Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The clinical success of repaired posterior composite restorations with and without silane application

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the clinical success of posterior composite restorations repaired with and without silane application for up to 2 years.

Materials and method

In this retrospective study, patient record files acquired from the 40 patients who were treated due to needing repair for two class II defective composite restorations and visited the clinical practice for regular check-up visits were used. In the experimental group, the defective restorations were repaired using a silane coupling agent (Porcelain Primer), a universal adhesive (G-Premio Bond), and a microhybrid resin composite (Charisma Smart). In the control group, the restorations were repaired using the universal adhesive and the resin composite without silane coupling agent application. The repaired restorations were blindly assessed by two calibrated examiners using modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 6 months, 1, and 2 years. The data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (p = 0.05).

Results

After 2 years, 80 repaired class II restorations were evaluated. No restoration of either the control or silane-treated group failed. After 2 years, there were no statistically significant differences between the experimental and control groups (p > 0.05). The differences in surface roughness were observed in each group over time (p < 0.05). There were no variations in other criteria over time (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

There was no significant effect of the silane coupling agent on restoration repair survival.

Clinical relevance

The repair of localized defects of the posterior composite restorations either with or without silane application is a conservative treatment option that may increase the clinical success of these restorations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC (2010) 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 89:1063–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510376071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ (2012) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 28:87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, Gaengler P, Lindberg A, Huysmans MC, van Dijken JW (2014) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 93:943–949. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514544217

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordan VV, Riley JL, Worley DC, Gilbert GH (2012) Restorative material and other tooth-specific variables associated with the decision to repair or replace defective restorations: findings from The Dental PBRN. J Dent 40:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanzow P, Wiegand A (2020) Retrospective analysis on the repair vs. replacement of composite restorations. Dent Mater 36:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Loomans B, Özcan M (2016) Intraoral repair of direct and indirect restorations: procedures and guidelines. Oper Dent 41:S68–S78. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-269-LIT

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Valente LL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Gonçalves AP, Fernández E, Loomans B, Moraes RR (2016) Repair bond strength of dental composites: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes 69:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N (2013) Repair of restorations--criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater 29:28–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernández E, Martín J, Vildósola P, Oliveira Junior OB, Gordan V, Mjor I, Bersezio C, Estay J, de Andrade MF, Moncada G (2015) Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. J Dent 43:279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Estay J, Martín J, Viera V, Valdivieso J, Bersezio C, Vildosola P, Mjor IA, Andrade MF, Moraes RR, Moncada G, Gordan VV, Fernández E (2018) 12 Years of repair of amalgam and composite resins: a clinical study. Oper Dent 43:12–21. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-313-C

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moncada G, Martin J, Fernández E, Hempel MC, Mjör IA, Gordan VV (2009) Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 140:425–432. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernández EM, Martin JA, Angel PA, Mjör IA, Gordan VV, Moncada GA (2011) Survival rate of Sealed, Refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up. Braz Dent J 22:134–139. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402011000200008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baena E, Vignolo V, Fuentes MVF, Ceballos L (2015) Influence of repair procedure on composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength. Am J Dent 28:255–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, Van Meerbeek B (2011) Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater 27:701–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Junior SAR, Ferracane JL, Della BÁ (2009) Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 25:442–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA (2007) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater 23:1276–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B (2009) Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Investig 13:317–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0228-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wendler M, Belli R, Panzer R, Skibbe D, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U (2016) Repair bond strength of aged resin composite after different surface and bonding treatments. Materials (Basel) 9:547. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Staxrud F, Dahl JE (2011) Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 119:316–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00833.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Flury S, Dulla FA, Peutzfeldt A (2019) Repair bond strength of resin composite to restorative materials after short- and long-term storage. Dent Mater 35:1205–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2012) Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent 40:513–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Altinci P, Mutluay M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A (2018) Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 4:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1412262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fornazari IA, Wille I, Meda EM, Brum RT, Souza EM (2017) Effect of surface treatment, silane, and universal adhesive on microshear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. Oper Dent 42:367–374. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-259-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Michelotti G, Niedzwiecki M, Bidjan D, Dieckmann P, Deari S, Attin T, Tauböck TT (2020) Silane effect of universal adhesive on the composite-composite repair bond strength after different surface pretreatments. Polymers (Basel) 12:950. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Popoff DA, de Magalhães CS, de Freitas OW, Soares LA, de Almeida Santa Rosa TT, Ferreira RC, Moreira AN, Mjör IA (2014) Two-year clinical performance of dimethacrylatebased composite restorations repaired with a silorane-based composite. J Adhes Dent 16:575–583. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Blaser PK, Mondragon E, Mjör IA (2009) A long-term evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of resin-based composite restorations: results of a seven-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 140:1476–1484. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Popoff DA, Santa Rosa TT, Ferreira RC, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Mjör IA (2012) Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 37:E1–E10. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-121-C

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BAC, Huysmans MCDNJM (2012) Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study. J Dent 40:829–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.06.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Valente LL, Silva MF, Fonseca AS, Münchow EA, Isolan CP, Moraes RR (2015) Effect of diamond bur grit size on composite repair. J Adhes Dent 17:257–263. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a34398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, Van Meerbeek B (2011) Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair. J Dent 39:499–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. De Paris MT, Perdigão J, de Paula E, Coppla F, Hass V, Scheffer RF, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2020) Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: a randomized double-blind trial. Dent Mater 36:1474–1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DENTAL.2020.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 11:5–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00784-006-0095-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gordan VV, Shen C, Riley J, Mjör IA (2006) Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 18:144–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1708-8240.2006.00007.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Moncada G, Fernández E, Martín J, Arancibia C, Mjör IA, Gordan VV (2008) Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent 33:258–264. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Baur V, Ilie N (2013) Repair of dental resin-based composites. Clin Oral Investig 17:601–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0722-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Süley man Demirel University, East Campus, 32200, Isparta, Turkey

    Muhittin Ugurlu & Fatmanur Sari

Authors
  1. Muhittin Ugurlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatmanur Sari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhittin Ugurlu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The Medical Ethics Committee of Süleyman Demirel University reviewed and approved this study under protocol number 2021/127.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consents were collected.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ugurlu, M., Sari, F. The clinical success of repaired posterior composite restorations with and without silane application. Clin Oral Invest 26, 5785–5793 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04535-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04535-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation