personally engaging in research activities and/or discussing research findings. However, there seems to be unmet needs of CAP residents that should be addressed, such as the availability of research supervisors and teachers.
Importantly, our survey did not cover several factors known to influence resident’s willingness to get involved in research. In a recent study conducted in Australia [6], barriers to research for residents were identified as having poor methodological and statistical skills and limited research resources. Health professionals considered financial and organizational support as well as clearly defined research time highly important. Further, the acquisition of research competences and the feeling of autonomy, e.g., having control over own’s personal goals, were relevant. The authors also investigated the motivation to do research. While previous generations might have been motivated by extrinsic factors such as career progression and academic improvement, the highest research-oriented group of the current generation was motivated by future usefulness of their work, attainment (i.e., doing well) and personal enjoyment [7]. A further crucial factor promoting research activities was a feeling of connectedness to other researchers/groups or mentors in a collaborative sense. The most highly motivated group was genuinely curious, willing to produce and share new knowledge, interested in improving patient health outcomes and satisfied with their jobs.
One important question is to define the best time to initiate the support of a person intending to pursue a scientific career. Here, data consistently recommend starting as early as possible, e.g., during medical studies [8]. Most physicians who pursue careers in research have already decided to do research before the start of their residency (e.g., they had a mentor while they were studying, worked in research > 5 h/week and developed their own projects [9]. Studies indicate that there may be a relationship between perceptions of and motivation to do research, e.g., in an environment where research is appreciated, the motivation to do research is high.
Finally, sex inequality in research continues to be a reality. In academic environments, women consistently have lower grant award rates and larger teaching, administrative, and organizational workloads compared to men, in addition to domestic responsibilities (e.g., child care) known to hinder women from pursuing scientific careers. Therefore, special attention is to be directed towards alleviating impediments specific to women [10].
If we want to improve the current status quo of research activities of residents in European child and adolescent psychiatry, what are the next steps?
We recommend the heads of child and adolescent psychiatric facilities to advocate for the inclusion of research and discussion of modern scientific literature in CAP daily clinical work and training. Identifying and supporting those residents who would like to participate will also be essential. Role models and mentoring systems for young clinicians interested in developing a scientific career could also be helpful. Finally, providing the personal and technical resources and—maybe more importantly—the time for young residents to develop their own research ideas, to expand their methodological skills and to follow a science-oriented career track will be essential [11].
Thus, there is work to do—let us start now!
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, JK and PK.
References
Lee W-C, Pan C-H, Su S-S et al (2022) Healthcare utilization and comorbidity shortly before suicide mortality in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a nested case–control study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-02038-y
Deserno MK, Bathelt J, Groenman AP, Geurts HM (2022) Probing the overarching continuum theory: data-driven phenotypic clustering of children with ASD or ADHD. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-01986-9
de Jong SRC, van den Hoofdakker BJ, van der Veen-Mulders L et al (2022) The efficacy of a self-help parenting program for parents of children with externalizing behavior: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-02028-0
Revet A, Hebebrand J, Bhide S et al (2018) Dual training as clinician-scientist in child and adolescent psychiatry: are we there yet? Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 27:263–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-1104-x
Skokauskas N, Fung D, Flaherty LT et al (2019) Shaping the future of child and adolescent psychiatry. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-019-0279-y
D’Arrietta LM, Vangaveti VN, Crowe MJ, Malau-Aduli BS (2022) Rethinking health professionals’ motivation to do research: a systematic review. JMDH 15:185–216. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S337172
(2003) Research Training in Psychiatry Residency: Strategies for Reform. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
Ommering BWC, Wijnen-Meijer M, Dolmans DHJM et al (2020) Promoting positive perceptions of and motivation for research among undergraduate medical students to stimulate future research involvement: a grounded theory study. BMC Med Educ 20:204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02112-6
Silberman EK, Belitsky R, Bernstein CA et al (2012) Recruiting researchers in psychiatry: the influence of residency vs. early motivation. Acad Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.10010010
Jebsen JM, Nicoll Baines K, Oliver RA, Jayasinghe I (2022) Dismantling barriers faced by women in STEM. Nat Chem 14:1203–1206. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-01072-2
Hunt J, Reichenberg J, Lewis AL, Jacobson S (2020) Child and adolescent psychiatry training in the USA: current pathways. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 29:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01402-9
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kindler, J., Kaess, M., Eliez, S. et al. Research training in child and adolescent psychiatry: lack of motivation or a structural problem?. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 32, 1817–1820 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-023-02293-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-023-02293-7