Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complementary and alternative therapies for managing postoperative pain after lower third molar surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of complementary and alternative treatments on postoperative pain following lower third molar surgeries.

Methods

A comprehensive search of Electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE via PubMed, and Cochrane Library) and grey literature was conducted up until May 2022. Randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of acupuncture, ozone therapy, laser (LLLT), drainage tube, kinesio-taping, ice therapy, and compressions on pain after LTM surgeries were included. The estimated mean differences (MD) for alternative therapies were pooled using the frequentist approach to random-model network meta-analysis NMA.

Results

Eighty-two papers were included in the qualitative analysis; 33 of them were included in the quantitative analyzes. NMA revealed that drainage tube and kinesio-taping were superior in controlling pain 24-hours postoperatively than no-treatment. At 48-hours follow-up, kinesio-taping and LLLT more effective than placebo and drainage tube; and kinesio-taping and LLLT were superior to no treatment. At 72 h postoperatively, ozone therapy was superior to placebo; and drainage tube, kinesio-taping, and LLLT were better than no treatment. At 7-days follow-up, ozone and LLLT were superior to placebo; and LLLT and kinesio-taping were superior to no treatment. The SUCRA-ranking placed drainage tube as top-ranking intervention at 48-hours (98.2%) and 72-hours (96%) follow-ups, and ozone (83.5%) at 7-days follow-up.

Conclusion

The study findings suggest that these alternative and complementary therapies may be useful in reducing postoperative pain after LTM surgeries, and may offer advantages when combined to traditional pain management methods. Clinical relevance: Non-pharmacological therapies are gaining popularity among healthcare professionals and patients. This study found that some of these therapies, specifically kinesio-taping and drainage tube were effective in controlling postoperative pain after third molar surgeries. These findings have important implications for clinical practice, as they highlight the potential benefits of incorporating these therapies into postoperative pain management plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Alcântara CEP, Falci SGM, Oliveira-Ferreira F et al (2014) Pre-emptive effect of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone on pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery: a split-mouth randomized triple-blind clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.05.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Applied Sciences | Free Full-Text | Type I Collagen-Based Devices to Treat Nerve Injuries after Oral Surgery Procedures. A Systematic Review. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/9/3927. Accessed 26 Feb 2024

  3. Duarte-Rodrigues L, Miranda EFP, Souza TO et al (2018) Third molar removal and its impact on quality of life: systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil 27:2477–2489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1889-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Falci SGM, Lima TC, Martins CC et al (2017) Preemptive effect of dexamethasone in third-molar surgery: a Meta-analysis. Anesth Prog 64:136–143. https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-64-05-08

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cetira Filho EL, Carvalho FSR, de Barros Silva PG et al (2020) Preemptive use of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the relief of inflammatory events after surgical removal of lower third molars: a systematic review with meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials. J Cranio-Maxillo-Fac Surg off Publ Eur Assoc Cranio-Maxillo. -fac Surg 48:293–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2020.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Simone JL, Jorge WA, Horliana ACRT et al (2013) Comparative analysis of preemptive analgesic effect of dexamethasone and diclofenac following third molar surgery. Braz Oral Res 27:266–271. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242013005000012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Agarwal S, Chattopadhyay S, Mandal M (2017) Comparison of efficacy of aceclofenac and ibuprofen after surgical removal of impacted third molar. J Evol Med Dent Sci 6:1670–1677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Çebi AT, Kasapoğlu MB, Eren S, Kasapoğlu Ç (2018) Comparison of the effects of diclofenac potassium and tenoxicam on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus following third molar surgery. Turk J Med Sci 48:271–278. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1702-100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prashar DV, Pahwa D, Kalia V et al (2016) A comparative evaluation of the effect of diclofenac sodium with and without per-orally administered methylprednisolone on the sequelae of impacted mandibular third molar removal: a cohort randomized double-blind clinical trial. Indian J Dent 7:11–16. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.158187

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Canellas JVDS, Fraga SRG, Santoro MF et al (2020) Intrasocket interventions to prevent alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Cranio-Maxillo-Fac Surg off Publ Eur Assoc Cranio-Maxillo. -fac Surg 48:902–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2020.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Firoozi P, Moreira Falci SG, Kim S-G, Assael LA (2022) Nonpharmacological complementary interventions for the Management of Pain after third molar surgery: an Umbrella Review of current Meta-analyses. Pain Res Manag 2022:1816748. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1816748

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bianchi de Moraes M, Gomes de Oliveira R, Raldi FV et al (2020) Does the low-intensity laser protocol affect tissue Healing after third molar removal? J oral Maxillofac Surg off J am assoc oral Maxillofac Surg 78:1920.e1-1920.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.05.018

  13. Yurttutan ME, Sancak KT (2020) The effect of kinesio taping with the web strip technique on pain, edema, and trismus after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Niger J Clin Pract 23:1260–1265. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_23_20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Glória JCR, Douglas-de-Oliveira DW, Silva E LDA, et al (2020) Influence of ozonized water on pain, oedema, and trismus during impacted third molar surgery: a randomized, triple blind clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 20:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1029-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zandi M, Amini P, Keshavarz A (2016) Effectiveness of cold therapy in reducing pain, trismus, and oedema after impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized, self-controlled, observer-blind, split-mouth clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:118–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Armond ACV, Glória JCR, Dos Santos CRR et al (2019) Acupuncture on anxiety and inflammatory events following surgery of mandibular third molars: a split-mouth, randomized, triple-blind clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.07.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM et al (2015) The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 162:777–784. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eshghpour M, Ahrari F, Takallu M (2016) Is low-level laser therapy effective in the Management of Pain and Swelling after Mandibular Third Molar surgery? J oral Maxillofac Surg Off. J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 74:1322e1–1322e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.02.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Farhadi F, Eslami H, Majidi A et al (2017) Evaluation of adjunctive effect of low-level laser therapy on pain, swelling and trismus after surgical removal of impacted lower third molar: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Laser Ther 26:181–187. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.17-OR-13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kahraman SA, Cetiner S, Strauss RA (2017) The effects of Transcutaneous and Intraoral Low-Level laser therapy after extraction of Lower Third molars: a randomized single blind, Placebo Controlled Dual-Center Study. Photomed Laser Surg 35:401–407. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2016.4252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Merigo E, Vescovi P, Margalit M et al (2015) Efficacy of LLLT in swelling and pain control after the extraction of lower impacted third molars. Laser Ther 24:39–46. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.15-OR-05

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Momeni E, Barati H, Arbabi MR et al (2021) Low-level laser therapy using laser diode 940 nm in the mandibular impacted third molar surgery: double-blind randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 21:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01434-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Nejat AH, Eshghpour M, Danaeifar N et al (2021) Effect of Photobiomodulation on the incidence of Alveolar Osteitis and Postoperative Pain following Mandibular Third Molar surgery: a double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Photochem Photobiol 97:1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/php.13457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pol R, Ruggiero T, Gallesio G et al (2016) Efficacy of anti-inflammatory and analgesic of Superpulsed Low Level Laser Therapy after impacted Mandibular Third molars extractions. J Craniofac Surg 27:685–690. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Raiesian S, Khani M, Khiabani K et al (2017) Assessment of Low-Level Laser Therapy effects after extraction of impacted lower third molar surgery. J Lasers Med Sci 8:42–45. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2017.08

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jackson D, Boddington P, White IR (2016) The design-by-treatment interaction model: a unifying framework for modelling loop inconsistency in network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 7:329–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Salanti G, Del Giovane C, Chaimani A et al (2014) Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9:e99682. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Veroniki AA, Mavridis D, Higgins JPT, Salanti G (2014) Characteristics of a loop of evidence that affect detection and estimation of inconsistency: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:106. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Alan H, Yolcu Ü, Koparal M et al (2016) Evaluation of the effects of the low-level laser therapy on swelling, pain, and trismus after removal of impacted lower third molar. Head Face Med 12:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-016-0121-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Eroglu CN, Keskin Tunc S (2016) Effectiveness of single Session of low-level laser therapy with a 940 nm Wavelength Diode Laser on Pain, Swelling, and Trismus after impacted third molar surgery. Photomed Laser Surg 34:406–410. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2016.4101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Genc A, Cakarer S, Yalcin BK et al (2019) A comparative study of surgical drain placement and the use of kinesiologic tape to reduce postoperative morbidity after third molar surgery. Clin Oral Investig 23:345–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2442-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hadad H, Santos AFP, de Jesus LK et al (2022) Photobiomodulation Therapy improves Postoperative Pain and Edema in Third Molar surgeries: a Randomized, comparative, Double-Blind, and prospective clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 80:37. .e1-37.e12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kazancioglu HO, Kurklu E, Ezirganli S (2014) Effects of ozone therapy on pain, swelling, and trismus following third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:644–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.11.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kjærgaard Larsen M, Kofod T, Starch-Jensen T (2021) The Use of Cryotherapy in Conjunction with Surgical removal of Mandibular Third molars: a single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Oral Maxillofac Res 12:e2. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2021.12402

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Landucci A, Wosny AC, Uetanabaro LC et al (2016) Efficacy of a single dose of low-level laser therapy in reducing pain, swelling, and trismus following third molar extraction surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:392–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mohajerani H, Tabeie F, Alirezaei A et al (2021) Does combined low-level laser and light-emitting Diode Light Irradiation Reduce Pain, Swelling, and Trismus after Surgical extraction of Mandibular Third molars? A Randomized double-blinded crossover study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 79:1621–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Santos PL, Marotto AP, Zatta da Silva T et al (2020) Is low-level laser therapy effective for Pain Control after the Surgical removal of Unerupted Third molars? A Randomized Trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 78:184–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.08.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Singh V, Garg A, Bhagol A et al (2019) Photobiomodulation alleviates postoperative discomfort after mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 77:2412–2421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tavares MG, Machado AP, Motta BG et al (2007) Electro-acupuncture efficacy on pain control after mandibular third molar surgery. Braz Dent J 18:158–162. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402007000200014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Asutay F, Ozcan-Kucuk A, Alan H, Koparal M (2018) Three-dimensional evaluation of the effect of low-level laser therapy on facial swelling after lower third molar surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Niger J Clin Pract 21:1107–1113. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_38_18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Forouzanfar T, Sabelis A, Ausems S et al (2008) Effect of ice compression on pain after mandibular third molar surgery: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:824–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.05.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. KHO CHAI CHIANG, N SATYA BHUSHAN, U SIVA KALYAN, R SAI BHAVANA (2020) Use of Kinesiologic Therapeutic Tape on Pain, Trismus, Swelling and its influence on quality of life after mandibular third molar surgery. J Clin Diagn Res 14:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ekblom A, Hansson P, Thomsson M, Thomas M (1991) Increased postoperative pain and consumption of analgesics following acupuncture. Pain 44:241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(91)90092-C

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Abou El-Soud N, Shenawy H (2010) A Randomized double blind clinical study on the efficacy of low level laser therapy in reducing Pain after simple third molar extraction. Maced J Med Sci 3. https://doi.org/10.3889/MJMS.1857-5773.2010.0114

  46. Jaroń A, Preuss O, Grzywacz E, Trybek G (2021) The impact of using Kinesio tape on non-infectious complications after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:399. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020399

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Koparal M, Kucuk AO, Alan H et al (2018) Effects of low-level laser therapy following surgical extraction of the lower third molar with objective measurement of swelling using a three-dimensional system. Exp Ther Med 15:3820–3826. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.5921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Menziletoglu D, Guler AY, Basturk F, Isik BK (2020) Comparison of Surgical Drain Placement With Use of Kinesiologic Tape on Postoperative Pain, Swelling, and Trismus in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.06.023. 78:1919.e1-1919.e7

  49. Tatli U, Benlidayi IC, Salimov F, Guzel R (2020) Effectiveness of kinesio taping on postoperative morbidity after impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study. J Appl Oral Sci Rev FOB 28:e20200159. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ordulu M, Aktas I, Yalcin S et al (2006) Comparative study of the effect of tube drainage versus methylprednisolone after third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101:e96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Danda AK, Krishna Tatiparthi M, Narayanan V, Siddareddi A (2010) Influence of primary and secondary closure of surgical wound after impacted mandibular third molar removal on postoperative pain and swelling–a comparative and split mouth study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:309–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Firoozi P, Souza MRF, de Souza GM et al (2022) Does kinesio taping reduce pain, swelling, and trismus after mandibular third molar surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Maxillofac Surg 26:535–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-021-01025-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Qi J, Yue H, Liu E et al (2022) Effects of Kinesio tape on pain and edema following surgical extraction of the third molar: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 35:1097–1107. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-210209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang Y, Zhu X, Guo J, Sun J (2021) Can Kinesio taping improve discomfort after mandibular third molar surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 25:5139–5148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04069-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We offer our deepest thanks to Parsa Firoozi, which provided technical support for the development and implementation of this study.

Funding

Partial financial support was received from CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior)-Brazil (finance code 001) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ). We offer our deepest thanks to the Programa de Pós-graduacão em Odontologia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, and Parsa Firoozi, which provided technical support for the development and implementation of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.G.M.F wrote the main manuscript I.A.F and M.T.B.A.G collected and extracted the data E.L.G performed statistics and prepared figures G.M.S did risk of bias and certainty of evidence E.A.A. supported statistics and revised the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Falci, S.G.M., Fernandes, I.A., Guimarães, M.T.B.Á. et al. Complementary and alternative therapies for managing postoperative pain after lower third molar surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Oral Invest 28, 231 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05625-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05625-2

Keywords

Navigation